Skip to main content
Log in

Political Districting: from classical models to recent approaches

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Political Districting problem has been studied since the 60’s and many different models and techniques have been proposed with the aim of preventing districts’ manipulation which may favor some specific political party (gerrymandering). A variety of Political Districting models and procedures was provided in the Operations Research literature, based on single- or multiple-objective optimization. Starting from the forerunning papers published in the 60’s, this article reviews some selected optimization models and algorithms for Political Districting which gave rise to the main lines of research on this topic in the Operations Research literature of the last five decades.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This work is based on the same electoral data already analyzed in Arcese et al. (1992).

  2. We want to thank our Ph.D. colleague and friend Andrea De Vitis for his precious help in the translation of this paper which was published only in Japanese. Besides knowing Japanese, Andrea is an expert in Operations Research and a former student of Bruno Simeone. We are sure that he patiently supported us not only out of friendship, but also in high regard for Bruno.

References

  • Aarts, E., & Lenstra, J. K. (2003). Local search in combinatorial optimization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altman, M. (1997). Is automation the answer?—The computational complexity of automated redistricting. Rutgers Computer & Technology Law Journal, 23, 81–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apollonio, N., Lari, L., Puerto, J., Ricca, F., & Simeone, B. (2008). Polynomial algorithms for partitioning a tree into single-center subtrees to minimize flat service costs. Networks, 51, 78–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arcese, F., Battista, M. G., Biasi, O., Lucertini, M., & Simeone, B. (1992). Un modello multicriterio per la distrettizzazione elettorale: la metodologia C.A.P.I.R.E. A.D.E.N.. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Aurenhammer, F., & Edelsbrunner, H. (1984). An optimal algorithm for constructing the weighted Voronoi diagram in the plane. Pattern Recognition, 17, 251–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bação, F., Lobo, V., & Painho, M. (2005). Applying genetic algorithms to zone-design. Soft Computing, 9, 341–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodin, L. D. (1973). A district experiment with a clustering algorithm. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 219, 209–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourjolly, J. M., Laporte, G., & Rousseau, J. M. (1981). Découpage electoral automatisé: application a l’Ile de Montréal. INFOR. Information Systems and Operational Research, 19, 113–124 (in French).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozkaya, B., Erkut, E., & Laporte, G. (2003). A tabu search heuristic and adaptive memory procedure for political districting. European Journal of Operational Research, 144, 12–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browdy, M. H. (1990). Simulated annealing: an improved computer model for political redistricting. Yale Law & Policy Review, 8, 163–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bussamra, N. M., França, P. M., & Sosa, N. G. (1996). Legislative districting by heuristic methods. Atti Giornate AIRO Perugia.

  • Carlson, R. C., & Nemhauser, G. L. (1966). Scheduling to minimize interaction cost. Operations Research, 14, 52–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou, C., & Li, S. P. (2006). Taming the gerrymander—statistical physics approach to political districting problem. Physica. A, 369, 799–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordone, R. (2001). A short note on graph tree partition problems with assignment or communication objective functions (Internal Report DEI 2001.7). Politecnico di Milano.

  • Duque, J. C., Ramos, R., & Suriñach, J. (2007). Supervised regionalization methods: a survey. International Regional Science Review, 30, 195–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman, S. L., & Yue, Y. (2003). Congressional districting using a TSP-based genetic algorithm. In Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 2724, pp. 2072–2083).

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrest, E. (1964). Apportionment by computer. American Behavioral Scientist, 7, 23–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garey, M. R., & Johnson, D. S. (1979). Computers and intractability. A guide to the theory of NP-completeness. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, R. S., & Nemhauser, G. L. (1970). Optimal political districting by implicit enumeration techniques. Management Science, 16, 495–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, J. A., Lamar, B. W., & Wallace, C. A. (1997). Political district determination using large-scale network optimization. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 31, 11–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glover, F., & Laguna, M. (1997). Tabu search. Boston: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, D. (1989). Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grilli di Cortona, P., Manzi, C., Pennisi, A., Ricca, F., & Simeone, B. (1999). SIAM monographs on discrete mathematics and applications. Evaluation and optimization of electoral systems. Philadelphia: SIAM, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harary, F. (1994). Graph theory. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, S. W., Weaver, J. B., Siegfelatt, H. J., Whelan, J. N., & Zitlau, P. A. (1965). Nonpartisan political redistricting by computer. Operations Research, 13, 998–1006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hojati, M. (1996). Optimal political districting. Computers & Operations Research, 23, 1147–1161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horn, D. L., Hampton, C. R., & Vandenberg, A. J. (1993). Practical application of district compactness. Political Geography, 12, 103–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, T. C., Kahng, A. B., & Tsao, C. W. A. (1995). Old bachelor acceptance: a new class of non-monotone threshold accepting methods. ORSA Journal on Computing, 7, 417–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, H. F. (1967). An objective method for establishing legislative districts. Midwest Journal of Political Science, 10, 200–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalcsics, J., Nickel, S., & Schröder, M. (2005). Towards a unified territorial design approach—applications, algorithms and GIS integration. TOP, 13, 1–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Z., Wang, R., & Wang, Y. (2007). A quadratic programming model for political districting problem. In Proceedings of the first international symposium on optimization and system biology (OSB), Beijing, China, August 8–10, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, S., & Kernighan, B. W. (1973). An effective heuristic algorithm for the traveling-salesman problem. Operations Research, 21, 498–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrotra, A., Johnson, E. L., & Nemhauser, G. L. (1998). An optimization based heuristic for political districting. Management Science, 44, 1100–1114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. (2007). The problem of redistricting: the use of centroidal Voronoi diagrams to build unbiased congressional districts. Master thesis, Withmann College, USA. http://www.whitman.edu/mathematics/SeniorProjectArchive/2007/millersl.pdf.

  • Nemoto, T., & Hotta, K. (2003). Modelling and solution of the problem of optimal electoral districting. Communications of the OR Society of Japan, 48, 300–306. http://www.orsj.or.jp/~archive/pdf/bul/Vol.48_04_300.pdf (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemi, R. G., Grofman, B., Carlucci, C., & Hofeller, T. (1990). Measuring compactness and the role of a compactness standard in a test for partisan and racial gerrymandering. The Journal of Politics, 52, 1155–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nygreen, B. (1988). European Assembly constituencies for Wales. Comparing of methods for solving a political districting problem. Mathematical Programming, 42, 159–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osman, I. H., & Laporte, G. (1996). Metaheuristics: a bibliography. Annals of Operations Research, 63, 511–623. Special issue: G. Laporte & I. H. Osman (Eds.), Metaheuristics in combinatorial optimization.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricca, F. (1996). Algoritmi di ricerca locale per la distrettizzazione elettorale. Atti Giornate AIRO Perugia.

  • Ricca, F., & Simeone, B. (1997). Political districting: traps, criteria, algorithms and trade-offs. Ricerca Operativa, 27, 81–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricca, F., & Simeone, B. (2008). Local search algorithms for political districting. European Journal of Operational Research, 189, 1409–1426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricca, F., Scozzari, A., & Simeone, B. (2007). Weighted Voronoi region algorithms for political districting. In Proc. international seminars, Schloss Dagstuhl, 07311/2007, frontiers of electronic voting. http://kathrin.dagstuhl.de/07311/Materials/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricca, F., Scozzari, A., & Simeone, B. (2008). Weighted Voronoi region algorithms for political districting. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 48, 1468–1477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricca, F., Scozzari, A., & Simeone, B. (2011). Political Districting: from classical models to recent approaches. 4OR, 9, 223–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahni, S. (1974). Computationally related problems. SIAM Journal on Computing, 3, 262–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simeone, B. (1978). Optimal graph partitioning. Atti Giornate AIRO.

  • Tavares-Pereira, F., Figueira, J. R., Mousseau, V., & Roy, B. (2007). Multiple criteria districting problem. The public transportation network pricing system of the Paris region. Annals of Operations Research, 154, 69–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vickrey, W. (1961). On the prevention of gerrymandering. Political Science Quarterly, 76, 105–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, J. B., & Hess, S. W. (1963). A procedure for nonpartisan districting: development of computer techniques. The Yale Law Journal, 73, 288–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamada, T. (2009). A mini-max spanning forest approach to the political districting problem. International Journal of Systems Science, 40, 471–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamada, T., Takahashi, H., & Kataoka, S. (1996). A heuristic algorithm for the mini-max spanning forest problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 91, 565–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, H. P. (1988). Measuring compactness of legislative districts. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 13, 105–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Federica Ricca.

Additional information

Federica Ricca and Andrea Scozzari dedicate this work to their dear friend Bruno Simeone, who passed away unexpectedly on October 10, 2010. He was the prime mover of their common research in this field. He started productive research on electoral systems with political districting which remained throughout the years one of his main interests. This paper is meant to be both a tribute to the deep scientific oeuvre of Bruno and a wish for further developments in this area.

This is an updated version of the paper that appeared in 4OR, 9, 223–254 (2011).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ricca, F., Scozzari, A. & Simeone, B. Political Districting: from classical models to recent approaches. Ann Oper Res 204, 271–299 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-012-1267-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-012-1267-2

Keywords

Navigation