Skip to main content
Log in

Double-sided price adjustment flexibility with a preemptive right to exercise

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes a double-sided flexibility in adjusting the lease price as an alternative, more accessible tool for managing revenues or controlling costs in volatile markets. The double-sided flexibility addresses the dilemma of allowing only one party of a lease contract to have the price adjustment flexibility while both parties want it. Although the proposed clause grants both contract parties the right to adjust the lease price for one time during the contract life, one party can enjoy superior flexibility over the counterparty by buying a preemptive right to exercise it. The paper models the double-sided flexibility as sequentially compounded real options and optimizes the exercise decision for each option owner. The proposed flexibility clause is embedded in time charter contracts in the maritime transport industry to illustrate the effectiveness of it in helping manage the price risk of lease contracts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agarwal, S., Ambrose, B. W., Huang, H., & Yildirim, Y. (2011). The term structure of lease rates with endogenous default triggers and tenant capital structure: Theory and evidence. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 46(2), 553–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al sharif, A. A. A., & Qin, R. (2014). Valuation of lease contracts with a price adjustment option: An application to the maritime transport industry. The Engineering Economist, 59(1), 30–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose, B. W., Hendershott, P. H., & Klosek, M. M. (2002). Pricing upward-only adjusting leases. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 25(1), 33–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastian-Pinto, C., Brandão, L., & de Lemos Alves, M. (2010). Valuing the switching flexibility of the ethanol-gas flex fuel car. Annals of Operations Research, 176(1), 333–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjerksund, P., & Steinar, E. (1995). Contingent claims evaluation of mean-reverting cash flows in shipping. In L. Trigeorgis (Ed.), Real options in capital investment: Models, strategies, and applications. New York, NY: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buetow, G. W., & Albert, J. D. (1998). The pricing of embedded options in real estate lease contracts. Journal of Real Estate Research, 15(3), 253–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarksons Shipping Intelligence Network. Accessed August 31, 2013 from http://www.clarksons.net.

  • Gamba, A., & Rigon, R. (2008). The value of embedded real options: Evidence from consumer automobile lease contractsa note. Finance Research Letters, 5(4), 213–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, V. P. (1985). Price adjustment in long-term contracts. Wisconsin Law Review, 1985, 527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grenadier, S. R. (1995). Valuing lease contracts a real-options approach. Journal of Financial Economics, 38(3), 297–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grenadier, S. R. (1996). Leasing and credit risk. Journal of Financial Economics, 42(3), 333–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grenadier, S. R. (2005). An equilibrium analysis of real estate leases. Journal of Business, 78(4), 1173–1213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendershott, P., & Ward, C. (2000). Incorporating option-like features in the valuation of shopping centers. Real Estate Finance, 16(4), 31–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, J. E., & Triantis, A. J. (1993). Valuing flexibility: An impulse control framework. Annals of Operations Research, 45(1), 109–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, S., & Yang, Y. (2002). Pricing lease contracts with options in imperfect markets of durable goods. Technical Report, Ford Research Laboratory.

  • Hull, J. (2011). Options, futures, and other derivatives (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen, P., & De Giovanni, D. (2010). Time charters with purchase options in shipping: Valuation and risk management. Applied Mathematical Finance, 17(5), 399–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenyon, C., & Tompaidis, S. (2001). Real options in leasing: The effect of idle time. Operations Research, 49(5), 675–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koussis, N., Martzoukos, S. H., & Trigeorgis, L. (2007). Real R&D options with time-to-learn and learning-by-doing. Annals of Operations Research, 151(1), 29–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, Z., Wang, W., & Li, S. (2012). Decomposition valuation of complex real options embedded in creative financial leases. Economic Modelling, 29(6), 2627–2631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lückerath-Rovers, M. (2007). Operating-lease disclosures: An empirical investigation. PhD thesis, Erasmus School of Law (ESL).

  • Lund, M. W. (2000). Valuing flexibility in offshore petroleum projects. Annals of Operations Research, 99(1–4), 325–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, J. J., & Schallheim, J. S. (1983). Valuation of asset leasing contracts. Journal of Financial Economics, 12(2), 237–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M. H., & Upton, C. W. (1976). Leasing, buying, and the cost of capital services. The Journal of Finance, 31(3), 761–786.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paddock, J. L., Siegel, D. R., & Smith, J. L. (1988). Option valuation of claims on real assets: The case of offshore petroleum leases. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 103(3), 479–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rygaard, J. (2009). Valuation of time charter contracts for ships. Maritime Policy & Management, 36(6), 525–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. (1979). Applications of option pricing analysis. In J. Bicksler (Ed.), Handbook of financial economics (pp. 79–121). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanton, R., & Wallace, N. (2002). An empirical test of a contingent claims lease valuation model. Manuscript, Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley.

  • Trigeorgis, L. (1996). Evaluating leases with complex operating options. European Journal of Operational Research, 91(2), 315–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, M. T., Saphores, J. D., & Regan, A. (2011). Valuation of freight transportation contracts under uncertainty. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 47(6), 920–932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vetzal, K. (1998). An improved finite difference approach to fitting the initial term structure. The Journal of Fixed Income, 7(4), 62–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the anonymous referees and the editor for their constructive comments and suggestions on the early version of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruwen Qin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al sharif, A.A.A., Qin, R. Double-sided price adjustment flexibility with a preemptive right to exercise. Ann Oper Res 226, 29–50 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-014-1659-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-014-1659-6

Keywords

Navigation