Skip to main content
Log in

A new inverse DEA cost efficiency model for estimating potential merger gains: a case of Canadian banks

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Estimating potential gains from mergers is an important strategic decision-making problem. This paper introduces a new inverse data envelopment analysis (DEA) based on a cost efficiency model for estimating potential gains from mergers. There are restructuring scenarios for firms that want to minimize cost. The existing inverse DEA technical efficiency models are not appropriate for estimating merger gains in these situations. It is also shown that the proposed inverse DEA cost efficiency model can reveal more merger gains than the inverse DEA technical efficiency model. The applicability of the proposed method is shown through an application in Canada’s banking sector to determine the required level of inputs and outputs for a merged bank to achieve target levels of cost and technical efficiencies. The results highlight the potential financial gains to improving both technical and cost efficiencies as efficiency-seeking banks increasingly become large and complex institutions through growth, mergers and acquisitions in a financial environment that is being shaped by reforms and technological innovation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amin, G. R., & Al-Muharrami, S. (2018). A new inverse DEA model for merger with negative data. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, 29(2), 137–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin, G. R., Al-Muharrami, S., & Toloo, M. (2019). A combined goal programming and inverse DEA method for target setting in mergers. Expert Systems with Applications, 115, 412–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin, G. R., Emrouznejad, A., & Gattoufi, S. (2017a). Modelling generalized firms’ restructuring using inverse DEA. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 48(1), 51–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin, G. R., Emrouznejad, A., & Gattoufi, S. (2017b). Minor and major consolidations in inverse DEA: Definition and determination. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 103, 193–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin, G. R., & Oukil, A. (2019). Flexible target setting in mergers using inverse data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Operational Research, 35(3), 301–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogetoft, P., & Wang, D. (2005). Estimating the potential gains from mergers. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 23, 145–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emrouznejad, A., & Yang, G. (2018). A survey and analysis of the first 40 years of scholarly literature in DEA: 1978–2016. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 61, 4–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emrouznejad, A., Yang, G., & Amin, G. R. (2019). A novel inverse DEA model with application to allocate the CO2 emissions quota to different regions in Chinese manufacturing industries. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 70(7), 1079–1090.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyni, M., Tohidi, G., & Mehrabeian, S. (2017). Applying inverse DEA and cone constraint to sensitivity analysis of DMUs with undesirable inputs and outputs. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 68(1), 34–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang, L. (2013). A generalized DEA model for centralized resource allocation. European Journal of Operational Research, 228(2), 405–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gattoufi, S., Amin, G. R., & Emrouznejad, A. (2014). A new inverse DEA method for merging banks. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, 25, 73–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiyasi, M. (2017). Inverse DEA based on cost and revenue efficiency. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 114, 258–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiyasi, M. (2018). Efficiency improvement and resource estimation: A tradeoff analysis. International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, 25(2), 151–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiyasi, M. (2019). Novel criterion models in the inverse DEA problem. International Journal of Operational Research, 35(1), 20–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, C., Shureshjani, R. A., Foroughi, A. A., & Zhu, J. (2017). Decomposition weights and overall efficiency in two-stage additive network DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 257(3), 896–906.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadi-Vencheh, A., Foroughi, A. A., & Soleimani-damaneh, M. (2008). A DEA model for resource allocation. Economic Modelling, 25(5), 983–993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagendorff, J., & Keasey, K. (2009). Post-merger strategy and performance: Evidence from the US and European banking industries. Accounting and Finance, 49(4), 725–751.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hankir, Y., Rauch, C., & Umber, M. P. (2011). Bank M&A: A market power story? Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(9), 2341–2354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, T., & Pilloff, S. (2009). Acquisition targets and motives in the banking industry. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 41(6), 1167–1187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, C. W. (2018). Assessing the performance of tourism supply chains by using the hybrid network data envelopment analysis model. Tourism Management, 65, 303–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibn Boamah, M. (2018). Real interest parity: Evidence from trade partnerships. Review of Financial Economics, 36(3), 199–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahanshahloo, G. R., Soleimani-Damaneh, M., & Ghobadi, S. (2015). Inverse DEA under inter-temporal dependence using multiple-objective programming. European Journal of Operational Research, 240(2), 447–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaffash, S., & Marra, M. (2017). Data envelopment analysis in financial services: A citations network analysis of banks, insurance companies and money market funds. Annals of Operations Research, 253(1), 307–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalantary, M., & Saen, R. F. (2019). Assessing sustainability of supply chains: An inverse network dynamic DEA model. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 135, 1224–1238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapelko, M. (2019). Measuring productivity change accounting for adjustment costs: evidence from the food industry in the European Union. Annals of Operations Research, 278(1–2), 215–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, M., Gart, A., & Becher, D. (2005). Post-merger performance of bank holding companies, 1987–1998. The Financial Review, 40(4), 549–574.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaPlante, A. E., & Paradi, J. C. (2015). Evaluation of bank branch growth potential using data envelopment analysis. Omega, 52, 33–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Abtahi, A. R., & Seyedan, M. (2019a). Supply chain performance evaluation using fuzzy network data envelopment analysis: A case study in automotive industry. Annals of Operations Research, 275(2), 461–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Li, F., Emrouznejad, A., Liang, L., & Xie, Q. (2019b). Allocating the fixed cost: an approach based on data envelopment analysis and cooperative game. Annals of Operations Research, 274(1–2), 373–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, D. J. (2016). Inverse DEA with frontier changes for new product target setting. European Journal of Operational Research, 254(2), 510–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., Sun, J., Yang, F., & Wu, J. (2018). How ownership structure affects bank deposits and loan efficiencies: an empirical analysis of Chinese commercial banks. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-3106-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lozano, S. (2013). Using DEA to find the best partner for a horizontal cooperation. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 66(2), 286–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lozano, S., & Villa, G. (2010). DEA-based pre-merger planning tool. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 61, 1485–1497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayston, D. J. (2017). Data envelopment analysis, endogeneity and the quality frontier for public services. Annals of Operations Research, 250(1), 185–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niepmann, F., & Schmidt-Eisenlohr, T. (2017). International trade, risk and the role of banks. Journal of International Economics, 107, 111–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panetta, F., Schivardi, F., & Shum, M. (2009). Do mergers improve information? Evidence from the loan market. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 41, 673–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seccareccia, M. (2012). Financialization and the transformation of commercial banking: understanding the recent Canadian experience before and during the international financial crisis. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 35(2), 277–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, K., Wei, Y. M., & Huang, Z. (2018). Environmental efficiency and abatement efficiency measurements of China’s thermal power industry: A data envelopment analysis based materials balance approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 269(1), 35–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegener, M., & Amin, G. R. (2019). Minimizing GHG emissions using inverse DEA with an application in oil and gas. Expert Systems with Applications, 122, 369–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, Q., Zhang, J., & Zhang, X. (2000). An inverse DEA model for inputs/outputs estimate. European Journal of Operational Research, 121(1), 151–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, S., Li, Y., Emrouznejad, A., Xie, J., & Liang, L. (2017). Estimation of potential gains from bank mergers: A novel two-stage cost efficiency DEA model. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 68(9), 1045–1055.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, H., Wei, Q., & Hao, G. (2002). DEA models for resource reallocation and production input/output estimation. European Journal of Operational Research, 136(1), 19–31.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gholam R. Amin.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 4.

Table 4 Data for 28 Canadian banks (year 2017)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amin, G.R., Ibn Boamah, M. A new inverse DEA cost efficiency model for estimating potential merger gains: a case of Canadian banks. Ann Oper Res 295, 21–36 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03667-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03667-9

Keywords

Navigation