Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Electronic institutions for B2B: dynamic normative environments

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Artificial Intelligence and Law Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The regulation of the activity of multiple autonomous entities represented in a multi-agent system, in environments with no central design (and thus with no cooperative assumption), is gaining much attention in the research community. Approaches to this concern include the use of norms in so-called normative multi-agent systems and the development of electronic institution frameworks. In this paper we describe our approach towards the development of an electronic institution providing an enforceable normative environment. Within this environment, institutional services are provided that assist agents in forming cooperative structures whose commitments are made explicit through contracts. Our normative framework borrows some concepts from contract law theory. Contracts are formalized using norms which are used by the institution while monitoring agents’ activities, thus making our normative environment dynamic. We regard the electronic institution as a means to facilitate both the creation and the enforcement of contracts between agents. A model of “institutional reality” is presented that allows for monitoring the fulfillment of norms. The paper also distinguishes our approach from other developments of the electronic institution concept. We address the application of our proposal in the B2B field, namely regarding the formation of Virtual Organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arcos JL, Esteva M, Noriega P, Rodríguez-Aguilar JA, Sierra C (2005) Environment engineering for multiagent systems. Eng Appl Artif Intel 18(2):191–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Artikis A, Pitt J, Sergot M (2002) Animated specifications of computational societies. In: Proceedings 1st International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS’02), Bologna, July 2002, pages 1053–1062. ACM Press

  • Boella G, van der Torre L (2004) Regulative and constitutive norms in normative multiagent systems. In: Dubois D, Welty C, Williams M-A (eds) Proc. 9th Int. Conf. principles of knowledge representation and reasoning. Canada, Whistler, pp 255–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Boella G, van der Torre L, Verhagen H (2005) Introduction to normative multiagent systems in 1st Int. Symposium on Normative Multiagent Systems. England, Hatfield

    Google Scholar 

  • Castelfranchi C (2000) Engineering social order. In: Omicini A, Tolksdorf R, Zambonelli F (eds) Engineering societies in the agents world. Springer, pp 1–18

  • Castelfranchi C, Dignum F, Jonker C, Treur J (2000). Deliberative normative agents: principles and architectures. In: Jennings N, Lesperance Y (eds) Intelligent agents VI: agent theories, architectures, and languages. Springer, pp 364–378

  • Colombetti M, Verdicchio M (2002) An analysis of agent speech acts as institutional actions. In: Proc. 1st Int. Joint Conf. on autonomous agents and multiagent systems. ACM Press, New York, pp 1157–1164

  • Conte R, Falcone R, Sartor G (1999) Introduction: agents and norms: how to fill the gap? Artif Intel Law 7(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craswell R (2000) Contract law: general theories. In: Bouckaert B, De Geest G (eds) Encyclopedia of law and economics, vol III: the regulation of contracts. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Daskalopulu A, Maibaum T (2001) Towards Electronic Contract Performance. Legal Information Systems Applications, 12th International Conference and Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications. IEEE Computer Society, pp 771–777

  • Dignum V, Dignum F (2002) Towards an agent-based infrastructure to support virtual organizations. In: Camarinha-Matos LM (ed) Collaborative business ecosystems and virtual enterprises. Kluwer, pp 363–370

  • Dignum V, Meyer J-J, Dignum F, Weigand H (2003) Formal specification of interaction in agent societies. In: Hinchey M, Rash J, Truszkowski W, Rouff C, Gordon-Spears D (eds) Formal approaches to agent-based systems. Springer, pp 37–52

  • Esteva M, Padget J, Sierra C (2002) Formalizing a language for institutions and norms. In: Meyer J-J, Tambe M (eds) Intelligent agents VIII. Springer, pp 348–366

  • Esteva M, Rosell B, Rodríguez-Aguilar JA, Arcos JL (2004) AMELI: an agent-based middleware for electronic institutions. In: Proc. 3rd Int. Joint Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems: vol 1. IEEE Computer Society, New York, pp 236–243

  • FIPA (2002a) FIPA-ACL Message Structure Specification, http://www.fipa.org/specs/fipa00061/

  • FIPA (2002b) FIPA Communicative Act Library Specification, http://www.fipa.org/specs/fipa00037/

  • FIPA (2002c). FIPA Agent Message Transport Service Specification, http://www.fipa.org/specs/fipa00067/

  • Fornara N, Viganò F, Colombetti M (2005) Agent communication and institutional reality. In: van Eijk RM, Huget M-P, Dignum F (eds) Agent communication: international workshop on agent communication, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3396. Springer, pp 1–17

  • Friedman-Hill E (2003) Jess in action. Manning Publications Co

  • García-Camino A, Rodríguez-Aguilar JA (2005) Implementing norms in electronic institutions. In: Proc. 4th Int. Joint Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems. ACM Press, New York, pp 667–673

  • Jones A, Carmo J (2001) Deontic logic and contrary-to-duties. In: Gabbay D (ed) Handbook of philosophical logic. Kluwer, pp 203–279

  • Jones A, Sergot M (1996) A formal characterisation of institutionalised power. Logic J IGPL 4(3):427–443

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kollingbaum MJ, Norman TJ (2002) Supervised interaction—creating a web of trust for contracting agents in electronic environments. In: Proc. 1st Int. Joint Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems. ACM Press, New York, pp 272–279

  • López y López F, Luck M (2003) Modelling norms for autonomous agents. In: Chavez E, Favela J, Mejia M, Oliart A (eds) Proc. 4th Mexican Int. Conf. on Computer Science, IEEE Computer Society, pp 238–245

  • Lopes Cardoso H, Malucelli A, Rocha AP, Oliveira E (2005) Institutional services for dynamic virtual organizations. In: Camarinha-Matos LM, Afsarmanesh H, Ortiz A (eds) Collaborative networks and their breeding environments—6th IFIP working conference on virtual enterprises (PRO-VE’05). Springer, pp 521–528

  • Lopes Cardoso H, Oliveira E (2005a) Assisting and regulating virtual enterprise interoperability through contracts. In: Berre A, Elms K, Fischer K, Mueller JP (eds) Proc. Agent-based Technologies and applications for enterprise interOPerability. The Netherlands, Utrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopes Cardoso H, Oliveira E (2005b) Virtual enterprise normative framework within electronic institutions. In: Gleizes M-P, Omicini A, Zambonelli F (eds) Engineering societies in the agents World V. Springer, pp 14–32

  • Malucelli A, Palzer D, Oliveira E (2005) Combining ontologies and agents to help in solving the heterogeneity problem. In: Proceedings of the international workshop on data engineering issues in e-commerce (DEEC2005). IEEE Computer Society, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 26–35

  • Oliveira E, Rocha AP (2000) Agents advanced features for negotiation in electronic commerce and virtual organisations formation process. In: Dignum F, Sierra C (eds) Agent mediated electronic commerce: the european agentlink perspective. Springer, pp 78–97

  • Pacheco O, Carmo J (2003) A role based model for the normative specification of organized collective agency and agents interaction. J Autonomous Agents Multi-Agent Syst 6(2):145–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Aguilar JA (2001) On the design and construction of Agent-mediated Electronic Institutions, Ph.D. Thesis, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona

  • Sallé M (2002) Electronic contract framework for contractual agents. In: Cohen R, Spencer B (eds) Advances in artificial intelligence: 15th conference of the Canadian society for computational studies of intelligence. Springer, pp 349–353

  • Searle JR (1969) Speech acts: an essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle JR (1995) The construction of social reality. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Vázquez-Salceda J, Aldewereld H, Dignum F (2004) Implementing norms in multiagent systems. In: Lindemann G, enzinger J, Timm IJ, Unland R (eds) Multiagent system technologies. Springer, pp 313–327

Download references

Acknowledgment

The work reported in this paper is supported by the FCT (Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia) Project POSC/EIA/57672/2004. Henrique Lopes Cardoso enjoys the FCT grant SFRH/BD/29773/2006.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. LIACC – NIAD&R, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, R. Dr. Roberto Frias, Porto, 4200-465, Portugal

    Henrique Lopes Cardoso & Eugénio Oliveira

Authors
  1. Henrique Lopes Cardoso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eugénio Oliveira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henrique Lopes Cardoso.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lopes Cardoso, H., Oliveira, E. Electronic institutions for B2B: dynamic normative environments. Artif Intell Law 16, 107–128 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-007-9044-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-007-9044-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation