Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Pupil size variation in primary facial expressions–testing potential biomarker of self-criticism

  • Published:
Artificial Intelligence Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is no previous research exploring the relationship between self-criticism and pupillary reactivity. Biomarkers such as pupillary reactivity inform about the quantity of the information being processed. Potentially, they can improve predictions of self-criticism levels and identification of pathological levels of self-criticism. The goal of our study is to test whether changes in pupil size act as predictors of self-criticism in participants viewing facial emotional stimuli. This is a first study that includes all basic emotions, and allows detailed analyses of pupillary reactivity predictors. Our results show that the pathological form of self-criticism, which is Hated Self in The Forms of Self-Criticizing/Attacking and Self-Reassuring Scale (FSCRS), was significantly predicted by enlarged pupils in the presence of Anger and Disgust and by narrowed pupils in the presence of Happiness. Greater information gain for Disgust predicted higher score in Inadequate Self and Hated Self measures and lower score for Reassuring Self. The greater information gain for Anger predicted higher score in Inadequate Self and Hated Self measures, but not lower score for Reassuring Self. Pupillary reactivity seems to be a promising biomarker in diagnosing the level of self-criticism and self-reassurance by different pupilar reactions to facial emotion expression especially for Disgust. Greater information gain for Disgust predicts higher score in Inadequate Self and Hated Self measures and lower score for Reassuring Self. In the future, this finding could help create a screening tool for diagnosing pathologically self-critical people without having to rely on self-reporting instruments, which are prone to numerous biases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andric S, Maric NP, Knezevic G, Mihaljevic M, Mirjanic T, Velthorst E, van Os J (2016) Neuroticism and facial emotion recognition in healthy adults. Early Interv Psychiatry 10(2):160–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.12212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azzalini A, Capitanio A (2003) Distributions generated by perturbation of symmetry with emphasis on a multivariate skew t-distribution. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 65:367–389

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Baião R, Gilbert P, McEwan K, Carvalho S (2015) Forms of self-criticising/ attacking & self-reassuring scale: psychometric properties and normative study. Psychol Psychother 88(4):438–452. https://doi.org/10.1111/papt.12049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner F, Ferencová M (2000) Prežívanie depresie vo vzťahu k dispozičným charakteristikám. In: Blatny M, Svoboda M, Výrost J (eds) Sociální procesy a osobnost. Masarykova Univerzita, Brno, pp 12–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatty J (1982) Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources. Psychol Bull 91:276–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein EE, Heeren A, McNally RJ (2019) Reexamining trait rumination as a system of repetitive negative thoughts: a network analysis. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 63:21–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2018.12.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein EE, Heeren A, McNally RJ (2017) Unpacking rumination and executive control: a network perspective. Clinical Psychological Science 5(5):816–826. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702617702717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bielikova M, Konopka M, Simko J, Moro R, Tvarozek J, Hlavac P, Kuric E (2018) Eye-tracking en masse: Group user studies, lab infrastructure, and practices. Journal of Eye Movement Research. https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.11.3.6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blatt SJ, Homann E (1992) Parent-child interaction in the etiology of dependent and self-critical depression. Clin Psychol Rev 12(1):47–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blatt SJ, Zuroff DC (1992) Interpersonal relatedness and self-definition: two prototypes for depression. Clin Psychol Rev 12:527–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boettcher J, Leek L, Matson L, Holmes EA, Browning M et al (2013) Internet-based attention bias modification for social anxiety: a randomised controlled comparison of training towards negative and training towards positive cues. PLoS ONE 8(9):34. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braehler C, Gumley A, Harper J, Wallace S, Norrie J, Gilbert P (2013) Exploring change processes in compassion focused therapy in psychosis: Results of a feasibility randomized controlled trial. Br J Clin Psychol 52:199–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkhouse KL, Gibb BE, Siegle GJ (2014) Pupillary reactivity to emotional stimuli in children of depressed and anxious mothers. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 55:1009–1016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkhouse KL, Owens M, Feurer C, Sosoo E, Kudinova A, Gibb BE (2017) Increased neural and pupillary reactivity to emotional faces in adolescents with current and remitted major depressive disorder. Soc Cognit Affective Neurosci 12(5):783–792. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsw184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campos RC, Besser A, Blatt SJ (2010) The mediating role of self-criticism and dependency in the association between perceptions of maternal caring and depressive symptoms. Depress Anxiety 27(12):1149–1157. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.20763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carton JS, Kessler EA, Pape CL (1999) Nonverbal decoding skills and relationship well-being in adults. J Nonverbal Behav 23:91–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castilho P, Pinto-Gouveia J, Duarte J (2015) Exploring self-criticism: confirmatory factor analysis of the FSCRS in clinical and nonclinical samples. Clin Psychol Psychother 22:153–164. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.1881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaplin TM, Aldao A (2013) Gender differences in emotion expression in children: A meta-analytic review. Psychol Bull 139(4):735–765. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooley EL, Nowicki S (1989) Discrimination of facial expressions of emotion by depressed subjects. Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr 115:449–465

    Google Scholar 

  • Delignette-Muller ML, Dutang C (2015) fitdistrplus: an r package for fitting distributions. J Stat Softw 64(4):1–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duque A, Sanchez A, Vazquez C (2014) Gaze-fixation and pupil dilation in the processing of emotional faces: the role of rumination. Cogn Emot 28(8):1347–1366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebner NC, Johnson MK (2009) Young and older emotional faces: are there age group differences in expression identification and memory? Emotion 9(3):329–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehret AM, Joormann J, Berking M (2015) Examining risk and resilience factors for depression: The role of self-criticism and self-compassion. Cogn Emot 29(8):1496–1504. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2014.992394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer AH, Rodriguez Mosquera PM, van Vianen AE, Manstead AS (2004) Gender and culture differences in emotion. Emotion 1:87–94. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.4.1.87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavas, R., Chatterjee, D., & Sinha, A. (2017). Estimation of cognitive load based on the pupil size dilation. IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), 5(8): 1499–1504.

  • Gilbert P (2014) The origins and nature of compassion focused therapy. Br J Clin Psychol 53(1):6–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert P, Clark M, Hempel S, Miles JNV, Irons C (2004) Criticising and reassuring oneself: an exploration of forms, styles and reasons in female students. Br J Clin Psychol 43:31–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert P, Baldwin MW, Irons C, Baccus JR, Palmer M (2006) Self-criticism and self-warmth: Animagery study exploringtheirrelation to depression. J Cognitive Psychother 20(2):183–200. https://doi.org/10.1891/088983906780639817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granholm E, Asarnow RF, Sarkin AJ, Dykes KL (1996) Pupillary responses index cognitive resource limitations. Psychophysiology 33:457–461. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1996.tb01071.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granholm E, Verney SP (2004) Pupillary responses and attentional allocation problems on the backward masking task in schizophrenia. Int J Psychophysiol 52(1):37–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2003.12.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green P, MacLeod CJ (2016) simr: an R package for power analysis of generalised linear mixed models by simulation. Methods Ecol Evol 7(4):493–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg LS, Watson JC, Goldman R (1998) Process-experiential therapy of depression. In LS Greenberg, JC Watson, G Lietaer(Eds.), Handbook of experiential psychotherapy. New York, NY: Guilford Press, 227–248

  • Gross JJ, Muñoz RF (1995) Emotion regulation and mental health. Clin Psychol Sci Pract 2(2):151–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosso R, Bossi F, Ricciardelli P (2015) Emotion recognition through static faces and moving bodies: a comparison between typically developed adults and individuals with high level of autistic traits. Front Psychol 6:1570. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halamová J, Kanovský M, Pacúchová M (2017) Robust psychometric analysis and factor structure of the forms of self–criticizing/attacking and self–reassuring scale. Československá Psychologie 61(4):331–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Halamová J, Kanovský M, Gilbert P, Troop N, Zuroff D, Hermanto N, Petrocchi N, Sommers-Spijkerman M, Kirby J, Shahar B, Krieger T, Matos M, Asano K, Yu F, Basran J, Kupeli N (2018) The factor structure of the forms of self-criticising/ attacking & self-reassuring scale in thirteen populations. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 40(4):736–751. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-018-9686-2

  • Hale WW (1998) Judgment of facial expressions and depression persistence. Psychiatry Res 80:265–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hankin BL, Gibb BE, Abela JRZ, Flory K (2010) Selective attention to affective stimuli and clinical depression among youths: Role of anxiety and specificity of emotion. J Abnorm Psychol 119:491–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrell FE (2001) Regression modeling strategies. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harrell, F. E. (2019). rms: regression modeling strategies. R package version 5.1–3.1. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rms.

  • Heinze G, Dunkler D (2017) Five myths about variable selection. Transpl Int 30:6–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson JM, Williams CC, Falk RJ (2005) Eye movements are functional during face learning. Mem Cognit 33:98–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hess EH (1965) Attitude and pupil size. Sci Am 212:46–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard GS (1980) Response-shift bias: a problem in evaluating interventions with pre/post self-reports. Eval Rev 41:93–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841x8000400105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber PJ (1981) Robust statistics. Wiley, New York, NY

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Joeng JR, Turner SL (2015) Mediators between self-criticism and depression: fear of compassion, self-compassion, and importance to others. J Couns Psychol 62(3):453–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joormann J, Gotlib IH (2006) Is this happiness I see? Biases in the identification of emotional facial expressions in depression and social phobia. J Abnorm Psychol 115:705–714. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.115.4.705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joormann J, Dkane M, Gotlib IH (2006) Adaptive and maladaptive components of rumination? Diagnostic specificity and relation to depressive biases. Behav Ther 37(3):269–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kret ME, Sjak-Shie EE (2019) Preprocessing pupil size data: Guidelines and code. Behav Res Methods 51:1336–1342. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1075-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerman SF, Shahar G, Rudich Z (2012) Self-criticism interacts with the affective component of pain to predict depressive symptoms in female patients. European J Pain (london, England) 16(1):115–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpain.2011.05.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locantore N, Marron JS, Simpson DG, Tripoli N, Zhang JT (1999) Robust principal components for functional data. TEST 8:1–28

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Loewenfeld IE, Lowenstein O (1993) The pupil: anatomy, physiology, and clinical applications. Iowa State University Press, Ames and Wayne State University Press, Detroit

    Google Scholar 

  • Maronna RA (2005) Principal components and orthogonal regression based on robust scales. Technometrics 47:264–273

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews A, MacLeod C (2005) Cognitive vulnerability to emotional disorders. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 1(1):167–195. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.143916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathôt S, Fabius J, Van Heusden E et al (2018) Safe and sensible preprocessing and baseline correction of pupil-size data. Behav Res Methods 50:94–106. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-1007-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McEwan K, Gilbert P, Dandeneau S, Lipka S, Maratos F, Paterson KB, Baldwin M (2014) The processing of compassionate and critical facial expressions. PLoS ONE 9(2):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meares R, Gerull F, Stevenson J, Korner A (2011) Is self disturbance the core of borderline personality disorder? An outcome study of borderline personality factors. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 45:214–222. https://doi.org/10.3109/00048674.2010.551280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGinley MJ, Vinck M, Reimer J, Batista-Brito R, Zagha E, Cadwell CR, Tolias AS, Cardin JA, McCormick DA (2015) Waking state: rapid variations modulate neural and behavioral responses. Neuron 87:1143–1161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor RC, Noyce R (2008) Personality and cognitive processes: Self-criticism and different types of rumination as predictors of suicidal ideation. Behav Res Ther 46:392–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2008.01.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partala T, Surakka V (2003) Pupil size variation as an indication of affective processing. Int J Hum Comput Stud 59:185–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peckham AD, McHugh RK, Otto MW (2010) A meta-analysis of the magnitude of biased attention in depression. Depress Anxiety 27:1135–1142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plant EA, Hyde JS, Keltner D, Devine PG (2000) The gender stereotyping of emotions. Psychol Women Quart 24: 1–92

  • Price RB, Siegle GJ, Silk JS, Ladouceur C, McFarland A, Dahl RE, Ryan ND (2013) Sustained neural alterations in anxious youth performing an attentional bias task: A pupilometry study. Depress Anxiety 30:22–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/.

  • Reimer J, Froudarakis E, Cadwell CR, Yatsenko D, Denfield GH, Tolias AS (2014) Pupil fluctuations track fast switching of cortical states during quiet wakefulness. Neuron 84:355–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2014.09.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rigby RA, Stasinopoulos DM (2005) Generalized additive models for location, scale and shape. J Royal Statist Soc Series C (applied Statistics) 54(3):507–554

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenman R, Tennekoon V, Hill LG (2011) Measuring bias in self-reported data. Int J Behav Healthcare Res 2(4):320–332. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBHR.2011.043414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozin P, Haidt J, McCauley CR (2008) Disgust. In: Lewis M, Haviland-Jones JM, Barrett LF (eds) Handbook of emotions. Guilford Press, New York, NY, pp 757–776

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelsson H, Jarnvik K, Henningsson H, Andersson J, Carlbring P (2012) The umeå university database of facial expressions: a validation study. J Med Internet Res 14(5):136. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sears C, Newman K, Ference J, Thomas C (2011) Attention to emotional images in previously depressed individuals: an eye-tracking study. Cogn Ther Res 35:517–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-011-9396-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahar G (2015) Erosion: The Psyhopathology of Self-Criticism. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shields S (2002) Speaking from the Heart: Gender and the social meaning of emotion. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegle GJ, Granholm E, Ingram RE, Matt GE (2001) Pupillary and reaction time measures of sustained processing of negative information in depression. Biol Psychiat 49(7):624–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stasinopoulos DM, Rigby RA (2007) Generalized additive models for location scale and shape (GAMLSS) in R. J Stat Softw 23(7):1–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statisticat, LLC. (2020). laplacesdemon: complete environment for bayesian inference. Bayesian-Inference.com. R package version 16.1.4. [https://web.archive.org/web/20150206004624/http://www.bayesian-inference.com/software]

  • Steidtmann D, Ingram RE, Siegle GJ (2010) Pupil response to negative emotional information in individuals at-risk for depression. Cogn Emot 23:480–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strnádelová B, Halamová J, Kanovský M (2019) Identification of primary facial emotions in relation to level of self-criticism. Perception 31:948–967. https://doi.org/10.1177/0301006619870399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stute W, Gonzalez Manteiga WG, Presedo Quindimil MP (1998) Bootstrap approximations in model checks for regression. J Am Stat Assoc 93:141–149

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Todorov W, Filzmoser P (2009) An object-oriented framework for robust multivariate analysis. J Stat Softw 32(3):1–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trompetter HR, Kleine E, de Bohlmeijer ET (2017) Why does positive mental health buffer against psychopathology? An exploratory study on self-compassion as a resilience mechanism and adaptive emotion regulation strategy. Cogn Ther Res 41:459–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-016-9774-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson JC, Greenberg LS (1996) Pathways to change in the psychotherapy of depression: Relating process to session change and outcome. Psychother Theory Res Pract Training, 33(2): 262-274.

  • Werner KH, Jazaieri H, Goldin PR, Ziv M, Heimberg RG, Gross JJ (2012) Self-compassion and social anxiety disorder. Anxiety Stress Coping 25(5):543–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2011.608842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox RR (2006) 2012. Elsevier, Introduction to Robust Estimation and Hypothesis Testing. Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox RR, Keselman HJ (2006) Detecting heteroscedasticity in a simple regression model via quantile regression slopes. J Statist Comput Simulation 76:705–712

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zagermann J, Pfeil U, Reiterer H (2016) Measuring cognitive load using eye tracking technology in visual computing. Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors on Novel Evaluation Methods for Visualization, BELIV ́16, 78–85.

  • Zénon A. (2019). Eye pupil signals information gain. Proceedings of the Royal Society. Biological sciences, 286(1911): 20191593. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.1593

  • Zhang H, Watson-Singleton NN, Pollard SE, Pittman DM, Lamis DA, Fischer NL, Patterson B, Kaslow NJ (2019) Self-criticism and depressive symptoms: mediating role of self-compassion. Omega 80(2):202–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/0030222817729609

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Slovak Research and Development Agency under the Contract no. PP-COVID-20–0074. Writing this work was supported by the Vedecká grantová agentúra VEGA under Grant VEGA 1/0075/19 and VEGA 1/0725/19.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Social Anthropology, Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences, Comenius University in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia

    Martin Kanovský

  2. Institute of Applied Psychology, Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences, Comenius University in Bratislava, Mlynské luhy 4, 821 05, Bratislava, Slovakia

    Júlia Halamová & Bronislava Strnádelová

  3. Kempelen Institute of Intelligent Technologies, Bratislava, Slovakia

    Robert Moro & Maria Bielikova

Authors
  1. Martin Kanovský
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Júlia Halamová
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bronislava Strnádelová
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Robert Moro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Maria Bielikova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Júlia Halamová.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interests.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Data availability

In order to comply with the ethics approvals of the study protocols, data cannot be made accessible through a public repository. However, data are available upon request for researchers, who consent to adhering to the ethical regulations for confidential data.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kanovský, M., Halamová, J., Strnádelová, B. et al. Pupil size variation in primary facial expressions–testing potential biomarker of self-criticism. Artif Intell Rev 55, 2001–2022 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-021-10057-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-021-10057-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation