Skip to main content
Log in

Reliability estimation for a stochastic production system with finite buffer storage by a simulation approach

  • Reliability and Quality Management in Stochastic Systems
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study develops a novel Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) approach to estimate system reliability for a stochastic production system with finite buffer storage. System reliability indicates the probability of all workstations providing sufficient capacities to satisfy a specified demand, as well as that all buffer stations are not running out of storage. First, buffer stations are modeled in a stochastic production network (SPN) model and their storage usage is analyzed based on the network-structured SPN. Second, an MCS is developed to generate the system state and to check the storage usage of buffer stations to determine whether the demand can be satisfied. After repeated simulations, the system reliability of the SPN can be estimated. Experimental results show that the proposed MCS approach is effective and efficient in estimating system reliability with reasonable quality for an SPN within a reasonable time. More importantly, system reliability will be overestimated with infinite buffer storage, and thus, it is worth studying finite buffer storage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AOA:

Activity-on-arc

MCS:

Monte Carlo simulation

SPN:

Stochastic production network

WIP:

Work-in-process

N :

Set of nodes (inspection stations)

n :

Number of arcs (workstations)

\(a_{i}\) :

ith workstation

A :

\(\{a_{i}|i = 1, 2, {\ldots }, n\}\): the set of workstations

\(b_{i,i+1}\) :

Buffer station installed after \(a_{i}\)

B :

{\(b_{i,i+1}|i\): a buffer station is installed after \(a_{i}\)}: the set of buffer stations

rk :

Defective WIP output from the rth workstation is reworked starting from the previous k workstations

\(\varGamma ^{(\mathrm{G})}\) :

General processing route

\(\varGamma ^{(\mathrm{R}|r,r-k)}\) :

Rework route

\(f_i^{({\mathrm{G}})}\) :

Input flow for \(a_{i} \in \varGamma ^{({\mathrm{G}})}\)

\(f_i^{({\mathrm{R}}|r,r-k)}\) :

Input flow for \(a_{i} \in \varGamma ^{(\mathrm{R}|r,r-k)}\)

\(l_{i}\) :

Loading of \(a_{i}\) and \(l_{i}=f_i^{({\mathrm{G}})} +f_i^{({\mathrm{R}}|r,r-k)}\)

\(M_{i}\) :

Maximal capacity of \(a_{i}\)

\(x_{i}\) :

Capacity of each workstation \(a_{i}\)

\(x_{i(\alpha )}\) :

\(\alpha \)th possible capacity of \(a_{i}\), where \(\alpha = 1, 2, {\ldots }, c_{i}\)

\(\pi _{i(\alpha )}\) :

Pr(\(x_{i}=x_{i(\alpha )}\))

\(p_{i}\) :

Expected success rate of \(a_{i}\)

\({{\varvec{\Delta }}}_{c_i \times c_{i+1} }\) :

Matrix for different amount under all possible values of \(x_{i}\) and \(x_{i+1}\)

\({{\varvec{\Lambda }}}_{c_i \times c_{i+1} }\) :

Corresponding probability distribution matrix for \({{\varvec{\Delta }}}_{c_i \times c_{i+1} }\)

D :

Demand

\(R_D^b\) :

Reliability for finite buffer storage for D

References

  • Aronson, J. E. (1989). A survey of dynamic network flows. Annals of Operations Research, 20, 1–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayliss, C., Maere, G. D., Atkin, J. A. D., & Paelinck, M. (2016). A simulation scenario based mixed integer programming approach to airline reserve crew scheduling under uncertainty. Annals of Operations Research,. doi:10.1007/s10479-016-2174-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, C., & Scholl, A. (2006). A survey on problems and methods in generalized assembly line balancing. European Journal of Operational Research, 168, 694–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, J. C. C., & Kroese, D. P. (2011). Rare-event probability estimation with conditional Monte Carlo. Annals of Operations Research, 189, 43–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demir, L., Tunali, S., & Eliiyi, D. T. (2014). The state of the art on buffer allocation problem: A comprehensive survey. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 25, 371–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elsayed, E. A., & Turley, R. E. (1980). Reliability analysis of production systems with buffer storage. International Journal of Production Research, 18, 637–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, L. R., & Fulkerson, D. R. (1962). Flows in networks. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, S. (1992). Routing flexibility and production scheduling in a flexible manufacturing system. European Journal of Operational Research, 60, 344–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, H. J., & Xu, G. (1998). Aggregate scheduling and network solving of multi-stage and multi-item manufacturing systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 105, 52–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, N. (2012). Mean station reliabilities cause throughput overestimates in production system design. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 31, 184–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawas, B., Laumanns, M., & Pratsini, E. (2013). A robust optimization approach to enhancing reliability in production planning under non-compliance risks. OR Spectrum, 35, 835–865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleintje-Ell, F., & Kiesmüller, G. P. (2015). Cost minimising order schedules for a capacitated inventory system. Annals of Operations Research, 299, 501–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, J. S., Jane, C. C., & Yuan, J. (1995). On reliability evaluation of a capacitated-flow network in terms of minimal pathsets. Networks, 25, 131–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, J. S. (1998). Reliability evaluation of capacitated-flow networks with budget constraints. IIE Transactions, 30, 1175–1180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Y. K. (2007). Two-commodity reliability evaluation of a stochastic-flow network with varying capacity weight in terms of minimal paths. Computers & Operations Research, 36, 1050–1063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Y. K., & Chang, P. C. (2012). System reliability of a manufacturing network with reworking action and different failure rates. International Journal of Production Research, 50, 6930–6944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Y. K., & Chang, P. C. (2013). A novel reliability evaluation technique for stochastic flow manufacturing networks with multiple production lines. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 61, 92–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Y. K., & Chang, P. C. (2015). Demand satisfaction and decision-making for a PCB manufacturing system with production lines in parallel. International Journal of Production Research, 53, 3193–3206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Y. K., Fiondella, L., & Chang, P. C. (2013). Quantifying the impact of correlated failures on system reliability by a simulation approach. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 109, 32–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Y. K., Kuo, P. H., & Chang, C. C. (2012). System reliability for a multistate flow network with multiple joint minimal paths under time constraint. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 29, 78–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Y. K., Yeh, C. T., & Huang, C. F. (2014). A simple algorithm to evaluate supply-chain reliability for brittle commodity logistics under production and delivery constraints. Annals of Operations Research,. doi:10.1007/s10479-014-1741-0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moazeni, S., Coleman, T. F., & Li, Y. (2016). Smoothing and parametric rules for stochastic mean-CVaR optimal execution strategy. Annals of Operations Research, 237, 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penn, M., & Raviv, T. (2007). Optimizing the quality control station configuration. Naval Research Logistics, 54, 301–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez-Marquez, J., & Coit, D. W. (2005). A Monte-Carlo simulation approach for approximating multi-state two-terminal reliability. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 87, 253–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, W. J. (2015). Operations management (12th ed.). New York: McGrawHill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiaobo, Z., Gong, Q., & Nakashima, K. (2001). Analysis of a production system in a general configuration. Naval Research Logistics, 48, 128–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh, C. T., & Lin, Y. K. (2016). Component allocation cost minimization for a multistate computer network subject to a reliability threshold using Tabu search. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 12, 141–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh, W. C. (2008). A simple minimal path method for estimating the weighted multi-commodity multistate unreliable networks reliability. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 93, 125–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh, W. C. (2011). A sequential decomposition method for estimating flow in a multi-commodity multistate network. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 60, 612–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh, W. C., Lin, Y. C., & Chung, Y. Y. (2010). Performance analysis of cellular automata Monte Carlo Simulation for estimating network reliability. Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 3537–3544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahorik, A., Thomas, L. J., & Trigeiro, W. W. (1984). Network programming models for production scheduling in multi-stage, multi-item capacitated systems. Management Science, 30, 308–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, Republic of China (Grant Number MOST 103-2218-E-507-001-MY3).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ping-Chen Chang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chang, PC. Reliability estimation for a stochastic production system with finite buffer storage by a simulation approach. Ann Oper Res 277, 119–133 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2580-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2580-6

Keywords

Navigation