Skip to main content
Log in

Crime hotspot mapping using the crime related factors—a spatial data mining approach

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The technique of Hotspot Mapping is widely used in analysing the spatial characteristics of crimes. The spatial distribution of crime is considered to be related with a variety of socio-economic and crime opportunity factors. But existing methods usually focus on the target crime density as input without utilizing these related factors. In this study, we introduce a new crime hotspot mapping tool—Hotspot Optimization Tool (HOT). HOT is an application of spatial data miming to the field of hotspot mapping. The key component of HOT is the Geospatial Discriminative Patterns (GDPatterns) concept, which can capture the differences between two classes in a spatial dataset. Experiments are done using a real world dataset from a northeastern city in the United States and the pros and cons of utilizing related factors in hotspot mapping are discussed. Comparison studies with the Hot Spot Analysis tool implemented by Esri ArcMap 10.1 validate that HOT is capable of accurately mapping crime hotspots.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Algorithm 1
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bailey TC, Gatrell AC (1995) Interactive spatial data analysis. Longman Scientific & Technical, Harlow

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bates S (1987) Spatial and temporal analysis of crime. Res Bull

  3. Chainey S, Tompson L, Uhlig S (2008) The utility of hotspot mapping for predicting spatial patterns of crime. Secur J 21(1):4–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen LE, Felson M (1979) Social change and crime rate trends: a routine activity approach. Am Soc Rev 588–608

  5. Cook W, Ormerod P, Cooper E (2004) Scaling behaviour in the number of criminal acts committed by individuals. J Stat Mech Theory Exp 2004:P07003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ding W, Stepinski TF, Salazar J (2009) Discovery of geospatial discriminating patterns from remote sensing datasets. In: Proceedings of SIAM

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dong G, Li J (1999) Efficient mining of emerging patterns: discovering trends and differences. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM SIGKDD. ACM, New York, pp 43–52

    Google Scholar 

  8. Eck JE, Chainey S, Cameron JG, Leitner M, Wilson RE (2005) Mapping crime: Understanding hot spots. National Institute of Justice

  9. Gladwell M (2000) The tipping point: how little things can make a big difference. Little, Brown and Company, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  10. Harries KD (1999) Mapping crime: principle and practice. US Dept of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Crime Mapping Research Center

  11. Hirschfield A (2001) Mapping and analysing crime data: lessons from research and practice. CRC, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  12. http://www.esri.com/software/arcgis

  13. Jenks GF (1967) The data model concept in statistical mapping. Int Yearb Cartogr 7:186–190

    Google Scholar 

  14. Li J, Liu G, Wong L (2007) Mining statistically important equivalence classes and delta-discriminative emerging patterns. In: Proceedings of the 13th ACM SIGKDD. ACM, New York, pp 430–439

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mennis J, Guo D (2009) Spatial data mining and geographic knowledge discovery—an introduction. Comput Environ Urban Syst 33(6):403–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Murray AT, McGuffog I, Western JS, Mullins P (2001) Exploratory spatial data analysis techniques for examining urban crime. Br J Criminol 41(2):309–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pasquier N, Bastide Y, Taouil R, Lakhal L (1999) Discovering frequent closed itemsets for association rules. In: ICDT ’99 proceedings of the 7th international conference on database theory, pp 398–416

    Google Scholar 

  18. Short MB, Bertozzi AL, Brantingham PJ (2010) Nonlinear patterns in urban crime: hotspots, bifurcations, and suppression. SIAM J Appl Dyn Syst 9:462

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Skogan WG (1992) Disorder and decline: crime and the spiral of decay in American neighborhoods. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wand MP, Jones MC (1995) Kernel smoothing, vol 60. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work was partially funded by the National Institute of Justice (No. 2009-DE-BX-K219).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Ding.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, D., Ding, W., Lo, H. et al. Crime hotspot mapping using the crime related factors—a spatial data mining approach. Appl Intell 39, 772–781 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-012-0400-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-012-0400-x

Keywords

Navigation