Abstract
Quality of life and well-being is a topic of major importance for public policy making and urban planning decisions. However, these concepts entail complex multiple socio-economic aspects, and are ill-defined. Quantitative assessments of quality of life based on composite indicators have become quite popular in academic research and practice. This study presents the application of an approach that combines ideas from multiple criteria decision making and efficiency analysis to the assessment of quality of life at the municipality level. A dataset involving French municipalities in 2012 is used for the analysis based on a rich set of key performance indicators that cover different aspects of quality of life conditions for citizens. The relationship of quality of life performance with the financial strength of the municipalities is also explored.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The pessimistic version of model (1) is expressed as \( I_{0*} = \mathop {\hbox{min} }\limits_{{{\mathbf{w}}_{0} \in {\mathcal{W}}}} \frac{{{\mathbf{x}}_{0} {\mathbf{w}}_{0} }}{{\mathop {\hbox{max} }\limits_{i \in A} {\mathbf{x}}_{i} {\mathbf{w}}_{0} }} \). Entani et al. (2002) provided an algorithm to derive the optimal solution explicitly, but this works only when there are no restrictions about the weights (i.e., the weights are simply assumed non-negative).
National Institute for Statistics and Economic Studies (INSEE), Public Equipment database (BPE), Public Finances General Directorate (DGFiP), National Office for Water and Aquatic Environments (ONEMA), Central Directorate of the Judiciary Police (DCPJ) and the National Observatory on Delinquency (ONDRP).
The Kendall’s W coefficient of concordance between the mean scores across the three specifications for the weight restrictions, was 0.986 for municipalities with population at least 500, versus 0.979 for the optimistic results and 0.971 for the pessimistic ones.
The notion of urban unity is based both on building continuity and the number of inhabitants. One calls an urban unit a municipality or a set of municipalities with a continuous building area (no break of more than 200 m between two buildings), which has at least 2000 inhabitants.
References
Bigerna, S., & Polinori, P. (2014). Quality of life and efficiency in Italian municipalities. International Advances in Economic Research, 20(3), 347–348.
Briec, W. (1999). Hölder distance function and measurement of technical efficiency. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 11(2), 111–131.
Burrett, J. (2009). Measuring quality of life in Canadian municipalities. In M. J. Sirgy, R. Phillips, & D. R. Rahtz (Eds.), Community quality-of-life indicators: Best cases III (pp. 155–164). Dordrecht: Springer.
Cherchye, L., Moesen, W., Rogge, N., & Puyenbroeck, T. Van. (2007). An introduction to ‘Benefit of the Doubt’ composite indicators. Social Indicators Research, 82(1), 111–145.
Costa, D. S. J. (2015). Reflective, causal, and composite indicators of quality of life: A conceptual or an empirical distinction? Quality of Life Research, 24(9), 2057–2065.
Cummins, R. A., Eckersley, R., Pallant, J., van Vugt, J., & Misajon, R. (2003). Developing a national index of subjective wellbeing: The Australian Unity Wellbeing Index. Social Indicators Research, 64(2), 159–190.
de Almeida, P. N., & Dias, L. C. (2012). Value-based DEA models: Application-driven developments. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 63(1), 16–27.
Despotis, D. K., & Sotiros, D. (2014). Value-based data envelopment analysis: A piece-wise linear programming approach. International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making, 4(1), 47–68.
Doumpos, M., Zopounidis, C., & Galariotis, E. (2014). Inferring robust decision models in multicriteria classification problems: An experimental analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 236, 601–611.
Doyle, J. R., Green, R. H., & Cook, W. D. (1995). Upper and lower bound evaluation of multiattribute objects: Comparison models using linear programming. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 64(3), 261–273.
Entani, T., Maeda, Y., & Tanaka, H. (2002). Dual models of interval DEA and its extension to interval data. European Journal of Operational Research, 136(1), 32–45.
Fleurbaey, M. (2009). Beyond GDP: The quest for a measure of social welfare. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(4), 1029–1075.
Galariotis, E., Guyot, A., Doumpos, M., & Zopounidis, C. (2016). A novel multi-attribute benchmarking approach for assessing the financial performance of local governments: Empirical evidence from France. European Journal of Operational Research, 248(1), 301–317.
Gonzalez, E., Carcaba, A., Ventura, J., & Garcia, J. (2011). Measuring quality of life in Spanish municipalities. Local Government Studies, 37(2), 171–197.
González, E., Cárcaba, A., & Ventura, J. (2016). Weight constrained DEA measurement of the quality of life in Spanish municipalities in 2011. Social Indicators Research, 136, 1157–1182.
Guardiola, J., & Picazo-Tadeo, A. J. (2014). Building weighted-domain composite indices of life satisfaction with data envelopment analysis. Social Indicators Research, 117(1), 257–274.
Hagerty, M. R., Cummins, R. A., Ferriss, A. L., Land, K., Michalos, A. C., Peterson, M., et al. (2001). Quality of Life Indexes for national policy: Review and agenda for research. Social Indicators Research, 55(1), 1–96.
Hashimoto, A., Sugita, T., & Haneda, S. (2009). Evaluating shifts in Japan’s quality-of-life. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 43(4), 263–273.
Hwang, S.-N., Lee, H.-S., Tang, S.-C., & Hsu, S.-S. (2013). Measuring quality of life using DEA-AR: Focusing on undesirable factors. INFOR: Information Systems and Operational Research, 51(2), 84–91.
Kaklauskas, A., Zavadskas, E. K., Radzeviciene, A., Ubarte, I., Podviezko, A., Podvezko, V., et al. (2018). Quality of city life multiple criteria analysis. Cities, 72, 82–93.
Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1993). Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value trade-offs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Keeney, R. L., & Sicherman, A. (1976). Assessing and analyzing preferences concerning multiple objectives: An interactive computer program. Behavioral Science, 21(3), 173–182.
Martín, J. C., & Mendoza, C. (2013). A DEA approach to measure the quality-of-life in the municipalities of the Canary Islands. Social Indicators Research, 113(1), 335–353.
Morais, P., & Camanho, A. S. (2011). Evaluation of performance of European cities with the aim to promote quality of life improvements. Omega, 39(4), 398–409.
Pastor, J. T., & Aparicio, J. (2015). Translation invariance in data envelopment analysis. In J. Zhu (Ed.), Data envelopment analysis—A handbook of models and methods (pp. 245–268). New York: Springer.
Rogge, N. (2012). Undesirable specialization in the construction of composite policy indicators: The Environmental Performance Index. Ecological Indicators, 23, 143–154.
Tavares, G., & Antunes, C. H. (2001). A Tchebycheff DEA model (No. RRR 35-2001). RUTCOR Research Report. New Jersey: Rutgers University.
Veenhoven, R. (2007). Subjective measures of well-being. In M. McGillivray (Ed.), Human well-being (pp. 214–239). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Zhou, P., Ang, B. W., & Poh, K. L. (2007). A mathematical programming approach to constructing composite indicators. Ecological Economics, 62(2), 291–297.
Zhu, J. (2001). Multidimensional quality-of-life measure with an application to Fortune’s best cities. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 35(4), 263–284.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Doumpos, M., Guyot, A., Galariotis, E. et al. Assessing the quality of life in French municipalities: a multidimensional approach. Ann Oper Res 293, 789–808 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-3068-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-3068-8