Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Performance analysis of non-banking finance companies using two-stage data envelopment analysis

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper analyses the performance of non-banking finance companies (NBFC) in the Indian context using data envelopment analysis (DEA). The underlying objective of this study is to fill the void in the domain of NBFC, although a lot of research has been done on the banking industry in the context of the application of DEA, but none on NBFCs. The paper takes the panel data of the last 5 years (2014–2018) to calculate super-efficiencies in the first stage and then regresses the same on exogenous factors in stage-2. Descriptive statistics are used to estimate the efficiency by carrying out the calculations using both the traditional models (OTE, PTE and SE) and super-efficiency model. A comparison is made by categorizing NBFC’s based on the size of total assets and using non-parametric statistic tests to find whether the efficiency scores are significantly different across different categories. The second stage DEA analysis uses Tobit regression to find the exogenous factors which affect the model significantly. Based on traditional models, the total number of efficient DMUs are 8 out of 43 while there are 15 after considering the super-efficiency algorithm. Malmquist Indices are used to study the productivity indices of NBFCs over the last 5 years, and it gives us a maximum productivity growth of 8.53%. It was noticed that there is a significant difference in the mean efficiency values of different sized NBFC’s which can be explained by the lack of standardization in the NBFC domain and the few companies which are listed on the stock market. The managers should not consider ROE as a significant indicator of efficiency and should instead focus on aspects such as ROA and income diversity. Through the Malmquist analysis, the managers can break down the productivity change into technical and efficiency shifts for further investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bassem, B. S. (2008). Efficiency of microfinance institutions in the Mediterranean: An application of DEA. Transitions Studies Review, 15(2), 343–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben Abdelkader, I., Hathroubi, S., & Ben Jemaa, M. (2014). Microfinance institutions’ efficiency in the MENA region: A bootstrap-DEA approach. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 5, 179–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A. N., Hancock, D., & Humphrey, D. B. (1993). Bank efficiency derived from the profit function. Journal of Banking and Finance, 17(2–3), 317–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodla, B. S., & Verma, R. (2006). Determinants of profitability of banks in India: A multivariate analysis. Journal of Services Research, 6(2), 75–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burki, A. A., & Niazi, G. S. K. (2010). Impact of financial reforms on efficiency of state-owned, private and foreign banks in Pakistan. Applied Economics, 42(24), 3147–3160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casu, B., Ferrari, A., & Zhao, T. (2013). Regulatory reform and productivity change in Indian banking. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(3), 1066–1077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong, Y., Hamilton, R., & Tippett, M. (2014). Cost efficiency of the Chinese banking sector: A comparison of stochastic frontier analysis and data envelopment analysis. Economic Modelling, 36, 298–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drake, L., & Hall, M. J. (2003). Efficiency in Japanese banking: An empirical analysis. Journal of Banking and Finance, 27(5), 891–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebrahimnejad, A., Tavana, M., Lotfi, F. H., Shahverdi, R., & Yousefpour, M. (2014). A three-stage data envelopment analysis model with application to banking industry. Measurement, 49, 308–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes, F. D. S., Stasinakis, C., & Bardarova, V. (2018). Two-stage DEA-truncated regression: Application in banking efficiency and financial development. Expert Systems with Applications, 96, 284–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrier, G. D., & Lovell, C. A. K. (1990). Measuring cost efficiency in banking. Journal of Econometrics, 46(1–2), 229–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitch. (2008). Non-Bank Financial Institutions in India: Performance trends and outlook, Fitch Friday Presentation, Ananda Bhoumik and Arshad Khan, December, 2008 report.

  • Gulati, R., & Kumar, S. (2017). Analysing banks’ intermediation and operating efficiencies using the two-stage network DEA model. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 66(4), 500–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havrylchyk, O. (2006). Efficiency of the Polish banking industry: Foreign versus domestic banks. Journal of Banking and Finance, 30(7), 1975–1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Işık, I., & Hassan, M. (2002). Technical, scale and allocative efficiencies of Turkish banking industry. Journal of Banking and Finance, 26(4), 719–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, P. M., & Fethi, M. D. (2000). Evaluating the efficiency of Turkish commercial banks: An application of DEA and Tobit Analysis. A paper presented at the international DEA symposium, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. Available at: http://www.le.ac.uk/ulsm/research/epru/dispaper.html.

  • Jaffry, S., Ghulam, Y., & Cox, J. (2013). Trends in efficiency in response to regulatory reforms: The case of Indian and Pakistani commercial banks. European Journal of Operational Research, 226, 122–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jagwani, B. (2012). Efficiency measurement in the Indian Banking Industry: An application of data envelopment analysis. Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective, 16(4), 315–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayaraman, A. R., & Srinivasan, M. R. (2014). Performance evaluation of Banks in India A Shannon-DEA approach. Eurasian Journal of Business and Economics, 7(13), 51–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalra, R. (2016). Performance analysis of non-banking financial institutions. International Journal of Research in Economics and Social Sciences, 6(11), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantawala, A. S. (2001). Financial performance of non banking finance companies in India. Indian Economic Journal, 49(1), 86–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaur, S., & Gupta, P. K. (2015). Productive efficiency mapping of the Indian Banking System using data envelopment analysis. Procedia Economics and Finance, 25, 227–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishna, T. H., & Sai, N. V. (2016). A DEA-topsis approach to analyse the financial efficiency of Indian Public Sector Bank. Iranian Journal of Optimization, 8(1), 37–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, S., & Gulati, R. (2008). An examination of technical, pure technical, and scale efficiencies in Indian Public Sector Banks using data envelopment analysis. Eurasian Journal of Business and Economics, 1(2), 33–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Wei, J., Xu, J., & Ouyang, Z. (2018). Evaluation of the moderate earthquake resilience of counties in China based on a three-stage DEA model. Natural Hazards, 91(2), 587–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. M., & Noulas, A. G. (1996). The technical efficiency of large bank production. Journal of Banking and Finance, 20(3), 495–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nawaz, A. (2010). Efficiency and productivity of microfinance: Incorporating the role of subsidies. ULB - Universite Libre de Bruxelles, working papers CEB.

  • Ouenniche, J., & Carrales, S. (2018). Assessing efficiency profiles of UK commercial banks: A DEA analysis with regression-based feedback. Annals of Operations Research, 266(1–2), 551–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasiouras, F. (2008). Estimating the technical and scale efficiency of Greek commercial banks: The impact of credit risk, off-balance sheet activities, and international operations. Research in International Business and Finance, 22(3), 301–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puri, J., & Yadav, S. P. (2015). Intuitionistic fuzzy data envelopment analysis: An application to the banking sector in India. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(11), 4982–4998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puri, J., Yadav, S. P., & Garg, H. (2017). A new multi-component DEA approach using common set of weights methodology and imprecise data: An application to public sector banks in India with undesirable and shared resources. Annals of Operations Research, 259(1–2), 351–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raina, D., & Kumar Sharma, S. (2013). Determinants of cost efficiency of Commercial Banks in India: DEA evidence. IUP Journal of Bank Management, 12(2), 17–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Řepková, I. (2015). Banking efficiency determinants in the Czech banking sector. Procedia Economics and Finance, 23, 191–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Safania, S. (2010). The study of non-banking financial companies in Indian. Asian Journal of Development Matters, 4(1), 28–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sealey, C., & Lindley, J. T. (1977). Inputs, outputs, and a theory of production and cost at depository financial institutions. Journal of Finance, 32(4), 1251–1266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shankarii, S. & Muthukumar, J. (2017). A comparative study of financial performance analysis on non banking financial companies. International Journal of Scientific Research, 6(7), 291–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, A. B. (2017). Non-Banking Financial Institutions of India: Their onset, growth and performance of selected NBFCs. https://www.icsi.edu/Portals/86/Manorama/DBIMS%20Journal%20.pdf.

  • Sornaganesh, V., Maria, N., & Soris, N. (2013). A fundamental analysis of NBFC in India. OUTREACH-A Multi-Disciplinary Refereed Journal, 6, 119–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sufian, F. (2006). The efficiency of non-bank financial institutions: Empirical evidence from Malaysia. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 6, 49–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sufian, F., & Majid, M. Z. A. (2007). Banks’ efficiency and stock prices in emerging markets: Evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Asia-Pacific Business, 7(4), 35–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiping, W., & Yuesheng, L. (2010). Banking efficiency in China: Application of dea and tobit analysis. In China business review (pp. 12–25).

  • Zervopoulos, P. D., Sklavos, S., Kanas, A., & Cheng, G. (2019). A multi-parametric method for bias correction of DEA efficiency estimators. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 70(4), 655–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pankaj Dutta.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dutta, P., Jain, A. & Gupta, A. Performance analysis of non-banking finance companies using two-stage data envelopment analysis. Ann Oper Res 295, 91–116 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03705-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03705-6

Keywords

Navigation