Skip to main content
Log in

Performance evaluation of weights selection schemes for linear combination of multiple forecasts

  • Published:
Artificial Intelligence Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Time series modeling and forecasting are essential in many domains of science and engineering. Extensive works in literature suggest that combining outputs of different forecasting methods substantially increases the overall accuracies as well as reduces the risk of model selection. The most popular method of forecasts combination is the weighted averaging of the constituent forecasts. The effectiveness of this method solely depends on appropriate selection of the combining weights. In this paper, we comprehensively evaluate a wide variety of benchmark weights selection techniques for linear combination of multiple forecasts in terms of their prediction accuracies. Nine real-world time series from different domains and five individual forecasting methods are used in our empirical work. A robust scheme is also suggested for fairly ranking the combination methods on the basis of their forecasting performances. Our study precisely demonstrates the relative strengths and weaknesses of various benchmark linear combination techniques which evidently can be of much practical importance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aksu C, Gunter S (1992) An empirical analysis of the accuracy of SA, OLS, ERLS and NRLS combination forecasts. Int J Forecast 8(1): 27–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrawis RR, Atiya AF, El-Shishiny H (2011) Forecast combinations of computational intelligence and linear models for the NN5 time series forecasting competition. Int J Forecast 27(3): 672–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong JS (2001) Principles of forecasting: a handbook for researchers and practitioners. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, USA

  • Bates JM, Granger CWJ (1969) Combination of forecasts. Oper Res Q 20(4): 451–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Box GEP, Jenkins GM (1970) Time series analysis, forecasting and control, 3rd edn. Holden-Day, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunn D (1975) A Bayesian approach to the linear combination of forecasts. Oper Res Q 26(2): 325–329

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chan CK, Kingsman BG, Wong H (2004) Determining when to update the weights in combined forecasts for product demand—an application of the CUSUM technique. Eur J Oper Res 153(3): 757–768

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chapelle O (2002) Support vector machines: introduction principles, adaptive tuning and prior knowledge. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Paris, France

  • Clemen RT (1989) Combining forecasts: a review and annotated bibliography. J Forecast 5(4): 559–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Gooijer JG, Hyndman RJ (2006) 25 years of time series forecasting. J Forecast 22(3): 443–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Menezes LM, Bunn DW, Taylor JW (2000) Review of guidelines for the use of combined forecasts. Eur J Oper Res 120(1): 190–204

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Demuth H, Beale M, Hagan M (2010) Neural network toolbox user’s guide. The MathWorks, Natic

    Google Scholar 

  • Frietas PSA, Rodrigues AJL (2006) Model combination in neural-based forecasting. Eur J Oper Res 173(3): 801–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamzaçebi C, Akay D, Kutay F (2009) Comparison of direct and iterative artificial neural network forecast approaches in multi-periodic time series forecasting. Expert Syst Appl 36(2): 3839–3844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurd HL (2012) A collection of MATLAB programs to do various time series tasks. http://www.stat.unc.edu/faculty/hurd.html . Accessed 12 Feb 2012

  • Hyndman RJ (2011) Time series data library (TSDL). http://robjhyndman.com/TSDL/

  • Jose VRR, Winkler RL (2008) Simple robust averages of forecasts: some empirical results. Int J Forecast 24(1): 163–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuncheva LI (2004) Combining pattern classifiers: methods and algorithms. Wiley, NJ

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lemke C, Gabrys B (2010) Meta-learning for time series forecasting and forecast combination. Neurocomputing 73: 2006–2016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim CP, Goh WY (2005) The application of an ensemble of boosted elman networks to time series prediction: a benchmark study. J Comput Intell 3(2): 119–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Makridakis S, Hibon M (2000) The M3 competition: results, conclusions and implications. Int J Forecast 16(4): 451–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makridakis S, Andersen A, Carbone R, Fildes R, Hibon M, Lewandowski R, Newton J, Parzen E, Winkler R (1982) The accuracy of extrapolation (time series) methods: results of a forecasting competition. J Forecast 1(2): 111–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newbold P, Granger CWJ (1974) Experience with forecasting univariate time series and the combination of forecasts (with discussion). J R Stat Soc A 137(2): 131–165

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Reidmiller M, Braun H (1993) A direct adaptive method for faster backpropagation learning: the rprop algorithm. In: IEEE international conference on neural networks (ICNN), San Francisco, USA, pp 586–591

  • Stock JH, Watson MW (2004) Combination forecasts of output growth in a seven-country data set. J Forecast 23(6): 405–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suykens JAK, Vandewalle J (1999) Least squares support vector machines classifiers. Neural Process Lett 9(3): 293–300

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Terui N, Van Dijk HK (2002) Combined forecasts from linear and nonlinear time series models. Int J Forecast 18(3): 421–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vapnik V (1995) The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Winkler RL, Makridakis S (1983a) The combination of forecasts. J R Stat Soc A 146(2): 150–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winkler RL, Makridakis S (1983b) Averages of forecasts: some empirical result. Manag Sci 29(9): 987–996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang GP (2003) Time series forecasting using a hybrid ARIMA and neural network model. Neurocomputing 50: 159–175

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang G, Patuwo BE, Hu MY (1998) Forecasting with artificial neural networks: the state of the art. Int J Forecast 14(1): 35–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zou H, Yang Y (2004) Combining time series models for forecasting. Int J Forecast 20(1): 69–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ratnadip Adhikari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Adhikari, R., Agrawal, R.K. Performance evaluation of weights selection schemes for linear combination of multiple forecasts. Artif Intell Rev 42, 529–548 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-012-9361-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-012-9361-z

Keywords

Navigation