Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Improving the Effectiveness of Virtual Teams by Adapting Team Processes

  • Published:
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Results are presented from a study on virtual teams and whether appropriate early training can positively influence their effectiveness. Sixteen teams that worked together for periods ranging from three months to three years were studied. Team processes that emerged naturally from long-duration teams were formalized and taught to shorter duration teams. These shorter duration teams comprised three different cohorts, each of which received different levels of training. It was found that the adoption of formal procedures and structured processes significantly increased the effectiveness of virtual teams. Tasks that lend themselves to a structured approach were most effectively accomplished during virtual meetings, whereas face-to-face interactions were better for relatively unstructured, discussion intensive tasks. The performance of a virtual team was significantly improved when team processes were adapted to the affordances of the CMC environment. It is shown that this adaptation can occur very rapidly if teams are trained on the technology as well as on work processes that best exploit it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Carmel, E. and R. Agarwal (2001): Tactical Approaches for Alleviating Distance in Global Software Development. IEEE Software, March/April, pp. 22–29.

  • Chinowsky, P.S. and E.M. Rojas (2003): Virtual Teams: Guide to Successful Implementation. Journal of Management in Engineering ASCE, July 2003, pp. 98–106.

  • Cho, H.C., J-S. Lee, M. Stefanone and G. Gay (2005): Development of Computer-Supported Collaborative Social networks in a Distributed Learning Community. Behavior & Information Technology, Vol. 24, No. 6, pp. 435–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, H., G. Gay, B.D. Davidson and A. Ingraffea (2007): Social Networks, Communication Styles, and Learning Performance in a CSCL Community. Computers & Education, Vol. 49, No. 2, pp. 309–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Citera, M. (1998): Distributed Teamwork: The Impact of Communication Media on Influence and Decision Quality. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 49, No. 9, pp. 792–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constant, D., L. Sproull and S. Kiesler (1996): The Kindness of Strangers: The Usefulness of Electronic Weak Ties for Technical Advice. Organization Science, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 119–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daft, R.L. and R.H. Lengel (1986): Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design. Management Science, Vol. 35, No. 5, pp. 554–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, B.D., R. Davidson, G. Gay, A. Ingraffea, M. Miller, L. Nozick, A. Zehnder, R. Sheckler and C. Rath (2002): Distance Design Collaboration Through an Advanced Interactive Discovery Environment. In Proceedings of the 2002 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Session 1302, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, June 2002.

  • Davidson, B.D., J.F. Dannenhoffer, A. Ingraffea, S. Jones and A. Zehnder (2003): Facilitating Effective, Geographically Distributed Engineering Design Teams. In ASEE/IEEE Proceedings of the 2003 Frontiers in Education Conference, Paper 0-7803-7444-4/03, Boulder, Colorado, November 5–8, 2003.

  • Davis, F.D. (1989): Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 319–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeSanctis, G. and R.B. Gallupe (1987) A Foundation for the Study of Group Decision Support Systems. Management Science, May 1987, Vol. 33, No. 5, pp. 589–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeSanctis, G. and M.S. Poole (1994): Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory. Organization Science, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 121–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, A. (1999): Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 44, No. 2, pp. 350–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fjermestad, J. (2003): An Analysis of Communication Mode in Group Support Systems Research. Decision Support Systems, Vol. 37, pp. 239–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fjermestad, J. and S.R. Hiltz (1998): An Assessment of Group Support Systems Experimental Research: Methodology and Results. Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 7–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fjermestad, J. and S.R. Hiltz (2000): Group Support Systems: A Descriptive Evaluation of Case and Field Studies. Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 115–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaver, W.W. (1992): The Affordances of Media Spaces for Collaboration. In Proceedings of the 1992 Computer Supported Collaborative Work Conference, 1992, Toronto, Canada.

  • Geisler, G. and E.H. Rogers (2000): Technological Mediation for Design Collaboration. IEEE, pp. 395–405.

  • Gopal, A., R.P. Bostrom and W.W. Chin (1992): Applying Adaptive Structuration Theory to Investigate the Process of Group Support Systems Use. Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 45–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graveline, A., C. Geisler and M. Danchak (2000): Teaming Together Apart: Emergent Patterns of Media Use in Collaboration at a Distance. IEEE, pp. 381–393.

  • Gutwin, C. and S. Greenberg (2002): A Descriptive Framework of Workspace Awareness for Real-Time Groupware. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Vol. 11, pp. 411–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammon, J.M., C.M. Harvey, R.J. Koubek, W.D. Compton and A. Darisipudi (2005): Distributed Collaborative Design Teams: Media Effects on Design Processes. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, Vol. 18, No. 2. pp. 145–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison (2007): http://harrison-innerview.com/, last accessed 9 March, 2007.

  • Henry, J.E. and M. Hartzler (1997): Virtual Teams: Today’s Reality, today’s Challenge. Quality Progress, Vol. 30, No. 5, pp. 108–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinds, P.J. and D.E. Bailey (2003): Out of Sight, Out of Sync: Understanding Conflict in Distributed Teams. Organization Science, Vol. 14, No. 6, pp. 615–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollan, J. and S. Stornetta (1992): Beyond Being There. Proceedings of CHI 92, pp. 119–125.

  • Jarvenpaa, S.L. and D.E. Leidner (1999): Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams. Organization Science, Vol. 10, No. 6, pp. 791–815.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jassawalla, A.R. and H.C. Sashittal (2003): Building Collaborative New Product Processes: Why Instituting Teams is not Enough. S.A.M. Advanced Management Journal, Vol. 68, No. 1, pp. 27–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, D.S. and U.S. Murthy (2004): Divergent and Convergent Idea Generation in Teams: A Comparison of Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Communication. Group Decision and Negotiation, Vol. 13, pp. 381–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. and R.J. Varey (1999): Impacts of Computer-Mediated Communication on Cultural Aspects at Work. Cognition, Technology & Work, Vol. 1, pp. 153–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J-S., H.C. Cho, G. Gay, B.D. Davidson and A.R. Ingraffea (2003): Technology Acceptance and Social Networking in Distance Learning. Educational Technology and Society, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 60–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. and G. Gay (2004): Understanding the Process of Social Influence of Technology Use in a Distance Learning Environment. Presented at the 13th Annual Asian Media Information & Communication Center (AMIC) Annual Conference at Bangkok, July 1, 2004.

  • Legris, P., J. Ingham and P. Collerette (2003): Why do people use information technology? A Critical Review of the Technology Acceptance Model. Information & Management, Vol. 40, pp. 191–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipnack, J. and J. Stamps (1999): Virtual Teams: The New Way to Work. Strategy & Leadership, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 14–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Q. and L. Liu (2004): The Technology Acceptance Model: A Meta-Analysis of Empirical Findings. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 59–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martins, L.L., L.L. Gilson and M.T. Maynard (2004): Virtual Teams: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go From Here? Journal of Management, Vol. 30, No. 6, pp. 805–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonough, E.F., K.B. Kahn and G. Barczak (2001): An Investigation of the Use of Global, Virtual, and Collocated New Product Development Teams. Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 18, pp. 110–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, K.Y.A. and A.S. Green (2002): Virtual Group Dynamics. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 116–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyerson, D., K.E. Weick and R.M. Kramer (1996): Swift Trust and Temporary Groups. In M. Kramer and T.R. Tyler (eds): Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research (pp. 166–195), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, R.E., C.C. Snow and G. Miles (2000): The Future.org. Long Range Planning, Vol. 33, pp. 300–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mongeau, P.A. and M.C. Morr (1999): Reconsidering Brainstorming. Group Facilitation: A Research and Applications Journal, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 14–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montoya-Weiss, M.M., A.P. Massey and M. Song (2001): Getting it Together: Temporal Coordination and Conflict Management in Global Virtual Teams. The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 44, No. 6, pp. 1251–1262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ocker, R.J. and G.J. Yaverbaum (1999): Asynchronous Computer-Mediated Communication versus Face-to-Face Collaboration: Results on Student Learning, Quality and Satisfaction. Group Decision and Negotiation, Vol. 8, No. 5, pp. 427–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odom, P., M. Stefanone, B.D. Davidson, G. Gay and A. Ingraffea (2004): Social Ties: They Really Matter. Presented at the 54th Annual Conference of the International Communication Association, New Orleans, Louisiana, May 2004.

  • Olson, G.M. and J.S. Olson (2000): Distance Matter. Human–Computer Interaction, Vol. 15, pp. 139–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, G.M. and J.S. Olson (2003): Mitigating the Effects of Distance on Collaborative Intellectual Work. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 27–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinsonneault, A., H. Barki, R.B. Gallupe and N. Hoppen (1999): Electronic Brainstorming: The Illusion of Productivity. Information Systems Research, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 110–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, A., G. Piccoli and I. Ives (2004): Virtual Teams: A Review of Current Literature and Directions for Future Research. Database for Advances in Information Systems, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 6–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, K. (2002): The Problem with ‘Awareness’. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Vol. 11, pp. 285–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, R.C. (2001). “The Mind’s Eye in Cyberspace: Online Perceptions of Self and Others,” in G. Riva and C. Galimberti (eds): Towards CyberPsychology: Mind, Cognitions and Society in the Internet Age, Amsterdam, IOS Press, pp. 53–72.

  • Sia, C-L., B.C-Y. Tan and K-K. Wei (2002): Group Polarization and Computer-Mediated Communication: Effects of Communication Cues, Social Presence, and Anonymity. Information Systems Research, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 70–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sole, D. and A. Edmondson (2002a): Bridging Knowledge Gaps: Learning in Geographically Dispersed Cross-Functional Development Teams. Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge, (pp. 587–604). Oxford University Press.

  • Sole, D. and A. Edmondson (2002b): Situated Knowledge and Learning in Dispersed Teams. British Journal of Management, Vol. 13, pp. 17–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stefanone, M., J. Handcock, G. Gay and A. Ingraffea (2004): Emergent Networks, Locus of Control, and the Pursuit of Social Capital. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Chicago, IL, pp. November 6–10, 2004.

  • Tidwell, L.C. and J.B. Walther (2002): Computer-Mediated Communication Effects on Disclosure, Impressions, and Interpersonal Evaluations: Getting to Know One Another a Bit at a Time. Human Communication Research, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 317–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, A.M., S.M. DeMarie and A.R. Hendrickson (1998): Virtual Teams: Technology and the Workplace of the Future. The Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 17–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, D. (1996). The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA, (pp. 278–333), University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vick, R.M. (1998): Perspectives on and Problems with Computer-Mediated Teamwork: Current Groupware Issues and Assumptions. Journal of Computer Documentation, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wainfan, L. and P.K. Davis (2004): Challenges in Virtual Collaboration, (pp. 4–12), RAND National Defense Research Institute, Santa Monica, CA.

  • Wang, X., J.F. Dannenhoffer, B.D. Davidson and J.M. Spector (2005): Design Issues in a Cross-Institutional Collaboration on a Distance Education Course. Distance Education, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 405–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitworth, B., B. Gallupe and R. McQueen (2001): Generating Agreement in Computer-Mediated Groups. Small Group Research, Vol. 32, No. 5, pp. 625–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, G.B. (1999): Teaching and Technology in Higher Education: Changes and Challenges. Adult Learning, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 16–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, Y.C., G. Gay and H. Hembrooke (2006): Focused Activities and the Development of Social Capital in a Distributed Learning Community. The Information Society, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 25–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by NASA Langley Research Center under Cooperative Agreement NCC-1-01004 and Grant NNL05AA08G, by the Empire State Development Corporation under Project Q181, and by the AT&T Foundation under Grant 000203938.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Syracuse University, 151 Link Hall, Syracuse, NY, 13244, USA

    Daniel J. Rice, Barry D. Davidson & John F. Dannenhoffer

  2. Kenneth J. Bissett Professor of Communications & Information Science, Cornell University, 339 Kennedy, Ithaca, NY, 14850-4623, USA

    Geri K. Gay

Authors
  1. Daniel J. Rice
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Barry D. Davidson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. John F. Dannenhoffer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Geri K. Gay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel J. Rice.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rice, D.J., Davidson, B.D., Dannenhoffer, J.F. et al. Improving the Effectiveness of Virtual Teams by Adapting Team Processes. Comput Supported Coop Work 16, 567–594 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-007-9070-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-007-9070-3

Key words

Search

Navigation