Skip to main content
Log in

A survey on the linear ordering problem for weighted or unweighted tournaments

  • Invited survey
  • Published:
4OR Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we survey some results, conjectures and open problems dealing with the combinatorial and algorithmic aspects of the linear ordering problem. This problem consists in finding a linear order which is at minimum distance from a (weighted or not) tournament. We show how it can be used to model an aggregation problem consisting of going from individual preferences defined on a set of candidates to a collective ranking of these candidates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adám A (1964) Problem. In: Theory of graphs and its applications. Proc Coll Smolenice, Czech Acad Sci Publ

  • Adler I, Alon N, Ross SM (2001) On the number of Hamiltonian paths in tournaments. Random Struct Alg 18:291–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Ailon N, Alon N (2007) Hardness of fully dense problems (submitted)

  • Ailon N, Charikar M, Newman A (2005) Aggregating inconsistent information: ranking and clustering. In: Proceedings of the 37th annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing (STOC): 684–693

  • Ali I, Cook WD, Kress M (1986) On the minimum violations ranking of a tournament. Manage Sci 32:660–674

    Google Scholar 

  • Alon N (1990) The maximum number of Hamiltonian paths in tournaments. Combinatorica 10: 319–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Alon N (2006) Ranking tournaments. SIAM J Discrete Mathe 20(1):137–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Alon N, Spencer J (2000) The probabilistic method, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Alspach B (1967) Cycles of each length in regular tournaments. Can Math Bull 10:283–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Alspach B (1968) A combinatorial proof of a conjecture of Goldberg and Moon. Can Math Bull 11:655–661

    Google Scholar 

  • Arditti D (1984) Un nouvel algorithme de recherche d’un ordre induit par des comparaisons par paires. In: Diday E et al. (eds). Data analysis and informatics III. North Holland, Amsterdam, 323–343

  • Arora S, Frieze A, Kaplan H (1996) A new rounding procedure for the assignment problem with applications to dense graph arrangement problems. In: Proceedings of the 37th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS):2433

  • Ausiello G, Crescenzi P, Gambosi G, Kann V, Marchetti-Spaccamela A, Protasi M (2003) Complexity and approximation, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker FB, Hubert LJ (1977) Applications of combinatorial programming to data analysis: seriation using asymmetric proximity measures. Br L Math Statist Psychol 30:154–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks J (1985) Sophisticated voting outcomes and agenda control. Soc Choice Welfare 2:295–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks J, Bordes G, Le Breton M (1991) Covering relations, closest orderings and hamiltonian bypaths in tournaments. Soc Choice Welfare 8:355–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbut M (1966) Note sur les ordres totaux à distance minimum d’une relation binaire donnée. Mathématiques et Sciences humaines 17:47–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Noy A, Naor J (1990) Sorting, minimal feedback sets, and Hamilton paths in tournaments. SIAM J Disc Math 3(1):7–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthélemy J-P, Monjardet B (1981) The median procedure in cluster analysis and social choice theory. Math Soc Sci 1:235–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthélemy J-P, Monjardet B (1988) The median procedure in data analysis: new results and open problems. In: Bock HH (ed) Classification and related methods of data analysis. North Holland, Amsterdam

  • Barthélemy J-P, Guénoche A, Hudry O (1989) Median linear orders: heuristics and a branch and bound algorithm. EJOR 41:313–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthélemy J-P, Hudry O, Isaak G, Roberts FS, Tesman B (1995) The reversing number of a digraph. Discrete Appl Math 60:39–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthélemy J-P, Cohen G, Lobstein A (1996) Algorithmic Complexity and Communication Problems. UCL Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartholdi III JJ, Tovey CA, Trick MA (1989) Voting schemes for which it can be difficult to tell who won the election. Soc Choice Welfare 6:157–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker O (1967) Das Helmstädtersche Reihenfolgeproblem—die Effizienz verschiedener Näherungsverfahren. In: Computers uses in the Social Science. Vienna

  • Belloni A, Lucena A (2004) Lagrangian heuristics for the linear ordering problem. In: Resende MGC, de Sousa JP (eds). Metaheuristics: Computer Decision Making. Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York, pp. 37–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Berge C (1985) Graphs. North-Holland, Amsterdam

  • Berger B, Shor PW (1990) Approximation algorithms for the maximum acyclic subgraph problem. In: Proceedings of the first annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms (SODA), 236–243

  • Berger B, Shor PW (1997) Tight bounds for the maximum acyclic subgraph problem. J Algor 25:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Bermond J-C (1972) Ordres à distance minimum d’un tournoi et graphes partiels sans circuits maximaux. Math Sci hum 37:5–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Bermond J-C (1975) The circuit-hypergraph of a tournament. In: Infinite and finite sets, Proceedings of the Colloquia Mathematica Societatis János Bolyai 10. North Holland, Amsterdam, 165–180

  • Bermond J-C, Kodratoff Y (1976) Une heuristique pour le calcul de l’indice de transitivité d’un tournoi. RAIRO 10(3):83–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertacco L, Brunetta L, Fischetti M (2004) The linear ordering problem with cumulative costs. Technical report, University of Padova, and EJOR (in press)

  • Black D (1958) The theory of committees and elections. Cambridge University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Blin JM, Whinston AB (1974) A note on majority rule under transitivity constraints. Manage Sci 20:1439–1440

    Google Scholar 

  • Blin JM, Whinston AB (1975) Discriminant functions and majority voting. Manage Sci 21: 1029–1041

    Google Scholar 

  • Boenchendorf K (1982) Reihenfolgenprobleme/Mean-flow-time sequencing. Mathematical Systems in Economics 74, Verlagsgruppe Athanäum/Hain/Scriptor/Hanstein

  • Bolotashvili G, Kovalev M, Girlich E (1999) New Facets of the Linear Ordering Polytope. SIAM J Discrete Math 12(3):326–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Borda J-C (chevalier de) (1784) Mémoire sur les élections au scrutin, Histoire de l’Académie Royale des Sciences pour 1781, Paris

  • Bowman VJ, Colantoni CS (1973) Majority rule under transitivity constraints. Manage Sci 19: 1029–1041

    Google Scholar 

  • Brualdi RA, Qiao L (1983) Upsets in round robin tournaments. J Combin Theory 35 Ser B:62–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Brualdi RA, Qiao L (1984) The interchange graph of tournaments with the same score vector. In: Progress in graph theory. Academic Press, Toronto, pp 129–151

  • Burkov VN, Groppen VO (1972) Branch cuts in strongly connected graphs and permutation potentials. Auto Remote Control 6:111–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Campos V, Laguna M, Martí R (1999) Scatter search for the linear ordering problem. In: Corne D, Dorigo M, Glover F (eds). New ideas in optimization. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 331–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Campos V, Glover F, Laguna M, Martí R (2001) An experimental evaluation of a scatter search for the linear ordering problem. J Global Optim 21(4):397–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Chanas S, Kobylanski P (1996) A new heuristic algorithm solving the linear ordering problem. Comput Optim Appl 6:191–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaovalitwongse W, Pardalos PM (1997) GRASP with Path-Relinking for the Linear Ordering Problem. Industrial and Systems Engineering Working Paper, Rutgers University

  • Charbit P, Thomasse S, Yeo A (2007) The minimum feedback arc set problem is NP-hard for tournaments. Combin Prob Comput 16(1):1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Charon I, Germa A, Hudry O (1992a) Encadrement de l’indice de Slater d’un tournoi à l’aide de ses scores. Math Inf Sci Hum 118:53–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Charon I, Germa A, Hudry O (1992b) Utilisation des scores dans des méthodes exactes déterminant les ordres médians de tournois. Math Inf Sci Hum 119:53–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Charon I, Germa A, Hudry O (1996a) Random generation of tournaments and asymmetric digraphs with given out-degrees. Eur J Oper Res 95:411–419

    Google Scholar 

  • Charon I, Guénoche A, Hudry O, Woirgard F (1996b) A bonsaï branch and bound method applied to voting theory. In: Ordinal and symbolic data analysis. Springer, Berlin, pp 309–318

  • Charon I, Hudry O, Woirgard F (1996c) Ordres médians et ordres de Slater des tournois. Mathématiques, Informatique et Sciences humaines 133:23–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Charon I, Guénoche A, Hudry O, Woirgard F (1997a) New results on the computation of median orders. Disc Math 165–166:139–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Charon I, Hudry O, Woirgard F (1997b) A 16-vertex tournament for which Banks set and Slater set are disjoint. Disc Appl Math 80(2–3):211–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Charon I, Hudry O (1998) Lamarckian genetic algorithms applied to the aggregation of preferences. Ann Oper Res 80:281–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Charon I, Hudry O (2000) Slater orders and Hamiltonian paths of tournaments. Electron Notes Disc Math 5:60–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Charon I, Hudry O (2001a) The noising methods: a generalization of some metaheuristics. Eur J Oper Res 135(1):86–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Charon I, Hudry O (2001b) Metod vetvei i granits dlia recheniia zadatchi o lineinom poriadke na vzvechennikh tournirakh. Discretii Analiz i Issledovanie Operatsii 8 (2) Seriia 2:73–91 (in Russian)

  • Charon I, Hudry O (2002) The noising methods: a survey. In: Hansen P, Ribeiro CC (eds) Essays and surveys in metaheuristics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp. 245–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Charon I, Hudry O (2003) Links between the Slater index and the Ryser index of tournaments. Graphs Combina 19(3):309–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Charon I, Hudry O (2006) A branch and bound algorithm to solve the linear ordering problem for weighted tournaments. Disc Appl Math 154:2097–2116

    Google Scholar 

  • Charon I, Hudry O (2007) Building a mi nimum profile or tournaments or of linear orders from a weighted graph (in preparation)

  • Chartrand G, Geller D, Hedetniemi S (1971) Graphs with forbidden subgraphs. J Comb Theory 10 (1) series B:12–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Christof T, Reinelt G (1996) Combinatorial optimization and small polytopes. Top 4(1):1–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Christof T, Reinelt G (1997a) Low-dimensional Linear Ordering Polytopes. Working paper, University of Heidelberg

  • Christof T, Reinelt G (1997b) Small instances relaxations for solving linear ordering problems by branch-and-cut. Technical report, University of Heidelberg

  • Christof T, Reinelt G (2001) Algorithmic aspects of using small instance relaxations in parallel branch-and-cut. Algorithmica 30(4):597–629

    Google Scholar 

  • Christophe J, Doignon J-P, Fiorini S (2004) The biorder. Order 21/1:61–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen W, Schapire R, Singer Y (1999) Learning to order things. J Artif Intell Res 10:213–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Condorcet MJAN, Caritat (marquis de) (1785) Essai sur l’application de l’analyse à la probabilité des décisions rendues à la pluralité des voix, Paris

  • Congram RK (2000) Polynomially searchable exponential neighbourhoods for sequencing problems in combinatorial optimisation. PhD thesis, University of Southampton

  • Conitzer V (2005) Computing Slater Rankings Using Similarities Among Candidates. IBM research report RC23748 (W0510–105)

  • Cook WD, Saipe AL (1976) Committee approach to priority planning: the median ranking method. Cahiers du Centre d’études et de recherche opèrationnelle 18(3):337–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook WD, Golan I, Kress M (1988) Heuristics for ranking players in a round robin tournament. Comput Oper Res 15(2):135–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook WD, Doyle J, Green R, Kress M (1996) Ranking players in multiple tournaments. Comput Oper Res 23(9):869–880

    Google Scholar 

  • Copeland AH (1951) A “reasonable” social welfare function. Seminar on applications of mathematics to social sciences, University of Michigan

  • Coppersmith D, Winograd S (1990) Matrix multiplication via arithmetic progressions. J Symbolic Comput 9:251–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Coppersmith D, Fleischer L, Rudra A (2006) Ordering by weighted number of wins gives a good ranking for weighted tournaments. In: Proceedings of the seventeenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithm (SODA’06), pp 776–782

  • Czygrinow A, Poljak S, Rödl V (1999) Constructive quasi-Ramsey numbers and tournament ranking. SIAM J Disc Math 12(1):48–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport A, Kalagnanam J (2004) A computational study of the Kemeny rule for preference aggregation. In: Proceedings of the national conference on artificial intelligence (AAAI), pp 697–702

  • Debord B (1987a) Caractérisation des matrices de préférences nettes et méthodes d’agrégation associées, Mathématiques et Sciences humaines 97:5–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Debord B (1987b) Axiomatisation de procédures d’agrégation de préférences. PhDthesis, Université scientifique technologique et médicale de Grenoble

  • de Cani JS (1969) Maximum likelihood paired comparison ranking by linear programming. Biometrika 3:537–545

    Google Scholar 

  • de Cani JS (1972) A branch and bound algorithm for maximum likelihood paired comparison ranking. Biometrika 59:131–135

    Google Scholar 

  • de la Vega, WF (1983) On the maximal cardinality of a consistent set of arcs in a random tournament. J Comb Theory 35, series B:328–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon JD (1967) The maximum order of the group of a tournament. Can Math Bull 10:503–505

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodgson CL (1876) A method of taking votes on more than two issues, Clarendon Press, Oxford, and in D. Black, The theory of committees and elections, Cambridge University Press, London, 1958

  • Doignon J-P, Fiorini S, Joret G (2006) Facets of the linear ordering polytope: a unification for the fence family through weighted graphs. J Math Psychol 50/3:251–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Dom M, Guo J, Hüffner F, Niedermeier R, Truß A (2006) Fixed-Parameter Tractability Results for Feedback Set Problems in Tournaments. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3998, Springer, Heidelberg, pp 320–331

  • Downey RG, Fellows MR (1999) Parameterized complexity. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Dréo J, Petrowski A, Taillard E, Siarry P (2006) Metaheuristics for hard Optimization, Methods and Case Studies. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Duarte A, Laguna M, Marti R (2006) Tabu search for the linear ordering problem with cumulative costs, Technical Report, University of Valencia

  • Dugat V (1990) Décomposition de tournois réguliers : théorie et application aux algorithmes de tests d’isomorphisme. PhD thesis, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse

  • Dutta B (1988) Covering sets and a new Condorcet choice correspondence. J Econ Theory 44(1988):63–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwork C, Kumar R, Naor M, Sivakumar D (2001) Rank aggregation methods for the Web. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on World Wide Web (WWW10), pp 613–622

  • Eades P, Lin X (1995) A new heuristic for the feedback arc set problem. Aust J Comb 12:15–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Eades P, Lin X, Smyth WF (1993) A fast and effective heuristic for the feedback arc set problem. Inform Process Lett 47(6):319–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdös P, Moser L (1964) On the representation of directed graphs as unions of orderings. Magyar Tud Akad Mat Kutato Int Közl 9:125–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdös P, Moon JW (1965) On sets of consistent arcs in a tournament. Canad Math Bull 8:269–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Even G, Naor JS, Sudan M, Schieber B (1998) Approximating minimum feedback sets and multicuts in directed graphs. Algorithmica 20(2):151–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagin R, Kumar R, Mahdian M, Sivakumar D, Vee E (2005) Rank aggregation: an algorithmic perspective. Unpublished Manuscript

  • Festa P, Pardalos P, Resende M (1999) Feedback set problems. In: handbook of combinatorial optimization 4, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston

  • Fiorini S (2001a) Polyhedral combinatorics of order polytopes. PhD thesis, Université libre de Bruxelles

  • Fiorini S (2001b) Determining the automorphism group of the linear ordering polytope. Disc Appl Math 112/1–3:121–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorini S, Fishburn P (2003) Facets of linear signed order polytopes. Disc Appl Math 131/3:597–610

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorini S (2006a) How to recycle your facets. Disc Optim 3/2:136–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorini S (2006b) 0, 1/2-cuts and the linear ordering problem: surfaces that define facets. SIAM J Disc Math 20/4: 893–912

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn P (1977) Condorcet social choice functions. SIAM J Appl Math 33:469–489

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn P (1992) Induced binary probabilities and the linear ordering polytope: a status report. Math Soc Sci 23:67–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood MM (1990) Exact and heuristic algorithms for the weighted feedback arc set problem: a special case of the skew-symmetric quadratic assignment problem. Networks 20:1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Flueck JA, Korsh JF (1974) A branch search algorithm for maximum likelihood paired comparison ranking. Biometrika 61(3):621–626

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulkerson DR (1965) Upsets in round robin tournaments. Can J Math 17:957–969

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamboa D, Rego C, Glover F (2006) A Relax-and-Cut RAMP Approach for the Linear Ordering Problem. In the abstracts booklet of ECCOXIX/CO2006 Joint Meeting, Porto, Portugal, p. 40

  • Garcia CG, Perez-Brito D, Campos V, Marti R (2006) Variable neighborhood search for the linear ordering problem. Comput Oper Res 33(12):35493565

    Google Scholar 

  • Garey MR, Johnson DS (1979) Computers and intractability, a guide to the theory of NP-completeness. Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Girlich E, Kovalev M, Nalivaiko V (1998) A note on the extension of facet-defining digraphs. Technical report 23/98, Faculty of Mathematics, University of Magdeburg

  • Glover F, Kochenberger GA (2003) Handbook of Metaheuristics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Glover F, Klastorin T, Klingman D (1974) Optimal weighted ancestry relationships. Manage Sci 20:1190–1193

    Google Scholar 

  • Goddard ST (1983) Tournament rankings. Manage Sci 29(12):1385–1392

    Google Scholar 

  • Goemans MX, Hall LA (1996) The strongest facets of the acyclic subgraph polytope are unknown. In: Cunningham WH, McCormick ST, Queyranne M (eds). Integer programming and optimization, lecture notes in computer science 1084, Springer, Heidelberg, pp 415–429

  • Goldberg M (1966) Results on the automorphism group of a graph, M.Sc. Thesis, University of Alberta

  • Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. Addison-Wesley, Reading

  • González CG, Pérez-Brito D (2001) A variable neighborhood search for solving the linear ordering problem. In: Proceedings of MIC’2001–4th Metaheuristics International Conference, pp 181–185

  • Grindberg E, Dambit Y (1965) Some properties of graphs containing circuits. Latv math ezh 65–70 (in Russian)

  • Grötschel M, Jünger M, Reinelt G (1984a) A cutting plane algorithm for the linear ordering problem. Oper Res 32:1195–1220

    Google Scholar 

  • Grötschel M, Jünger M, Reinelt G (1984b) Optimal triangulation of large real-world input-output-matrices. Statistische Hefte 25:261–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Grötschel M, Jünger M, Reinelt G (1985a) On the acyclic subgraph polytope. Math Program 33:1–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Grötschel M, Jünger M, Reinelt G (1985b) Facets of the linear ordering polytope. Math Program 33:43–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Grötschel M, Jünger M, Reinelt G (1985c) Acyclic subdigraphs and linear orderings: polytopes, facets, and a cutting plane algorithm. In: Rival I (ed) Graphs and orders. D Reidel Publishing Company 217–264

  • Guénoche A (1977) Un algorithme pour pallier l’effet Condorcet. RAIRO 11(1):77–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Guénoche A (1986) A. B. C. D. : logiciel d’analyses booléennes et combinatoires des données, notice d’utilisation. G. R. T. C, Marseille

  • Guénoche A (1988) Order at minimum distance of a valued tournament. Communication to Modélisation, Analyse et Agrégation des Préférences et des Choix (TRAP 3), Marseille-Luminy

  • Guénoche A, Vandeputte-Riboud B, Denis J-B (1994) Selecting varieties using a series of trials and a combinatorial ordering method. Agronomie 14:363–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Guénoche A (1995) How to choose according to partial evaluations. In: Bouchon-Meunier B, et al. (eds) Advances in intelligent computing, IPMU’94. Lecture notes in computer sciences 945. Springer, Heidelberg, pp. 611–618

    Google Scholar 

  • Guénoche A (1996) Vainqueurs de Kemeny et tournois difficiles. Math Inf Sci Hum 133:57–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilbaud GT (1952) Les théories de l’intérêt général et le problème logique de l’agrégation. économie appliquée 5 (4), reprint in éléments de la théorie des jeux, Dunod, Paris, 1968

  • Guy RK (1967) A coarseness conjecture of Erdös. J Comb Theory 3:38–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardouin Duparc J (1975) Quelques résultats sur l’ < < indice de transitivité > > de certains tournois. Mathématiques et Sciences humaines 51:35–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassin R, Rubinstein S (1994) Approximations for the maximum acyclic subgraph problem. Inform Process Lett 51(3):133–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang G, Lim A (2003) Designing a hybrid genetic algorithm for the linear ordering problem. In: Proceedings of “Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO) 2003”, part I. Springer, Heidelberg LNCS 2723, pp 1053–1064

  • Huber L (1976) Seriation using asymmetric proximity measures. Br J Math Statist Psychol 29:32–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubert L, Schulz J (1975) Maximum likehood paired-comparison ranking and quadratic assignment. Biometrika 62(3):655–659

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudry O (1989) Recherche d’ordres médians : complexité, algorithmique et problèmes combinatoires. PhD thesis, ENST, Paris

  • Hudry O (1997a) Algorithms for the aggregation of ordinal preferences: a review. In: Proceedings of the first conference on operations and quantitative management (ICOQM), pp 169–176

  • Hudry O (1997b) Nombre maximum d’ordres de Slater des tournois T vérifiant σ(T) = 1. Mathématiques, Informatique et Sciences humaines 140:51–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudry O (1998) Tournois et optimisation combinatoire. Habilitation à diriger des recherches, Université Paris 6, Paris, 1998

  • Hudry O (2004) A note on “Banks winners in tournaments are difficult to recognize” by G.J. Woeginger. Soc Choice Welfare 23:113–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudry O (2006) On the difficulty of computing the winners of a tournament. Annales du LAMSADE 6, In: Proceedings of the workshop on voting theory and preference modelling, DIMACS, 2006, pp 181–191

  • Hudry O (2007) Complexity results on the aggregation of linear orders into median orders. Ann Oper Res (in press)

  • Hudry O (2007) Complexity of Slater problems (in preparation)

  • Isaak G (1995) Tournaments as feedback arc sets. Electron J Comb 2:R20

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaak G, Tesman B (1991) The weighted reversing number of a digraph. Congressus Numerantium 83:115–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacquet-Lagrèze É (1969) L’agrégation des opinions individuelles. Informatique et Sciences humaines 4:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung H.A (1970) On subgraphs without cycles in a tournament. In: P. Erdös, A. Renyi, V.T. Sös (eds) Combinatorial theory and its applications II, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 675–677

  • Jünger M (1985) Polyhedral combinatorics and the acyclic subdigraph problem. Heldermann Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaas R (1981) A branch and bound algorithm for the acyclic subgraph problem. Eur J Oper Res 8:355–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadane JB (1966) Some equivalence classes in paired comparisons. Ann Math Statist 37:488–494

    Google Scholar 

  • Kano M, Sakamoto A (1985) Ranking the vertices of a paired comparison digraph. SIAM J Alg Disc Meth 6(1):79–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Karp R (1972) Reducibility among combinatorial problems. In: Miller RE, Tatcher JW (eds). Complexity of computer computations. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 85–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaykobad M, Ahmed QNU, Shafiqul Khalid ATM, Bakhtiar R-A (1995) A new algorithm for ranking players of a round-robin tournament. Comput Oper Res 22(2):221–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemeny JG (1959) Mathematics without numbers. Daedalus 88:577–591

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall MG (1938) Rank correlation methods. Hafner, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall MG, Babington Smith B (1940) On the method of paired comparisons. Biometrika 33: 239–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Klamler C (2003) Kemeny’s rule and Slater’s rule: a binary comparison. Econ Bull 4(35):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Klamler C (2004) The Dodgson ranking and its relation to Kemeny’s method and Slater’s rule. Soc Choice Welfare 23:91–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Koppen M (1995) Random utility representation of binary choice probabilities: critical graphs yielding critical necessary conditions. J Math Psych 19:21–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Korte B (1979) Approximation algorithms for discrete optimization problems. Ann Disc Math 4:85–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korte B, Oberhofer W (1968) Zwei Algorithmen zur Lösung eines komplexen Reihenfolgeproblems. Unternehmensforschung 12:217–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Korte B, Oberhofer W (1969) Zur Triangulation von Input-Output-Matrizen. Jahrbuch Nationaloekon Statist 182:398–433

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotzig, A (1975) On the maximal order of cyclicity of antisymmetric directed graphs. Disc Math 12:17–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Laffond G, Laslier J-F (1991) Slater’s winners of a tournament may not be in the Banks set. Soc Choice Welfare 8:355–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Laffond G, Laslier J-F, Le Breton M (1991a) Choosing from a tournament: a progress report and some new results. Technical report, CNAM, Paris

  • Laffond G, Laslier J-F, Le Breton M (1991b) A game-theoretical method for ranking the participants in a tournament”, Technical report, CNAM, Paris

  • Laffond G, Laslier J-F, Le Breton M (1993) The Bipartisan set of a tournament game. Games Econ Behav 5:182–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Landau HG (1953) On dominance relations and the structure of animal societies III. The condition for a score structure. Bull Math Biophys 13:1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Laguna M, Marti R, Campos V (1999) Intensification and diversification with elite tabu search solutions for the linear ordering problem. Comput Oper Res 26(12):1217–1230

    Google Scholar 

  • Laslier J-F (1997) Tournament solutions and majority voting. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler EL (1964) A comment on minimum feedback arc sets. IEEE Trans Circuit Theory 11:296–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Leighton T, Rao S (1988) An approximation max-flow min-cut theorem for uniform multicommodity flow problems with applications to approximation algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 29th annual symposium on foundations of computer science, pp 422–431

  • Lemaréchal C (2003) The omnipresence of Lagrange, 4OR 1(1):7–25

  • Lempel A, Cederbaum I (1966) Minimum feedback arc and vertex sets of a directed graph. I E E E Trans Circuit Theory 13:399–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenstra HW Jr (1973) The acyclic subgraph problem. Technical report BW26, Mathematisch Centrum, Amsterdam

  • Lenstra JK (1977) Sequencing by enumerative methods. Mathematical Centre Tracts 69, Mathematisch Centrum, Amsterdam

  • Leung J, Lee J (1994) More facets from fences for linear ordering and acyclic subgraph polytopes. Disc Appl Mathe 50:185–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Loiseau I, Mendez-Dias I, Nasini G (1993) Determinacion del rango disyuntivo de facetas del problema de ordinacion lineal. Anales XXII JAIIO, pp 124–130

  • Marcotorchino J-F, Michaud P (1979) Optimisation en analyse ordinale de données, Masson, Paris

  • Matousek J, Nesetril J (1998) Invitation to Discrete Mathematics, Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York

  • McGarvey D (1953) A theorem on the construction of voting paradoxes. Econometrica 21:608–610

    Google Scholar 

  • McKey B (2006) http://cs.anu.edu.au/~bdm/data/digraphs.html

  • McLean I, Urken A (1995) Classics of social choice, University of Michigan Press

  • Méndez-Díaz I, Nasini G, Zabala P (submitted for publication) The disjunctive rank and cutting plane algorithms using of facets of the linear ordering polytope

  • Mendonça D, Raghavachari M (2000) Comparing the efficacy of ranking methods for multiple round-robin tournaments. Eur J Oper Res 123:593–605

    Google Scholar 

  • Merchant DK, Rao MR (1976) Majority decisions and transitivity: some special cases. Manage Sci 23(2):125–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller N (1980) A new solution set for tournaments and majority voting: Further graph-theoretical approaches to the theory of voting. Am J Polit Sci 24(1):68–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell JE, Borchers B (1996) Solving real world linear ordering problems using a primal-dual interior point cutting plane method. Ann Oper Res 62:253–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell JE, Borchers B (2000) Solving linear ordering problems with a combined interior point/ simplex cutting plane algorithm. In: Frenk HL, Roos K, Terlaky T, Zhang S (eds). High Performance Optimization. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 349–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell J (2007) Generating linear ordering problems, http://www.rpi.edu/~mitchj/generators/ linord/

  • Monjardet B (1973) Tournois et ordres médians pour une opinion, Mathématiques et Sciences humaines 43:55–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Monjardet B (1979) Relations à éloignement minimum de relations binaires, note bibliographique. Mathématiques et Sciences humaines 67:115–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Monjardet B (1990) Sur diverses formes de la “règle de Condorcet” d’agrégation des préférences. Math Inf Sci hum 111:61–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Monsuur H, Storcken T (1997) Measuring intransitivity. Math Soc Sci 34:125–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon JW (1968) Topics on tournaments, Holt, Rinehart and Winston

  • Nalivaiko V (1997) The linear ordering polytope. Preprint 39/97, Faculty of Mathematics of the Otto-von-Guericke-University of Magdeburg

  • Nishihara O, Kumamoto H, Inoue K (1989) The new formulations of minimum feedback arc set problem. In: Brexinski C (ed) Numerical and applied mathematics. J.C. Baltzer AG, Scientific Publishing Co

  • Nutov Z, Penn M (1995) On the integral dicycle packings and covers and the linear ordering polytope. Disc Appl Math 60:293–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Nutov Z, Penn M (1996) On non (0,1/2,1) Extreme Points of the Generalized Transitive Tournament Polytope. Linear Algebra and its applications 233:149–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlin JB (1981) unpublished manuscript

  • Papadimitriou C, Yannakakis M (1991) Optimization, approximation, and complexity classes. J Comput Syst Sci 43:425–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips JPN (1967) A procedure for determining Slater’s i and all nearest adjoining orders. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 20:217–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips JPN (1969) A further procedure for determining Slater’s i and all nearest adjoining orders. Br J Math Stat Psychol 22:97101

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips JPN (1976) On an algorithm of Smith and Payne for determining Slater’s i and all nearest adjoining orders. Br J Math Stat Psychol 29:126–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Poljak S, Turzík D (1986) A polynomial time heuristic for certain subgraph optimization problems with guaranteed lower bound. Disc Math 58:99–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Poljak S, Rödl V, Spencer J (1988) Tournament ranking with expected profit in polynomial time. SIAM J Disc Math 1(3):372–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Raman V, Saurabh S (2006) Parameterized algorithms for feedback set problems and their duals in tournaments. Theor Comput Sci 351:446–458

    Google Scholar 

  • Rédei L (1934) Ein kombinatorischer Satz. Acta Litt Szeged 7:39–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid KB (1969) On set of arcs containing no cycles in tournaments. Canad. Math Bull 12:261–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid KB (1983) Monochromatic reachability, complementary cycles and single arc reversals in tournaments. In: Graph Theory, Proceedings of the First Southeast Asian Graph Theory Colloquium held in Singapore (May 1983). Springer, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1073, Berlin, pp 11–21

  • Reid KB (2004) Tournaments. In: Gross JL, Yellen J (eds). Handbook of Graph Theory. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 156–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid KB, Beineke LW (1978) Tournaments. In: Beineke LW, Wilson RJ (eds). Selected topics in graph theory. Academic, New York, pp. 169–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinelt G (1985) The linear ordering problem: algorithms and applications. Research and Exposition in Mathematics 8, Heldermann Verlag, Berlin

  • Reinelt G (1993) A Note on Small Linear-Ordering Polytopes. Disc Comput Geometry 10:67–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Remage R, Thompson WA (1964) Rankings from paired comparison. Ann math Statist 35:739–747

    Google Scholar 

  • Remage R, Thompson WA (1966) Maximum likelihood paired comparison rankings. Biometrika 53:143–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein A (1980) Ranking the participants in a tournament. SIAM J Appl Math 98:108–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryser HJ (1964) Matrices of zeros and ones in combinatorial mathematics. In: Recent advances in matrix theory, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, pp 103–124

  • Schiavinotto T, Stützle T (2003) Search space analysis of the linear ordering problem. In: Raidl GR et al. (eds). Applications of evolutionary computing. Lecture notes in computer science 2611. Springer, Berlin, pp. 322–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiavinotto T, Stützle T (2004) The linear ordering problem: instances, search space analysis and algorithms. J Math Model Algorithms 3(4):367–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrijver A (2003) Combinatorial optimization. Polyhedra and efficiency. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz T (1990) Cyclic tournaments and cooperative majority voting: a solution. Soc Choice Welfare 7:19–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymour P (1995) Packing directed circuits fractionally. Combinatorica 15(2):281–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater P (1961) Inconsistencies in a schedule of paired comparisons. Biometrika 48:303312

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith WD (2007) http://rangevoting.org/PuzzDG.html

  • Smith AFM, Payne CD (1974) An algorithm for determining Slater’s i and all nearest adjoining orders. Br J Math Stat Psychol 27:4952

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer J (1971) Optimal ranking of tournaments. Networks 1:135–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer J (1978) Nonconstructive methods in discrete mathematics. In: Rota GC (eds). Studies in combinatorics. Mathematical Association of America, Washington DC, pp. 142–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer J (1987) Ten lectures on the probabilistic method. CBMS-NSF regional conference series in applied mathematics N° 52, SIAM, Philadelphy

  • Stearns R (1959) The voting problem. Am Math Monthly 66:761–763

    Google Scholar 

  • Szele T (1943) Kombinatorikai vizsgálatok az irányított teljes gráffal kapesolatban. Mat Fiz Lapok 50:223–256, German translation: Untersuchungen über gerichtete vollständige Graphen. Publ Math Debrecen 13(1966):145–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomassen C (1975) Transversals of circuits in the lexicographic product of directed graphs. Mathématiques et Sciences Humaines 51:43–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomassen C (1987) Counterexamples to Adám’s conjecture on arc reversals in directed graphs. J Comb Theory 42, series B:128–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker AW (1960) On directed graphs and integer programs. In: 1960 symposium on combinatorial problems, Princeton University, Princeton

  • Tüshaus U (1983) Aggregation binärer Relationen in der qualitativen Datenanalyse. Mathematical Systems in Economics 82, Verlagsgruppe Athenäum/Hain/Hanstein

  • van Zuylen A (2005) Deterministic approximation algorithms for ranking and clusterings. Cornell ORIE Tech. Report No. 1431

  • Vazirani VV (2003) Approximation algorithms. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakabayashi Y (1986) Aggregation of binary relations: algorithmic and polyhedral investigations, PhD thesis, Augsburg university

  • Wakabayashi Y (1998) The Complexity of Computing Medians of Relations. Resenhas 3(3):323–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei T (1952) The Algebraic Foundations of ranking Theory. Ph D thesis, Cambridge University, Cambridge

  • Wessels H (1981) Triangulation und Blocktriangulation von Input-Output Tabellen. Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung: Beiträge zur Strukturforshung, Heft 63, Berlin

  • Woeginger GJ (2003) Banks winners in tournaments are difficult to recognize. Soc Choice Welfare 20(3):523–528

    Google Scholar 

  • Woirgard F (1997) Recherche et dénombrement des ordres médians des tournois. PhD thesis, ENST, Paris

  • Young HP (1978) On permutations and permutation polytopes. Math Program Study 8:128–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Young HP (1988) Condorcet Theory of Voting. Am Polit Sci Rev 82:1231–1244

    Google Scholar 

  • Younger DH (1963) Minimum feedback arc sets for a directed graph. IEEE Trans Profes Tech Group Circuit Theory 10(2):238–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Zermelo E (1929) Die Berechnung der Turnier-Ergebnisse als ein maximal Problem der Warscheinlichkeistsrechnung. Math Zeitung 29:436–460

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olivier Hudry.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Charon, I., Hudry, O. A survey on the linear ordering problem for weighted or unweighted tournaments. 4OR 5, 5–60 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10288-007-0036-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10288-007-0036-6

Keywords

Mathematical Subject Classification (2000)

Navigation