Skip to main content
Log in

Research on vulnerable people and digital inclusion: toward a consolidated taxonomical framework

  • Communication
  • Published:
Universal Access in the Information Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has not only caused a worldwide health crisis, but it has also deepened existing inequalities, and “has exacerbated the vulnerability of the least protected in society” (United Nations, 2020). Nowadays, there are many population groups that would be regarded as vulnerable. In daily life, citizens deal with a wide range of issues—social injustices, social marginalization and lack of impartiality—due to many reasons: culture, class, ethnicity, race, ideology, religion, gender, etc. To respond effectively to this problem—as the United Nations proposes in the goal 10 of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)—we first need to understand and clearly define the phenomenon of vulnerable people, and how digital inclusion could represent an asset to help vulnerable people to bridge inequalities. There is no commonly agreed typology framework, and specific categorization criteria as a basis to assist the further investigation of the area. Our work is focused on filling this gap. In doing so, our contribution is twofold. First, we conduct a systematic review of the literature (N = 331 studies) providing an overview of the overall definitions, trends, patterns, and developments that characterize the research on vulnerable people and digital inclusion. Second, we propose a taxonomy to frame the phenomenon of vulnerable people and digital inclusion. The categorization criteria can promote and support further multidisciplinary research to study and explore the relation existing between vulnerable people and digital inclusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Data availability

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Notes

  1. Given the circumstances, the United Nations 2030 Sustainable Development Goals become more urgent now than ever before, to understand how to address the global challenges we are currently facing. In this regard, the 17 goals proposed by the United Nations seek to develop more sustainable societies that contribute to a better world. Specifically, Goal 10 is particularly connected with the aims of this study, since both are focused on reducing inequalities. Further information about Goal 10 is available at https://bit.ly/3aJUICJ.

References

Due to the limited space, we have just included the publications of the most prolific scholars of the N=331 publications (see Table 1) annotating all of them with a*

  1. Aday, L.A.: At risk in america: the health and health care needs of vulnerable populations in the United States. Jossey-Bass Inc, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Adkins, D., Moulaison, S.H. (2020). Information behavior and ICT use of Latina immigrants to the U.S. Midwest. Inf. Process. Manag. 57(3).

  3. *Aires, L., Dias, P., Azevedo, J., Rebollo, M., García-Perez, R.: Education, digital inclusion and sustainable online communities. In: Caeiro, S., Leal Filho, W., Azeiteiro, U.M. (eds.) E-learning and Sustainability – Umweltbildung, Umweltkommunikation und Nachhaltigkeit – Environmental Education, Communication and Sustainability Serie. Peter Lang Publishers, New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. *Aires, L., Santos, R., Guardia, J.R.D.D.L., Lima, C., Correia, J.: Mediating towards digital inclusion: the monitors of internet access places. Observatorio (OBS*) 12(2), 196–213 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Alabi, A.O., Mutula, S.M.: Digital inclusion for visually impaired students through assistive technologies in academic libraries. Library Hi Tech News 37(2), 14–17 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Attewell, P.: The first and second digital divides. Sociol. Educ. 74(3), 252–259 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Baumeister, R.F., Leary, M.R.: Writing narrative literature reviews. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 1(3), 311–320 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Benkler, Y.: The Wealth of Networks. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. *Bertot, J.C.: Building digitally inclusive communities: The roles of public libraries in digital inclusion and development. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, Montevideo, Uruguay, March 2016, pp. 95–102. New York: Association for Computing Machinery. (2016)

  10. *Bertot, J.C., Real, B., Jaeger, P.T.: Public libraries building digital inclusive communities: data and findings from the 2013 digital inclusion survey. Libr. Q. 86(3), 270–289 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1086/686674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bhatnagar, S.: Strategies for digital inclusion: experience from India. In: Baum, S., Mahizhnan, A. (eds.) E-Governance and Social Inclusion: Concepts and Cases, pp. 243–255. Hershey, IGI Global (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Boote, D.N., Beile, P.: Scholars before researchers: on the centrality of the dissertation literature review in research preparation. Educ. Res. 34(6), 3–15 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X03400600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Booth, A., Papaionnaou, D., Sutton, A.: Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review. Sage, London (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Borg, K., Boulet, M., Smith, L., Bragge, P.: Digital inclusion & health communication: a rapid review of literature. Health Commun. 34(11), 1320–1328 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bourdieu, P.: Structures, habitus, practices. In: Bourdieu, P. (ed.) The Logic of Practice, pp. 52–79. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bradbrook, G., Fisher, J.: Digital Equality Reviewing Digital Inclusion Activity and Mapping the Way Forwards. https://bit.ly/2XwM6wR (2005)

  17. Chico, M.C.O., Pérez, E.O., Lara, J.C.B.: Before and after the reform: Fixed line internet penetration in Mexican households. Revista de Direito, Estado e Telecomunicacoes 10(2), 1–14 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Combs, J.P., Bustamante, R.M., Onwuegbuzie, A.J.: An interactive model for facilitating development of literature reviews. Int. J. Multiple Res. Approaches 4(2), 159–182 (2010). https://doi.org/10.5172/mra.2010.4.2.159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Counsell, C.: Formulating questions and locating primary studies for inclusion in systematic reviews. Ann. Intern. Med. 127(5), 380–387 (1997). https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-127-5-199709010-00008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. *Da Silva, A.D.S., De Brito, S.R., Martins, D.L., Vijaykumar, N.L., Da Rocha, C.A.J., Costa, J.C.W.A., Francês, C.R.L.: Social networks analysis and participation in learning environments to digital inclusion based on large-scale distance education. Int. J. Distance Edu. Technol. (IJDET) 12(2), 1–25 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  21. *De Brito, S.R., Da Silva, A.D.S., Martins, D.L., Da Rocha, C.A.J., Costa, J.C.W.A., Francês, C.R.L.: Brazilian government’s training network for digital inclusion: analysis of strategies for improving interactivity. In: Cruz-Cunha, M.M., Moreira, F., Varajão, J. (eds.) Handbook of Research on Enterprise 2.0: Technological, Social, and Organizational Dimensions, pp. 618–643. IGI Global, Hershey (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  22. *De Brito, S.R., Da Silva, A.D.S., Martins, D.L., Vijaykumar, N.L., Da Rocha, C.A.J., Costa, J.C.W.A., Francês, C.R.L.: Employing online social networks to monitor and evaluate training of digital inclusion agents. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 3(3), 497–519 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  23. De Chesnay, M.: Vulnerable populations: vulnerable people. caring for the vulnerable. In: de Chesnay, M., Anderson, B. (eds.) Caring for the Vulnerable: Perspectives in Nursing Theory, Practice, and Research, Jones & Bartlett Learning, pp. 1–14. MA, Burlington (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dedding, C., Goedhart, N.S., Broerse, J.E.W., Abma, T.A.: Exploring the boundaries of ‘good’ participatory action research in times of increasing popularity: dealing with constraints in local policy for digital inclusion. Edu. Action Res. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2020.1743733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. *De Souza, J.A., Da Silva, M.S., Francês, C.R., Costa, J.C., Segatto, M.E., Antonio, F.R., Vijaykumar, N.L.: A feasibility study of PLC technology for digital inclusion. In: VI International Telecommunications Symposium (ITS2006) (ed IEEE), Fortaleza, Brazil, pp. 410–415 (2006)

  26. *De Souza, J.A., Da Silva, M.S., Francês, C.R., Costa, J.C., Santana, A., Segatto, M.E.V., Antonio, F.R., Rodrigues, G.: A feasibility study of powerline communication technology for digital inclusion in Brazilian Amazon. In: SPIE 6390, Broadband Access Communication Technologies, 63900I, Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 2 October 2006. doi: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.686311(2006)

  27. DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E., Celeste, C., Shafer, S.: Digital inequality, from unequal access to differentiated use. In: Neckerman, K. (ed.) Social Inequality, pp. 355–400. Russell Sage Foundation, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Eckhardt, J., Kaletka, C., Pelka, B.: New initiatives for the empowerment of people with activity limitations - An analysis of 1,005 cases of (digital) social innovation worldwide. In: 10th international conference, UAHCI (ed Springer), Toronto, Canada, 17–22 July 2016, pp. 183–193. Switzerland: Lecture Notes in Computer Science. (2016)

  29. *Fitzgerald, B., Hawkins, W., Denison, T., Kop, T.: Digital inclusion, disability, and public libraries: A summary Australian perspective. In: Wentz B, Jaeger PT and Bertot JC (eds) Advances in librarianship (Volume 40). Accessibility for persons with disabilities and the inclusive future of libraries. Bradford: Emerald Group Publishing, pp. 213–236 (2015)

  30. Gangadharan, S.P.: Digital inclusion and data profiling. First Monday (2012). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v17i5.3821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gibson, L., Sloan, D., Moncur, W.: E-health and digital inclusion. In: Information Resources Management Association (ed.) User-Driven Healthcare: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, vol. 1. IGI Global, Hershey, pp. 197–210 (2013). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-2770-3.ch011

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. *Goggin, G., Ellis, K., Hawkins, W.: Internet accessibility and disability policy: lessons for digital inclusion and equality from Australia. Int. Policy Rev. (2017). https://doi.org/10.14763/2017.1.452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. *Goggin, G., Ellis, K., Hawkins, W.: Disability at the centre of digital inclusion: assessing a new moment in technology and rights. Commun. Res. Practice 5(3), 290–303 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Gómez-Hernández, J.A., Hernández-Pedreño, M., Romero-Sánchez, E.: Social and digital empowerment of vulnerable library users of the Murcia Regional Library Spain. El Profesional de la Información 26(1), 20–32 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Grant, M.J., Booth, A.: A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info. Libr. J. 26(2), 91–108 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Grošelj, D., Reisdorf, B.C., Petrovčič, A.: Obtaining indirect internet access: an examination how reasons for internet non-use relate to proxy internet use. Telecommunications Policy 43(3), 213–224 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Haddad, S., Oliveira, A.: The role paper of Telecentres as community spaces of non-formal education - the case of BH digital program in Belo Horizonte, Brazil. In: 10th annual International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation (ed IATED). Seville, Spain, 16–18 November 2017, pp. 6779–6787. Seville, Spain: ICERI2017 Proceedings (2017).

  38. Hargittai, E.: Digital Na(t)ives? Variation in internet skills and uses among members of the ‘Net Generation.’ Sociol. Inq. 80(1), 92–113 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Hargittai, E., Hsieh, Y.P.: From dabblers to omnivores: a typology of social network site usage. In: Papacharissi, Z. (ed.) A Networked Self, pp. 146–168. Routledge, London (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Helsper, E.J., Reisdorf, B.C.: The emergence of a “digital underclass” in Great Britain and Sweden: changing reasons for digital exclusion. New Media Soc. 19(8), 1253–1270 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Institute of Museum and Library Services, University of Washington and International City/County Management Association (2012) Building Digital Communities: A framework for action. Washington, DC: Institute of Museum and Library Services. https://bit.ly/2VZ9NNU

  42. *Jaeger, P.T., Bertot, J.C., Thompson, K.M., Katz, S.M., DeCoster, E.J.: The intersection of public policy and public access: digital divides, digital literacy, digital inclusion, and public libraries. Public library quarterly 31(1), 1–20 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Litt, E.: Measuring users’ internet skills: a review of past assessments and a look toward the future. New Media Soc. 15(4), 612–630 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  44. *Madon, S., Reinhard, N., Roode, D., Walsham, G.: Digital inclusion projects in developing countries: value, sustainability, and scalability. In: Trauth, E., Howcroft, D., Butler, T., Fitzgerald, B., DeGross, J. (eds.) Social Inclusion: Societal and Organizational Implications for Information Systems, pp. 67–70. Springer, Boston, MA (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  45. *Madon, S., Reinhard, N., Roode, D., Walsham, G.: Digital inclusion projects in developing countries: Processes of institutionalization. Inf. Technol. Dev. 15(2), 95–107 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  46. *Malek, J.A., Razak, N.A., Salman, A., Nor, F.M., Abdullah, M.Y.: From agricultural society to digital inclusion society: a case study for FELDA community. In: 6th WSEAS International Conference on Applied and Theoretical Mechanics, MECHANICS (Vol. 10), Vouliagmeni, Athens, Greece, 29–31 December, pp. 29–34 (2010).

  47. *Malek, J.A., Razak, N.A., Salman, A., Nor, F.M., Abdullah, M.Y.: Digital inclusion society in Malaysia Felda Agricultural area. WSEAS Trans. Inf. Sci. Appl. 9(4), 115–124 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Mechanic, D., Tanner, J.: Vulnerable people, groups and populations: societal view. Health Aff. 26(5), 1220–1230 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Meline, T.: Selecting studies for systematic review: inclusion and exclusion criteria. Contemp. Issues Commun. Sci. Disorders 33, 21–27 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Monje, P.M.M., Mesa Del Olmo, A.: Digital divide and digital citizenship: Adapting the social policies to promote e-inclusion. In: David O'Donnell (Ed.) ECEG2010-Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on E-Government, Limerick, Ireland, 17–18 June 2010. UK: Academic Publishing Limited Reading, pp. 251–258 (2010).

  51. Morales, R.C., Dieguez, M., Carrasco, R., Cisternas, J.P.: ICT mediator as teaching transversal competences and digital inclusion. In: IATED (ed) 9th International Technology, Education and Development Conference, Madrid, Spain, 2–4 March 2015, pp. 7553–7562. Madrid, Spain: INTED2015 Proceedings (2015).

  52. Nedungadi, P.P., Menon, R., Gutjahr, G., Erickson, L., Raman, R.: Towards an inclusive digital literacy framework for digital India. Educ. Train. 60(6), 516–528 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  53. NTIA (1998, July 28) Falling Through The Net II: New Data on the Digital Divide. https://bit.ly/3AJY701

  54. Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Leech, N.L., Collins, K.M.T.: Innovative qualitative data collection techniques for conducting literature reviews/research Syntheses. In: Williams, M., Vogt, W.P. (eds.) The SAGE Handbook of Innovation in Social Research Methods, pp. 182–204. Sage, London (2014). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446268261.n13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  55. Olphert, W., Damodaran, L.: Older people and digital disengagement: a fourth digital divide? Gerontology 59(6), 564–570 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  56. *Palmeiro, R., Pereda Herrero, M.V., Aires, L.: Digital inclusion programs: the case of the Basque Country. Revista Lusófona de Educação 45, 73–88 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Parsons, C., Hick, S.: Moving from digital divide to digital inclusion. Currents: New Scholarship in the Human Services 7(2), (2008) https://bit.ly/3iO0k4p

  58. Petticrew, M.: Systematic reviews from astronomy to zoology: myths and misconceptions. BMJ 322(7278), 98–101 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7278.98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Petticrew, M., Roberts, H.: Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Blackwell, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  60. Quaresma, H., Borges, M.M.: How open are institutional repositories? Web accessibility to open access content at DOAR by people with blindness and visual impairment. In: 10th International Technology, Education and Development Conference (ed IATED), Valencia, Spain, 7–9 March 2016, pp. 728–734. Valencia, Spain: INTED2016 Proceedings (2016).

  61. Ragnedda, M., Mutsvairo, B.: Digital inclusion empowering people through information and communication technologies. In: Ragnedda, M., Mutsvairo, B. (eds.) The Digital Inclusion. An International Comparative Analysis, pp. 7–14. Lexington Books Press, London (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  62. *Rahim, S.A., Pawanteh, L., Salman, A.: Digital inclusion: the way forward for equality in a multiethnic society. Innovation J. 16(3), 1–12 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  63. *Real, B., Bertot, J.C., Jaeger, P.T.: Rural public libraries and digital inclusion: issues and challenges. Inf. Technol. Libr. 33(1), 6–24 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  64. *Real, B., McDermott, A.J., Bertot, J.C., Jaeger, P.T.: Digital inclusion and the affordable care act: public libraries, politics, policy, and enrollment in “Obamacare.” Public Library Quarterly 34(1), 1–22 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  65. *Sacchi, A., Giannini, E., Bochic, R., Reinhard, N., Lopes, A.B.: Digital inclusion with the McInternet: would you like fries with that? Commun. ACM 52(3), 113–116 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  66. Salemink, K.: Digital margins: social and digital exclusion of Gypsy-travelers in the Netherlands. Environ Plan A 48(6), 1170–1187 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  67. *Serrano-Santoyo, A., Armenta-Ramade, A., Castillo-Olea, C., Rojas-Mendizabal, V.A.: Exploration of new perspectives in projects of digital inclusion in rural communities. Interciencia 40(1), 16–22 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  68. *Serrano-Santoyo, A., Rojas-Mendizabal, V.: Exploring a complexity framework for digital inclusion interventions. In: CENTERIS – International Conference on ENTERprise Information Systems (ed Procedia computer science, 121), Barcelona, Spain, 8–10 November 2017, pp. 212–217 (2017)

  69. *Serrano-Santoyo, A., Rojas-Mendizabal, V., Castillo-Olea, C.: Exploring new perspectives for digital inclusion projects in rural areas: a view from complexity science. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Information and Communications Technologies and Development: Notes-Volume 2 (ed Association for Computing Machinery), Cape Town, South Africa, December 2013, pp. 144–146. New York: Association for Computing Machinery (2013).

  70. Sheon, A.R., Bolen, S.D., Callahan, B., Shick, S., Perzynski, A.T.: Addressing disparities in diabetes management through novel approaches to encourage technology adoption and use. JMIR Diabetes 2(2), 16 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  71. Siddaway, A.P., Wood, A.M., Hedges, L.V.: How to do a systematic review: a best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 70(1), 747–770 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. *Thompson, K.M., Paul, A.: “I am not sure how much it will be helpful for me”: factors for digital inclusion among middle-class women in India. Libr. Q. 86(1), 93–106 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  73. *Thompson, K.M., Paul, A.: Factors of digital inclusion among women: revisiting India and extending to Chile and Australia for additional analysis. Libr. Q. 90(2), 173–188 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  74. Tomczyk, L., Eliseo, M.A., Costaz, V., Sanchez, G., Silveira, I.F., Barros, M.J., Amado-Salvatierra, H.R., Oyelere, S.S.: Digital divide in Latin america and Europe: Main characteristics in selected countries. In: 14th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI) (ed (ed IEEE), Coimbra, Portugal, 19–22 June 2019. (2019). https://doi.org/10.23919/CISTI.2019.8760821

  75. *Tsatsou, P.: Digital inclusion. A case for micro perspectives. In: Youngs, G. (ed.) Digital World: Connectivity, Creativity and Rights, pp. 52–63. Routledge, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  76. *Tsatsou, P.: Digital inclusion of people with disabilities: a qualitative study of intra-disability diversity in the digital realm. Behav. Inf. Technol. 39(9), 995–1010 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  77. *Tsatsou, P.: Is digital inclusion fighting disability stigma? Opportunities, barriers, and recommendations. Disability Soc. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2020.1749563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. *Tsatsou, P., Higgs, G., Stafford, I., Fry, R., Berry, R.: Digital inclusion and connectivity of minority communities: the case of communities of disabled people. In: Choudrie, J., Middleton, C. (eds.) Management of Broadband Technology Innovation. Policy, Deployment and Use, pp. 122–141. Routledge, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  79. *Tsatsou, P., Youngs, G., Watt, C.: Literacy and identity links forging digital inclusion? Critical reflections and signposts from a qualitative study. In: Choudrie, J., Kurnia, S., Tsatsou, P. (eds.) Innovative ICT-enabled Services and Social Inclusion and Usability of ICT-Enabled Services, pp. 335–358. Routledge, London (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  80. United Nations (2020) COVID-19 and Human Rights. We are all in this together. Available at https://bit.ly/2QaTZBh

  81. Van Deursen, A.J.A.M., Van Dijk, J.A.G.M.: Improving digital skills for the use of online public information and services. Gov. Inf. Q. 26(2), 333–340 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2008.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Van Deursen, A.J.A.M., Van Dijk, J.A.G.M.: Measuring internet skills. Int. J. Human-Computer Inter. 26(10), 891–916 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  83. Van Dijk, J.A.G.M.: Digital divide: impact of access. In: The International Encyclopedia of Media Effects. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Chichester, West Sussex (2017) https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783764.wbieme0043

  84. Vines, J., McNaney, R., Clarke, R., Lindsay, S., McCarthy, J., Howard, S., Romero, M., Wallace, J. (2013). Designing for- and with- vulnerable people. In: CHI ’13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. pp. 3231–3234. CHI EA ’13. https://doi.org/10.1145/2468356.2479654

  85. Warschauer, M.: Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide. The MIT press, London (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  86. Williams, J.R.: The use of online social networking sites to nurture and cultivate bonding social capital: a systematic review of the literature from 1997 to 2018. New Media Soc. 21(11–12), 1–20 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819858749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Witoolkollachit, P., Bhuasiri, W., Athimethphat, M., Mitaim, S.: A step towards digital inclusion within the Thailand digital economy and society development plan. Int. J. Innov. Creat. Change 8(5), 187–208 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  88. Xie, H., Wong, T.L., Zou, D., Wang, F.L., Wong, L.P.: Sentiment analysis for older people in cross-platform instant messaging service. In: First International Symposium SETE 2016: International Symposium on Emerging Technologies for Education (ed Springer), Rome, Italy, 26–29 October 2016, pp. 301–305. Switzerland: Lecture Notes in Computer Science. (2017)

  89. Yang, J., Du, P.: Gender, capital endowment and digital exclusion of older people in China. Ageing and Society pp. 1–25 (2020).

Download references

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Marta Pérez Escolar and Fernando Canet. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Marta Pérez Escolar and Fernando Canet, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marta Pérez-Escolar.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Ethics approval

The submitted work is original and has not been published elsewhere in any form or language (partially or in full). Results are presented clearly, honestly, and without fabrication, falsification or inappropriate data manipulation (including image based manipulation). All authors whose names appear on the submission adhere to discipline-specific rules for acquiring, selecting and processing data. No data, text or theories by others are presented as if they were the author’s own (“plagiarism”). Proper acknowledgements to other works is given (this includes material that is closely copied (near verbatim), summarized and/or paraphrased), quotation marks (to indicate words taken from another source) are used for verbatim copying of material, and permissions secured for material that is copyrighted.

Consent to participate

All authors whose names appear on the submission made substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data; or the creation of new software used in the work; drafted the work or revised it critically for important intellectual content.

Consent for publication

All authors whose names appear on the submission approved the version to be published; and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pérez-Escolar, M., Canet, F. Research on vulnerable people and digital inclusion: toward a consolidated taxonomical framework. Univ Access Inf Soc 22, 1059–1072 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-022-00867-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-022-00867-x

Keywords