Skip to main content
Log in

Practices of Stigmergy in the Building Process

  • Published:
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Actors coordinate their cooperative efforts by acting on the evidence of work previously accomplished. Based on a field study this article introduces the concept of stigmergy to the analysis of coordinative practices in the building process. It distinguishes between practices of stigmergy, articulation work and awareness practices. Stigmergy is understood as coordination achieved by acting directly on the evidence of work previously accomplished by others. The article provides descriptions of stigmergy in the building process i.e. in design as well as construction work. It seeks to (1) introduce the concept of stigmergy to CSCW, (2) to delimit this concept in regard to other concepts of coordination such as articulation work and awareness and (3) to provide descriptions of practices of stigmergy in the building process and, in this capacity, to help explain how complex large-scale cooperative work is coordinated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Building services include e.g. electricity, ventilation, sanitation, heating and cooling and etc.

  2. Grassé developed the concept of stigmergy during his study of termites. However, it has since been used and applied to other groups of social insects (e.g. Wilson 1975), not least in the study of ants (e.g. Hölldobler and Wilson 1994). Over the last decade or so the concept of stigmergy has been introduced to the field of telecommunication especially in connection with the development of algorithms for network traffic, these algorithms are sometimes termed ‘ant algorithms’ (e.g. White and Pagurek 1998), and to the field of robotics (e.g. Dorigo et al. 2000).

  3. This must be a discussion for the field of entomology, rather than the field of CSCW, and consequently we shall refrain from forming an opinion on the subject.

  4. Please keep in mind that although we are now highlighting practices of stigmergy, articulation work in e.g. meetings, emails and phone calls is just as important for the coordination of the building process.

  5. In the last 30 years or so, computers have become a prominent tool in the design process, and we speak of Computer Aided Design (CAD) in the context of architectural work and construction. Architects, engineers and other specialists create, share and exchange CAD files in order to be able to coordinate their cooperative efforts in regard to designing a building. The files are shared by the use of a repository on a server that is accessed with a web browser such as Firefox or Internet Explorer. Here the latest versions of the CAD files pertaining to the design of the building are stored and accessed by all the members of the work ensemble. The sharing of CAD files is a crucial resource for coordination of the design process, as we shall see below.

  6. As mentioned above, stigmergy (and possibly awareness) are heed concepts.

References

  • Bardram, J.E., and C.A. Bossen (2005). A web of coordinative artifacts: collaborative work at a hospital ward. In GROUP 2005: Proceedings of the 2005 International Conference on Supporting Group Work, USA, 6–9 November 2005, Sanibel Island, Florida. New York: ACM Press, pp. 168–176.

  • Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Carstensen, P., and C. Sørensen (1996). From the social to the systematic: Mechanisms supporting coordination in design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). The Journal of Collaborative Computing, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 387–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, L.R. (2007). Practices of stigmergy in architectural work. GROUP 2007: Proceedings of the International Conference on Supporting group work, 4–7 November 2007, Sanibel Island, Florida. New York: ACM Press, pp. 11–20.

  • Christensen, L.R. (2008). The logic of practices of stigmergy: representational artifacts in architectural design. CSCW 2008: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 8–12 November 2008, San Diego, USA. New York: ACM Press, pp. 559–568.

  • Christensen, L.R. (2013). Coordinative Practices in the Building Process: An Ethnographic Perspective. London: Springer.

  • Dorigo, M., E. Bonabeau, and G. Theraulaz (2000). Ant algorithms and stigmergy. Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 851–871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerson, E.M., and S.L. Star (1986). Analyzing due process in the workplace. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 257–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grassé, P.P. (1959). La reconstruction du nid et les coordinations inter-individuelles chez Bellicositermes natalensis et Cubitermes sp. La théorie de la stigmergie: Essai d'interprétation des termites. constructeurs. Insect Sociaux, vol. 6, pp. 41–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harper, R.H.R., and J.A. Hughes (1993). What a f—ing system! send 'em all to the same place and then expect us to stop them hitting: Making technology work in air traffic control. In G. Button (ed.): Technology in Working Order: Studies of Work, Interaction, and Technology. Routledge, pp. 127–144.

  • Harper, R.H.R., J.A. Hughes, and D.Z. Shapiro (1989a). Working in harmony: An examination of computer technology in air traffic control. Proceedings of the First European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Gatwick, London, 13–15 September, 1989, London: Computer Sciences Company, pp. 73–86.

  • Harper, R.R., J.A. Hughes, and D.Z. Shapiro (1989b). The Functionality of Flight Strips in ATC Work: The Report for the Civil Aviation Authority. Lancaster, UK: Lancaster Sociotechnics Group, Department of Sociology, Lancaster University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, C., and P. Luff (1992). Collaboration and control: Crisis mangement and multimedia technology in London Underground control rooms. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) An International Journal, vol. 1, no. 1–2, pp. 69–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heath, C., M.S. Svensson, J. Hindmarsh, P. Luff, and D. Lehn (2002). Configuring awarness. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): The Journal of Collaborative Computing, vol. 11, no. 3–4, pp. 317–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heath, C.C., and P. Luff (1996). Convergent activities: Line control and passenger information on the London Underground. In Y. Engeström and D. Middleton (eds.): Cognition and Communication at Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 96–129.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler, B., and E.O. Wilson (1994). Journey to the Ants. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, G. (1955). The Concept of Mind. London: Hutchinson & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, K. (1994). Modes and Mechanisms of Interaction in Cooperative Work. Roskilde, Denmark: Risø National Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, K. (2002a). The problem with ‘awareness’: Introductory remarks on ‘Awareness in CSCW’. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): The Journal of Collaborative Computing, vol. 11, no. 3–4, pp. 285–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, K. (2002b). Remarks on the complexity of cooperative work. P. Salembier and T.H. Benchekroun (eds.): Cooperation and Complexity in Sociotechnical Systems, [special issue of] Revue des sciences et technologies de l’information, [série] Revue d’intelligence artificielle (RSTI-RAI), vol. 16, no. 4–5, pp. 443–483.

  • Schmidt, K., and L. Bannon (1992). Taking CSCW Seriously: Supporting Articulation Work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). An International Journal. vol. 1, no. 1–2, pp. 7–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, K., and C. Simone (1996). Coordination mechanisms: Towards a conceptual foundation of CSCW systems design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): The Journal of Collaborative Computing, vol. 5, no. 2–3, pp. 155–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, K., and I. Wagner (2004). Ordering systems: Coordinative practices and artifacts in architectural design and planning. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): The Journal of Collaborative Computing, vol.13, no. 5–6, pp. 349–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, A. (1976). Collected Papers II: Studies in Social Theory. The Hauge: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, A. (1990). Collected Papers I: The Problem of Social Reality. Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A.P. (1978). An investigation of the mechanisms underlying nest construction in the mud wasp Paralastor sp. (Hymenoptera: Eumenidae). Animal Behaviour, vol. 26, pp. 232–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Star, S.L. (1989). The structure of ill-structured solutions: Boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving. In L. Gasser and M. Huhns (eds.): Distributed Artificial Intelligence. London: Pitman, pp. 37–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, S.L., and J.R. Griesemer (1989). Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, vol. 19, pp. 387–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. (1985). Work and the division of labor. The Sociological Quarterly, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. (1988). The articulation of project work: An Organizational Process. The Sociological Quarterly, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 163–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., S. Fagerhaugh, B. Suczek, and C. Wiener (1985). Social Organization of Medical Work. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Suchman, L. (1997). Centers of coordination: A case and some themes. In L. B. Resnick, et al. (eds.): Discourse, Tools, and Reasoning: Essays on Situated Cognition. Berlín-Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 41–62.

  • Theraulaz, G., and E. Bonabeau (1999). A brief history of stigmergy. Artificial Life, vol. 5, pp. 97–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, T., and B. Pagurek (1998). Towards multi-swarm problem solving in networks. ICMAS'98: Proceedings of Third International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 333–340.

  • Wilson, E.O. (1975). Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am indebted to PLH Arkitekter A/S and to BPLUS Arkitekter & Designere for letting me take up so much of their time. In addition, I am grateful to the staff of PHIL & Søn A/S and MT Højgaard A/S. Moreover, Kjeld Schmidt’s opinions and careful reading of the text are greatly appreciated - needless to say, the responsibility for any errors is mine alone. Furthermore, the comments and opinions of Kristian Kreiner are also greatly appreciated. Also, thanks to Morten Visby for proof reading. Lastly, the comments of the anonymous reviewers that helped improve this paper are greatly appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lars Rune Christensen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Christensen, L.R. Practices of Stigmergy in the Building Process. Comput Supported Coop Work 23, 1–19 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-012-9181-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-012-9181-3

Key words

Navigation