Abstract
Egon Börger (SOSYM, 11, pp. 305–318, 2012) challenges the concepts of BPMN, workflow patterns and YAWL as useful contributions to the modeling of business processes. I show that he misjudges the role of BPMN, YAWL and similar techniques in the modeling of business processes. In particular he mistakes YAWL’s formal basis, i.e. Petri nets. Börger furthermore suggests evaluation criteria for business process modeling tools. I argue that his criteria overemphasize some less important aspects, while ignoring some decisive ones.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Börger, E.: Approaches to model business processess: a critical analysis of BPMN, work ow patterns and YAWL. SOSYM 11, 305–318 (2012)
Petri, C.A.: Non-Sequential Processes GMD Report. In: ISF-77-5 (1977)
Reisig, W.: Understanding Petri Nets. Springer, Berlin (2013)
Universität Hamburg. Petri Net World. Last retrieved on 29 Sept 2012. URL: http://www.informatik.uni-hamburg.de/TGI/PetriNets/tools/quick.html
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Bernhard Rumpe.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reisig, W. Remarks on Egon Börger: “Approaches to model business processes: a critical analysis of BPMN, workflow patterns and YAWL, SOSYM 11:305–318”. Softw Syst Model 12, 5–9 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-012-0306-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-012-0306-4