Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Hybrid models based on biological approaches for speech recognition

  • Published:
Artificial Intelligence Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper aims to adapt the Clonal Selection Algorithm (CSA) which is usually used to explain the basic features of artificial immune systems to the learning of Neural Networks, instead of Back Propagation. The CSA was first applied to a real world problem (IRIS database) then compared with an artificial immune network. CSA performance was contrasted with other versions of genetic algorithms such as: Differential Evolution (DE), Multiple Populations Genetic Algorithms (MPGA). The tested application in the simulation studies were IRIS (vegetal database) and TIMIT (phonetic database). The results obtained show that DE convergence speeds were faster than the ones of multiple population genetic algorithm and genetic algorithms, therefore DE algorithm seems to be a promising approach to engineering optimization problems. On the other hand, CSA demonstrated good performance at the level of pattern recognition, since the recognition rate was equal to 99.11% for IRIS database and 76.11% for TIMIT. Finally, the MPGA succeeded in generalizing all phonetic classes in a homogeneous way: 60% for the vowels and 63% for the fricatives, 68% for the plosives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bishop M. (1995) Neural networks for pattern recognition 1. Oxford University Press Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta D (1998) Artificial immune systems and their applications. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta D, Ji Z, Gonzalez F (2003) Artificial immune system (AIS) research in the last five years. Congr Evol Comput 1: 123–130

    Google Scholar 

  • De Castro LN, Von Zuben FJ (2000) The clonal selection algorithm with engineering applications. In: Workshop Proceedings of GECCO, pp 36–47

  • De Castro LN, Von Zuben FJ (2002) Learning and optimization using the clonal selection principle. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6(3): 239–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decastro LN, Timmis J (2002) Artificial immune systems : a new computational intelligence. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Decastro LN, Von Zuben FJ (2001) Immune and neural network models: theoretical and empirical comparisons. Int J Comput Intell Appl(IJCIA) I 3: 239–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eiben AE, Smith JE (2003) Introduction to evolutionary computing. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Garofalo S, Lamel LF, Fisher WM, Fiscus J, GPallett DS, Dahlgren NL (1990) The DARPA TIMIT acoustic-phonetic continuous speech corpus CDR, NIST

  • Goldberg D (1989) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. Addison Wesley, Massachusetts

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Haykin S (1998) Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland JH (1998) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems, 5th edn. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishida Y (2004) Immunity based systems. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Jian PL, Balazs ME, Parks GT, Clarkson PJ (2002) A species conserving genetic algorithm for multimodal function optimization. Evol Comput 10(3): 207–234. doi:10.1162/106365602760234081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junejia A, Wilson CE (2002) Segmentation of continuous speech using acoustic phonetic parameters and statistical learning. In: Proceedings of 9th international conference on neural information processing, Singapore, 2002, vol 2, pp 726–730

  • Karaboga D, Akay B (2009) A comparative study of artificial bee colony algorithm. Appl Math Comput 214(1): 108–132. doi:10.1016/j.amc.2009.03.090

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Karaboga D, Okdem S (2004) A simple and global optimization algorithm for engineering problems: differential evolution algorithm. TUBITAK 12(1): 53–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampinen J, Zelinka Y (2000) On stagnation of the differential evolution algorithm. In: Proceedings of MENDEL Conferens, pp 76–83

  • Linde Y, Buzo A, Gray RM (1980) An algorithm for vector quantizer design. IEEE Trans Comput 28(1): 84–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lydyard PM, Whelan A, Fanger MW (2000) Instant notes in immunology. BIOS, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesbahi L, Benyettou A (2005) A new look to adaptive temporal radial function basis function applied in speech recognition. J Comput Sci 01(1): 1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neggaz N (2006) Apprentissage des réseaux de neurones par les algorithmes évolutionnaires appliquéà la classification phonétique, thesis, Deparment of Computer Science. USTO University os Oran, Algeria

  • Neggaz N, Tlemsani R, Benyettou A (2004) Evolutionary algorithms based neural networks training for phonetic classification. ACIT04, Algeria :1000–1006

  • Price KV, Storn RM, Lampinen JA (2005) Differential evolution : a practical approach to global optimization. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Seiffert U (2001) Multiple layer perceptrons training using genetic algorithm. Adelaide knowledge-based intelligent engineering systems center (KES), ESANN’01, Australia, pp 159–164

  • Sivanandam SN, Deepa SN (2007) Introduction to genetic algorithms. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Storn R, Price K (1997) Differential evolution a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. J Global Optim 11: 341–359

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yao X (1999) Evolving artificial neural networks. IEEE Trans 87(9): 1423–1447

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nabil Neggaz.

Additional information

This work was supported by SIMPA laboratory.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Neggaz, N., Benyettou, A. Hybrid models based on biological approaches for speech recognition. Artif Intell Rev 32, 45–57 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-009-9132-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-009-9132-7

Keywords

Navigation