Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Optimal decisions in a closed-loop supply chain: fairness concerns, corporate social responsibility and information value

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper develops a series of two-echelon closed-loop supply chain (CLSC) game models in which the retailer acts as the Stackelberg leader of the channel power under the scenarios of information symmetry and information asymmetry. The manufacturer has fairness concern and undertakes corporate social responsibility (CSR) by recycling used products using the reverse channel. We aim to explore the impact of fairness concerns and information asymmetry on the performance of the CLSC. Under the information symmetry, we compare different models with fairness concerns and find that one participant’s unilateral fairness concern can be beneficial to her or his own interests but not to the other participant’s interests. That is, each participant is motivated to adopt his (her) own unilateral fairness concern while avoiding fairness concern of the other. The manufacturer’s CSR level is always negatively related to her fairness concern information. However, the fairness concern has mixed effects on unit wholesale price and retail price in the different models. Bilateral fairness concerns can lead the retailer to raise the retail price, but not always raise the manufacturer’s wholesale price. Under information asymmetry, we investigate the impact of asymmetric information on the performance of the CLSC and find that asymmetric information is not always beneficial to the manufacturer although she owns private information on fairness concern. In each scenario, when both participants are concerned with fairness, we find that under certain conditions the manufacturer’s CSR level is always positively related to the colleting rate, but her utility does not always increase with it. Finally, we evaluate the information value of fairness concerns to the channel participants and find that the information value is always positive for the retailer but may be negative for the manufacturer when the level of fairness concern is higher than a certain threshold.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arya, A., & Mittendorf, B. (2015). Supply chain consequences of subsidies for corporate social responsibility. Production and Operations Management, 24(8), 1346–1357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battini, D., Bogataj, M., & Choudhary, A. (2017). Closed loop supply chain (CLSC): Economics, modelling, management and control. International Journal of Production Economics, 183, 319–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chai, J., Qian, Z., Wang, F., & Zhu, J. (2021). Process innovation for green product in a closed loop supply chain with remanufacturing. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03888-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chernonog, T., & Avinadav, T. (2019). Pricing and advertising in a supply chain of perishable products under asymmetric information. International Journal of Production Economics, 209, 249–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, T., Li, Y., & Xu, L. (2013). Channel leadership, performance and coordination in closed loop supply chains. International Journal of Production Economics, 146(1), 371–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chuang, C., Wang, C. X., & Zhao, Y. (2014). Closed-loop supply chain models for a high-tech product under alternative reverse channel and collection cost structures. International Journal of Production Economics, 156, 108–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cui, T. H., Raju, J. S., & Zhang, Z. J. (2007). Fairness and Channel Coordination. Management Science, 53(8), 1303–1314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darbari, J. D., Kannan, D., Agarwal, V., & Jha, P. C. (2019). Fuzzy criteria programming approach for optimising the TBL performance of closed loop supply chain network design problem. Annals of Operations Research, 273, 693–738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekker, R., Fleischmann, M., Inderfurth, K., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (Eds.). (2004). Reverse logistics: Quantitative models for closed-loop supply chains. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng, Q., Lai, G., & Lu, L. X. (2015). Dynamic bargaining in a supply chain with asymmetric demand information. Management Science, 61(2), 301–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forti, V., Baldé, C.P., Kuehr, R. and Bel, G., 2020. The global E-waste monitor 2020: Quantities, flows and the circular economy potential. United Nations University, International Telecommunication Union, and International Solid Waste Association. https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Environment/Documents/Toolbox/GEM_2020_def.pdf.

  • Gao, J., Han, H., Hou, L., & Wang, H. (2016). Pricing and effort decisions in a closed-loop supply chain under different channel power structures. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 2043–2057.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genc, T. S., & De Giovanni, P. (2018). Optimal return and rebate mechanism in a closed-loop supply chain game. European Journal of Operational Research, 269(2), 661–681.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genc, T. S., & De Giovanni, P. (2020). Closed-loop supply chain games with innovation-led lean programs and sustainability. International Journal of Production Economics, 219, 440–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindan, K., & Soleimani, H. (2017). A review of reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chains: a Journal of Cleaner Production focus. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 371–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, X., Feng, B., & Pu, X. (2015). Modelling decision behaviours in pricing game of closed-loop supply chains. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 66(6), 1052–1060.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, P., He, Y., & Xu, H. (2019). Channel structure and pricing in a dual-channel closed-loop supply chain with government subsidy. International Journal of Production Economics, 213, 108–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, Q., Wang, N., Yang, Z., He, Z., & Jiang, B. (2019). Competitive collection under channel inconvenience in closed-loop supply chain. European Journal of Operational Research, 275(1), 155–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsueh, C. (2014). Improving corporate social responsibility in a supply chain through a new revenue sharing contract. International Journal of Production Economics, 151, 214–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inderfurth, K., Sadrieh, A., & Voigt, G. (2013). The impact of information sharing on supply chain performance under aymmetric information. Production and Operations Management, 22(2), 410–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jena, S. K., & Sarmah, S. P. (2014). Price competition and cooperation in a duopoly closed-loop supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 156, 346–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katok, E., & Pavlov, V. (2013). Fairness in supply chain contracts: A laboratory study. Journal of Operations Management, 31(3), 129–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuiti, M. R., Ghosh, D., Basu, P., & Bisi, A. (2020). Do cap-and-trade policies drive environmental and social goals in supply chains: Strategic decisions, collaboration, and contract choices. International Journal of Production Economics, 223, 107537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamata, M. T., Liern, V., & Pérez-Gladish, B. (2018). Doing good by doing well: A MCDM framework for evaluating corporate social responsibility attractiveness. Annals of Operations Research, 267(1–2), 249–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lexmark, 2020. Lexmark 2020 Corporate Social Responsibility Report. https://csr.lexmark.com/pdfs/Lexmark -2020-CSR-report.pdf.

  • Liu, M., Zhao, Y., Huang, R., & Perera, S. (2021). Vertical value-added cost information sharing in a supply chain. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04021-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, W., Shen, X., Wang, D., & Zhu, D. (2020). Service quality guarantee design: Obedience behavior, demand updating and information asymmetry. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03623-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, W., Wang, S., Zhu, D. L., Wang, D., & Shen, X. (2018). Order allocation of logistics service supply chain with fairness concern and demand updating: Model analysis and empirical examination. Annals of Operations Research, 268(1–2), 177–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, P., Li, K. W., & Wang, Z. (2017). Pricing decisions in closed-loop supply chains with marketing effort and fairness concerns. International Journal of Production Research, 55(22), 6710–6731.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, P., Shang, J., & Wang, H. (2017). Enhancing corporate social responsibility: Contract design under information asymmetry. Omega, 67, 19–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Z., Zhang, N., Dai, Y., & Hu, S. (2016). Managing channel profits of different cooperative models in closed-loop supply chains. Omega, 59, 251–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mobini, Z., Van den Heuvel, W., & Wagelmans, A. (2019). Designing multi-period supply contracts in a two-echelon supply chain with asymmetric information. European Journal of Operational Research, 277(2), 542–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modak, N. M., Kazemi, N., & Cárdenas-Barrón, L. E. (2019). Investigating structure of a two-echelon closed-loop supply chain using social work donation as a Corporate Social Responsibility practice. International Journal of Production Economics, 207, 19–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modak, N. M., & Kelle, P. (2019). Managing a dual-channel supply chain under price and delivery-time dependent stochastic demand. European Journal of Operational Research, 272(1), 147–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modak, N. M., Modak, N., Panda, S., & Sana, S. S. (2018). Analyzing structure of two-echelon closed-loop supply chain for pricing, quality and recycling management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 171, 512–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikoofal, M. E., & Gümüş, M. (2019). Supply diagnostic incentives under endogenous information asymmetry. Production and Operations Management, 28(3), 588–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pal, B., Cárdenas-Barrón, L. E., & Chaudhuri, K. S. (2021). Price, delivery time, and retail service sensitive dual-channel supply chain. Scientia Iranica E, 28(3), 1765–1779.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panda, S., Modak, N. M., Basu, M., & Goyal, S. K. (2015). Channel coordination and profit distribution in a social responsible three-layer supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 168, 224–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panda, S., Modak, N. M., & Cárdenas-Barrón, L. E. (2017). Coordinating a socially responsible closed-loop supply chain with product recycling. International Journal of Production Economics, 188, 11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panda, S., Modak, N.M., Cárdenas-Barrón, L.E., 2020. Does extended warranty depict competitive advantage to a retailer in a retail-e-tail channel supply chain. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 149, 106770.

  • Panda, S., & Modak, N. M. (2016). Exploring the effects of social responsibility on coordination and profit division in a supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 25–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qin, Y., Wei, G., & Dong, J. (2019). The signaling game model under asymmetric fairness-concern information. Cluster Computing, 22(S3), 5547–5562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reverte, C., Gómez-Melero, E., & Cegarra-Navarro, J. G. (2016). The influence of corporate social responsibility practices on organizational performance: evidence from Eco-Responsible Spanish firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 2870–2884.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savaskan, R. C., Bhattacharya, S., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2004). Closed-Loop supply chain models with product remanufacturing. Management Science, 50(2), 239–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2013). The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm value: the role of customer awareness. Management Science, 59(5), 1045–1061.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soleimani, H., Govindan, K., Saghafi, H., & Jafari, H. (2017). Fuzzy multi-objective sustainable and green closed-loop supply chain network design. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 109, 191–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Souza, G. C. (2013). Closed-loop supply chains: a critical review, and future research. Decision Sciences, 44(1), 7–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stindt, D., & Sahamie, R. (2014). Review of research on closed loop supply chain management in the process industry. Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, 26, 268–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X., Guo, H., Yan, R., & Wang, X. (2018). Achieving optimal performance of supply chain under cost information asymmetry. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 53, 523–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, X., & Niederhoff, J. A. (2014). Fairness in Selling to the Newsvendor. Production and Operations Management, 23(11), 2002–2022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, J., Xie, J., Deng, X., & Xiong, H. (2013). Cooperative advertising in a distribution channel with fairness concerns. European Journal of Operational Research, 227(2), 401–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, R., & Ma, L. (2017). Two-part tariff contracting with competing unreliable suppliers in a supply chain under asymmetric information. Annals of Operations Research, 257(1–2), 559–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L., Zhou, H., Liu, Y., & Lu, R. (2019). Optimal environmental quality and price with consumer environmental awareness and retailer’s fairness concerns in supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 213, 1063–1079.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, X., Liu, Z., Li, K. W., Huang, J., & Chen, J. (2019). Cooperative game approaches to coordinating a three-echelon closed-loop supply chain with fairness concerns. International Journal of Production Economics, 212, 92–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, J., Zhao, R., & Wang, W. (2019). Pricing decision of a manufacturer in a dual-channel supply chain with asymmetric information. European Journal of Operational Research, 278(3), 809–820.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhuo, W., Yang, H., Cárdenas-Barrón, L. E., & Wan, H. (2021). Loss-averse supply chain decisions with a capital constrained retailer. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 17(2), 711–732.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the editor and anonymous referees for their constructive comments and encouragement that have helped improve our paper greatly. The work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grants (71971113).

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China, 71971113, Kebing Chen.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kebing Chen.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 450 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Q., Chen, K., Wang, S. et al. Optimal decisions in a closed-loop supply chain: fairness concerns, corporate social responsibility and information value. Ann Oper Res 309, 277–304 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04456-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04456-8

Keywords

Navigation