Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Gaze motion clustering in scan-path estimation

  • Research Report
  • Published:
Cognitive Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Visual attention is considered nowadays a paramount ability both in Cognitive Sciences and in Cognitive Vision to bridge the gap between perception and higher level reasoning functions, such as scene interpretation and decision making. Bottom-up gaze shifting is the main mechanism used by humans when exploring a scene without a specific task. In this paper we investigated which criteria allow for the generation of plausible fixation clusters by analysing experimental data of human subjects. We suggest that fixations should be grouped in cliques whose saliency can be assessed through an innovation factor encompassing bottom-up cues, proximity, direction and memory components.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

References

  • Belardinelli A, Pirri F, Carbone A (2006) Spatial discrimination in task-driven attention. In: Proceedings of IEEE RO-MAN’06. Hatfield, UK, pp 321–327

  • Belardinelli A, Pirri F, Carbone A (2007) Bottom-up gaze shifts and fixations learning by imitation. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B 37:256–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop CM (2006) Pattern recognition and machine learning. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce NDB, Tsotsos JK (2006) Saliency based on information maximization. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 18:155–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Findlay JM, Brown V (2006) Eye scanning of multi-element displays: I scanpath planning. Vis Res 46:179–195

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frintrop S, Jensfelt P, Christensen H (2006) Attentional landmark selection for visual slam. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS’06)

  • Härdle W, Hlavka Z (2007) Multivariate statistics: exercises and solutions. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Itti L, Baldi P (2006) Bayesian surprise attracts human attention. In: Advances in neural information processing systems, vol 19 (NIPS*2005). MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 1–8

  • Itti L, Koch C (2001) Computational modeling of visual attention. Nat Rev Neurosci 2(3):194–203

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Just M, Carpenter P (1980) A theory of reading. Psychol Rev 87:329–354

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klein RM (2000) Inhibition of return. Trends Cogn Sci 4:138–147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer AF, Wiegmann DA, Kirlik A (2007) Attention. From theory to practice. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Mardia K, Kent J, Bibby J (1979) Multivariate analysis. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Najemnik J, Geisler WS (2005) Optimal eye movement strategies in visual search. Nature 434:387–391

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Posner MI (1980) Orienting of attention. Q J Exp Psychol 32-A:3–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Raj R, Geisler WS, Frazor RA, Bovik AC (2005) Contrast statistics for foveated visual systems: fixation selection by minimizing contrast entropy. J Opt Soc Am 22(10):2039–2049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renninger LW, Coughlan J, Verghese P, Malik J (2005) An information maximization model of eye movements. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 17:1121–1128

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Santella A, Decarlo D (2003) Robust clustering of eye movement recordings for quantification of visual interest. In ETRA 2004. New York, pp 23–34

  • Shokoufandeh A, Sala PL, Sim R, Dickinson SJ (2006) Landmark selection for vision-based navigation. IEEE Trans Rob 22(2):334–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spalek TM, Hammad S (2004) Supporting the attentional momentum view of ior: Is attention biased to go right? Percept Psychophys 66(2):219–233

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thibadeau R, Just M, Carpenter P (1980) Real reading behaviour. In: Proceedings of the 18th annual meeting on association for computational linguistics, Morristown, NJ, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics, pp 159–162

  • Treisman A, Gelade G (1980) A feature-integration theory of attention. Cogn Psychol 12:97–136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tsotsos JK, Culhane S, Wai W, Lai Y, Davis N, Nuflo F (1995) Modeling visual attention via selective tuning. Artif Intell 78:507–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turano KA, Geruschat DR, Baker FH (2003) Oculomotor strategies for the direction of gaze tested with a real-world activity. Vis Res 43:333–346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yarbus AL (1967) Eye movements and vision. Plenum Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z (1999) Flexible camera calibration by viewing a plane from unknown orientations. In: The Proceedings of the seventh IEEE international conference on Computer vision, 1999, vol 1, pp 666–673

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the reviewers for their worthwhile suggestions. This research has been supported by the European Union 6th Framework Programme Project Viewfinder.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Belardinelli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Belardinelli, A., Pirri, F. & Carbone, A. Gaze motion clustering in scan-path estimation. Cogn Process 9, 269–282 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-008-0206-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-008-0206-2

Keywords

Navigation