Skip to main content
Log in

A blast furnace coke ratio prediction model based on fuzzy cluster and grid search optimized support vector regression

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the study of blast furnace coke ratio, existing methods can only predict coke ratio of daily. At the same time, the data under abnormal furnace conditions are excluded, and the model’s robustness needs to be improved. In order to improve the prediction accuracy and time precision of the blast furnace mathematical simulation model, a blast furnace coke ratio prediction model based on fuzzy C-means (FCM) clustering and grid search optimization support vector regression (SVR) is proposed to achieve accurate prediction of coke ratio. First, preprocess the blast furnace sensor data and steel plant production data. Then, the FCM algorithm is used to cluster the data under different furnace conditions. Finally, the SVR model optimized by grid search is used to predict the coke ratio under different blast furnace conditions. The average absolute error of the improved model is 1.7721 kg/t, the hit rate within 0.5% error is 81.19%, the coefficient of determination R2 is 0.9474, and the prediction performance is better than ridge regression and decision tree regression. Experiments show that the model can predict the coke ratio of molten iron in each batch when the blast furnace conditions are going forward and fluctuating, and it has high time accuracy and stability. It objectively describes the changing trend of blast furnace conditions, and provides new research ideas for the practical application of blast furnace mathematical models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abdul Quader M, Shamsuddin A (2016) A HYBRID FUZZY MCDM approach to identify critical factors and CO2 capture technology for sustainable iron and steel manufacturing[J]. Arab J Sci Eng 41(11):4411–4430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Magazzino C, Mele M (2020) A machine learning analysis of the relationship among iron and steel industries, air pollution, and economic growth in China[J]. J Clean Prod 277:123293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ariyama T, Sato M (2006) Optimization of ironmaking process for reducing CO2 emissions in the integrated steel works[J]. ISIJ Int 46(12):1736–1744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ueda S, Natsui S, Nogami H et al (2010) Recent progress and future perspective on mathematical modeling of blast furnace[J]. ISIJ Int 50(7):914–923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhou C, Tang GW, Wang JC et al (2016) Comprehensive numerical modeling of the blast furnace ironmaking process[J]. JOM 68(5):1353–1362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chu MS, Wang HT, Liu ZG et al (2014) Research progress on mathematical modeling of blast furnace ironmaking process[J]. Iron & Steel 49(11):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jian C (2001) A predictive system for blast furnaces by integrating a neural network with qualitative analysis[J]. Eng Appl Artif Intell 14(1):77–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Su X, Zhang S, Yin Y et al (2019) Prediction model of hot metal temperature for blast furnace based on improved multi-layer extreme learning machine[J]. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 10(10):2739–2752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yang AM, Zhuansun YX, Shi Y et al (2021) IoT system for pellet proportioning based on BAS intelligent recommendation model[J]. IEEE Trans Industr Inf 17(2):934–942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang YH, Zhang H, Jiang ZG et al (2013) Research of coke rate prediction of blast furnace based on operative characteristics of auxiliary resources[J]. Adv Mater Res 605–607:1792–1797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhou H, Wu J, Hong Z et al (2021) Numerical simulation of coke collapse and its optimization during burden charging at the top of bell-less blast furnace[J]. Powder Technol 389:155–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Henrik S, Frank P (2007) Non-linear prediction of the hot metal silicon content in the blast furnace[J]. ISIJ Int 47(12):1732–1737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wu M, Ma JJ, Hu J et al (2018) Optimization of coke ratio for the second proportioning phase in a sintering process base on a model of temperature field of material layer[J]. Neurocomputing 275:10–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li H, Wang Y, Jiao K et al (2019) Study on alkali circulation process and its influence on coke ratio in blast furnace[M].10th International Symposium on High-Temperature Metallurgical Processing, pp 15–24

  15. Fan Z, Qiu G, Jia J et al (2003) The investigation of predicting the coke rate based on BP neural network[C]. pp 491–496

  16. Zhou Y, Wen-Wu YU, Dong XJ et al (2010) A prediction model for blast furnace coke ratio with clustering analysis and neural network[J]. J Univ Sci Technol Liaoning 33(3):4

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yue YJ, Hu YF, Zhao H et al (2015) Coke rate prediction model based on genetic algorithm optimized support vector machine[J]. Appl Mech Mater 740:600–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hu J, Wu M, Chen X et al (2016) Prediction model of comprehensive coke ratio based on principal component analysis for sintering process[C]. pp 3612–3617

  19. Asghar MZ, Subhan F, Ahmad H et al (2020) Senti-eSystem: A sentiment-based eSystem-using hybridized fuzzy and deep neural network for measuring customer satisfaction[J]. Softw Pract Exp 51(3):571–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gadekallu TR, Gao XZ (2021) An efficient attribute reduction and fuzzy logic classifier for heart disease and diabetes prediction[J]. Recent Adv Comput Sci Commun (Formerly: Recent Patents on Computer Science) 14(1):158–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tang QL, Zhang JL, Li KJ et al (2017) New concept about replacement ratio between coke and coal[J]. J Iron Steel Res 29(5):345–351

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang D, Chen L, Wang Y et al (2021) The Research on Improving the Precision of The Polymer IFHI By BP Neural Network of The Method Data Normalization[C]. IOP Publishing, pp 032067

  23. Yu K, Liu Z, Zhao G et al (2021) A novel protection method for a wind farm collector line based on FCM clustering analysis[J]. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 129(16):106863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhou K, Yang S (2016) Exploring the uniform effect of FCM clustering: A data distribution perspective[J]. Knowl Based Syst 96:76–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang D, Xiang W, Cao Q et al (2020) Application of incremental support vector regression based on optimal training subset and improved particle swarm optimization algorithm in real-time sensor fault diagnosis[J]. Appl Intell 51(6):3323–3338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hu J, Zheng K (2015) A novel support vector regression for data set with outliers[J]. Appl Soft Comput 31:405–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wu CH, Tzeng GH, Lin RH (2009) A novel hybrid genetic algorithm for kernel function and parameter optimization in support vector regression[J]. Expert Syst Appl 36(3):4725–4735

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.52074126); Hebei Province Natural Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (NO.E2020209082).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jincai Chang or Mansheng Chu.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, S., Chang, J., Chu, M. et al. A blast furnace coke ratio prediction model based on fuzzy cluster and grid search optimized support vector regression. Appl Intell 52, 13533–13542 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-022-03234-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-022-03234-8

Keywords

Navigation