Skip to main content
Log in

Estimation of potential gains from mergers in multiple periods: a comparison of stochastic frontier analysis and Data Envelopment Analysis

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new dynamic Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) approach is created to provide valuable managerial insights when assessing the merger performance. This new approach allows us to dynamically evaluate the pre-merger firms and the post-merger firm in a multi-period situation. A case study of bank branch merger is conducted to illustrate and validate the proposed approach. Both stochastic frontier analysis and data envelopment analysis are used and compared leading to highly correlated results. The computation show that merger results in an overall efficiency achievement in a banking industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akhavein, J. D., Berger, A. N., & Humphrey, D. B. (1997). The effects of megamergers on efficiency and prices: evidence from a bank profit function. Review of Industrial Organization, 12, 95–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amirteimoori, A. (2006). Data envelopment analysis in dynamic framework. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 181, 21–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30, 1078–1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battese, G. E., & Coelli, T. J. (1995). A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empirical Economics, 20, 325–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A. N., & Humphrey, D. B. (1992). Megamergers in banking and the use of cost efficiency as an antitrust defense. Antitrust Bulletin, 37(3), 541–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A. N., & Humphrey, D. B. (1997). Efficiency of financial institutions: international survey and directions for future research. European Journal of Operational Research, 98, 175–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A. N., Clarke, G. R. G., Cull, R., Klapper, L., & Udell, G. F. (2005). Corporate governance and bank performance: a joint analysis of the static, selection, and dynamic effects of domestic, foreign, and state ownership. Journal of Banking and Finance.

  • Bogetoft, P., & Wang, D. (2005). Estimating the potential gains from mergers. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 23, 145–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 6(2), 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. A. (1996). Economic cost scale efficiency, and competitive viability in banking. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 28(3), 342–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coelli, T. J. (1992). A computer program for frontier production function estimation: FRONTIER, Version 2.0. Economics Letters, 39, 29–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Tone, K. (2000). Data envelopment analysis. Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, J. D., & Xie, X. (2008). Mergers and acquisitions in the US property-liability insurance industry: Productivity and efficiency effects. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2(1), 30–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray, S. C. (2004). Data envelopment analysis: theory and techniques for economics and operations research (pp. 189–208). Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Richey, R. G. Jr., Kiessling, T. S., Tokman, M., & Dalela, V. (2008). Market growth through mergers and acquisitions: the role of the relationship marketing manager in sustaining performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 37(4), 394–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, H. D., & Rupert, T. J. (2006). Do bank mergers have hidden or foregone value? Realized and unrealized operating synergies in one bank merger. European Journal of Operational Research, 168(1), 253–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tulkens, H. (1993). On FDH efficiency analysis: some methodological issues and applications to retail banking, courts and urban transit. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 4(1/2), 183–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, D. (2009). Performance evaluation: an integrated method using data envelopment analysis and fuzzy preference relations. European Journal of Operational Research, 194(1), 227–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, D. & Birge, J. (2011). Serial chain merger evaluation model and application to mortgage banking. Decision sciences (accepted).

  • Wu, D., Yang, Z., Vela, S., & Liang, L. (2007). Simultaneous analysis of production and investment performance of Canadian life & health insurance companies using DEA. Computers & Operations Research, 2(34), 429–444.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Desheng Dash Wu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wu, D.D., Zhou, Z. & Birge, J.R. Estimation of potential gains from mergers in multiple periods: a comparison of stochastic frontier analysis and Data Envelopment Analysis. Ann Oper Res 186, 357–381 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-011-0903-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-011-0903-6

Keywords

Navigation