Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An efficient forensic technique for exposing region duplication forgery in digital images

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The internet users share a massive amount of digital images daily. The accessibility of powerful image manipulation tools has made the integrity of image contents questionable. The most popular image tampering is to duplicate a region elsewhere in the same image to replicate or conceal some other region. The duplicated regions have identical color and texture attributes that make this artifact invisible to the human eye. Therefore, efficient techniques are required to verify the credibility of image contents by detecting the regions duplicated in the digital images. This paper proposes an efficient technique for exposing region duplication forgery in digital images. The proposed technique divides the approximation (LL) sub-band of shift invariant stationary wavelet transform into overlapping blocks of w × w (i.e. w = 4, 8) sizes. The distinctive features extracted from the overlapping blocks are utilized to expose the region duplication forgeries in digital images. The experimental results of the proposed technique are compared with state-of-the-art techniques that reveal the prominence, and effectiveness of the proposed technique in terms of precision, recall and F 1 score for different block sizes. Therefore, the proposed technique can reliably be applied to identify the counterfeited regions and the benefits of the proposed technique can be achieved in different fields for example crime investigation, news reporting, and judiciary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Qureshi MA, Deriche M (2015) A bibliography of pixel-based blind image forgery detection techniques. Signal Process Image Commun 39:46–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Asghar K, Habib Z, Hussain M (2017) Copy-move and splicing image forgery detection and localization techniques: a review. Aust J Forensic Sci 49(3):281–307

  3. Qi X, Xin X (2015) A singular-value-based semi-fragile watermarking scheme for image content authentication with tamper localization. J Vis Commun Image Represent 30:312–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bausvs R, Kriukovas A (2008) Digital signature approach for image authentication. Electron Electr Eng 6(86):65–68

  5. Qazi T, Hayat K, Khan SU, Madani SA, Khan I, Kołodziej J, Li H, Lin W, Yow K, Xu C-Z (2013) Survey on blind image forgery detection. IET Image Process 7(7):660–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pan X, Lyu S (2010) Region duplication detection using image feature matching. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 5(4):857–867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Amerini I, Barni M, Caldelli R, Costanzo A (2013) Counter-forensics of SIFT-based copy-move detection by means of keypoint classification. EURASIP J Image Video Process 2013(1):18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Alkawaz MH, Sulong G, Saba T, Rehman A (2016) Detection of copy-move image forgery based on discrete cosine transform. Neural Comput Appl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2663-3

  9. Zimba M, Xingming S (2011) DWT-PCA(EVD) based copy-move image forgery detection. Int J Digital Content Technol Appl 5(1):251–258

  10. Hayat K, Qazi T (2017) Forgery detection in digital images via discrete wavelet and discrete cosine transforms. Comput Electr Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2017.03.013

  11. Fridrich AJ, Soukal BD, Lukáš AJ (2003) Detection of copy-move forgery in digital images. In: Proceedings of digital forensic research workshop. Citeseer

  12. Popescu AC, Farid H (2004) Exposing digital forgeries by detecting duplicated image regions. TR2004-515, Technical Report, Dartmouth College

  13. Myna A, Venkateshmurthy M, Patil C (2007) Detection of region duplication forgery in digital images using wavelets and log-polar mapping. In: International conference on computational intelligence and multimedia applications, 2007. IEEE, pp 371–377

  14. Christlein V, Riess C, Angelopoulou E (2010) A Study on Features for the Detection of Copy-Move Forgeries. In: Sicherheit, pp 105–116

  15. Ryu S-J, Lee M-J, Lee H-K (2010) Detection of copy-rotate-move forgery using zernike moments. In: 12th international conference on information hiding. Springer, Berlin, pp 51–65

  16. Huang Y, Lu W, Sun W, Long D (2011) Improved DCT-based detection of copy-move forgery in images. Forensic Sci Int 206(1):178–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Muhammad G, Hussain M, Bebis G (2012) Passive copy move image forgery detection using undecimated dyadic wavelet transform. Digit Investig 9(1):49–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sekeh MA, Maarof MA, Rohani MF, Mahdian B (2013) Efficient image duplicated region detection model using sequential block clustering. Digit Investig 10(1):73–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lynch G, Shih FY, Liao H-YM (2013) An efficient expanding block algorithm for image copy-move forgery detection. Inf Sci 239:253–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wu Y, Deng Y, Duan H, Zhou L (2014) Dual tree complex wavelet transform approach to copy-rotate-move forgery detection. Sci China Inf Sci 57(1):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  21. Alahmadi A, Hussain M, Aboalsamh H, Muhammad G, Bebis G, Mathkour H (2017) Passive detection of image forgery using DCT and local binary pattern. Signal Image Video Process 11(1): 81–88

  22. Ulutas G, Ustubioglu B, Ulutas M, Nabiyev V (2017) Frame duplication/mirroring detection method with binary features. IET Image Process 11(5):333–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee J-C (2015) Copy-move image forgery detection based on Gabor magnitude. J Vis Commun Image Represent 31:320–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nason GP, Silverman BW (1995) The stationary wavelet transform and some statistical applications. Lecture notes in statistics. Springer, New York, pp 281–281

  25. Pesquet J-C, Krim H, Carfantan H (1996) Time-invariant orthonormal wavelet representations. IEEE Trans Signal Process 44(8):1964–1970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. CoMoFoD dataset. http://www.vcl.fer.hr/comofod/

  27. Li Y (2013) Image copy-move forgery detection based on polar cosine transform and approximate nearest neighbor searching. Forensic Sci Int 224(1):59–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Taxila, Pakistan

    Toqeer Mahmood

  2. Department of Software Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Taxila, Pakistan

    Zahid Mehmood

  3. Department of Information Technology, Hazara University, Mansehra, Pakistan

    Mohsin Shah & Zakir Khan

  4. School of Information Science and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China

    Mohsin Shah

Authors
  1. Toqeer Mahmood
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zahid Mehmood
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohsin Shah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zakir Khan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toqeer Mahmood.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

All authors declare that there are no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mahmood, T., Mehmood, Z., Shah, M. et al. An efficient forensic technique for exposing region duplication forgery in digital images. Appl Intell 48, 1791–1801 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-017-1038-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-017-1038-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation