Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A model-driven method for describing and predicting the reliability of composite services

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Software & Systems Modeling Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Service-oriented computing is the prominent paradigm for viewing business processes as composed of functions provided by modular and standardized services. Web services are the building blocks for the application of service-oriented computing on the Web and provide the necessary support for the consolidation of multiple services into a single composite service corresponding to the overall process. In such a context, service providers are strategically interested in both describing the quality of service (QoS) characteristics of offered services, to better qualify their offer and gain a significant advantage in the global marketplace, and predicting the level of QoS that can be offered to service consumers when building composite web services that make use of services managed by various service providers. This paper illustrates a model-driven method to automatically describe and predict the QoS of composite web services specified by use of business process execution language (BPEL). The paper specifically addresses the reliability characteristic of the QoS. The proposed method is founded on Q-WSDL, a lightweight WSDL extension for the description of the QoS characteristics of a web service, and exploits Q-WSDL to annotate reliability data onto a BPEL-based UML model of the composite service. The UML model is then used to predict and describe the reliability of the composite web service. The proposed method is illustrated by use of an example application that deals with a composite web service for the migration of PSTN telephone numbers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ActiveBpel Designer: http://www.active-endpoints.com/active-bpel-designer.htm

  2. Alonso G., Casati F., Kuno H., Machiraju V. (2004) Web Services. Springer-Verlag, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bordbar, B., Staikopoulos, A.: Automated generation of metamodels for web service languages. In: Proceedings of the Second European Workshop on Model Driven Architecture (MDA), Canterbury, UK, 7–8 September 2004

  4. Box, D., Curbera, F., Hondo, M., Kale, C., Langworthy, D., Nadalin, A., Nagaratnam, N., Nottingham, M., von Riegen, C., Shewchuk, J.: Web services policy framework (WS-Policy). http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/ws-policy (2003)

  5. Cardoso J., Sheth A.P., Miller J.A., Arnold J., Kochut K. (2004) Quality of service for workflows and web service processes. J. Web Semant. 1(3): 281–308

    Google Scholar 

  6. Catania, N., Kumar, P., Murray, B., Pourhedari, H., Vambenepe, W. Wurster, K.: Web Services Management Framework, Version 2.0, Hewlett-Packard. http://devresource.hp.com/drc/specifications/wsmf/WSMFWSM.jsp (2003)

  7. Chappell D. (2004) Enterprise Service Bus. O’Reilly, Sebastopol

    Google Scholar 

  8. Clemens, P.L.: Fault Tree Analysis, Tutorial, 4th edn. http://www.sverdrup.com (1993)

  9. D’Ambrogio, A.: A model transformation framework for the automated building of performance models from UML models. In: Proceedings of the ACM Fifth International Workshop on Software and Performance (WOSP’05), Palma de Mallorca, Spain, 11–15 July 2005

  10. D’Ambrogio, A.: A Model-driven WSDL extension for describing the QoS of web services. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS’06), Chicago, USA, 18–22 September 2006

  11. D’Ambrogio, A., Bocciarelli, P.: A model-driven approach to describe and predict the performance of composite services. In: Proceedings of the ACM Sixth International Workshop on Software and Performance (WOSP’07), Buenos Aires, Argentina, 5–8 February 2007

  12. Eclipse BPEL project. http://www.eclipse.org/bpel/

  13. Gardner, T.: UML modelling of automated business processes with a mapping to BPEL. In: First European Workshop on Object Orientation and Web Services (in conjunction with ECOOP’03), Darmstad, Germany. http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/webservices/library/ws-uml2bpel/ (2003)

  14. IBM: IBM, BPEL—Business Process Execution Language for Web Services, version 1.1 (2003)

  15. ISO: International Organization for Standardization, CD15935 Information Technology: Open Distributed Processing—Reference Model—Quality of Service. ISO document ISO/IEC JTC1/SC7N1996 (1998)

  16. Immonen A., Niemela E. (2008) Survey of reliability and availability prediction methods from the viewpoint of software architecture. Softw Syst Model 7(1): 49–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Laplace, S., Dalmau, M., Roose, P.: Kalinahia: considering quality of service to design and execute distributed multimedia applications. In: NOMS 2008, pp 951–954

  18. Leangsuksun, C., Song, H., Shen, L.: Reliability modeling using UML. In: Proceeding of the 2003 International Conference on Software Engineering Research and Practice. LasVegas (2003)

  19. Ludwig, H.: Web services QoS: external SLAs and internal policies—or: How do we deliver what we promise? In: Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering, WISE 2003 Workshops, Roma (Italy), 13 December 2003

  20. Ludwig, H., Keller, A., Dan, A., King, R., Franck, R.: Web Service Level Agreement (WSLA) Language Specification, Version 1.0, IBM Corporation. http://www.research.ibm.com/wsla/WSLASpecV1-20030128.pdf (2003)

  21. Lyu M.R. (1995) Handbook of Software Reliability Engineering. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  22. Martin, D., Burstein, M., Lassila, O., Paolucci, M., Payne, T., McIlraith, S.: Describing Web Services using OWL-S and WSDL. http://www.daml.org/services/owl-s/1.1/owl-s-wsdl.htm (2004)

  23. Menasce, D.A.: QoS issues in web services. IEEE Internet Computing, pp 72–75, Nov./Dec. (2002)

  24. Menasce D.A., Almeida V.A.F. (2001) Capacity Planning for Web Services: Metrics, Models and Methods. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  25. OMGmda: Object Management Group, MDA Guide, version 1.0.1 (2003)

  26. OMGmof: Object Management Group, Meta Object Facility (MOF) Specification, version 1.4 (2002)

  27. OMGqos: Object Management Group, UML Profile for Modeling Quality of Service and Fault Tolerance Characteristics and Mechanisms, Adopted Specification (2005)

  28. OMGspt: Object Management Group, UML Profile for Schedulability, Performance and Time Specification, v. 1.1 (2005)

  29. OMGuml: Object Management Group, Unified Modeling Language (UML): Superstructure, version 2.0 (2005)

  30. OMGxmi: Object Management Group, XML Metadata Interchange (XMI) Specification, version 2.0 (2003)

  31. Oracle BPEL Process Manager—Tutoria 7: Invoking BPEL Processes through SOAP and Java. http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/ias/bpel/pdf/orabpel-Tutorial7-InvokingBPELProcesses.pdf

  32. O’Sullivan, J., Edmond, D., ter Hofstede A.H.M.: Service description: a survery of the general nature of services. Technical Report FIT-TR-2003-02, Queensland University of Technology. http://www.service-description.com (2003)

  33. Papazoglou M.P., Georgakopoulos D. (2003) Service-oriented computing. Commun. ACM 46(10): 25–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Peltz C. (2003) Web services orchestration and choreography. IEEE Comput 36: 46–52

    Google Scholar 

  35. Roberts, N.H., Vesely, W.E., Haasl, D.E., Goldberg, E.: Fault Tree Handbook, Systems and Reliability Research Office of U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Jan 1981

  36. Reussner R.H., Schmidt H.W., Poernomo I.H. (2003) Reliability prediction for component-based software architectures. J. Syst. Softw. 66(3): 241–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Singh, H., et al.:A Bayesian approach to reliability prediction and assessment of component based systems. In: Proceedings of 12th International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering (ISSRE 01), Hong Kong (2001)

  38. Smith R.M., Trivedi Kishor S., Ramesh A.V. (1988) Performability analysis: measures, an algorithm, and a case study. IEEE Trans. Comput. 37(4): 406–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Tigris.org: ArgoUML User Manual v0.22. http://argouml-stats.tigris.org/documentation/manual-0.22 (2006)

  40. Tosic, V., Pagurek, B., Patel, K.: WSOL a language for the formal specification of classes of service for web services. In: Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on Web Services, pp. 375–381, Las Vegas, USA (2003)

  41. Tsai, W.T., Zhang, D., Chen, Y., Huang, H., Paul, R., Liao, N.: A software reliability model for web services. In: Proceedings of the 8th IASTED International Conference on Software Engineering and Applications, pp. 144–149, Cambridge, MA, November 2004

  42. W3C: WWW Consortium, XSL Transformations (XSLT), W3C Recommendation. http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20/ (2001)

  43. W3C: WWW Consortium, Web Services Description Language (WSDL) Version 2.0, W3C Working Draft. http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20/ (2006)

  44. Weerawarana S., Curbera F., Leymann F., Storey T., Ferguson D. (2005) Web Services Platform Architecture: SOAP, WSDL, WS-Policy, WS-Addressing, WS-BPEL, WS-Reliable Messaging, and More. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  45. Wohed P., van der Aalst, M.P.W., Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A.H.M.: Analysis of web services composition languages, the case of BPEL4WS. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Conceptual Modelling (ER), pp. 200–215, Chicago, IL, USA (2003)

  46. Zeng, L., Benatallah, B., Ngu, A.H., Dumas, M., Kalagnanam, J.: QoS-aware middleware for web services composition. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 30(5). May 2004

  47. Zhang, J., Zhang, L.J.: Criteria analysis and validation of the reliability of web services-oriented systems. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS’05), pp. 621–628, Orlando, Florida, July 2005

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science, Systems and Production, University of Roma “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy

    Paolo Bocciarelli & Andrea D’Ambrogio

Authors
  1. Paolo Bocciarelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrea D’Ambrogio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea D’Ambrogio.

Additional information

Communicated by Dr. Jean-Michel Bruel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bocciarelli, P., D’Ambrogio, A. A model-driven method for describing and predicting the reliability of composite services. Softw Syst Model 10, 265–280 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-010-0150-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-010-0150-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation