Skip to main content
Log in

Sustainable cooperative robotic technologies for human and robotic outpost infrastructure construction and maintenance

  • Published:
Autonomous Robots Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Robotic Construction Crew (RCC) is a heterogeneous multi-robot system for autonomous acquisition, transport, and precision mating of components in construction tasks. RCC minimizes use of resources constrained by a space environment such as computation, power, communication, and sensing. A behavior-based architecture provides adaptability and robustness despite low computational requirements. RCC successfully performs several construction related tasks in an emulated outdoor environment despite high levels of uncertainty in motions and sensing. This paper provides quantitative results for formation keeping in component transport, precision instrument placement, and construction tasks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, P.K., Timcenko, A., Yoshimi, B., and Michelman, P. 1992. Real-time visual servoing. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 1850–1856.

  • Balch, T. and Arkin, R.C. 1998. Behavior-based formation control for multi-robot teams. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 14(6):926–939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, E.T. and Schenker, P.S. (1996). Autonomous image-plane robot control for martian lander operations. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 726–731.

  • Brookshire, J., Singh, S., and Simmons, R. 2004. Preliminary results in sliding autonomy for coordinated teams. In Proceedings of the 2004 Spring Symposium Series.

  • Brown, R.G. and Jennings, J.S. 1995. A pusher/steerer model for strongly cooperative mobile robot manipulation. Proc. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, vol. 3, pp. 562–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpin, S. and Parker, L.E. 2002. Cooperative leader following in a distributed multi-robot system. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, vol. 3: pp. 2994–3001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W.Z., Korde, U., and Skaar, S.B. 1994. Position-control experiments using vision. International Journal of Robotics Research, 13(3):199–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desay, J.P., Kumar, V., and Ostrowski, P. 1999. Control of change in formation for a team of mobile robots. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, vol. 2, pp. 1556–1561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feddema, J.T. and Mitchell, O.R. 1989. Vision-guided visual servoing with feature-based trajectory generation. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 5(5):691–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, A.S. 2000. Designing for automated construction. Automation in Construction, 9(3):259–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huntsberger, T., Pirjanian, P., Trebi-Ollennu, A., Nayar, H.D., Aghazarian, H., Ganino, A., Garrett, M., Joshi, S. S. and Schenker, P. S. 2003. CAMPOUT: A control architecture for tightly coupled coordination of multi-robot systems for planetary surface exploration. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, Collective Intelligence, 33(5):550–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, S., Hager, G., and Corke, P. 1996. A tutorial on visual servo control. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 12(5):651–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukaiyama, T., Kyunghwan, K., and Hori, Y. 1996. Implementation of cooperative manipulation using decentralized robust position/force control. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Advanced Motion Control, vol. 2: pp. 529–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NASA Office of Exploration Systems. Human and Robotic Technology (H and RT) Formulation Plan. Version 3.0, May 14, 2004.

  • Nelson, B., Papanikolopoulos, N. P., and Khosla, P. 1996. Robotic visual servoing and robotic assembly tasks. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, 3(2):23–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papanikolopoulos, N., Khosla, P. K., and Kanade, T. 1991. Vision and control techniques for robotic visual tracking. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 857–864.

  • Parker, L.E. 1994. ALLIANCE: an architecture for fault tolerant, cooperative control of heterogeneous mobile robots. In Proc.eedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, vol. 2: pp. 776–683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritschow, G., Dalacker, M., Kurz, J., and Zeiher, J. 1994. A mobile robot for on-site construction of masonry. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ/GI International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, vol. 3, pp. 1701–1707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qingguo, L. and Payandeh, S. 2003. Multi-agent cooperative manipulation with uncertainty: a neural net-based game theoretic approach. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, vol. 3, pp. 3607–3612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rus, D., Donald, B., and Jennings, J. 1995. Moving furniture with teams of autonomous robots. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, vol. 1, pp. 235–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, R., Singh, S., Hershberger, D., Ramos, J., and Smith, T. 2000. First Results in the coordination of heterogeneous robots for large-scale assembly. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Experimental Robotics.

  • Skaar, S.B., Seelinger, M.J., Robinson, M.L., and Gonzalez-Galvan, E.J. 2001. Means and method of robot control relative to an arbitrary surface using camera-space manipulation. U.S. Patent 6 304 050, October 16.

  • Squyres, S. et al., 2003. Athena investigation overview. Journal of Geophysical Research.

  • Stroupe, A., Huntsberger, T., Okon, A., and Aghazarian, H. 2005. Precision manipulation with cooperative robots. multi-robot systems: From Swarms to Intelligent Automata Volume III. Schultz et al (Eds).

  • Trebi-Ollennu, A., Das, H., Aghazarian, H., Ganino, A., Pirjanian, P., Huntsberger, T., and Schenker, P. 2002. Mars rover pair cooperatively transporting a long payload. Proc. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

  • Urmson, C., Shamah, B., Teza, J., Wagner, M.D., Apostolopoulos, D., and Whittaker, W.L. 2001. A sensor arm for robotic antarctic meteorite search. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Field and Service Robotics, Helsinki, Finland.

  • Wawerla, J., Sukhatme, G.S., and Matarić, M.J. 2002. Collective construction with multiple robots. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, vol. 3, pp. 2696–2701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashley Stroupe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stroupe, A., Okon, A., Robinson, M. et al. Sustainable cooperative robotic technologies for human and robotic outpost infrastructure construction and maintenance. Auton Robot 20, 113–123 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-006-5943-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-006-5943-4

Keyword

Navigation