Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

On the application of rough sets to skeletal maturation classification

Multicriteria classification models for the characterization of skeletal maturation using rough sets theory

  • Published:
Artificial Intelligence Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Assessment of skeletal maturation is important for the accurate diagnosis and medical treatment of many disorders and syndromes. However, determining skeletal maturation is not a trivial task, and requires professional medical training. The aim of this paper is to review the application of classification techniques to the problem of identifying the skeletal maturation stage of individuals, in order to provide the specialists a second opinion to backup or reject their assessments. A methodology based on Rough Sets is developed, which formulates skeletal maturation as a multicriteria classification problem, and generates classification rules employing data from lateral radiographs. Our methodology introduces the concept of transition maturity stages to obtain a finer classification on the data. Our empirical evaluation shows that the rules generated match the terms used by experts to determine maturation stage. Furthermore, our rough sets methodology produces the best results in our case of study, both in terms of coverage on the data and accuracy of the classification process, with respect to alternative classification approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Both datasets can be provided upon request, and will be made public at the web at: http://pisis.fime.uanl.mx/aire2015/data/

References

  • Absi EG (2002) Orthodontic radiographs guidelines (guidelines for the use of radiographs in clinical orthodontics): K g isaacson and a r thom (eds) british orthodontic society. J Orthod 29(3):237. doi:10.1093/ortho/29.3.237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aja-Fernández S, de Luis-García R, Martín-Fernández MA, Alberola-López C (2004) A computational TW3 classifier for skeletal maturity assessment. a computing with words approach. J Biomed Inform 37(2):99–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alkhal HA, Wong RWK, Rabie ABM (2008) Correlation between chronological age, cervical vertebral maturation and fishman’s skeletal maturity indicators in southern chinese. Angle Orthod 78(4):591–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr (2000) Mandibular growth as related to cervical vertebral maturation and body height. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 118(3):335–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr (2002) An improved version of the cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of mandibular growth. Angle Orthod 72(4):316–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr (2005) The cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of optimal treatment timing in dentofacial orthopedics. Semin Orthod 11(3):119–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazan JG, Szczuka MS, Wroblewski J (2002) A new version of rough set exploration system. In: Proceedings of the third international conference on rough sets and current trends in computing, Springer, TSCTC ’02, pp 397–404. http://logic.mimuw.edu.pl/~rses/start.html

  • Bernal N, Arias MI (2007) Indicadores de maduración esquelética y dental. Rev CES Odontol 20(1):59–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Black S, Aggrawal A, Payne-James J (eds) (2010) Age estimation in the living: the practitioner’s guide. Wiley, New York

  • Boechat MI, Lee DC (2007) Graphic representation of skeletal maturity determinations. Am J Roentgenol 189(4):873–874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvo PD (2006) Edad ósea en las vértebras cervicales en población de 9 a 16 años con oclusión normal. Tesis doctoral para optar por el grado de especialista en 1er grado en ortodoncia, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Matanzas, Cuba

  • Castro Lara AL (2004) Una propuesta de horizontal verdadera: Estudio preliminar. Rev Cuba Estomatol 41(1):0-0

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatzigianni A, Halazonetis DJ (2009) Editor’s summary and q&a: geometric morphometric evaluation of cervical vertebrae shape and its relationship to skeletal maturation. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 136(4):481–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen L, Liu J, Xu T, Long X, Lin J (2010) Quantitative skeletal evaluation based on cervical vertebral maturation: a longitudinal study of adolescents with normal occlusion. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 39(7):653–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dembczyński K, Greco S, Słowiński R (2009) Rough set approach to multiple criteria classification with imprecise evaluations and assignments. Eur J Op Res 198(2):626–636

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer B, Brosig A, Welter P, Grouls C, Günther RW, Deserno TM (2010) Content-based image retrieval applied to bone age assessment. Proc SPIE 7624:762412. doi:10.1117/12.844392

  • Gandini P, Mancini M, Andreani F (2006) A comparison of hand-wrist bone and cervical vertebral analyses in measuring skeletal maturation. Angle Orthod 76(6):984–989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giordano D, Spampinato C, Scarciofalo G, Leonardi R (2009) Automatic skeletal bone age assessment by integrating emroi and croi processing. In: IEEE international workshop on medical measurements and applications. MeMeA 2009, pp 141–145

  • Greco S, Matarazzo B, Slowinski R (2001) Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis. Eur J Op Res 129(1):1–47

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Greulich W, Pyle S (1999) Radiographic atlas of skeletal development of the hand and wrist, 2nd edn. Stanford University Press, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Guglielmi G, Diacinti D, van Kuijk C, Aparisi F, Krestan C, Adams JE, Link TM (2008) Vertebral morphometry: current methods and recent advances. Eur Radiol 18(7):1484–1496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassel B, Farman A (1995) Skeletal maturation evaluation using cervical vertebrae. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 107(1):58–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao TH, Tsai SM, Chou ST, Pan JY, Tseng YC, Chang HP, Chen HS (2010) Sex determination using discriminant function analysis in children and adolescents: a lateral cephalometric study. Int J Legal Med 124(2):155–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh CW, Jong TL, Chang CH, Tiu CM (2008) Method of automatically assessing skeletal age of hand radiographs. Patent US20050196031 A1

  • Hsieh CW, Jong TL, Tiu CM (2007) Bone age estimation based on phalanx information with fuzzy constrain of carpals. Med Biol Eng Comput 45(3):283–295. doi:10.1007/s11517-006-0155-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamal M, Ragini, Goyal S (2006) Comparative evaluation of hand wrist radiographs with cervical vertebrae for skeletal maturation in 10–12 years old children. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 24(3):127–135. doi:10.4103/0970-4388.27901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamparski DG (1975) Skeletal age assessment utilizing cervical vertebrae. Am J Orthod 67(4):458–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Liao X, Zhao W (2009) A rough set approach to knowledge discovery in analyzing competitive advantages of firms. Ann Op Res 168(1):205–223. doi:10.1007/s10479-008-0399-x

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Liliequist B, Lundberg M (1971) Skeletal and tooth development: a methodologic investigation. Acta Radiol Diagn 11(2):97–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z, Chen J, Liu J, Yang L (2007) Automatic bone age assessment based on pso. In: The 1st international conference on bioinformatics and biomedical engineering, 2007. ICBBE 2007, pp 445–447. doi:10.1109/ICBBE.2007.117

  • Mahalanobis PC (1936) On the generalised distance in statistics. Proc Natl Inst Sci India 2:49–55

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Martin DD, Neuhof J, Jenni OG, Ranke MB, Thodbergh HH (2010) Automatic determination of left- and right-hand bone age in the first zurich longitudinal study. Horm Res Pedriatics 74(1):50–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nie NH (1975) SPSS: statistical package for the social sciences, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemeijer M, van Ginneken B, Maas CA, Beek FJA, Viergever MA (2003) Assessing the skeletal age from a hand radiograph: automating the Tanner-Whitehouse method. Proc SPIE 5032:1197–1205. doi:10.1117/12.480163

  • Özer T, Kama JD, Özer SY (2006) A practical method for determining pubertal growth spurt. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 130(2):131.e1–131.e6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.019

  • Padros E, Creus M (2002) Revisión de los métodos para estudiar el crecimiento craneofacial en ortodoncia. Ortod Clín 5(2):100–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak Z (1992) Rough sets: theoretical aspects of reasoning about data. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pietka E, Pospiech-Kurkowska S, Gertych A, Cao F (2003) Integration of computer assisted bone age assessment with clinical pacs. Comput Med Imaging Gr 27(2–3):217–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polizio Terçarolli S (2004) http://es.scribd.com/doc/17583100/Skeletal-and-Vertebral-Age-A-Literature-Review

  • Prado Llanes LM (2009) Clasificación multicriterio aplicada a la caracterización de la maduración Ósea en niños y adolescentes con oclusión normal y edades entre 9 y 16 años. Tesis de maestría para optar por el grado de maestro en ciencias con especialidad en ingeniería de sistemas, Facultad de Ingenierí Mecánica y Eléctrica, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, México

  • Prieto DMI (2012) Maduración cervical en niños y adolescentes de 9 a 16 años. Tesis doctoral, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas. Universidad de Ciencias Médicas, Matanzas

    Google Scholar 

  • RESEARCH R (2013) Data mining tools see5. http://www.rulequest.com/see5-info.html

  • San Román P, Palma JC, Oteo MD, Nevado E (2002) Skeletal maturation determined by cervical vertebrae development. Eur J Orthod 24(3):303–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith RJ (1980) Misuse of hand-wrist radiographs. Am J Orthod 77(1):75–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanner JM, Whitehouse RH, Cameron N, Marshall WA, Healy MJR (1983) Assessment of skeletal maturity and prediction of adult height (TW2 Method), 2nd edn. Academic Press, Waltham

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner JM, Healy MJR, Goldstein H, Cameron N (2001) Assessment of skeletal maturity and prediction of adult height (TW3) Method, 3rd edn. Saunders Ltd, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsumoto S (2002) Accuracy and coverage in rough set rule induction. In: Alpigini J, Peters J, Skowron A, Zhong N (eds) Rough sets and current trends in computing, lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 373–380

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • van Rijn RR, Lequin MH, Thodberg HH (2009) Automatic determination of greulich and pyle bone age in healthy dutch children. Pediatric Radiol 39(6):591–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong RWK, Alkhal HA, Rabie ABM (2009) Use of cervical vertebral maturation to determine skeletal age. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 136(4):484.e1–484.e6

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadik Z, Rehovot MD (2009) Age and bone age determinations: inaccurate methods at their best. J Pediatric Endocrinol Metab 22(6):479–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zamora G, Sari-Sarraf H, Long LR (2003) Hierarchical segmentation of vertebrae from X-ray images. Proc SPIE 5032:631–642. doi:10.1117/12.481400

  • Zaror Quintana R, Paniagua Bravo H (2008) Skeletal maturation determination by cervical vertebral assessment method and its relationship with dentoskeletal class ii treatment opportunity. Int J Odontostomatol 2(1):27–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang A, Gertych A, Liu BJ (2007) Automatic bone age assessment for young children from newborn to 7-year-old using carpal bones. Comput Med Imaging Gr 31(4–5):299–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang A, Sayre JW, Vachon L, Liu BJ, Huang H (2009) Racial differences in growth patterns of children assessed on the basis of bone age. Radiology 250(1):228–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank M. D. Isabel Martínez Brito for providing the expert classification of our data samples, and for her many valuable comments on the drafts of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Romeo Sanchez.

Additional information

Author names are listed alphabetically.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Garza-Morales, R., López-Irarragori, F. & Sanchez, R. On the application of rough sets to skeletal maturation classification. Artif Intell Rev 45, 489–508 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-015-9450-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-015-9450-x

Keywords

Navigation