Skip to main content
Log in

A semi-analytical method for VaR and credit exposure analysis

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we discuss new analytical methods for computing Value-at-Risk (VaR) and a credit exposure profile. Using a Monte Carlo simulation approach as a benchmark, we find that the analytical methods are more accurate than RiskMetrics delta VaR, and are more efficient than Monte Carlo, for the case of fixed income securities. However the accuracy of the method deteriorates when applied to a portfolio of barrier options.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brandimarte, P. (2002). Numerical Methods in Finance—A Matlab Based Introduction. New York: J. Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • De, R. and T. Tamarchenko. (2002a). “A New and Accurate Method to Calculate Value at Risk and Other Tail Measures.” Working paper.

  • De, R. and T. Tamarchenko. (2002b). “VaR You Can Rely On.” Risk Magazine, 15(8), 77–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dembo, A., J.-D. Deuschel, and D. Duffie. (2004). “Large Portfolio Losses.” Finance and Stochastics, 8, 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dembo, A. and O. Zeitouni. (1998). Large Deviation Techniques and Applications, 2nd edition. New York: Sprinher-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dembo, R., A. Kreinin, and D. Rosen. (2001). “Computer-Implemented Method and Apparatus for Portfolio Compression.” US patent number: 6,278,981.

  • Iscoe, I. and A. Kreinin. (1996). “Statistical Analysis of Monte Carlo VaR Estimation.” Technical report, Algorithmics Inc.

  • Iscoe, I. and A. Kreinin. (1997). “Analytical Estimations of Value-at-Risk for Fixed Income Securities.” Technical report, Algorithmics Inc.

  • Jäckel, P. (2002). Monte Carlo Methods in Finance. New York: John Wiley and Sons, LTD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorion, P. (2001). Value at Risk: The New Benchmark for Managing Financial Risk, 2nd edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiureghian, A. (1998). “Multiple Design Points in First and Second-Order Reliability.” Structural Safety, 20(1), 37–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, H., S. Krenk, and N. Lind. (1986). Methods of Structural Safety. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • RiskMetrics. (1995). RiskMetrics™-Technical Document. J.P Morgan Guaranty Trust Company, 3rd edition. http://www.riskmetrics.com/techdoc.html.

  • Sobol, I. (1998). “On Quasi-Monte Carlo Integration.” Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 47, 103–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Kreinin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Prisco, B., Iscoe, I., Kreinin, A. et al. A semi-analytical method for VaR and credit exposure analysis. Ann Oper Res 152, 23–47 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-006-0123-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-006-0123-7

Keywords

Navigation