Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Learning orientations of IT higher education students in UAE University

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 10 April 2018

This article has been updated

Abstract

This research examines the learning preferences of students in UAE University (UAEU). The uniqueness of this research emanates from the fact that no prior research examined this area from the UAE’s perspective. Thus, this research embarks on the fact that student learning strategies vary from one country to another due to many factors. This research utilizes six learning strategies extended from the literature and attempts to examine their importance on UAEU students using survey research. The selected learning strategies were students” motivation, time-poorness, mastery effort, assessment focus, competitiveness, and listening. This research provided interesting insights and contrasts pertaining to the learning strategies of UAEU students. Implications are discussed highlighting different theoretical as well as professional contributions and contentions and portrayed a path where pending issues could be addressed by future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 10 April 2018

    The authors would like to note that one of the co-author’s names was displayed incorrectly. Not Serhani Mohamd, but Mohamed Adel Serhani co-authored this article as correctly shown above.

References

  • Abu Alhija, Fadia Nasser (2016). Teaching in higher education: Good teaching through students’ lens, Studies in Educational Evaluation, Available online 19 October 2016, ISSN 0191-491X.

  • Beckers, Ronald, Van der Voordt, Theo & Dewulf, Geert (2016). Learning space preferences of higher education students, Building and Environment, Volume 104, 1 August 2016, 243-252, ISSN 0360–1323

  • Bekleyen, N. (2009). Helping teachers become better English students: causes, effects, and coping strategies for foreign language listening anxiety. System, 37(4), 664–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabi, E., & Yalcinalp, S. (2012). Lifelong learning considerations: relationship between learning styles and learning strategies in higher education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 4457–4462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ersözlü, Z. N. (2010). Determining of the student teachers’ learning and studying strategies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 5147–5151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fook, C. Y., & Sidhu, G. K. (2015). Investigating learning challenges faced by students in higher education, Procedia - social and behavioral sciences 186. ISSN, 604-612, 1877–0428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S. (2006). Listening comprehension: the learners’ perspective. System, 34(2), 165–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinga, R., McInerneyb, D., & Watkinsa, D. (2012). Competitiveness is not that bad…at least in the east: testing the hierarchical model of achievement motivation in the Asian setting. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 36(6), 446–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koçak, E., & Bayır, R. (2009). Project and group based learning and competition based evaluation in lesson of microcontroller applications. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 1513–1518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, J. (2009). Learning orientations: Diversity in higher education. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(2), 195–208 London: Sage Publications.

  • Michou, A., Mouratidis, A., Lens, W., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2013). Personal and contextual antecedents of achievement goals: their direct and indirect relations to students' learning strategies. Learning and Individual Differences, 23(2013), 187–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitrofana, N., & Iona, A. (2013). Predictors of academic performance. The Relation between the Big Five Factors and Academic Performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 78, 125–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Premkumar, G., & Roberts, M. (1999). Adoption of new information Technologies in Rural Small Businesses. The International Journal of Management Science (OMEGA), 27, 467–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thong, J. (1999). An integrated model of information systems adoption in small business. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15(4), 187–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vedel, A. (2014). The big five and tertiary academic performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 71, 66–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer, R. E. (1983). The teaching of learning strategies. Innovations Abstracts, 5(32), 1–4 http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED237180.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolters, C. (1999). Relation between high school students' motivational regulations and their use of learning strategies. Learning and Individual Differences, 11(3), 281–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1994). Dimensions of academic self-regulation: a conceptual framework for education. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: issues and educational applications (pp. 3–21). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nabeel Al-Qirim.

Appendix 1 The survey questions

Appendix 1 The survey questions

Motivation

 1. make university work enjoyable by focusing on something about it that is fun

 2. try to find ways that the material relates to my life

 3. remind myself about how important it is to get good grades

 4. push myself to see if I can do better than I have done before

 5. persuade myself to work hard just for the sake of learning

 6. challenge myself to complete the work and learn as much as possible

 7. think about trying to become good at what we are learning or doing

 8. try to study at a time when I can be more focused

 9. try to get rid of any distractions that are around me

Time-poorness

1. don”t have enough time to do as much study as I need to for my course

2. Other things such as work and family do not leave me enough time to think about the ideas from my studies

3. Often I don”t have enough time to really understand the ideas I read about

Assessment focus

1. pay close attention to information the lecturer gives about exams

2. Lecturers sometimes indicate what is likely to be in the exams, so I look out for hints

3. take care to find as much information as possible on what will be in an exam

4. When working on an assignment, I try to keep in mind exactly what the particular lecturer seems to want

Mastery effort

 1. try to be strict with myself in my study habits, so that I can do the very best I can

 2. look at most of the additional readings suggested by the lecturer

 3. limit my studying to the slides only

 4. use the prescribed textbook in my study

 5. make sure I clearly understand the assessment requirements early in the course

 6. usually set out to understand thoroughly the meaning of what I am asked to read

 7. usually put a lot of effort into trying to understand things that at first seem difficult

Competitiveness

1. want top grades in my studies so that I will be able to select from among the best jobs available

2. see myself as an ambitious person

3. The main benefit of a university education is that it will enable me to earn more money

Listening

1. remember best things that are spoken

2. remember best what I hear

3. prefer listening to the lecturer than reading textbooks

4. prefer listening to reading

5. understand better if the lecturer explains things rather than reading about them

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al-Qirim, N., Tarhini, A., Rouibah, K. et al. Learning orientations of IT higher education students in UAE University. Educ Inf Technol 23, 129–142 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9589-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9589-y

Keywords

Navigation