Skip to main content
Log in

An interactive optimization approach to a real-world oceanographic campaign planning problem

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we deal with a real-world routing problem that consists of finding the best route for an oceanographic campaign. The planning task involves setting up the initial route and managing the route variations along the way. Bearing in mind the idea of building an experimental tool to support the decision making process of the expert when planning the route, two different approaches to solve the problem were developed. First of all, we assumed that the problem was well characterized by the initial description of the expert, using as fitness function the time employed in the route and applying classical local search optimization heuristics. The difficulty of a precise constraint definition and the infeasibility of mathematically describing all the evaluation criteria of the expert led us towards interactive optimization as a way to introduce the knowledge of the expert. According to the results, this last approach was able to provide satisfactory solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Banzhaf W (1997) Interactive evolution. IOP Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bentley PJ (1999) Evolutionary design by computers with cdrom. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cho SB (2002) Towards creative evolutionary systems with interactive genetic algorithm. Appl Intell 16(2), 129–138

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Coello CAC, Lamont GB, Van Veldhuizen DA (2007) Evolutionary algorithms for solving multi-objective problems. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Croes GA (1958) A method for solving traveling-salesman problems. 4OR 6(6), 791–812

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Deb K (2001) Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. In: Wiley-interscience series in systems and optimization. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dumas Y, Desrosiers J, Gelinas E (1995) An optimal algorithm for the traveling salesman problem with time windows. 4OR 43(2), 367–371

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Ecemis MI, Wikel J, Bingham C, Bonabeau E (2008) A drug candidate design environment using evolutionary computation. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 12(5), 591–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gendreau M, Hertz A, Laporte G, Stan M (1998) A generalized insertion heuristic for the traveling salesman problem with time windows. 4OR 46, 330–335

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Junger M, Reinelt G, Rinaldi G (1997) The traveling salesman problem. In: Dell’Amico M, Maffioli F, Martello S (eds.) Annotated bibliographies in combinatorial. Optimization discrete mathematics. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kamalian RR, Takagi H, Agogino AM (2004) Optimized design of mems by evolutionary multi-objective optimization with interactive evolutionary computation. In: Deb K et al (eds.) Genetic and evolutionary computation—GECCO 2004, genetic and evolutionary computation conference, Seattle, WA, USA, Proceedings, part II Lecture notes in computer science, vol 3103. Springer, Berlin, pp 1030–1041

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kang M, Choi H, Kim H, Park B (2011) Development of a maritime transportation planning support system for car carriers based on genetic algorithm. Applied Intelligence 1–20

  13. Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt CD, Vecchi MP (1983) Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220(4598), 671–680

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Klau GW, Lesh N, Marks J, Mitzenmacher M (2010) Human-guided search. J Heuristics 16(3), 289–310

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Larrañaga P, Lozano JA (2002) Estimation of Distribution Algorithms: A new tool for evolutionary computation. Kluwer Academic, Norwell

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Lawler EL, Lenstra JK, Rinnooy Kan AHG, Shmoys DB (eds) (1985) The traveling salesman problem: A guided tour of combinatorial optimization. In: Discrete mathematics optimization. Wiley, Chichester

  17. Louis S, Tang R (1999) Interactive genetic algorithms for the traveling salesman problem. In: Genetic and evolutionary computation conf, pp 1043–1048

    Google Scholar 

  18. Miettinen K (1999) Nonlinear multiobjective optimization. In: International series in operations research and management science, vol 12. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mühlenbein H, Paass G (1996) From recombination of genes to the estimation of distributions. I. Binary parameters. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on parallel problem solving from nature (London) (UK), PPSN IV. Springer, Berlin, pp 178–187

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Ombuki BM, Ross B, Hanshar F (2006) Multi-objective genetic algorithms for vehicle routing problem with time windows. Appl Intell 24(1), 17–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Parmee IC, Cvetkovic D, Watson AH, Bonham CR (2000) Multiobjective satisfaction within an interactive evolutionary design environment. Evol Comput 8(2), 197–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sagarna R, Lozano JA (2006) Scatter search in software testing, comparison and collaboration with estimation of distribution algorithms. Eur J Oper Res 169(2), 392–412

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Santana R, Larrañaga P, Lozano JA (2008) Protein folding in simplified models with estimation of distribution algorithms. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 12(4), 418–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Simons C, Parmee I (2007) A cross-disciplinary technology transfer for search-based evolutionary computing: from engineering design to software engineering design. Eng Optim 39, 631–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Takagi H, Ohsaki M (2007) Interactive evolutionary computation-based hearing aid fitting. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 11(3), 414–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Takagi H (2001) Interactive evolutionary computation: Fusion of the capabilities of EC optimization and human evaluation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE, 89, No. 9, pp 1275–1296, Invited Paper

    Google Scholar 

  27. Takagi H (2009) New iec research and frameworks. In: Fodor J, Kacprzyk J (eds.) Aspects of soft computing, intelligent robotics and control, studies in computational intelligence, vol 241. Springer, Berlin, pp 65–76

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Tsutsui S (2009) Effect of using partial solutions in edge histogram sampling algorithms with different local searches. In: IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernetics 2009. SMC 2009, pp 2137–2142

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Izaskun Ibarbia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ibarbia, I., Mendiburu, A., Santos, M. et al. An interactive optimization approach to a real-world oceanographic campaign planning problem. Appl Intell 36, 721–734 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-011-0291-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-011-0291-2

Keywords

Navigation