Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

DEA as a tool for auditing: application to Chinese manufacturing industry with parallel network structures

  • Data Mining and Analytics
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Performing a high-quality manufacturing audit can be time consuming and costly given the large number and scale of manufacturing firms and enterprises. Chinese economy has experienced some rapid and significant growth over the past 30 years, which is largely due to contributions from the development of manufacturing industry. Auditing tools are very much needed in auditing the Chinese manufacturing industry. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) has been used as an auditing tool in selecting audit objects that are treated as decision making units (DMUs). These DMUs are characterized by a set of performance measures. DEA then uses data on these performance measures to identify potential audit objects. However, conventional DEA treat each DMU or system as a “black-box” and does not take the operations of individual components within the “black-box” into consideration. For example, a large number of firms or enterprises exist in a manufacturing industry. When the conventional DEA is applied to the industries, the performance of the firms is often ignored. This paper proposes a new parallel DEA model where each input/output of the system is not the sum of those of all its components. Such a situation arises from the need of auditing firms or enterprises in Chinese manufacturing industries. For example, the cost margin of a particular industry may not equal to the sum of that of all its component firms within the industry because this metric is measured in percentage. The proposed approach is applied to the manufacturing industry of China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen, P., & Petersen, N. C. (1993). A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 39, 1261–1264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for the estimation of technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beasley, J. E. (1995). Determining teaching and research efficiencies. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 46(4), 441–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bi, G., Ding, J., Luo, Y., & Liang, L. (2011). Resource allocation and target setting for parallel production system based on DEA. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 35(9), 4270–4280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bi, G., Feng, C. P., Ding, J. J., & Khan, M. R. (2012). Estimating relative efficiency of DMU: Pareto principle and Monte Carlo oriented DEA approach. INFOR, 50(1), 44–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castelli, L., Pesenti, R., & Ukovich, W. (2004). DEA-like models for the efficiency evaluation of hierarchically structured units. European Journal of Operational Research, 154(2), 465–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castelli, L., Presenti, R., & Ukovich, W. (2010). A classification of DEA models when the internal structure of the decision making units is considered. Annals of Operations Research, 173(1), 207–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chao, C. M., Yu, M. M., & Chen, M. C. (2010). Measuring the performance of financial holding companies. The Service Industries Journal, 30(30), 811–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1962). Programming with linear fractional functionals. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 9(3–4), 181–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Cook, W.D., Du, J., Hu, H. & Zhu, J. (2015). Bounded and discrete data and Likert scales in data envelopment analysis: Application to regional energy efficiency in China. Annals of Operations Research (in press).

  • Chen, C. L., Zhu, J., Yu, J. Y., & Noori, H. (2012). A new methodology for evaluating sustainable product design performance with two-stage network data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 221(2), 348–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., & Zhu, J. (2004). Measuring information technology’s indirect impact on firm performance. Information Technology and Management Journal, 5(1–2), 9–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chilingerian, J. A., & Sherman, H. D. (1996). Benchmarking physician practice patterns with DEA: A multi-stage approach for cost containment. Annals of Operations Research, 67(1), 83–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, W. D., & Green, R. H. (2004). Multicomponent efficiency measurement and core business identification in multiplant firms: A DEA model. European Journal of Operational Research, 157(3), 540–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, W. D., Hababou, M., & Tuenter, H. J. H. (2000). Multicomponent efficiency measurement and shared inputs in data envelopment analysis: An application to sales and service performance in bank branches. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 14(3), 209–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, W. D., & Seiford, L. M. (2009). Data envelopment analysis (DEA)—Thirty years on. European Journal of Operational Research, 192(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, W. D., Tone, K., & Zhu, J. (2014). Data envelopment analysis: Prior to choosing a model. OMEGA, 44, 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diez-Ticio, A., & Mancebon, M. J. (2002). The efficiency of the Spanish police service: An application of the multiactivity DEA model. Applied Economics, 34(3), 351–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, J., Chen, Y., & Huo, J. (2015a). DEA for non-homogenous parallel networks. Omega, 56, 122–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, J., Zhu, J., Cook, W., & Huo, J. (2015b). DEA models for parallel systems: Game-theoretic approaches. Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research, 32(2), 1550008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, K., Hong, X., Li, S., Song, M., & Zhang, J. (2013). Choosing competitive industries in manufacturing of China under low-carbon economy: A three-stage DEA analysis. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 5(4), 431–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., Grabowski, R., Grosskopf, S., & Kraft, S. (1997). Efficiency of a fixed but allocatable input: A non-parametric approach. Economics Letters, 56(2), 187–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. (1996). Productivity and intermediate products: A frontier approach. Economic Letters, 50(1), 65–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., & Primont, D. (1984). Efficiency measures for multiplant firms. Operations Research Letters, 3(5), 257–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamyabi, Y., & Salahinejad, M. (2014). Using data envelopment analysis to examine operational auditing efficiency in audited firms. International Journal of Basic Sciences and Applied Research, 3(3), 135–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kao, C. (2009). Efficiency measurement for parallel production systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 196(3), 1107–1112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao, C., & Hwang, S. N. (2010). Efficiency measurement for network systems: IT impact on firm performance. Decision Support Systems, 48, 437–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao, C., & Lin, P. H. (2012). Efficiency of parallel production systems with fuzzy data. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 198(7), 83–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., Zhou, P., & Zhu, Y. (2014). The Efficiency and productivity for manufacturing industries in China with network structure considering undesirable output. Asian Social Science, 10(18), 63–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, T., & Li, K. W. (2012). Analyzing China’s productivity growth: Evidence from manufacturing industries. Economic Systems, 36(4), 531–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogge, N., & Jaeger, S. (2012). Evaluating the efficiency of municipalities in collecting and processing municipal solid waste: A shared input DEA-model. Waste Management, 32(10), 1968–1978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (1999). Profitability and marketability of the top 55 US commercial banks. Management Science, 45(9), 1270–1288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, H. D. (1984). Data envelopment analysis as a new managerial audit methodology-test and evaluation. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 4(1), 35–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sueyoshi, T., Shang, J., & Chiang, W. (2009). A decision support framework for internal audit prioritization in a rental car company: A combined use between DEA and AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 199(1), 219–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, H., Hone, P., & Doucouliago, H. (1999). Economic openness and technical efficiency: A case study of Chinese manufacturing industries. The Economics of Transition, 7(3), 615–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, P. F., & Mar Molinero, C. (2002). A variable returns to scale data envelopment analysis model for the joint determination of efficiencies with an example of the UK health service. European Journal of Operational Research, 141(1), 21–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaz, C. B., Camanho, A. S., & Guimarães, R. C. (2010). The assessment of retailing efficiency using network data envelopment analysis. Annals of Operations Research, 173(1), 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, G. Z., Wu, J. R., & Liu, J. (2010). Evaluation and analysis of input–output efficiency of regional equipment manufacturing industry based on DEA method. International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 4, 1661–1666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, L., Yang, H., Fang, K., Ye, L., & Zhang, J. (2015). Evaluation of regional environmental efficiencies in China based on super-efficiency-DEA. Ecological Indicators, 51, 13–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Y., Ma, B., & Koike, M. (2000). Efficiency-measuring DEA model for production system with k independent subsystems. Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan, 43(3), 343–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, M. M. (2008). Measuring the efficiency and return to scale status of multimode bus transit—Evidence from Taiwan’s bus system. Applied Economics Letters, 15(8), 647–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, M. M., & Fan, C. K. (2006). Measuring the cost effectiveness of multimode bus transit in the presence of accident risks. Transportation Planning and Technology, 29(5), 383–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, D. Z., & Zhang, D. M. (2013). A study of environmental management efficiency using the DEA method: Focus on manufacturing by district in China. Journal of Management Research, 13(1), 11–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, J. (2000). Multi-factor performance measure model with an application to Fortune 500 companies. European Journal of Operational Research, 123(1), 105–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the comments and suggestions from two anonymous reviewers on an earlier version of this paper. Dr. Yande Gong thanks the support by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71302178) and “Qinglan” Engineering of Jiangsu Province. Support from the Priority Academic Program Development of the Jianhsu Higher Education Institutions (China) is acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. International Center for Auditing and Evaluation, Nanjing Audit University, Nanjing, 211815, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China

    Yande Gong

  2. Foisie School of Business, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, 01609, USA

    Joe Zhu

  3. School of Economics, Hefei University of Technology, 193 Tunxi Road, Hefei, 230009, Anhui, People’s Republic of China

    Ya Chen

  4. Schulich School of Business, York University, Toronto, ON, M3J 1P3, Canada

    Wade D. Cook

Authors
  1. Yande Gong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joe Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ya Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Wade D. Cook
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joe Zhu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gong, Y., Zhu, J., Chen, Y. et al. DEA as a tool for auditing: application to Chinese manufacturing industry with parallel network structures. Ann Oper Res 263, 247–269 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-016-2197-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-016-2197-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation