Abstract
Participants were presented with sentences mentioning an entity with a typical location in the upper or lower vertical space (e.g., roof vs. root). Sentences supported or reversed the typical location of the target entity. Sensibility judgments requiring upwards or downwards responses were faster when the response matched rather than mismatched the target entity’s typical location. This compatibility effect was independent of whether the sentence context supported or reversed the target entity’s typical location. The results, therefore, provide clear evidence for word-based but no evidence for sentence-based simulation processes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barsalou LW (2008) Grounded cognition. Annu Rev Psychol 59:617–645
Bergen BK, Lindsay S, Matlock T, Narayanan S (2007) Spatial and linguistic aspects of visual imagery in sentence comprehension. Cogn Sci 31:733–764
Borghi AM, Glenberg AM, Kaschak MP (2004) Putting words in perspective. Mem Cogn 32(6):863–873
Bub DN, Masson MEJ (2010) On the nature of hand-action representations evoked during written sentence comprehension. Cognition 116:394–408
Dudschig C, Lachmair M, de la Vega I, De Filippis M, Kaup B (in press) From top to bottom: spatial shifts of attention caused by linguistic stimuli. Cogn Process
Estes Z, Verges M, Barsalou LW (2008) Head up, foot down. Psychol Sci 19(2):93–97
Kaschak MP, Madden CJ, Therriault DJ, Yaxley RH, Aveyard M, Blanchard AA, Zwaan RA (2005) Perception of motion affects language processing. Cognition 94:B79–B89
Lachmair M, Dudschig C, De Filippis M, de la Vega I, Kaup B (2011) Root versus roof: automatic activation of location information during word processing. Psychon Bull Rev 18:1180–1188
Levinson SC (2003) Space in language and cognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Loftus GR, Masson MEJ (1994) Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychon Bull Rev 1:476–490
Raposo A, Moss HE, Stamatakis EA, Tyler LK (2009) Modulation of motor and premotor cortices by action, action words and action sentences. Neuropsychologia 47:388–396
Zwaan RA, Madden CJ (2005) Embodied sentence comprehension. In: Pecher D, Zwaan RA (eds) The grounding of cognition: the role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Acknowledgments
The work reported in this paper was supported by a grant from the German Research Foundation awarded to the first author (SFB 833; Project B4).
Conflict of interest
This supplement was not sponsored by outside commercial interests. It was funded entirely by ECONA, Via dei Marsi, 78, 00185 Roma, Italy.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kaup, B., De Filippis, M., Lachmair, M. et al. When up-words meet down-sentences: evidence for word- or sentence-based compatibility effects?. Cogn Process 13 (Suppl 1), 203–207 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-012-0453-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-012-0453-0