Skip to main content
Log in

Fighting strategies in a market with counterfeits

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Counterfeiting is a widely spread phenomenon and has seen rapid growth in recent years. In this paper, we adopt the standard vertical differentiation model and allow consumers the choices of purchasing an authentic product, purchasing a counterfeit, or not buying. We focus on how non-deceptive counterfeits, which consumers know at time of purchase that the products are counterfeits with certainty, affect the price, market share and profitability of brand name products. We also consider the strategies for brand name companies to fight counterfeiting. We compare different fighting strategies in a market with one brand name product and its counterfeit, and derive equilibrium fighting strategies in a market with two competing brand name products and a counterfeit under general conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Associated Press (2006). Piracy hits close to home in China, The Daily News, June 30.

  • Balfour, F. (2005). Fakes! Business Week, February, 7, 2005.

  • Bamossy, G. & Scammon, D. L. (1985). Product counterfeiting: consumers and manufacturers beware. In Hirschman, & Holbrook (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 12, pp. 334–340). Provo: Association for Consumer Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, P. H., Bush, R. F., & Campbell, L. (1993). Consumer ‘accomplices’ in product counterfeiting. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 10(4), 27–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bush, R., Bloch, P., & Dawson, S. (1989). Remedies for product counterfeiting. Business Horizons, 32, 59–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carty, P. (1994). Fakes’ progress. Accountancy, 114, 44–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhry, P. E., & Walsh, M. G. (1996). An assessment of the impact of counterfeiting in international markets: the piracy paradox persists. Columbia Journal of World Business, 31, 34–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conner, K., & Rumelt, R. H. (1991). Software piracy: an analysis of protection strategies. Management Science, 37, 125–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbet, J. (2005). French seize counterfeiting bag, The Guernsey Press, September 24.

  • Cordell, V. V., Wongtada, N., & Kieschnick, R. L. Jr. (1996). Counterfeit purchase intentions: role of lawfulness attitudes and product traits as determinants. Journal of Business Research, 35(1), 41–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisend, M., & Schuchert-Güler, P. (2006). Explaining counterfeit purchases: a review and preview. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 10, 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Givon, M., Mahajan, V., & Muller, E. (1995). Software piracy: estimation of lost sales and the impact on software diffusion. Journal of Marketing, 59(1), 29–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, R. T., & Smith, T. (2002). Executive insights: countering brand counterfeiters. Journal of International Marketing, 10(4), 89–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G. M., & Shapiro, C. (1988a). Counterfeit-product trade. American Economic Review, 78(March), 59–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G. M., & Shapiro, C. (1988b). Foreign counterfeiting of status goods. Quarterly Journal of Economics, February, 79–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, M. G., & Ronkainen, I. A. (1985). International counterfeiters: marketing success without the cost and the risk. Columbia Journal of World Business, 20, 37–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, M. G. (1987). Industrial product counterfeiting: problems and proposed solutions. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, Fall, 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, L., Samli, A. C., & Jedlik, T. (2001). The nightmare of international product piracy—exploring defensive strategies. Industrial Marketing Management, 30, 499–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain, S. (2008). Digital piracy: a competitive analysis. Marketing Science, 27(4), 610–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, K. (2005). Warner prices DVDs to fight pirates in China. Asian Wall Street Journal, February 24, 2005.

  • Kwong, K. K., Yau, O. H. H., Lee, J. S. Y., Sin, L. Y. M., & Tse, A. C. B. (2003). The effects of attitudinal and demographic factors on intention to buy pirated CDs: the case of Chinese consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 47(3), 223–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mussa, M., & Rosen, S. (1978). Monopoly and product quality. Journal of Economic Theory, 18(2), 301–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, J. E., & Granzin, K. L. (1992). Gaining retailers’ assistance in fighting counterfeiting: conceptualization and empirical test of a helping model. Journal of Retailing, 68, 90–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onkvisit, S., & Shaw, J. J. (1989). The international dimension of branding: strategic considerations and decisions. International Marketing Review, 6, 22–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian, Y. (2006). Pricing and marketing impacts of entry by counterfeiters and imitators. Working Paper, Northwestern University.

  • Ritson, M. (2007). Fake can genuinely aid luxury brands, Marketing, July 25.

  • Scandizzo, S. (2001). Counterfeit goods and income inequality. IMF Working Paper, No. 01/13, January.

  • Shaked, A., & Sutton, J. (1982). Relaxing price competition through product differentiation. Review of Economic Studies, 49, 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. (1997). Brand name pirates plunder open borders. The European, June 19, 4–5.

  • Tom, G., Garibaldi, B., Zeng, Y., & Pilcher, J. (1998). Consumer demand for counterfeit goods. Psychology and Marketing, 15(5), 405–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jie Zhang.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

(PDF 258 kB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, J., Hong, L.J. & Zhang, R.Q. Fighting strategies in a market with counterfeits. Ann Oper Res 192, 49–66 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-010-0768-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-010-0768-0

Keywords

Navigation