Skip to main content
Log in

A new look at dynamic behavior of binary coherent system from a state-level perspective

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we study lifetime properties of binary coherent systems from a state-level perspective. We define and study a system whose performance levels are determined by its total number of working components and structure. That is, the more working components the better performance level for the system. This enables us to make a more detailed analysis of a binary system. We obtain the distributions of the time that is spent by the system in a specific state subset and a specific state. Our analysis is based on the use of system signature. We also define an optimization problem concerned with the determination of the number of warm standby components.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boland, P. J. (2001). Signatures of indirect majority systems. Journal of Applied Probability, 38, 597–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David, H. A., & Nagaraja, H. N. (2003). Wiley series in probability and statistics. Order statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugas, M. R., & Samaniego, F. J. (2007). On optimal system designs in reliability-economics frameworks. Naval Research Logistics, 54, 568–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eryilmaz, S. (2010). Mixture representations for the reliability of consecutive-k systems. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 51, 405–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eryilmaz, S., Koutras, M. V., & Triantafyllou, I. S. (2011). Signature based analysis of m-consecutive-k-out-of-n:F system with exchangeable components. Naval Research Logistics, 58, 344–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, R., Bajaj, C. P., & Sinha, S. M. (1986). Cost-benefit analysis of a multi-component standby system with inspection and slow switch. Microelectronics and Reliability, 26, 879–882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gopalan, M. N., & Radhakrishnan, R. (1986). Cost-benefit analysis of repairable systems subject to slow switch: a state-of-art survey. Microelectronics and Reliability, 26, 1083–1087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kochar, S. (1999). On stochastic orderings between distributions and their sample spacings. Statistics & Probability Letters, 42, 345–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kochar, S. Mukerjee, H., & Samaniego, F.J. (1999). The signature of a coherent system and its application to comparisons among systems. Naval Research Logistics, 46, 507–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolowrocki, K., & Kwiatuszewska-Sarrecka, B. (2008). Reliability and risk analysis of large systems with ageing components. Reliability Engineering & Systems Safety, 93, 1821–1829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lisnianski, A., & Levitin, G. (2003). Multi-state system reliability: assessment, optimization and applications. Singapore: World Scientific.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Levitin, G. (2004). A universal generating function approach for the analysis of multi-state systems with dependent elements. Reliability Engineering & Systems Safety, 84, 285–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lisnianski, A. (2007). Extended block diagram method for a multi-state system reliability assessment. Reliability Engineering & Systems Safety, 92, 1601–1607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lisnianski, A., & Ding, Y. (2009). Redundancy analysis for repairable multi-state system by using combined stochastic processes methods and universal generating function technique. Reliability Engineering & Systems Safety, 94, 1788–1795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marichal, J.-L., Mathonet, P., & Waldhauser, T. (2011). On signature-based expressions of system reliability. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 102, 1410–1416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navarro, J., Ruiz, J. M., & Sandoval, C. J. (2005). A note on comparisons among coherent systems with dependent components using signatures. Statistics & Probability Letters, 72, 179–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navarro, J., & Rychlik, T. (2010). Comparisons and bounds for expected lifetimes of reliability systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 207, 309–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navarro, J., Samaniego, F. J., & Balakrishnan, N. (2010). Joint signature of coherent systems with shared components. Journal of Applied Probability, 47, 235–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samaniego, F. J. (1985). On closure of the IFR class under formation of coherent systems. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, R-34, 69–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samaniego, F. J. (2007). System signatures and their applications in engineering reliability. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Triantafyllou, I. S., & Koutras, M. V. (2011). Signature and IFR preservation of 2-within-consecutive-k-out-of-n:F systems. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 60, 315–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Z. (2010). Ordering conditional general coherent systems with exchangeable components. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 140, 454–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to express gratitude to the referees for a through review and valuable comments that led to some improvements in this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Serkan Eryilmaz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eryilmaz, S. A new look at dynamic behavior of binary coherent system from a state-level perspective. Ann Oper Res 212, 115–125 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-012-1138-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-012-1138-x

Keywords

Navigation