Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The design and testing of multimedia for teaching arithmetic to deaf learners

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of the study reported on in this paper was to design and test multimedia for deaf and hard of hearing (DHH) learners. The study focused on counting, addition and subtraction with grade one (age 7) DHH learners in Thailand. The multimedia created for the study was informed by design considerations for DHH learners of arithmetic and aimed to minimize cognitive load. Testing took place over a period of 16 weeks during which learners alternated between 2 and 3 week sessions of one hour per day with multimedia (numbers 1–10) versus 2–3 week sessions of one hour per day with the teacher (numbers 11–20). Results of the design included features such as non-essential use of text, reliance on non-symbolic objects, user control, and signals to relevant content. Results of testing showed that learning with multimedia resulted in higher scores than learning with the teacher (Z = 4.545, p = 0.000). Post-intervention interviews highlighted the role of motivation, ease of comprehension and independent learner control of the multimedia. The conclusion highlighted the need for multimedia design principles that reflect a more inclusionary focus on children with special needs such as those featured in this study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antia, S., Reed, S., & Kreimeyer, K. (2005). The written language of deaf and hard of hearing students in public schools. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 10(3), 244–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, L. (2003). Computer-assisted vocabulary acquisition: the CSLU vocabulary tutor in oral-deaf education. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 8(2), 187–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baroody, A., & Dowker, A. (2003). The development of arithmetic concepts and skills: Constructing adaptive expertise. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Beal-Alvarez, J., & Cannon, J. (2014). Technology intervention research with deaf and hard of hearing learners: levels of evidence. American Annals of the Deaf, 158(5), 486–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beal-Alvarez, J., & Easterbrooks, S. (2013). Increasing children’s ASL classifier production: a multicomponent intervention. American Annals of the Deaf, 158(3), 311–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgna, G., Convertino, C., Marschark, M., Morrison, C., & Rizzolo, K. (2011). Enhancing deaf students' learning from sign language and text: metacognition, modality, and the effectiveness of content scaffolding. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 16(1), 79–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, J., Easterbrooks, S., Gagné, P., & Beal-Alvarez, J. (2011). Improving DHH students' grammar through an individualized software program. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 16(4), 437–457. doi:10.1093/deafed/enr023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavender, A., Bigham, J., & Ladner, R. (2009). ClassInFocus: enabling improved visual attention strategies for deaf and hard of hearing students. In Proceedings of the 11th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, ACM, New York, NY, 67–74. doi:10.1145/1639642.1639656

  • Chan, W., & Chou, T. (2006). Model of school adjustment of students with learning disabilities and general students in senior high and/or vocational school students. The Journal of Special Education, 24, 113–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H. (2007). Visual feedback training to promote mandarin disyllabic tone perception and production in hearing-impaired children. Bulletin of Special Education, 32(4), 47–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. (2014). A study to explore the effects of self-regulated learning environment for hearing-impaired students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30, 97–109. doi:10.1111/jcal.12023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, C., Woods, T., & Schweingruber, H. (2009). Mathematics learning in early childhood: Paths towards excellence and equity. Washington DC: Committee on Early Childhood Mathematics, National Research Council and National Academy of Sciences.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dangsaart, S. et al. (2008). Intelligent Thai text – Thai sign translation for language learning. Computers and Education, 51, 1125–1141.

  • Debevc, M., & Peljhan, Z. (2004). The role of video technology in on-line lectures for the deaf. Disability and Rehabilitation, 26(17), 1048–1059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downes, T., Arthur, L., & Beecher, B. (2001). Effective learning environments for young children using digital resources: an Australian perspective. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 2001(1), 139–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentry, M., Chinn, K., & Moulton, R. (2004/2005). Effectiveness of multimedia reading materials when used with children who are deaf. American Annals of the Deaf, 149(5), 394–403.

  • Gilmore, C., McCarthy, S., & Spelke, E. (2010). Non-symbolic arithmetic abilities and mathematics achievement in the first year of formal schooling. Cognition, 115, 394–406. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.02.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golos, D., & Moses, A. (2011). How teacher mediation during video viewing facilitates literacy behaviors. Sign Language Studies, 12(1), 98–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, S. (1998). Mathematics and deaf children. In S. Gregory, P. Knight, W. McCracken, S. Powers, & L. Watson (Eds.), Issues in deaf education (pp. 119–126). London: David Fulton.

  • Hurlbut, H. (2009). Thai signed languages survey – a rapid appraisal. SIL Electronic Survey Reports. Retrieved from http://www.sil.org/system/files/reapdata/15/36/24/15362443367023639 4926740506782505719790/silesr2009_016.pdf.

  • Israelite, N., Ower, J., & Goldstein, G. (2002). Hard-of- hearing adolescents and identity construction: influences of school experiences, peers, and teachers. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 7(2), 134–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiboss, J. (2012). Effects of special e-learning program on hearing-impaired learners' achievement and perceptions of basic geometry in lower primary mathematics. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 46(1), 31–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kritzer, K. (2008). Family mediation of mathematically based concepts while engaged in a problem-solving activity with their young deaf children. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 13(4), 503–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kritzer, K. (2009). Barely started and already left behind: a descriptive analysis of the mathematics ability demonstrated by young deaf children. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 14(4), 409–421. doi:10.1093/deafed/enp015.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kyle, F., & Harris, M. (2010). Predictors of reading development in deaf children: a 3 year longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 107(3), 229–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, H., & Pagliaro, C. (2007). Factors predicting recall of mathematics terms by deaf students: implications for teaching. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 12(4), 449–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, D., Bates, C., & So, J. (2009). Young children’s learning with digital media. Computers in the Schools: Interdisciplinary. Journal of Practice, Theory, and Applied Research, 26(4), 271–283. doi:10.1080/07380560903360194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, C., Chou, C., Liu, B., & Yang, J. (2006). Improving mathematics teaching and learning experiences for hard of hearing students with wireless technology–enhanced classrooms. American Annals of the Deaf, 151(3), 345–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lomber, S., Meredith, M. A., & Kral, A. (2010). Cross-model plasticity in specific auditory cortices underlies visual compensations in deaf. Nature Neuroscience, 13, 1421–1427. doi:10.1038/nn.2653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markellou, P., Rigou, M., Sirmakessis, S., & Tsakalidis, A. (2000). A web adaptive educational system for people with hearing difficulties. Education and Information Technologies, 5(3), 189–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marschark, M., Lang, H., & Albertini, J. (2006). Educating deaf students: From research to practice. US: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masataka, N. (2006). Differences in arithmetic subtraction of nonsymbolic numerosities by deaf and hearing adults. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 11, 139–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. (1997). Multimedia learning: are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed., ). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. (2014a). Incorporating motivation into multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 171–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. (2014b). Research-based principles for designing multimedia instruction. In V. Benassi, C. Overson, & C. Hakala (Eds.). Applying science of learning in education: Infusing psychological science into the curriculum. Retrieved from the Society for the Teaching of Psychology web site: http://teachpsych.org/ebooks/asle2014/index.php

  • Mayer, R., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 43–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mich, O., Pianta, E., & Mana, N. (2013). Interactive stories and exercises with dynamic feedback for improving reading comprehension skills in deaf children. Computers and Education, 65, 35–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed., ). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakorn Phrathom School for the Deaf (2009). Innovation and instructional bilingual media for deaf students by Waldorf theory. Nakorn Pharthom. Nakorn Phrathom School for the Deaf.

  • National Association of the Deaf in Thailand. (2013). Silent world. Retrieved from http://nadt.thport.com/introductioneng.html

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM), (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics VR.: Reston., VA: Author.

  • National Deaf Children’s Society (2015). About Deaf Child Worldwide. Retrieved from http://www.deafchildworldwide.info/about_us/.

  • Nunes, T., & Moreno, C. (2002). An intervention program for promoting deaf pupil’s achievement in mathematics. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 7(1), 120–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Office of the Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Education, Thailand (2007). Report: The problem and need to use instructional of teacher and student in deaf school in Bangkok. Education and technology center. Non-formal Education Office.

  • Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panselina, M., Sigalas, M., & Tzougraki, C. (2002). Design and development of a bilingual multimedia educational tool for teaching chemistry concepts to deaf students in Greek sign language. Education and Information Technologies, 7(3), 225–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Passig, D., & Eden, S. (2000). Enhancing the induction skill in deaf and hard-of-hearing children with virtual reality technology. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5(3), 277–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Passig, D., & Eden, S. (2010). Enhancing time connectives with 3-D immersive virtual reality. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 42(3), 307–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qi, S., & Mitchell, R. E. (2011). Large-scale academic achievement testing of deaf and hard-of-hearing students: past, present, and future. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 17(1), 1–18.doi:10.1093/deafed/enr028

  • Reilly, C., & Reilly, N. (2005). The rising of lotus flowers: the self-education of deaf children in Thai boarding schools. Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitsma, P. (2009). Computer-based exercises for learning to read and spell by deaf children. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 14(2), 178–189. doi:10.1093/deafed/enn031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rovinelli, R., & Hambleton, R. (1977). On the use of content specialists in the assessment of criterion-referenced test item validity. Dutch Journal of Educational Research, 2, 49–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segers, P. & Verhoeven, L. (2015). Benefits of technology-enhanced learning for deaf and hard-of-hearing students. In H. Knoors & M. Marschark, (eds.), Educating deaf learners. creating a global evidence base (pp. 481–502). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Sewell, D., Clark, R., Philips, R., & Rostron, A. (1980). Language and the deaf: an interactive microcomputer-based approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 1(11), 57–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, R. et.al. (2004).Transforming teaching and learning: embedding ICT into everyday classroom practices. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 413–425.

  • Swanwick, R., Oddy, A., & Roper, T. (2005). Mathematics and deaf children: An exploration of barriers to success. Deafness and Education International, 7(1), 1–21. doi:10.1002/2Fdei.20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J. (1999). Instructional design in technical areas. Camberwell, Australia: ACER Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J., Van Merrienboer, J., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thai Department of Education (2003). National education act BE 2542 as amended (second ed., ). Bangkok: Aksornthai Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Merrienboer, J., Kirschner, P., & Kester, L. (2003). Taking the load off a learner’s mind: instructional design for complex learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 5–13. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3801_2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varee, T. (2004). Special education. Bangkok: Netikul Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, J. (1996). Modern standard Thai sign language, influence from American sign language & its relationship to original Thai sign language verities. Sign Language Studies, 92, 227–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, J. (2000). Sign languages and sign language families in Thailand and Vietnam. In K. Emmorey, & H. Lane (Eds.), The signs of language revisited: an anthology to honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima (pp. 23–47). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Federation of the Deaf (2015). Who are we?. Retrieved from http://wfdeaf.org/whoarewe.

  • Yoong, J.-O., & Kim, M. (2011). The effects of captions on deaf students' content comprehension, cognitive load, and motivation in online learning. American Annals of the Deaf, 156(3), 283–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zevenbergen, R., Hyde, M., & Power, D. (2001). Language, arithmetic, word problems, and deaf students: linguistic strategies used to solve tasks. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 13(3), 204–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Learning Innovation and Technology, Faculty of Industrial Education and Technology, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi, 126 Pracha Uthit Rd., Bang Mod, Thung Khru, Bangkok, 10140, Thailand

    Piyaporn Techaraungrong

  2. The Department of Electrical Technology Education, Faculty of Industrial Education and Technology, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi, 126 Pracha Uthit Rd., Bang Mod, Thung Khru, Bangkok, 10140, Thailand

    Surachai Suksakulchai & Wacheerapan Kaewprapan

  3. Faculty of Education, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, A1B 3X8, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

    Elizabeth Murphy

Authors
  1. Piyaporn Techaraungrong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Surachai Suksakulchai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wacheerapan Kaewprapan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Elizabeth Murphy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Piyaporn Techaraungrong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Techaraungrong, P., Suksakulchai, S., Kaewprapan, W. et al. The design and testing of multimedia for teaching arithmetic to deaf learners. Educ Inf Technol 22, 215–237 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9441-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9441-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation