Skip to main content
Log in

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Support vector regression methodology for prediction of input displacement of adaptive compliant robotic gripper

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This article was retracted on 19 November 2018

This article has been updated

Abstract

The prerequisite for new versatile grippers is the capability to locate and perceive protests in their surroundings. It is realized that automated controllers are profoundly nonlinear frameworks, and a faultless numerical model is hard to get, in this way making it troublesome to control utilizing tried and true procedure. Here, a design of an adaptive compliant gripper is presented. This design of the gripper has embedded sensors as part of its structure. The use of embedded sensors in a robot gripper gives the control system the ability to control input displacement of the gripper and to recognize specific shapes of the grasping objects. Since the conventional control strategy is a very challenging task, soft computing based controllers are considered as potential candidates for such an application. In this study, the polynomial and radial basis function (RBF) are applied as the kernel function of Support Vector Regression (SVR) to estimate and predict optimal inputs displacement of the gripper according to experimental tests and shapes of grasping objects. Instead of minimizing the observed training error, SVR poly and SVR rbf attempt to minimize the generalization error bound so as to achieve generalized performance. The experimental results show that an improvement in predictive accuracy and capability of generalization can be achieved by the SVR approach compared to other soft computing methodology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 19 November 2018

    The Editor-in-Chief has retracted this article [1] because validity of the content of this article cannot be verified. This article showed evidence of substantial text overlap (most notably with the articles cited [2, 3]) and authorship manipulation.

References

  1. Petković D, Pavlović ND (2012) A new principle of adaptive compliant gripper, mechanisms, Series: transmission and applications, mechanisms and machine science, vol 3. Springer, pp 143–150. XVI, ISBN 978-94-007-2726-7

  2. Becedas J, Gonzales E, Payo I, Feliu V (2011) On line visual-grasping system based on a gripper with two flexible fingers, preprints of the 18th IFAC world congress Milano (Italy) August 28 - September 2, p 14675–14680

  3. Russell RA, Wijaya JA (2003) Object location and recognition using whisker sensors, Australian conference on robotics and automation, CD-ROM. In: Proceedings ISBN,

  4. E. Baccarelli, N. Cordeschi, T. Patriarca (2011) QoS Stochastic Traffic Engineering for the wireless support of real-time streaming applications, 56(1), 2012, pp. 287–302. doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2011.09.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chitta S, Piccoli M, Sturm J (2010) Tactile object class and internal state recognition for mobile manipulation. IEEE Int Conf Robot Autom (ICRA):2342–2348. Anchorage, AK, 3–7 May 2010

  6. D. Amendola, F. De Rango, Kh. Massri, A. Vitaletti (2014) Efficient Neighbor Discovery in RFID Based Devices Over Resource-Constrained DTN Networks, IEEE ICC 2014, pp. 1–6.

  7. Allen P, Bajcsy R (1987) Robotic object recognition using vision and touch. In: Proceedings of the 9th international joint conference on artificial intelligence,

  8. Abdullah SC, Wada J, Ohka M, Yussof H (2012) Object exploration using a three-axis tactile sensing information. J Comput Sci 7(4):499–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jimenez AR, Soembagijo AS, Reynaerts D, Brussel HV, Ceres R, Pons JL (1997) Featureless classification of tactile contacts in a gripper using neural networks. Sensors Actuators 62:488–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bohg J, Kragic D (2010) Learning grasping points with shape context. Robot Auton Syst 58:362–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Radig B, Florczyk S (2001) A new contour-based approach to object recognition for assembly line robots, pattern recognition – 23rd DAGM symposium. Springer, pp 329–336

  12. Katic D, Vikobratovic M (1999) The application of connectionist structures to learning impedance control in robotic contact tasks. Appl Intell 7:315–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sanz PJ, Inqesta JM, Del pobil AP (1997) Planar grasping characterization based on curvature-symmetry fusion. Appl Intell 10:25–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. An S-Y, Kang J-G, Choi W-S, An S-Y O-Y, Kang J-G, Choi W-S, Oh S-Y (2011) A neural network based retrainable framework for robust object recognition with application to mobile robotics. Appl Intell 35:190–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Issa M, Petković D, Pavlović ND, Zentner L (2011) Embedded-sensing elements made of conductive silicone rubber for compliant robotic joint, 56th Internationales Wissenschaftliches Kolloquium TU Ilmenau, (CD-ROM), Ilmenau, paper id 1231

  16. Petković D, Issa M, Pavlović ND, Zentner L (2013) Intelligent rotational direction control of passive robotic joint with embedded sensors. Expert Syst Appl, ISSN 0957–4174 40 (4):1265– 1273

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shamshirbanda S, Patelc A, Anuarb NB, Kiahb MLM, Abraham A Cooperative game theoretic approach using fuzzy Q-learning for detecting and preventing intrusions in wireless sensor networks. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 32:228–241. June 2014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wua S, Wanga Y, Cheng S (2013) Extreme learning machine based wind speed estimation and sensorless control for wind turbine power generation system. Neurocomputing 102:163–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Petković D, Ćojbašić ž, Nikolić V, Shamshirband S, Kiah MLM, Anuar NB, Abdul Wahab AW (2014) Adaptive neuro- fuzzy maximal power extraction of wind turbine with continuously variable transmission. Energy 64:868–874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Petković D, Pavlović NT, Shamshirband S, Mat Kiah ML, Anuar NB, Idna Idris MY Adaptive neuro-fuzzy estimation of optimal lens system parameters. Opt Lasers Eng 55:84–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lu K, Zhao J, Cai D (2006) An algorithm for semi-supervised learning in image retrieval. Pattern Recog 39:717–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Leng Y, Xu X, Qi G (2013) Combining active learning and semi-supervised learning to construct SVM classifier. Knowl-Based Syst 44:121–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Petković D, Ćojbašić ž, Nikolić V (2013) Adaptive neuro-fuzzy approach for wind turbine power coefficient estimation. Renew Sust Energ Rev 28:191–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shamshirband S, Anuar NB, Mat Kiah ML, Patel A An appraisal and design of a multi-agent system based cooperative wireless intrusion detection computational intelligence technique. Eng Appl Artif Intell 26(9):2105–2127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ornella L, Tapia E (2010) Supervised machine learning and heterotic classification of maize (Zea mays L.); using molecular marker data. Comput Electron Agric 74:250–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Jain P, Garibaldib JM, Hirst JD (2009) Supervised machine learning algorithms for protein structure classification. Comput Biol Chem 33:216–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Balahura A, Turchi M (2013) Comparative experiments using supervised learning and machine translation for multilingual sentiment analysis. Comput Speech Lang 28(1):56–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Chakraborty S (2011) Bayesian semi-supervised learning with support vector machine. Stat Methodol 8:68–82

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Rajasekaran S, Gayathri S, Lee T-L (2008) Support vector regression methodology for storm surge predictions. Ocean Eng 35:1578–1587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yang H, Huang K, King I, Lyu MR (2009) Localized support vector regression for time series prediction. Neurocomputing 72:2659–2669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wei Z, Tao T, ZhuoShu D, Zio E (2013) A dynamic particle filter-support vector regressio n method for reliability prediction. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 119:109–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang L, Zhou W-D, Chang P-C, Yang J-W, Li F-Z (2013) Iterated time series prediction with multiple support vector regression models. Neurocomputing 99:411–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Petković D, Pavlović ND (2011) Investigation and adaptive neuro-fuzzy estimation of mechanical/electrical properties of conductive silicone rubber, 34th international conference on production engineering, Nis, Serbia, p 385–388

  34. Issa M, Petković D, Pavlović ND, Zentner L (2013) Sensor elements made of conductive silicone rubber for passively compliant gripper. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69(5):1527–1536. doi:10.1007/s00170-013-5085-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Petković D, Pavlović ND, Shamshirband S, Anuar Nor B (2013) Development of a new type of passively adaptive compliant gripper. Ind Robot 40(6):610–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Petković D, Pavlović ND (2011) Investigation and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Estimation of Mechanical/Electrical Properties of Conductive Silicone Rubber, 34th International Conference on Production Engineering, Nis, Serbia, pp 385–388

  37. Cortes C, Vapnik V (1995) Support-vector networks. Mach Learn 20:273–297

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Suykens JAK, Vandewalle J (1999) Least Squares Support Vector Machine Classifiers. Neural Process Lett 9:293–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Lin J-Y, Cheng C-T, Chau K-W (2006) Using support vector machines for long-term discharge prediction. Hydrol Sci J 51:599–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Choy KY, Chan CW (2003) Modelling of river discharges and rainfall using radial basis function networks based on support vector regression. Int J Syst Sci 34:763–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Smola A, Schölkopf B (2004) A tutorial on support vector regression. Stat Comput 14:199–222

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is funded by the University of Malaya, Malaysia, under grant RP002D-13ICT.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dalibor Petković.

Additional information

The Editor-in-Chief has retracted this article [1] because validity of the content of this article cannot be verified. This article showed evidence of substantial text overlap (most notably with the articles cited [2-3]) and authorship manipulation. The authors have not responded to correspondence about this retraction.

References

1. Petkovic, D., Shamshirband, S., Saboohi, H. et al. Appl Intell (2014) 41: 887. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-014-0574-5

2. Petkovic, D., Shamshirband, S., Saboohi, H. et al. Infrared Physics & Technology (2014) 65: 94-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infrared.2014.04.005

3. Ramedani, Z., Omid, M., Keyhani, A. et al. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (2014) 39: 1005-1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.108

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Petković, D., Shamshirband, S., Saboohi, H. et al. RETRACTED ARTICLE: Support vector regression methodology for prediction of input displacement of adaptive compliant robotic gripper. Appl Intell 41, 887–896 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-014-0574-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-014-0574-5

Keywords

Navigation