Skip to main content
Log in

Research on telecom service providers’ network charge strategy based on two-sided market theory

  • Published:
Cluster Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Against the background of increasingly mature mobile internet eco-system, internet companies have been continuing pursuing the innovation of internet applications. The action has brought about not only more clicks from the netizens but also gave rise to mounting network burden. Telecom service providers are now faced with the dual pressure from both the soaring broadband building and maintenance costs as well as the declining traditional operating revenues. They wish to find a way to abolish the previous unified pricing model and shift it into the differential charging model by offering graded data flow services. Consequently, the controversy over “net neutrality” has been aroused in the whole society. In this article we analyze the optimum prices in different stages of the internet eco-system, and establish two-sided market model for further research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Krämer, J., Wiewiorra, L., Weinhardt, C.: Net neutrality: a progress report. Inf. Econ. Policy 37, 794–813 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lee, D., Kim, Y.-H.: Empirical evidence of network neutrality-the incentives for discrimination. Inf. Econ. Policy 29, 288–292 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Filistrucchi, L., Geradin, D., Damme, E.V.: Market definition in two-sided markets: theory and practice. J. Compet. Law Econ. 10(2), 293–339 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Katz, M., Shapiro, C.: Network externalities, compitetion and compatibility. Am. Econ. Rev. 75, 424–440 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Katz, M., Shapiro, C.: Technology adoption in the presence of network externalities. J. Polit. Econ. 94(4), 822–841 (1986b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Katz, M., Shapiro, C.: Product introduction with network externalities. J. Econ. Perspect. 40(1), 55–84 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Armstrong, M.: Competition in two-sided markets. RAND J. Econ. 37(3), 668–691 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nicholas, E., Joacim, T.: Network neutrality on the internet: a two-sided market analysis. Inf. Econ. Policy 24(2), 91–104 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Viotto, J.: Competition and regulation of crowdfunding platforms: a two-sided market approach. Commun. Strateg. 1, 33–50 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chou, M.C., Khian, S.C., Chungc-Piaw, T., Zheng, H.: Newsvendor pricing problem in a two-sided market. Prod. Oper. Manag. 21(1), 204–208 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Njoroge, P., Ozdaglar, A.E., Stier-Moses, N.E., Weintraub, G.Y.: Investment in two sided markets and the net neutrality debate. Rev. Netw. Econ. 12(4), 355–402 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lee, R.S.: Vertical integration and exclusivity in platform and two-sided markets. Am. Econ. Rev. 103(7), 2960–3000 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kang, J.S., Downing, S.: Keystone effect on entry into two-sided markets: an analysis of the market entry of WiMAX. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 94, 170–186 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu, Q., Serfes, K.: Price discrimination in two-sided markets. J. Econ. Manag. Strategy 22(4), 768–786 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. von Ehrlich, M., Greiner, T.: The role of online platforms for media markets—two-dimensional spatial competition in a two-sided market. Int. J. Ind. Organ. 31(6), 723–737 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hagiu, A., Halaburda, H.: Information and two-sided platform profits. Int. J. Ind. Organ. 34(1), 25–35 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gabszewicz, J.J., Wauthy, X.Y.: Vertical product differentiation and two-sided markets. Econ. Lett. 123(1), 58–61 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Reisinger, M.: Two-part tariff competition between two-sided platforms. Eur. Econ. Rev. 68(3), 168–180 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Vasconcelos, H.: Is exclusionary pricing anticompetitive in two-sided markets? Int. J. Ind. Organ. 40, 1–10 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang, Z.: Price cap regulate on in a two-sided market: intended and unintended consequences. Int. J. Ind. Organ. 45, 28–37 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Delgawy, E.I., La, R.J.: Interaction between a content provider and a service provider and its efficiency. In: IEEE International Conference on Communications, pp. 5890–5895 (2015)

  22. Economides, N., Tåg, J.: Modeling the welfare effects of net neutrality regulation: a response to Caves’s comment. Inf. Econ. Policy 24, 288–292 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hagiu, A., Wright, J.: Multi-sided platforms. Int. J. Ind. Organ. 43, 162–174 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Casadesus-Masanell, R., Llanes, G.: Investment incentives in open-source and proprietary two-sided platforms. J. Econ. Manag. Strategy 24(2), 306–324 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Baranes, Edmond: The interplay between network investment and content quality: implications to net neutrality on the Internet. Inf. Econ. Policy 28, 57–69 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper was supported by Major Program of the National Social Science Foundation of China (Grant No.15ZDB154), National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program, Grant No. 2012CB315805), and National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71172135).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xuanqi Ou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ou, X., Lv, T. & Chen, X. Research on telecom service providers’ network charge strategy based on two-sided market theory. Cluster Comput 22 (Suppl 2), 2963–2969 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-018-1711-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-018-1711-4

Keywords

Navigation