Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling pedestrian crowd behavior based on a cognitive model of social comparison theory

  • Published:
Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Modeling crowd behavior is an important challenge for cognitive modelers. Models of crowd behavior facilitate analysis and prediction of human group behavior, where people are close geographically or logically, and are affected by each other’s presence and actions. Existing models of crowd behavior, in a variety of fields, leave many open challenges. In particular, psychology models often offer only qualitative description, and do not easily permit algorithmic replication, while computer science models are often not tied to cognitive theory and often focus only on a specific phenomenon (e.g., flocking, bi-directional pedestrian movement), and thus must be switched depending on the goals of the simulation. We propose a novel model of crowd behavior, based on Festinger’s Social Comparison Theory (SCT), a social psychology theory known and expanded since the early 1950’s. We propose a concrete algorithmic framework for SCT, and evaluate its implementations in several pedestrian movement phenomena such as creation of lanes in bidirectional movement and movement in groups with and without obstacle. Compared to popular models from the literature, the SCT model was shown to provide improved results. We also evaluate the SCT model on general pedestrian movement, and validate the model against human pedestrian behavior. The results show that SCT generates behavior more in-tune with human crowd behavior then existing non-cognitive models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allport FH (1924) Social psychology. Houghton Mifflin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Balch T (1998) Behavioral diversity in learning robot teams. PhD thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology

  • Berk R (1974) A gaming approach to crowd behavior. Am Sociol Rev

  • Blue VJ, Adler JL (2000) Cellular automata microsimulation of bidirectional pedestrian flows. Trans Res Rec 135–141

  • Blumer HG (1939) Collective behavior. Princ Sociol

  • Braun A, Musse SR, de Oliveira LPL, Bodmann BEJ (2003) Modeling individual behaviors in crowd simulation. CASA

  • Braun A, Musse SR, de Oliveira LPL, Bodmann BEJ (2003) Modeling individual behaviors in crowd simulation. In: Computer animation and social agents, pp 143–148

  • Carley K, Newell A (1994) The nature of the social agent. J Math Sociol

  • Daamen W, Hoogendoorn SP (2003) Experimental research of pedestrian walking behavior. Transp Res Rec 20–30

  • Festinger L (1954) A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relat 117–140

  • Fridman N (2007) Modeling crowd behavior based on social comparison theory. Master’s thesis, Bar Ilan University

  • Fridman N, Kaminka GA (2009) Comparing human and synthetic group behaviors: A model based on social psychology. In: International conference on cognitive modeling ICCM-09)

  • Fridman N, Kaminka GA (2011) Towards a computational model of social comparison: Some implications for the cognitive architecture. Cogn Systems Res

  • Goethals GR, Darley JM (1977) Social comparison theory: an attributional approach. In: Social comparison processes: theoretical and empirical perspectives. Hemisphere, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Goethals GR, Klein WMP (2000) Interpreting and inventing social reality: attributional and constructive elements in social comparison. In: Handbook of social comparison: theory and research. Plenum, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Helbing D (1993) Boltzmann-like and Boltzmann-Fokker-Planck equations as a foundation of behavioral models. Physica A 196:546–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helbing D (2001) Traffic and related self-driven many-particle systems. Rev Mod Phys 73

  • Helbing D, Farkas IJ, Vicsek T (2000) Simulating dynamical features of escape panic. Nature 407:487–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helbing D, Molnar P (1997) Self-organization phenomena in pedestrian crowds. In: Schweitzer F (ed) Self-organization of complex structures: from individual to collective dynamics. Gordon and Breach, New York, pp 569–577

    Google Scholar 

  • Helbing D, Molnar P, Farkas IJ, Bolay K (2001) Self-organizing pedestrian movement. Environment and Planning B 28:361–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson LF (1971) The statistics of crowd fluids. Nature 229:381–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson LF (1974) On the fluid mechanics of human crowd motion. Transp Res 8:505–515

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornstein HA, Fisch E, Holmes M (1968) Influence of a model’s feeling about his behavior and his relevance as a comparison other on observers’ helping behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol

  • Kretz T (2007) Pedestrian traffic: simulation and experiments. PhD thesis, Universität Duisburg-Essen

  • Le Bon G (1895) The crowd: a study of the popular mind. Dunwoody, Ga., N.S. Berg, 1968 edition

  • Milgram S, Bickman L, Berkowitz L (1969) Note on the drawing power of crowds of different size. J Pers Soc Psychol 13(2):79–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell A (1990) Unified theories of cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelechano N, Allbeck JM, Badler NI (2008) Virtual crowds: methods, simulation, and control. Morgan and Claypool

  • Pelechano N, Stocker C, Allbeck J, Badler N (2008) Being a part of the crowd: towards validating vr crowds using presence. In: Autonomous agents and multiagent systems (AAMAS)

  • Reynolds CW (1987) Flocks, herds and schools: A distributed behavioral model. In: Proceedings of the 14th annual conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques (SIGGRAPH-87). ACM Press, New York, pp 25–34

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds CW (1999) Steering behavior for autonomous character. In: Proceedings of the game developers conference, pp 763–782

  • Rymill SJ, Dodgson NA (2005) A psychologically-based simulation of human behaviour. In: Theory and practice of computer graphics, pp 35–42

  • Smith WP, Arnkelsson GB (2000) Stability of related attributes and the inference of ability through social comparison. In: Handbook of social comparison: theory and research. Plenum, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Thalmann D (2001) The foundations to build a virtual human society. In: Proceedings of intelligent virtual actors (IVA-2001). Springer, Berlin, pp 1–14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tissera PC, Printista M, Errecalde ML (2007) Evacuation simulations using cellular automata. J Comput Sci Technol

  • Toyama MC, Bazzan ALC, da Silva R (2006) An agent-based simulation of pedestrian dynamics: from lane formation to auditorium evacuation. In: Autonomous agents and multiagent systems (AAMAS)

  • Tu X, Terzopoulos D (1994) Artificial fishes: physics, locomotion, perception, behavior. In: SIGGRAPH ’94’: proceedings of the 21st annual conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques. ACM Press, New York, pp 43–50

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Turner R, Killian LM (1972) Collective Behavior, 1993 edition. Prentice Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilensky U (1999) NetLogo. Center for connected learning and computer-based modeling—Northwestern University; http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/

  • Wolff M (1973) Notes on the behaviour of pedestrians. In: People in places: the sociology of the familiar, pp 35–48

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Natalie Fridman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fridman, N., Kaminka, G.A. Modeling pedestrian crowd behavior based on a cognitive model of social comparison theory. Comput Math Organ Theory 16, 348–372 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-010-9082-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-010-9082-2

Keywords

Navigation