Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The interpersonal diffusion mechanism of unethical behavior in groups: a social network perspective

  • Manuscript
  • Published:
Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous studies examining the impact of the unethical behavior of a group of colleagues on an individuals unethical behavior have typically employed social learning theory as a theoretical foundation. In this research, we extend these rich yet defective examinations by addressing the largely ignored relationship perspective. Drawing on the social network perspective, we posit that the structure of relationships significantly influences the process of unethical behavior diffusion. Consistent with the theoretically derived hypotheses, our agent-based model simulation results provide general support for our theoretical model: colleagues unethical behaviors positively affect an individuals unethical behaviors, and this influence is positively moderated by group network density, group network closeness centrality and group size. This paper also discusses theoretical contributions, practical values, limitations and directions for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiken LS, West SG (1991) Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. Sage Publishing House, Newbury Park, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura A (1976) Social learning theory. In: Spence JT, Carson RC, Thibaut JW (eds) Behavioral approaches to therapy. General Learning Press, Morristown, NJ, p 1C46

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura A (1986) Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 51:1173–1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartels KK, Harrick E, Martell K, Strickland D (1998) The relationship between ethical climate and ethical problems within human resource management. J Bus Ethics 17:799–804. doi:10.1023/A:1005817401688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beams JD, Brown RM, Killough LN (2003) An experiment testing the determinants of non-compliance with insider trading laws. J Bus Ethics 45:309–323. doi:10.1023/A:1024159730463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Freeman LC (2002) UCINET for windows: software for social network analysis. Analytic Technologies, Harvard

    Google Scholar 

  • Brass DJ, Butterfield KD, Skaggs BC (1998) Relationships and unethical behavior: a social network perspective. Acad Manag Rev 23:1–18. doi:10.5465/AMR.1998.192955

    Google Scholar 

  • Carletti T, Righi S, Fanelli D (2011) Emerging structures in social networks guided by opinions’exchanges. Adv Complex Syst 14:13–30. doi:10.1142/S021952591100286X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis TRV, Luthans F (1980) A social learning approach to organizational behavior. Acad Manag Rev 5:281–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Márquez CM, Vázquez FJ (2014) A simple emulation-based computational model. Jasss-J Artif Soc S 17:1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman LC (1978) Centrality in social networks: conceptual clarification. Soc Netw 1:215–239. doi:10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gino F, Ayal S, Ariely D (2009) Contagion and differentiation in unethical behavior: the effect of one bad apple on the barrel. Psychol Sci 20:393–398. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02306.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gino F, Galinsky AD (2012) Vicarious dishonesty: when psychological closeness creates distance from ones moral compass. Organ Behav Hum Dec 119:15–26. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.03.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter M (1992) Networks and organization: structure form and action. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, pp 25–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer LT (1987) The institutionalization of unethical behavior. J Bus Ethics 6:439–447. doi:10.1007/BF00383286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivancevich JM, Konopaske R, Matteson MT (2005) Organizational behavior and management. Irwin Publishing House, McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones GE, Kavanagh MJ (1996) An experimental examination of the effects of individual and situational factors on unethical behavioral intentions in the workplace. J Bus Ethics 15:511–523. doi:10.1007/BF00381927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones TM (1991) Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: an issue-contingent model. Acad Manag Rev 16:366–395. doi:10.5465/AMR.1991.4278958

    Google Scholar 

  • Keith NK, Pettijohn CE, Burnett MS (2003) An empirical evaluation of the effect of peer and managerial ethical behaviors and the ethical predispositions of prospective advertising employees. J Bus Ethics 48:251–265. doi:10.1023/B:BUSI.0000005786.09105.5c

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kish-Gephart JJ, Harrison DA, Treviño LK (2010) Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. J Appl Psychol 95:1–31. doi:10.1037/a0017103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knoke D, Yang S (2007) Social network analysis. SAGE Publications Incorporated, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg L (1969) Stage and sequence: the cognitive-developmentalapproach to socialization. In: Goslin DA (ed) Handbook of socialization theory and research. Rand McNally, Chicago, pp 347–480

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraatz MS (1998) Learning by association? Interorganizational networks and adaptation to environmental change. Acad Manag J 41:621–643. doi:10.2307/256961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulik BW, OFallon MJ, Salimath MS (2008) Do competitive environments lead to the rise and spread of unethical behavior? Parallels from Enron. J Bus Ethics 83:703–723. doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9659-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liverpool Tasie LSO, Winter NA (2011) Asset versus consumption poverty and poverty dynamics in rural Ethiopia. Agric Econ 42:221–233. doi:10.1111/j.1574-0862.2010.00479.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liviatan I, Trope Y, Liberman N (2008) Interpersonal similarity as a social distance dimension: implications for perception of others actions. J Exp Soc Psychol 44:1256–1269. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.04.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer DM, Aquino K, Greenbaum RL, Kuenzi M (2012) Who displays ethical leadership, and why does it matter? An examination of antecedents and consequences of ethical leadership. Acad Manag J 55:151–171. doi:10.5465/amj.2008.0276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe DL, Butterfield KD, Trevino LK (2006) Academic dishonesty in graduate business programs: prevalence, causes, and proposed action. Acad Manag Learn Edu 5:294–305. doi:10.5465/AMLE.2006.22697018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller JH, Page SE (2004) The standing ovation problem. Complexity 9:8–16. doi:10.1002/cplx.20033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore C, Gino F (2013) Ethically adrift: how others pull our moral compass from true north, and how we can fix it. Res Organ Behav 33:53–77. doi:10.1016/j.riob.2013.08.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Fallon MJ, Butterfield KD (2005) A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996–2003. J Bus Ethics 59:375–413. doi:10.1007/s10551-005-2929-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Fallon MJ, Butterfield KD (2011) Moral differentiation: exploring boundaries of the monkey see, monkey do perspective. J Bus Ethics 102:379–399. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0820-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Fallon MJ, Butterfield KD (2012) The influence of unethical peer behavior on observers unethical behavior: a social cognitive perspective. J Bus Ethics 109:117–131. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-1111-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer D (2008) Extending the process model of collective corruption. Res Organ Behav 28:107–135. doi:10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rienties B, Hliot Y, Jindal-Snape D (2013) Understanding social learning relations of international students in a large classroom using social network analysis. High Educ 66:489–504. doi:10.1007/s10734-013-9617-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson SL, OLeary-Kelly AM (1998) Monkey see, monkey do: the influence of work groups on the antisocial behavior of employees. Acad Manag J 41:658–672. doi:10.2307/256963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott J (1991) Social network analysis: a handbook. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonenshein S (2007) The role of construction, intuition, and justification in responding to ethical issues at work: the sensemaking-intuition model. Acad Manag Rev 32:1022–1040. doi:10.5465/AMR.2007.26585677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treviño LK (1986) Ethical decision making in organizations: a person-situation interactionist model. Acad Manag Rev 11:601–617. doi:10.5465/AMR.1986.4306235

    Google Scholar 

  • Treviño LK, Weaver GR, Reynolds SJ (2006) Behavioral ethics in organizations: a review. J Manage 32:951C990. doi:10.1177/0149206306294258

  • Umphress EE, Bingham JB, Mitchell MS (2010) Unethical behavior in the name of the company: the moderating effect of organizational identification and positive reciprocity beliefs on unethical pro-organizational behavior. J Appl Psychol 95:769C780. doi: 10.1037/a0019214

  • Weber J (1990) Managers moral reasoning: assessing their responses to three moral dilemmas. Hum Relat 43:687C702. doi: 10.1177/001872679004300705

  • Zuber F (2015) Spread of unethical behavior in organizations: A dynamic social network perspective. J Bus Ethics 131:151C172. doi: 10.1007/s10551-014-2270-0

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management, Zhejiang University, 866 Yuhangtang Road, Administration Building Zijingang Campus, Hangzhou, 310058, People’s Republic of China

    Duanxu Wang, Xin Pi & Yuhao Pan

Authors
  1. Duanxu Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xin Pi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yuhao Pan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xin Pi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, D., Pi, X. & Pan, Y. The interpersonal diffusion mechanism of unethical behavior in groups: a social network perspective. Comput Math Organ Theory 23, 271–292 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-016-9226-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-016-9226-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation