Skip to main content
Log in

Leaf constrained minimal spanning trees solved by modified quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization

  • Published:
Artificial Intelligence Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Given an undirected, connected, weighted graph, the leaf-constrained minimum spanning tree (LCMST) problem seeks a spanning tree of minimum weight among all the spanning trees of the graph with at least l leaves. In this paper, we have proposed an approach based on Quantum-Behaved Particle Swarm Optimization (QPSO) for the LCMST problem. Particle swarm optimization (PSO) is a well-known population-based swarm intelligence algorithm. Quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization (QPSO) is also proposed by combining the classical PSO philosophy and quantum mechanics to improve performance of PSO. In this paper QPSO has been modified by adding a leaping behavior. When the modified QPSO (MQPSO), falls in to the local optimum, MPSO runs a leaping behavior to leap out the local optimum. We have compared the performance of the proposed method with ML, SCGA, ACO-LCMST, TS-LCMST and ABC-LCMST, which are reported in the literature. Computational results demonstrate the superiority of the MQPSO approach over all the other approaches. The MQPSO approach obtained better quality solutions in shorter time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achuthan NR, Caccetta L, Caccetta PA, Geelan JF (1994) Computational methods for the diameter restricted minimum weight spanning tree problem. Australasian J Combinat 10: 51–71

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Borůvka O (1926) Pr̆ıspĕvek k r̆es̆enı otázky ekonomické stavby elektrovodnıch sıtı. Elektronický obzor 15: 153–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Deo N, Micikevicius P (1999) A heuristic for the leaf-constrained minimum spanning tree problem. Congressus Numer 141: 61–72

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Deo N, Abdalla A (2000) Computing a diameter-constrained minimum spanning tree in parallel. In: Bongiovanni G, Gambosi G, Petreschi R (eds) Algorithms and complexity, LNCS vol. 1767. Springer, Berlin, pp 17–31

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Edelson W, Gargano ML (2002) Leaf-constrained minimal spanning trees solved by a genetic algorithm. Congres Numer 157: 41–48

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Even R (1973) Algorithmic combinatorics. Macmillan, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hoelting CJ, Schoenefeld DA, Wainwright RL (1995) Approximation techniques for variations of the p-median problem. In: Proceedings of the 1995 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing. ACM Press, pp. 293–299

  • Julstrom BA (2004a) Codings and operators in two genetic algorithms for the leaf constrained minimum spanning tree problem. Int J Appl Math Comput Sci 14: 385–396

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Julstrom BA (2004) Better greedy heuristics for the leaf-constrained minimum spanning tree problem in complete graphs. Commun Discrete Appl Math 20: 213–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Julstrom BA, Raidl GR (2003) Greedy heuristics and an evolutionary algorithm for the bounded-diameter minimum spanning tree problem. Proc ACM Symp Applied Computing. ACM Press, New York, pp 747–752

  • Kennedy J, Eberhart RC (1995) Particle Swarm Optimization. Proceedings of IEEE 1995 International Conference on Neural Network, IV. Piscataway, 1942–1948

  • Knowles J, Corne D (2000) A new evolutionary approach to the degree constrained minimum spanning tree problem. IEEE Trans Evolut Comput 4(2): 125–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal JB (1956) On the shortest spanning subtree of a graph and the traveling salesman problem. Proc Amer Math Soc 7(1): 48–50

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Narula G, Ho CA (1989) Degree-constrained minimum spanning trees. Comput Oper Res 7(4): 39–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Nešetřil J, Milková E, Nešetřilová H (2001) Otakar Borůvka on minimum spanning tree problem. Translation of both the 1926 papers, comments, history. Discr Math 233(1-3): 3–36

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Picciotto S (1999) How to encode a tree. Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, San Diego

  • Raidl GR (2000) An efficient evolutionary algorithm for the degree-constrained minimum spanning tree problem. Proc Congress Evolutionary Computation CEC00. IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, pp 104–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh A (2008) An artificial bee colony algorithm for the leaf-constrained minimum spanning tree problem. Appl Soft Comput 31: 327–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh A, Baghel AS (2008) New metaheuristic approaches for the leaf-constrained minimum spanning tree problem. Asia-Pacific J Operat Res 25: 575–589

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sun J et al. (2004) Particle swarm optimization with particles having quantum behavior. Proc.of Congress on Evolutionary Computation pp. 325–331

  • Sun J et al. (2004) A global search strategy of quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization. Proc. IEEE Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent Systems, pp. 111–116

  • Sun J, Xu W, Liu J (2005) Parameter selection of quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization. Proc Adv Nat Comput Lect Notes Comput Sci 3612: 543–552

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bergh F (2001) An analysis of particle swarm optimizers. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Pretoria

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saeed Farzi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Farzi, S., Dastjerdi, A.B. Leaf constrained minimal spanning trees solved by modified quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization. Artif Intell Rev 34, 1–17 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-010-9158-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-010-9158-x

Keywords

Navigation