Skip to main content
Log in

A spatiotemporal attention-based neural network to evaluate the route risk for unmanned aerial vehicles

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Route risk evaluation is crucial for planning safe routes when unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) perform missions in hostile environments. The purpose of route risk evaluation is to fuse the intents, capabilities, and opportunities of the enemy to predict the damage to UAV in the future. Opportunities depend on the current as well as historical situation of the battlefield and are difficult to estimate effectively for the existing risk evaluation models. We propose a novel spatiotemporal attention-based evaluation network (STAEN) to automatically evaluate the route risk. In particular, the spatiotemporal attention values provided by the STAEN can reflect the opportunities of the enemy to threaten the UAV, which helps to understand the spatiotemporal evolutions of the situations on different routes. In addition, the network can automatically focus on the key route segments and defense subsystems in different evolution stages, to evaluate the route risk more accurately. The validity and interpretability of the evaluation network are verified by simulation experiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pfeiffer B, Batta R, Klamroth K, Nagi R (2005) Path planning for uavs in the presence of threat zones using probabilistic modeling. IEEE Trans Autom Control 43:278–283

    Google Scholar 

  2. Miller B, Stepanyan K, Miller A, Andreev M (2011) 3d path planning in a threat environment. In: 2011 50th IEEE conference on decision and control and European control conference. IEEE, pp 6864–6869

  3. Johansson F (2010) Evaluating the performance of TEWA systems. PhD thesis, Örebro universitet

  4. Erlandsson T, Niklasson L (2014) Automatic evaluation of air mission routes with respect to combat survival. Information Fusion 20:88–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang G, Guo L, Duan H (2013) Wavelet neural network using multiple wavelet functions in target threat assessment. The Scientific World Journal, 2013

  6. Little EG, Rogova GL (2006) An ontological analysis of threat and vulnerability. In: 2006 9th international conference on information fusion. IEEE, pp 1–8

  7. Naseem A, Khan SA, Malik AW (2017) A real-time man-in-loop threat evaluation and resource assignment in defense. Journal of the Operational Research Society 68(6):725–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Erlandsson T, Niklasson L (2013) Comparing air mission routes from a combat survival perspective. In: The twenty-sixth international FLAIRS conference

  9. Jiang H, Liang Y (2018) Online path planning of autonomous uavs for bearing-only standoff-target following in threat environment. IEEE Access 6:22531–22544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kabamba PT, Meerkov SM, Zeitz FH III (2006) Optimal path planning for unmanned combat aerial vehicles to defeat radar tracking. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 29(2):279–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. AAHE Goossens (2004) Development and evaluation of level 3 situation awareness support functions for a uav operator station. In: The 23rd Digital Avionics Systems Conference (IEEE Cat. No. 04CH37576), vol 2. IEEE, pp 12–D

  12. Rosenberg B, Richards M, Langton JT, Tenenbaum S, Stouch DW (2008) Applications of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms to air operations mission planning. In: Proceedings of the 10th annual conference companion on Genetic and evolutionary computation, pp 1879–1886

  13. Roberge V, Tarbouchi M, Labonté G (2012) Comparison of parallel genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization for real-time uav path planning. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 9(1):132–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. de la Cruz JM, Besada-Portas E, Torre-Cubillo L, Andres-Toro B, Lopez-Orozco JA (2008) Evolutionary path planner for uavs in realistic environments. In: Proceedings of the 10th annual conference on genetic and evolutionary computation, pp 1477–1484

  15. Ogren P, Winstrand M (2005) Combining path planning and target assignment to minimize risk in sead missions. In: AIAA guidance, navigation, and control conference and exhibit, p 5865

  16. Lee H, Choi BJ, Kim CO, Kim JS, Kim JE (2017) Threat evaluation of enemy air fighters via neural network-based markov chain modeling. Knowledge-Based Systems 116:49–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kong X, Zhang J, Wei X et al (2021) Adaptive spatial-temporal graph attention networks for traffic flow forecasting. Appl Intell. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-021-02648-0

  18. Yang H, Yuan C, Zhang L, Sun Y, Hu W, Maybank SJ (2020) Sta-cnn: convolutional spatial-temporal attention learning for action recognition. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 29:5783–5793

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Guo J, Xia W, Hu X (2020) A data-driven model for evaluating the survivability of unmanned aerial vehicle routes. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems: Theory & Applications 100(2):629–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Luong M-T, Pham H, Manning CD (2015) Effective approaches to attention-based neural machine translation. arXiv:1508.04025

  21. Song S, Lan C, Xing J, Zeng W, Liu J (2018) Spatio-temporal attention-based lstm networks for 3d action recognition and detection. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 27(7):3459–3471

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Qin Y, Song D, Chen H, Cheng W, Jiang G, Cottrell G (2017) A dual-stage attention-based recurrent neural network for time series prediction. arXiv:1704.02971

  23. Zhenhua W, Weiguo Z, Jingping S, Ying H (2008) Uav route planning using multiobjective ant colony system. In: 2008 IEEE conference on cybernetics and intelligent systems. IEEE, pp 797–800

  24. Beard RW, McLain TW, Goodrich MA, Anderson EP (2002) Coordinated target assignment and intercept for unmanned air vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 18(6):911–922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zheng C, Li L, Xu F, Sun F, Ding M (2005) Evolutionary route planner for unmanned air vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 21(4):609–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Peng Z, Li B, Chen X, Wu J (2012) Online route planning for uav based on model predictive control and particle swarm optimization algorithm. In: Proceedings of the 10th world congress on intelligent control and automation. IEEE, pp 397–401

  27. Zhang R, Zheng C, Yan P (2007) Route planning for unmanned air vehicles with multiple missions using an evolutionary algorithm. In: Third international conference on natural computation (ICNC 2007), vol 3. IEEE, pp 23–28

  28. Lv-wei N, Xiao-guang G, Bo L (2011) Target assignment for multi-fighters coordinated air combat based on vlsn. In: 2011 IEEE international conference on signal processing, communications and computing (ICSPCC). IEEE, pp 1–5

  29. Zengin U, Dogan A (2004) Dynamic target pursuit by uavs in probabilistic threat exposure map. In: AIAA 3rd “Unmanned Unlimited” technical conference, workshop and exhibit, pp 6580

  30. Dogan A (2003) Probabilistic approach in path planning for uavs. In: Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE international symposium on intelligent control. IEEE, pp 608–613

  31. Dogan A, Zengin U (2006) Unmanned aerial vehicle dynamic-target pursuit by using probabilistic threat exposure map. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 29(4):944–954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zengin U, Dogan A (2011) Cooperative target pursuit by multiple uavs in an adversarial environment. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 59(12):1049–1059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ren J, Du W, Du F (2013) A uav 3-d space dynamic path planning in complex battlefield environment. In: 2013 IEEE third international conference on information science and technology (ICIST). IEEE, pp 1379–1383

  34. Zhao Z, Niu Y, Ma Z, Ji X (2016) A fast stealth trajectory planning algorithm for stealth uav to fly in multi-radar network. In: 2016 IEEE international conference on real-time computing and robotics (RCAR). IEEE, pp 549–554

  35. Xinzeng W, Linlin C, Junshan L, Ning Y (2010) Route planning for unmanned aerial vehicle based on threat probability and mission time restriction. In: 2010 second IITA international conference on geoscience and remote sensing, vol 1. IEEE, pp 27–30

  36. Besada-Portas E, de la Torre L, Jesus M, de Andrés-Toro B (2010) Evolutionary trajectory planner for multiple uavs in realistic scenarios. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 26(4):619–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Hespanha JP, Kizilocak HH, Ateskan YS (2001) Probabilistic map building for aircraft-tracking radars. In: Proceedings of the 2001 American control conference. (Cat. No. 01CH37148), vol 6. IEEE, pp 4381–4386

  38. Zhao L, Zheng Z, Liu W, Cai K-Y, Lin S (2011) Real-time path planning for multi-uavs with share of threats information. In: 2011 6th IEEE conference on industrial electronics and applications. IEEE, pp 1359–1364

  39. Erlandsson T, Niklasson L, Nordlund P-J, Warston H (2011) Modeling fighter aircraft mission survivability. In: 14th international conference on information fusion. IEEE, pp 1–8

  40. Bahdanau D, Cho K, Bengio Y (2014) Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate. arXiv:1409.0473

  41. Mnih V, Heess N, Graves A, et al. (2014) Recurrent models of visual attention. In: Advances in neural information processing systems, pp 2204–2212

  42. Xu K, Ba J, Kiros R, Cho K, Courville A, Salakhudinov R, Zemel R, Bengio Y (2015) Show, attend and tell: Neural image caption generation with visual attention. In: International conference on machine learning. PMLR, pp 2048–2057

  43. Yang Z, He X, Gao J, Deng L, Smola A (2016) Stacked attention networks for image question answering. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 21–29

  44. Zhang J, Wu Z, Zhang H, Chen Y (2020) Visual question answering based on question attention model. In: Journal of Physics Conference Series. IOP Publishing, vol 1624, pp 022022

  45. Chorowski J, Bahdanau D, Cho K, Bengio Y (2014) End-to-end continuous speech recognition using attention-based recurrent nn: first results. arXiv:1412.1602

  46. Chorowski J, Bahdanau D, Serdyuk D, Cho K, Bengio Y (2015) Attention-based models for speech recognition. arXiv:1506.07503

  47. Gómez-Bombarelli R, Wei JN, Duvenaud D, Hernández-Lobato JM, Sánchez-Lengeling B, Sheberla D, Aguilera-Iparraguirre J, Hirzel TD, Adams RP, Aspuru-Guzik A (2018) Automatic chemical design using a data-driven continuous representation of molecules. ACS Central Science 4(2):268–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Liu B, Ramsundar B, Kawthekar P, Shi J, Gomes J, Luu Nguyen Q, Ho S, Sloane J, Wender P, Pande V (2017) Retrosynthetic reaction prediction using neural sequence-to-sequence models. ACS Central Science 3(10):1103–1113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Wang B, Klabjan D (2017) An attention-based deep net for learning to rank. arXiv:1702.06106

  50. Thekumparampil KK, Wang C, Oh S, Li L-J (2018) Attention-based graph neural network for semi-supervised learning. arXiv:1803.03735

  51. Xu K, Wu L, Wang Z, Feng Y, Witbrock M, Sheinin V (2018) Graph2seq: graph to sequence learning with attention-based neural networks. arXiv:1804.00823

  52. Yu B, Yin H, Zhu Z (2017) Spatio-temporal graph convolutional networks: a deep learning framework for traffic forecasting. arXiv:1709.04875

  53. Bi H-B, Lu D, Zhu H-H, Yang L-N, Guan H-P (2021) Sta-net: spatial-temporal attention network for video salient object detection. Applied Intelligence 51(6):3450–3459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Chen G, Lu J, Yang M, Zhou J (2019) Spatial-temporal attention-aware learning for video-based person re-identification. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 28(9):4192–4205

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  55. Kipf TN, Welling M (2016) Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. arXiv:1609.02907

  56. Guo S, Lin Y, Feng N, Song C, Wan H (2019) Attention based spatial-temporal graph convolutional networks for traffic flow forecasting. Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence 33:922–929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Ding Y, Zhu Y, Feng J, Zhang P, Cheng Z (2020) Interpretable spatio-temporal attention lstm model for flood forecasting. Neurocomputing 403:348–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Wu J, Zhong S-h, Liu Y (2020) Dynamic graph convolutional network for multi-video summarization. Pattern Recognition 107:107382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Cho K, Van Merriënboer B, Gulcehre C, Bahdanau D, Bougares F, Schwenk H, Bengio Y (2014) Learning phrase representations using rnn encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation. arXiv:1406.1078

  60. Battaglia PW, Pascanu R, Lai M, Rezende D, Kavukcuoglu K (2016) Interaction networks for learning about objects, relations and physics. arXiv:1612.00222

  61. Kingma DP, Ba J (2014) Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv:1412.6980

  62. Hochreiter S, Schmidhuber J (1997) Long short-term memory. Neural Computation 9(8):1735–1780

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Programme Nos.72071064 and 71521001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Xia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, J., Xia, W., Hu, X. et al. A spatiotemporal attention-based neural network to evaluate the route risk for unmanned aerial vehicles. Appl Intell 52, 15735–15750 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-021-03029-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-021-03029-3

Keywords

Navigation