Skip to main content
Log in

Neural dichotomy of word concreteness: a view from functional neuroimaging

  • Research Report
  • Published:
Cognitive Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our perception about the representation and processing of concrete and abstract concepts is based on the fact that concrete words are highly imagined and remembered faster than abstract words. In order to explain the processing differences between abstract and concrete concepts, various theories have been proposed, yet there is no unanimous consensus about its neural implication. The present study investigated the processing of concrete and abstract words during an orthography judgment task (implicit semantic processing) using functional magnetic resonance imaging to validate the involvement of the neural regions. Relative to non-words, both abstract and concrete words show activation in the regions of bilateral hemisphere previously associated with semantic processing. The common areas (conjunction analyses) observed for abstract and concrete words are bilateral inferior frontal gyrus (BA 44/45), left superior parietal (BA 7), left fusiform gyrus and bilateral middle occipital. The additional areas for abstract words were noticed in bilateral superior temporal and bilateral middle temporal region, whereas no distinct region was noticed for concrete words. This suggests that words with abstract concepts recruit additional language regions in the brain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  • Barber HA, Otten LJ, Kousta ST, Vigliocco G (2013) Concreteness in word processing: ERP and behavioral effects in a lexical decision task. Brain Lang 125(1):47–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barca L, Burani C, Arduino LS (2002) Word naming times and psycholinguistic norms for Italian nouns.Behav Res Methods, Instrum, & Comput 34(3):424–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou LW (1999a) Perceptions of perceptual symbols. Behav Brain Sci 22(04):637–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou LW (1999b) Perceptual symbol systems. Behav Brain Sci 22(04):577–660

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou LW (2008) Grounded cognition. Annu Rev Psychol 59:617–645

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou LW, Wiemer-Hastings K (2005) Situating abstract concepts. In: Grounding cognition: the role of perception and action in memory, language, and thought. pp 129–163

  • Barsalou LW, Santos A, Simmons WK, Wilson CD (2008). Language and simulation in conceptual processing. In: Symbols embodiment meaning. pp 245–283

  • Binder JR, Westbury CF, McKiernan KA, Possing ET, Medler DA (2005) Distinct brain systems for processing concrete and abstract concepts. J Cogn Neurosci 17(6):905–917

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bookheimer S (2002) Functional MRI of language: new approaches to understanding the cortical organization of semantic processing. Annu Rev Neurosci 25(1):151–188

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Borghi AM, Binkofski F (2014) The WAT proposal and the role of language. In: Words as social tools: an embodied view on abstract concepts. Springer, New York, pp 19–37

  • Borghi AM, Caramelli N, Setti A (2005) Conceptual information on objects’ locations. Brain Lang 93(2):140–151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brett M, Anton JL, Valabregue R, Poline JB (2002) Region of interest analysis using an SPM toolbox [abstract]. Presented at the 8th international conference on functional mapping of the human brain

  • Connell L, Lynott D (2012) Strength of perceptual experience predicts word processing performance better than concreteness or imageability. Cognition 125(3):452–465

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • D’Esposito M, Detre JA, Aguirre GK, Stallcup M, Alsop DC, Tippet LJ, Farah MJ (1997) A functional MRI study of mental image generation. Neuropsychologia 35(5):725–730

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dove G (2011) On the need for embodied and dis-embodied cognition. In: Embodied and grounded cognition. pp 129

  • Faulkner D, Foster JK (2002) The decoupling of “explicit” and “implicit” processing in neuropsychological Disorders. Psyche 8(02)

  • Fiebach CJ, Friederici AD (2004) Processing concrete words: fMRI evidence against a specific right-hemisphere involvement. Neuropsychologia 42(1):62–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fliessbach K, Weis S, Klaver P, Elger CE, Weber B (2006) The effect of word concreteness on recognition memory. Neuroimage 32(3):1413–1421

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin S, Howard D, Patterson K (1995) Abstract word anomia. Cogn Neuropsychol 12(5):549–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friederici AD, Opitz B, von Cramon DY (2000) Segregating semantic and syntactic aspects of processing in the human brain: an fMRI investigation of different word types. Cereb Cortex 10(7):698–705

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Friston K, Holmes AP, Ashburner J (1999) Statistical parameter mapping (SPM)

  • Friston KJ, Penny WD, Glaser DE (2005) Conjunction revisited. Neuroimage 25(3):661–667

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fuster JM (2003) Cortex and mind: unifying cognition. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabrieli JD, Poldrack RA, Desmond JE (1998) The role of left prefrontal cortex in language and memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci 95(3):906–913

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman M, Koenig P, DeVita C, Glosser G, Alsop D, Detre J, Gee J (2002) The neural basis for category-specific knowledge: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 15(4):936–948

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hickok G, Poeppel D (2004) Dorsal and ventral streams: a framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language. Cognition 92(1):67–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holcomb PJ, Kounios J, Anderson JE, West WC (1999) Dual-coding, context-availability, and concreteness effects in sentence comprehension: an electrophysiological investigation. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 25(3):721

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huette S, Winter B, Matlock T, Ardell DH, Spivey M (2014) Eye movements during listening reveal spontaneous grammatical processing. Front Psychol 5

  • Jessen F, Heun R, Erb M, Granath DO, Klose U, Papassotiropoulos A, Grodd W (2000) The concreteness effect: evidence for dual coding and context availability. Brain Lang 74(1):103–112

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Katz RB, Goodglass H (1990) Deep dysphasia: analysis of a rare form of repetition disorder. Brain Lang 39(1):153–185

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kiehl KA, Liddle PF, Smith AM, Mendrek A, Forster BB, Hare RD (1999) Neural pathways involved in the processing of concrete and abstract words. Hum Brain Mapp 7(4):225–233

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kounios J, Holcomb PJ (1994) Concreteness effects in semantic processing: ERP evidence supporting dual-coding theory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 20(4):804

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kousta ST, Vigliocco G, Vinson DP, Andrews M, Del Campo E (2011) The representation of abstract words: why emotion matters. J Exp Psychol Gen 140(1):14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kroll JF, Merves JS (1986) Lexical access for concrete and abstract words. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 12(1):92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar U, Padakannaya P, Mishra RK, Khetrapal CL (2013) Distinctive neural signatures for negative sentences in Hindi: an fMRI study. Brain Imaging Behav 7(2):91–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff G, Johnson M (2008) Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Louwerse MM, Jeuniaux P (2008) Language comprehension is both embodied and symbolic. In: Symbols and embodiment: debates on meaning and cognition. pp 309–326

  • Louwerse MM, Jeuniaux P (2010) The linguistic and embodied nature of conceptual processing. Cognition 114(1):96–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martin A, Wiggs CL, Ungerleider LG, Haxby JV (1996) Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge. Nature 379(6566):649–652

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mellet E, Tzourio N, Denis M, Mazoyer B (1998) Cortical anatomy of mental imagery of concrete nouns based on their dictionary definition. NeuroReport 9(5):803–808

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moore CJ, Price CJ (1999) A functional neuroimaging study of the variables that generate category-specific object processing differences. Brain 122(5):943–962

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mummery CJ, Patterson K, Hodges JR, Wise RJ (1996) Generating ‘tiger’ as an animal name or a word beginning with T: differences in brain activation. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 263(1373):989–995

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nobre AC, Allison T, McCarthy G (1998) Modulation of human extrastriate visual processing by selective attention to colours and words. Brain 121(7):1357–1368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Noppeney U, Price CJ (2004) Retrieval of abstract semantics. Neuroimage 22(1):164–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9(1):97–113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paivio A (1971) Imagery and verbal processes. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Paivio A (1986) Mental representations: a dual coding approach. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Paivio A (1991) Dual coding theory: retrospect and current status. Can J Exp Psychol 45(3):255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perani D, Cappa SF, Schnur T, Tettamanti M, Collina S, Rosa MM, Fazio F (1999) The neural correlates of verb and noun processing. A PET study. Brain 122(12):2337–2344

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Price CJ (2000) The anatomy of language: contributions from functional neuroimaging. J Anat 197(3):335–359

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson DC, Spivey MJ, Edelman S, Naples AD (2001) Language is spatial: experimental evidence for image schemas of concrete and abstract verbs. In: Proceedings of the twenty-third annual meeting of the cognitive science society. pp 873–878

  • Rüschemeyer SA, Brass M, Friederici AD (2007) Comprehending prehending: neural correlates of processing verbs with motor stems. J Cogn Neurosci 19(5):855–865

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sabsevitz DS, Medler DA, Seidenberg M, Binder JR (2005) Modulation of the semantic system by word imageability. Neuroimage 27(1):188–200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schwanenflugel PJ (1991) Why are abstract concepts hard to understand? Psychol Word Mean 11:223–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwanenflugel PJ, Akin CE (1994) Developmental trends in lexical decisions for abstract and concrete words. Read Res Q 251–264

  • Schwanenflugel PJ, Noyes CR (1996) Context availability and the development of word reading skill. J Lit Res 28(1):35–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwanenflugel PJ, Shoben EJ (1983) Differential context effects in the comprehension of abstract and concrete verbal materials. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 9(1):82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwanenflugel PJ, Stowe RW (1989) Context availability and the processing of abstract and concrete words in sentences. Read Res Q 114–126

  • Schwanenflugel PJ, Harnishfeger KK, Stowe RW (1988) Context availability and lexical decisions for abstract and concrete words. J Mem Lang 27(5):499–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwanenflugel PJ, Akin C, Luh WM (1992) Context availability and the recall of abstract and concrete words. Mem Cogn 20(1):96–104

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tagamets MA, Novick JM, Chalmers ML, Friedman RB (2000) A parametric approach to orthographic processing in the brain: an fMRI study. J Cogn Neurosci 12(2):281–297

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tsapkini K, Rapp B (2010) The orthography-specific functions of the left fusiform gyrus: evidence of modality and category specificity. Cortex 46(2):185–205

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Conder JA, Blitzer DN, Shinkareva SV (2010) Neural representation of abstract and concrete concepts: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Hum Brain Mapp 31(10):1459–1468

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • West WC, Holcomb PJ (2000) Imaginal, semantic, and surface-level processing of concrete and abstract words: an electrophysiological investigation. J Cogn Neurosci 12(6):1024–1037

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wiemer-Hastings K, Krug J, Xu X (2001) Imagery, context availability, contextual constraint, and abstractness. In: Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference of the cognitive science society. pp 1134–1139

  • Wise RJ, Howard D, Mummery CJ, Fletcher P, Leff A, Büchel C, Scott SK (2000) Noun imageability and the temporal lobes. Neuropsychologia 38(7):985–994

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Uttam Kumar.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Michael Spivey.

Reviewers: Kurt Stocker, and an anonymous reviewer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, U. Neural dichotomy of word concreteness: a view from functional neuroimaging. Cogn Process 17, 39–48 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-015-0738-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-015-0738-1

Keywords

Navigation