Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Factors affecting use of e-learning platform (SPeCTRUM) among University students in Malaysia

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Guided by the current need in equipping young minds with the 21st century skills, integration of Information Communication Technology (ICT) in education has changed the way of teaching and learning takes place in educational institutions. The need of fast delivery of knowledge and information, whenever and wherever, has been the catalyst to the growth of e-learning worldwide. In Malaysia, e-learning has been pioneered by the private universities and has been adopted in most universities ever since. In the setting of a research university in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia , a quantitative design was conducted to investigate the factors affecting the usage of e-Learning platform so called SPeCTRUM by the students. Total of 110 respondents consist of undergraduate and postgraduate students from Faculty of Education have been selected randomly to participate in this research. Findings indicate that the co-participatory activities are one the main factors in the motivation of using SPeCTRUM. It was also found that demographic factors of the participants also played a key role in the rate of usage for the e-learning platform.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Accuosti, J. (2014). Factors affecting education technology success. Proceeding of the ASEE 2014 Zone I Conference, April 3–5, 2014, University of Bridgeport, Bridgpeort, CT, USA.

  • Ali, A. (2004). Issues and challenges in implementing e-learning in Malaysia. Open University of Malaysia Publication, 1–9.

  • Awais Bhatti, M. (2015). E-training adoption in the Nigerian Civil Service. European Journal of Training and Development, 39(6), 1–25.

  • Bates, T. (2001). National strategies for e-learning in post- secondary education and training. Fundamentals of educational planning, No. 70. http://www.unesco.org/iiep2008/08/06. Retrieved on 6 Aug 2008.

  • Caroll, N. (2013). E-learning – the McDonaldization of education. European Journal of Higher Education, 3(4), 342–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, V., & Fisher, D. (1999). Students’ perceptions of the efficacy of Web-based learning environment: the emergence of a new learning instrument. HERDSA Annual International Conference, Melbourne, 12–15.

  • Cole, J., & Foster, H. (2007). Using moodle: teaching with the popular open source course management system. Google e-Book.

  • Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and quantitative descriptive research method approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F., Bagozzi, R., & Warshaw, P. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35, 982–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delone, W., & McLean, E. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost & Sullivan. (2010). Policy on ICT in Education Malaysia. Retrieved from www.mscmalaysia.my: http://www.mscmalaysia.my/codenavia/portals/msc/images/pdf/Policy%20on%20ICT%20in%20Education%20Malaysia%202010.pdf.

  • Hussain, R. M. (2004). E-learning in higher education institutions in Malaysia. E-mento, 5(7), 72–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, M., Browne, T., Walker, R., & Hewitt, R. (2011). The development of technology enhanced learning: Findings from a 2008 survey of UK higher education institutions. Interactive Learning Environments, 19(5), 447–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, N., & Man, A. (2010). Blending learning: Widening participation in higher education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(4), 405–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamsin, A. (2005). Is e-learning the solution and substitute for conventional learning? International Journal of the Computer, the Internet and Management, 13(3), 79–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karim, M. R., & Hashim, Y. (2004). The experience of the e-learning implementation at the Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Malaysia. Malaysian Online Journal of Instructional Technology, 1(1), 50–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, C., & Cenerud, L. (2002). Students’ perceptions of e‐learning in University education. Journal of Educational Media, 27(1–2), 55–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, K., & Badii, A. (2012). Impact of E-learning on higher education: Development of an e-learning framework. Life Science Journal, 9(4), 4073–4082.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2005). Learners and learning in the twenty‐first century: What do we know about students’ attitudes towards and experiences of information and communication technologies that will help us design courses? Studies in Higher Education, 3(3), 257–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C., & Yen, P. (2009). E‐learning in Malaysia: Success factors in implementing e‐learning program. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(2), 237–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raja Maznah Raja Hussain (2004). eLearning in higher education institutions in Malaysia. e-mentor, 5(7).

  • Oyadonghan, J. C. & Eke, F. M. (2011). Factors affecting student use of information technology: a comparative study of federal university of technology, Owerri and Niger Delta University, Amazoma. Library Philosophy and Practice e-journal, 505.

  • Özgen, C. (2012). Toward an understanding of acceptance of electronic performance support systems: What drives users ‘perceptions regarding usefulness and ease of use? Doctoral dissertation, Middle East Technical University.

  • Puteh, M. (2007). E-learning in Malaysian Public Universities: Case Studies of Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia and Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. 1st International Malaysian Educational Technology Convention, (pp. 825–834). Senai, Johor Bahru.

  • Puteh, M., & Hussin, S. (2007). A comparative study of e-learning practices at Malaysian Private Universities. 1st International Malaysian Educational Technology Convention, (pp. 1177–1188). Senai, Johor Bahru.

  • Sife, A., Lwoga, E., & Sanga, C. (2007). New technologies for teaching and learning: Challenges for higher learning institutions in developing countries. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT 3(2).

  • Sun, P., Tsai, R., Finger, G., Chen, Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a succesful e-learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learners’ satisfaction. Computers & Education, 50, 1183–1202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobins, K. (1998). Qualitative Perceptions of Learning Environments on the World Wide Web. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobins (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 581–594). United Kingdom: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trochim, W. (2010). The research methods knowledge base (3rd ed.). Cincinnati: Atomic Dog Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veeramani, M. (2010). E-learning: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 1(2), 20–24.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G., & Davis, F. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27, 425–478.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simin Ghavifekr.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghavifekr, S., Mahmood, H. Factors affecting use of e-learning platform (SPeCTRUM) among University students in Malaysia. Educ Inf Technol 22, 75–100 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9435-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9435-z

Keywords

Navigation