Skip to main content
Log in

Microswitch programs for persons with multiple disabilities: an overview of the responses adopted for microswitch activation

  • Review
  • Published:
Cognitive Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: To introduce a person with multiple disabilities to a microswitch-aided program, one has to select a plausible response(s), that is, a response(s) that can be performed reliably and without excessive effort by the person and can successfully activate the microswitch(es) available (producing preferred stimuli). This paper provides an overview of the responses adopted for microswitch activation in research studies during the last 20 years. Method: Computerized and manual searches were carried out to identify the studies published between 1986 and 2005. Forty-eight research studies were identified. They concerned the use of (1) a single (typical) response, (2) a single (non-typical) response, (3) multiple (typical and non-typical) responses, and (4) multiple (vocal) responses. Results and discussion: The results showed that 151 of the 190 participants involved in the studies had a positive outcome (i.e., clear increases in their responding, which suggested that they had learned the association between responding and consequent preferred stimuli). Failures were largely concentrated in the first group of studies. The discussion focused on (a) the importance of selecting plausible responses for increasing the chances of success, (b) the need of non-typical responses for persons with minimal motor behavior, (c) implications of programs with multiple responses on engagement and choice, and (d) relevance of using vocal utterances. Some suggestions for future research concerning these points were also examined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agran M, Snow K, Swaner J (1999) Teacher perception of self-determination: benefits, characteristics, and strategies. Educ Train Ment Retard Dev Disabil 34:293–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Algozzine B, Browder D, Karvonen M, Test DW, Wood WM (2001) Effects of interventions to promote self-determination for individuals with disabilities. Rev Educ Res 71:219–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brotherson MJ, Cook CC, Parette HP (1996) A home-centered approach to assistive technology provision for young children with disabilities. Focus Autism Other Dev Disabil 11:86–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browder DM, Wood WM, Test DW, Karvonen M, Algozzine B (2001) Reviewing resources on self-determination: a map for teachers. Remedial Spec Educ 22:233–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannella HI, O’Reilly MF, Lancioni GE (2005) Choice and preference assessment research with people with severe to profound developmental disabilities: a review of the literature. Res Dev Disabil 26:1–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carr EG, Levin L, McConnachie G, Carlson JI, Kemp DC, Smith CE, McLaughlin DM (1999) Comprehensive multisituational intervention for problem behavior in the community: long-term maintenance and social validation. J Posit Behav Inter 1:5–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr JE, Dozier CL, Patel MR, Adams AN, Martin N (2002) Treatment of automatically reinforced object mouthing with noncontingent reinforcement and response blocking: experimental analysis and social validation. Res Dev Disabil 23:37–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke S, Worcester J, Dunlap G, Murray M, Bradley-Klug K (2002) Using multiple measures to evaluate positive behavior support: a case example. J Posit Behav Inter 4:131–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford MR, Schuster JW (1993) Using microswitches to teach toy use. J Dev Phys Disabil 5:349–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crocker AC (2000) Introduction: the happiness in all our lives. Am J Ment Retard 105:319–325

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dattilo J (1986) Computerized assessment of preferences for severely handicapped individuals. J Appl Behav Anal 19:445–448

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dattilo J (1987) Computerized assessment of leisure preferences: a replication. Educ Train Ment Retard 22:128–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewson MRJ, Whiteley JH (1987) Sensory reinforcement of head turning with nonambulatory, profoundly mentally retarded persons. Res Dev Disabil 8:413–426

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Favell JE, Realon RE, Sutton KA (1996) Measuring and increasing the happiness of people with profound mental retardation and physical handicaps. Behav Inter 11:47–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felce D, Perry J (1995) Quality of life: its definition and measurement. Res Dev Disabil 16:51–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fetters L, Kluzik J (1996) The effects of neurodevelopmental treatment versus practice on the reaching of children with spastic cerebral palsy. Phys Ther 76:346–358

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fuhrer MJ, Jutai JW, Scherer MJ, Deruyter F (2003) A framework for the conceptual modeling of assistive technology device outcomes. Disabil Rehabil 25:1243–1251

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Glickman L, Deitz J, Anson D, Stewart K (1996) The effect of switch control site on computer skills of infants and toddlers. Am J Occup Ther 50:545–553

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Green CW, Reid DH (1994) A comprehensive evaluation of a train-the-trainers model for training education staff to assemble adaptive switches. J Dev Phys Disabil 6:219–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green CW, Reid DH (1999) A behavioral approach to identifying sources of happiness and unhappiness among individuals with profound multiple disabilities. Behav Modif 23:280–293

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gutowski SJ (1996) Response acquisition for music or beverages in adults with profound multiple handicaps. J Dev Phys Disabil 8:221–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins EL, Raskind MH (2004) Speech recognition-based and automaticity programs to help students with severe reading and spelling problems. Ann Dyslexia 54:365–389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoch H, McComas JJ, Johnson L, Faranda N, Guenther SL (2002) The effects of magnitude and quality of reinforcement on choice responding during play activities. J Appl Behav Anal 35:171–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holburn S, Nguyen D, Vietze PM (2004) Computer-assisted learning for adults with profound multiple disabilities. Behav Inter 19:25–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hux K, Rankin-Erickson J, Manasse N, Lauritzen E (2000) Accuracy of three speech recognition systems: case study of dysarthric speech. Augmentative Altern Commun 16:186–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivancic MT, Bailey JS (1996) Current limits to reinforcement identification for some persons with profound multiple disabilities. Res Dev Disabil 17:77–92

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karvonen M, Test DW, Wood WM, Browder D, Algozzine B (2004) Putting self-determination into practice. Except Child 71:23–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazdin AE (2001) Behavior modification in applied settings, 6th edn. Wadsworth, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketelaar M, Vermeer A, Hart H, van Petegem-van Beek E, Helders PJ (2001) Effects of a functional therapy program on motor abilities of children with cerebral palsy. Phys Ther 81:1534–1545

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kinsley TC, Langone J (1995) Application of technology for infants, toddlers, and preschoolers with disabilities. J Spec Educ Technol 12:312–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Ko MLB, McConachie H, Jolleff N (1998) Outcome of recommendations for augmentative communication in children. Child: Care, Health Dev 24:195–205

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koester HH (2001) User performance with speech recognition: a literature review. Assist Technol 13:116–130

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler A-L, Tam C (2002) Effectiveness of using discrete utterance speech recognition software. Augmentative Altern Commun 18:137–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lancioni GE, Lems S (2001) Using a microswitch for vocalization responses with persons with multiple disabilities. Disabil Rehabil 23:745–748

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lancioni GE, O’Reilly MF, Basili G (2001a) Use of microswitches and speech output systems with people with severe/profound intellectual or multiple disabilities: a literature review. Res Dev Disabil 22:21–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lancioni GE, O’Reilly MF, Oliva D, Coppa MM (2001b) A microswitch for vocalization responses to foster environmental control in children with multiple disabilities. J Intellect Disabil Res 45:271–275

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lancioni GE, O’Reilly MF, Oliva D, Coppa MM (2001c) Using multiple microswitches to promote different responses in children with multiple disabilities. Res Dev Disabil 22:309–318

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lancioni GE, O’Reilly MF, Oliva D, Singh NN, Coppa MM (2002a) Multiple microswitches for multiple responses with children with profound disabilities. Cognit Behav Ther 31:81–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lancioni GE, O’Reilly MF, Singh NN, Oliva D, Groeneweg J (2002b) Impact of stimulation versus microswitch-based programs on indices of happiness of people with profound multiple disabilities. Res Dev Disabil 23:149–160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lancioni GE, O’Reilly MF, Singh NN, Oliva D, Piazzolla G, Pirani P, Groeneweg J (2002c) Evaluating the use of multiple microswitches and responses for children with multiple disabilities. J Intellect Disabil Res 46:346–351

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lancioni GE, Singh NN, O’Reilly MF, Oliva D (2002d) Using a hand-tap response with a vibration microswitch with students with multiple disabilities. Behav Cogn Psychother 30:237–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lancioni GE, Singh NN, O’Reilly MF, Oliva D, Baccani S, Canevaro A (2002e) Using simple hand-movement responses with optic microswitches with two persons with multiple disabilities. Res Pract Pers Sev Disabil 27:276–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lancioni GE, Abels J, Wilms EH, Singh NN, O’Reilly MF, Groeneweg J (2003a) Microswitch responding and awareness of contingency in persons with profound multiple disabilities. Percept Mot Skills 96:835–838

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lancioni GE, O’Reilly MF, Singh NN, Oliva D, Groeneweg J (2003b) Using microswitches with persons who have multiple disabilities: evaluation of three cases. Percept Mot Skills 97:909–916

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lancioni GE, Singh NN, O’Reilly MF, Campodonico F, Scalini L, Oliva D (2003c) Extending the use of familiar microswitches to difficult daily situations: two case evaluations. Percept Mot Skills 96:927–930

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lancioni GE, Singh NN, O’Reilly MF, Oliva D (2003d) Evaluating optic microswitches with students with profound multiple disabilities. J Vis Impairment Blindness 97:492–495

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancioni GE, Singh NN, O’Reilly MF, Oliva D (2003e) Extending microswitch-based programs for people with multiple disabilities: use of words and choice opportunities. Res Dev Disabil 24:139–148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lancioni GE, O’Reilly MF, Sigafoos J, Singh NN, Oliva D, Basili G (2004a) Enabling a person with multiple disabilities and minimal motor behaviour to control environmental stimulation with chin movements. Disabil Rehabil 26:1291–1294

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lancioni GE, O’Reilly MF, Singh NN, Campodonico F, Marziani M, Oliva D (2004b) A microswitch program to foster simple foot and leg movements in adult wheelchair users with multiple disabilities. Cogn Behav Ther 33:137–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lancioni GE, O’Reilly MF, Singh NN, Sigafoos J, Oliva D, Baccani S, Bosco A, Stasolla F (2004c) Technological aids to promote basic developmental achievements by children with multiple disabilities: evaluation of two cases. Cognit Process 5:232–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lancioni GE, O’Reilly MF, Singh NN, Stasolla F, Manfredi F, Oliva D (2004d) Adapting a grid into a microswitch to suit simple hand movements of a child with profound multiple disabilities. Percept Mot Skills 99:724–728

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lancioni GE, Singh NN, O’Reilly MF, Oliva D (2004e) A microswitch program including words and choice opportunities for students with multiple disabilities. Percept Mot Skills 98:214–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lancioni GE, Singh NN, O’Reilly MF, Oliva D, Montironi G (2004f) A computer system serving as a microswitch for vocal utterances of persons with multiple disabilities: two case evaluations. J Vis Impairment Blindness 98:116–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancioni GE, Singh NN, O’Reilly MF, Oliva D, Montironi G, Chierchie S (2004g) Assessing a new response-microswitch combination with a boy with minimal motor behavior. Percept Mot Skills 98:459–462

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lancioni GE, Singh NN, O’Reilly MF, Oliva D, Montironi G, Piazza F, Ciavattini F, Bettarelli F (2004h) Using computer systems as microswitches for vocal utterances of persons with multiple disabilities. Res Dev Disabil 25:183–192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lancioni GE, Singh NN, O’Reilly MF, Oliva D, Scalini L, Vigo CM, Groeneweg J (2004i) Microswitch clusters to support responding and appropriate posture of students with multiple disabilities: three case evaluations. Disabil Rehabil 26:501–505

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lancioni GE, Singh NN, O’Reilly MF, Sigafoos J, Oliva D, Montironi G (2004j) Evaluating a computer system used as a microswitch for word utterances of persons with multiple disabilities. Disabil Rehabil 26:1286–1290

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lancioni GE, O’Reilly MF, Singh NN, Oliva D, Coppa MM, Montironi G (2005a) A new microswitch to enable a boy with minimal motor behavior to control environmental stimulation with eye blinks. Behav Inter 20:147–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lancioni GE, O’Reilly MF, Singh NN, Oliva D, Scalini L, Vigo CM, Groeneweg J (2005b) Microswitch clusters to enhance hand responses and appropriate head position in two children with multiple disabilities. Pediatr Rehabil 8:59–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lancioni GE, Singh NN, O’Reilly MF, Sigafoos J, Oliva D, Costantini A, Gatto S, Marinelli V, Putzolu A (in press) An optic microswitch for an eyelid response to foster environmental control in children with minimal motor behaviour. Pediatr Rehabil

  • Langley MB (1990) A developmental approach to the use of toys for facilitation of environmental control. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 10:69–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leatherby JK, Gast DL, Wolery M, Collins BC (1992) Assessment of reinforcer preference in multi-handicapped students. J Dev Phys Disabil 4:15–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linderman TM, Stewart KB (1999) Sensory integrative-based occupational therapy and functional outcomes in young children with pervasive developmental disorders: a single-subject study. Am J Occup Ther 53:207–213

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Matikka LM (1996) Effects of psychological factors on the perceived quality of life of people with intellectual disabilities. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil 9:115–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCathren RB, Yoder PJ, Warren SF (1999) The relationship between prelinguistic vocalization and later expressive vocabulary in young children with developmental delay. J Speech Lang Hear Res 42:915–924

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McClure JT, Moss RA, McPeters JW, Kirkpatrick MA (1986) Reduction of hand mouthing by a boy with profound mental retardation. Ment Retard 24:219–222

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell AA, Sturmey P (2000) The social validation of three physical restraint procedures: a comparison of young people and professional groups. Res Dev Disabil 21:85–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miltenberger R (1997) Behavior modification: principles and procedures. Brooks/Cole, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchard H, Winkles J (2002) Experimental comparisons of data entry by automated speech recognition, keyboard, and mouse. Hum Factors 44:198–209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy KM, Saunders MD, Saunders RR, Lesley LB (2004) Effects of ambient stimuli on measures of behavioral state and microswitch use in adults with profound multiple impairments. Res Dev Disabil 25:355–370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien Y, Glenn S, Cunningham C (1994) Contingency awareness in infants and children with severe and profound learning disabilities. Int J Disabil Dev Educ 41:231–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parette P, Scherer M (2004) Assistive technology use and stigma. Educ Train Dev Disabil 39:217–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Petry K, Maes B, Vlaskamp C (2005) Domains of quality of life of people with profound multiple disabilities: the perspective of parents and direct support staff. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil 18:35–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Realon RE, Favell JE, Dayvault KA (1988) Evaluating the use of adapted leisure materials on the engagement of persons who are profoundly multiply handicapped. Educ Train Ment Retard 23:228–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Realon RE, Favell JE, Phillips JF (1989) Adapted leisure material vs. standard leisure material: evaluating several aspects of programming for persons who are profoundly handicapped. Educ Train Ment Retard 24:168–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Realon RE, Favell JE, Lowerre A (1990) The effects of making choices on engagement levels with persons who are profoundly multiply handicapped. Educ Train Ment Retard 25:299–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards SB, Taylor RL, Ramasamy R, Richards RY (1999) Single subject research: applications in educational and clinical settings. Wadsworth, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross E, Oliver C (2003) The assessment of mood in adults who have severe or profound mental retardation. Clin Psychol Rev 23:225–245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sandler AG, McLain SC (1987) Sensory reinforcement: effects of response-contingent vestibular stimulation on multiply handicapped children. Am J Ment Defic 91:373–378

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders MD, Questad KA, Kedziorski TL, Boase BC, Patterson EA, Cullinan TB (2001) Unprompted mechanical switch use in individuals with severe multiple disabilities: an evaluation of the effects of body positions. J Dev Phys Disabil 13:27–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders MD, Smagner JP, Saunders RR (2003a) Improving methodological and technological analyses of adaptive switch use of individuals with profound multiple impairments. Behav Inter 18:227–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders MD, Timler GR, Cullinan TB, Pilkey S, Questad KA, Saunders RR (2003b) Evidence of contingency awareness in people with profound multiple impairments: response duration versus response rate indicators. Res Dev Disabil 24:231–245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schalock R, Brown I, Brown R, Cummins RA, Felce D, Matikka L, Keith KD, Parmenter T (2003) Conceptualization, measurement, and application of quality of life for persons with intellectual disabilities: reports of an international panel of experts. Ment Retard 40:457–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlosser RW (1999) Social validation of intervention in augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative Altern Commun 15:234–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlosser RW (2003) Roles of speech output in augmentative and alternative communication: narrative review. Augmentative Altern Commun 19:5–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh NN, Lancioni GE, O’Reilly MF, Molina EJ, Adkins AD, Oliva D (2003) Self-determination during mealtimes through microswitch choice-making by an individual with complex multiple disabilities and profound mental retardation. J Posit Behav Inter 5:209–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobsey D, Reichle J (1989) Components of reinforcement for attention signal switch activation. Ment Retard Learn Disabil Bull 17:46–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Stafford AM, Alberto PM, Fredrick LD, Heflin LJ, Heller KW (2002) Preference variability and the instruction of choice making with students with severe intellectual disabilities. Educ Train Ment Retard Dev Disabil 37:70–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan MW, Lewis M (1990) Contingency intervention: a program portrait. J Early Inter 14:367–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan MW, Lewis M (1993) Contingency, means-end skills and the use of technology in infant intervention. Infants Young Child 5:58–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan MW, Laverick DH, Lewis M (1995) Fostering environmental control in a young child with Rett syndrome: a case study. J Autism Dev Disord 25:215–221

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Szymanski LS (2000) Happiness as a treatment goal. Am J Ment Retard 105:352–362

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatagiri HS (2002) Speech recognition technology applications in communication disorders. Am J Speech-Lang Pathol 11:323–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wacker DP, Wiggins B, Fowler M, Berg WK (1988) Training students with profound or multiple handicaps to make requests via microswitches. J Appl Behav Anal 21:331–343

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wade J, Petheram B, Cain C (2001) Voice recognition and aphasia: can computers understand aphasic speech? Disabil Rehabil 23:604–613

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Waldron-Soler KM, Martella RC, Marchand-Martella NE, Ebey TL (2000) Effects of choice of stimuli as reinforcement for task responding in preschoolers with and without developmental disabilities. J Appl Behav Anal 33:93–96

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wehmeyer ML, Schwartz M (1998) The relationship between self-determination, quality of life, and life satisfaction for adults with mental retardation. Educ Train Ment Retard Dev Disabil 33:3–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Willems BF, Loebl D (1995) Case study: adapting a TV/VCR control for a person with severe developmental disabilities. Technol Disabil 4:287–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zekovic B, Renwick R (2003) Quality of life for children and adolescents with developmental disabilities: review of conceptual and methodological issues relevant to public policy. Disabil Soc 18:19–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giulio E. Lancioni.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lancioni, G.E., Singh, N.N., O’Reilly, M.F. et al. Microswitch programs for persons with multiple disabilities: an overview of the responses adopted for microswitch activation. Cogn Process 6, 177–188 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-005-0003-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-005-0003-0

Keywords

Navigation