Skip to main content
Log in

Coordination of a Supply Chain with One-Manufacturer and Two-Retailers Under Demand Promotion and Disruption Management Decisions

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Increasingly, customer service, rapid response to customer requirements, and flexibility to handle uncertainties in both demand and supply are becoming strategic differentiators in the marketplace. Organizations that want to achieve these benchmarks require sophisticated approaches to conduct order promising and fulfillment, especially in today’s high-mix low-volume production environment. Motivated by these challenges, the Available-to-Promise (ATP) function has migrated from a set of availability records in a Master Production Schedule (MPS) toward an advanced real-time decision support system to enhance decision responsiveness and quality in Assembly To Order (ATO) or Configuration To Order (CTO) environments. Advanced ATP models and systems must directly link customer orders with various forms of available resources, including both material and production capacity. In this paper, we describe a set of enhancements carried out to adapt previously published mixed-integer-programming (MIP) models to the specific requirements posed by an electronic product supply chain within Toshiba Corporation. This model can provide individual order delivery quantities and due dates, together with production schedules, for a batch of customer orders that arrive within a predefined batching interval. The model considers multi-resource availability including manufacturing orders, production capability and production capacity. In addition, the model also takes into account a variety of realistic order promising issues such as order splitting, model decomposition and resource expediting and de-expediting. We conclude this paper with comparison of our model execution results vs. actual historical performance of systems currently in place.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cachon, G.P. and M.A. Lariviere. (1999). “Capacity Choice and Allocation: Strategic Behavior and Supply Chain Performance.” Management Science 45(8), 1091–1108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cachon, G.P. (2002). “The Allocation of Inventory Risk and Advanced Purchase Discounts in a Supply Chain.” The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Working Paper.

  • Celikbas, M., J.G. Shanthikumar, and J.M. Swaminathan. (1999). “Coordinating Production Quantities and Demand Forecasts through Penalty Schemes.” IIE Transactions 31, 851–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, C.J. and G.A. DeCroix. (2001). “Shared-Savings Contracts for Indirect Materials in Supply Chains: Channel Profits and Environmental Impacts.” Management Science 47(7), 881–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, S., Y. Xia, and G. Yu. (2002). “Strategic Interactions Between Channel Structure and Control of Value-Added Services.” Red-McCombs School of Business, The University of Texas at Austin, Working Paper.

  • Iyer, G. (1998). “Coordinating Channels under Price and Non-price Competition.” Marketing Science 17(4), 338–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, M. and R. Porter. (1990). “Can Resale Price Maintenance Franchise Fees Correct Sub-optimal Levels of Retailer Service.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 8, 115–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qi, X., J.F. Bard, and G. Yu. (2004). “Supply Chain Coordination with Demand Disruptions.” Omega 32, 301–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, T.A. (2002). “Supply Chain Coordination under Channel Rebates with Sales Effort Effects.” Management Science 48(8), 992–1007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tirole, J. (1988). The Theory of Industrial Organization.Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treece, J. (1997). “Just-too-much Single-sourcing spurs Toyota Purchasing Review: Maker Seeks at Least 2 Suppliers for Each Part.” Automotive News,March 3.

  • Tsay, A.A. (1999). “The Quantity Flexibility Contract and Supplier-Customer Incentives.” Management Science 45(10), 1339–1358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsay, A. and N. Aggrawal. (2000). “Channel Dynamics under Price and Service Competition.” Manufacturing & Service Operations Management 2(4), 372–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ugarte, A. and S. Oren. (2000). “Coordination of Internal Supply Chains in Vertically Integrated High-Tech Manufacturing Organizations (HTMOs).” International Journal of Production Economics 67, 235–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. and Y. Gerchak. (2001).“Supply Chain Coordination when Demand is Shelf-Space-Dependent.” Manufacturing & Service Operations Management 3(1), 82–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xia, Y.S., X.T. Qi, and G. Yu. (2002). “Real-Time Production and Inventory Disruption Management under the Continuous Rate Economic Production Quantity Model.” Red-McCombs School of Business, the University of Texas at Austin, Working Paper.

  • Xia, Y.S., M. Yang, B. Golany, S. Gilbert, and G. Yu. (2004). “Real-Time Disruption Management in a Two-Stage Production and Inventory System.” IIE Transactions 36, 111–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tiaojun Xiao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xiao, T., Yu, G., Sheng, Z. et al. Coordination of a Supply Chain with One-Manufacturer and Two-Retailers Under Demand Promotion and Disruption Management Decisions. Ann Oper Res 135, 87–109 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-005-6236-6

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-005-6236-6

Keywords

Navigation