Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Local television news station compliance with online captioning rules

  • Long Paper
  • Published:
Universal Access in the Information Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In 2010, the United States' Twenty-First Century Communication and Video Accessibility Act (CVAA) required local television broadcasters provide captions when they re-distributed their news broadcasts online if the material had been broadcast with captions. Concerned that broadcasters were trying to skirt the CVAA by breaking up the online version of their newscasts into individual clips, in 2014, the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) mandated broadcasters caption online news clips as well, effective January 2016. Research conducted shortly before the rules announcement found many stations ill-prepared for the new mandate. In the current study, we examined a stratified sample of 20% of US television station markets to see how well local news stations responded to the new captioning mandate and to see whether or not the burden of captioning newsclips may have led to a reduction in the number of stations putting newsclips online, a concern expressed at the time by then FCC Commissioner Ajit Pai. We found that while the captioning rate has improved substantially since studies conducted shortly before the law was announced, around 30% of the news clips we examined were uncaptioned. We did not find a reduction in the number of stations with video clips. All of the 156 sampled station web sites included video clips.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. FCC.: FCC 14–97. Second order reconsideration and second further notice of proposed rulemaking, https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-14-97A1.pdf

  2. Twenty-First Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act, Pub. L. No. 111-260 (2010). (2010)

  3. Youngblood, N.E., Lysaght, R.: Accessibility and use of online video captions by local television news websites. Electron. News. 9, 242–256 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/1931243115604885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Media Insight Project: The personal news cycle, http://www.americanpressinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/ The_Media_Insight_Project_The_Personal_News_Cycle_Final.pdf

  5. Pai, A.: FCC Requires Closed Captioning Of IP-Delivered Video Clips, http://www.fcc.gov/article/doc-328173a5

  6. Pew Research Center: Americans’ online news use is closing in on TV news use, http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/09/07/americans-online-news-use-vs-tv-news-use/

  7. Pew Research Center: News use across social media platforms 2017, https://www.journalism.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2017/09/PJ_17.08.23_socialMediaUpdate_FINAL.pdf

  8. Ofcom: Television access services, https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0016/42442/access.pdf

  9. Patel, S.: 85 percent of Facebook video is watched without sound-Digiday, https://digiday.com/media/silent-world-facebook-video/

  10. Vanderheiden, G.C.: Nomadicity, disability access, and the every-citizen interface. In: National Research Council (ed.) More than screen deep: toward every-citizen interfaces to the nation’s information infrastructure. pp. 297–306. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C. (1997)

  11. TVNewsCheck: TV Station Directory, https://tvnewscheck.com/tv-station-directory/

  12. Stempel, G.H., III., Hargrove, T.: Mass media audiences in a changing media environment. J. Mass Commun. Q. 73, 549–558 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stempel, G.H., III., Hargrove, T., Bernt, J.P.: Relation of growth of use of the internet to changes in media use from 1995 to 1999. J. Mass Commun. Quarterly 77, 71–79 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pew Research Center: Digital news fact sheet, http://www.journalism.org/fact-sheet/digital-news/

  15. Pew Research Center: Local TV news fact sheet, http://www.journalism.org/files/2014/03/News-Video-on-the-Web.pdf

  16. Pew Research Center: For local news, Americans embrace digital but still want strong community connection, https://www.journalism.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2019/03/PJ_2019.03.26_Local-News_FINAL.pdf

  17. Brickman, G.: TV networks ready Web news content. Interact. Age. 2, 5 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pitts, M.J.: Television web sites and changes in the nature of storytelling. Simile. 3, 1–8 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pew Research Center: State of the news media 2014: News video on the web: A growing, if uncertain, part of news, http://www.journalism.org/files/2014/03/News-Video-on-the-Web.pdf

  20. Telecommunications for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing Inc., et al.: Report on the state of closed captioning of Internet protocol-delivered video programming, http://instituteforpublicrepresentation.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Consumer-Groups-IP-Captioning-Report-Final.pdf

  21. Boatner, E.B.: Captioned films for the deaf. Am. Ann. Deaf. 126, 520–525 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jensema, C., McCann, R., Ramsey, S.: Closed-captioned television presentation speed and vocabulary. Am. Ann. Deaf. 141, 284–292 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sillman, D.: Television captioning for the deaf. IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron. 30, 62–65 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Television Decoder Circuitry Act of 1990, 47 USC § 303. (1990)

  25. Kanayama, T.: Leaving it up to the industry: people with disabilities and the telecommunications act of 1996. Inf. Soc. 19, 185–194 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240309456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zdenek, S.: Reading sounds: close-captioned media and popular culture. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2015)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. FCC: Report and order, declaratory ruling, and further notice of proposed rulemaking. In the matter of closed captioning of video programming. Telecommunications for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing, Inc. Petition for Rulemaking. FCC 14–12. , Washington, D.C. (2014)

  28. National Association of the Deaf: Captioning Live Programs, https://www.nad.org/resources/technology/television-and-closed-captioning/captioning-live-programs/

  29. Berners-Lee, T.: Weaving the web. HarpersCollins, New York (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Americans with Disabilities Act Title II Regulations, 28 CFR § 35, Nondiscrimination on the basis of disability in state and local government services. 2010 guidance and section-by-section analysis.

  31. Twenty-First Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act of 2010, Pub. L. 111–260. (2010)

  32. Telecommunication.: 47 C.F.R. § 79.4. (2014)

  33. National Association of the Deaf, et al. v. Netflix, Inc. United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. (2012)

  34. FCC: Captioning of internet video programming, https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/captioning-internet-video-programming

  35. Rubaii-Barrett, N., Wise, L.R.: Disability access and e-government. J. Disabil. Policy Stud. 19, 52–64 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1177/1044207307311533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Shiver, B.N., Wolfe, R.J.: Evaluating alternatives for better deaf accessibility to selected web-based multimedia. In: Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility. ACM (2015)

  37. Oud, J.: Improving screencast accessibility for people with disabilities: guidelines and techniques. Internet Ref. Serv. Q. 16, 129–144 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/10875301.2011.602304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. FCC: Closed captioning on television | Federal Communications Commission, https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/closed-captioning-television

  39. Ofcom: Ofcom’s code on television access services contents. (2019)

  40. Ofcom: Measuring live subtitling quality Results from the first sampling exercise. (2014)

  41. Romero-Fresco, P., Martínez, J.: Accuracy rate in live subtitling: The NER Model. In: Audiovisual translation in a global context . pp. 28–50. Palgrave Macmillan, London (2015)

  42. CRTC: Broadcasting Regulatory Policy CRTC 2019–308–1: English-language closed captioning mandatory quality standards relating to the accuracy rate for live television programming – Correction. (2019)

  43. CRTC: TV Access for people who are deaf or hard of hearing: Closed captioning | CRTC, https://crtc.gc.ca/eng/info_sht/b321.htm

  44. Random.org, https://www.random.org/

  45. Neundorf, K.: The content analysis guidebook. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Lacy, S., Watson, B.R., Riffe, D., Lovejoy, J.: Issues and best practices in content analysis. J. Mass Commun. Q. 92, 791–811 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699015607338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Freelon, D.: ReCal OIR: ordinal, interval, and ratio intercoder reliability as a web service. Int. J. Internet Sci. 8, 10–16 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  48. U.S. Access Board.: Overview of the final rule-United States access board, https://www.access-board.gov/guidelines-and-standards/communications-and-it/about-the-ict-refresh/overview-of-the-final-rule

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Auburn University, Alabama, USA

    Norman E. Youngblood

  2. Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa, USA

    Lakshmi N. Tirumala

Authors
  1. Norman E. Youngblood
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lakshmi N. Tirumala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Norman E. Youngblood.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Youngblood, N.E., Tirumala, L.N. Local television news station compliance with online captioning rules. Univ Access Inf Soc 21, 239–247 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-020-00783-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-020-00783-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation