Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Technology for Social Change in school contexts: A new landscape for K-12 educational technology research

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on the assumption that technology can positively impact our society and help address larger societal problems, and given the fact that technology is a central component of children’s growth, the current study places its research focus on technology-enhanced social change in K-12 education. The study summarizes literature that has been published within the past decade (2006–2017) which has employed technology as a tool for achieving social change via working with K-12 school students. Despite the limited number of manuscripts that emerged to meet these criteria, the reviewed studies revealed evidence suggesting that the intentional use of technology within school contexts can become a means for fostering social change by achieving student behavioral and/or attitudinal shifts. The summary of research calls for more work towards specific directions: targeting school-aged students, designing interventions grounded in theoretical and design foundations, documenting the long-lasting impact of results, addressing technology mediated perspective-taking and addressing how technology-mediation functions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boler, M. (2004). Teaching for hope: The ethics of shattering world views. In D. Liston & J. Garrison (Eds.), Teaching, learning and loving: Reclaiming passion in educational practice (pp. 117–131). New York: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brynen, R., & Milante, G. (2013). Peacebuilding with games and simulations. Simulation & Gaming, 44(1), 27–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J., Wilson, S. T., & Gopal, N. (2008). A cross cultural virtual learning environment for students to explore the issue of racism: A case study involving the UK, USA and SA. Social Work Education, 27(6), 671–682. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615470802201804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckner, E., & Kim, P. (2012). Storytelling among Israeli and Palestinian children in the era of mobile innovation. In Educational media and technology yearbook (pp. 7–22). Springer New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buisine, S., Besacier, G., Aoussat, A., & Vernier, F. (2012). How do interactive tabletop systems influence collaboration? Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burdick, J., & Sandlin, J. (2013). Learning, becoming, and the unknowable: Conceptualizations, mechanism, and process in public pedagogy literature. Curriculum Inquiry, 43(1), 142–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carano, K. T., & Berson, M. J. (2007). Breaking stereotypes: Constructing geographic literacy and cultural awareness through technology. The Social Studies, 98(2), 65–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 21–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Correia, A. (2008). Team conflict in ICT-rich environments: Roles of technologies in conflict management. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(1), 18–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: defining gamification. Proceedings of the 15th. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2181040

  • Dillenbourg, P., & Evans, M. (2011). Interactive tabletops in education. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(4), 491–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferdig, R. E., Coutts, J., DiPietro, J., Lok, B., & Davis, N. (2007). Innovative technologies for multicultural education needs. Multicultural Education & Technology Journal, 1(1), 47–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gehlbach, H., Brown, S. W., Ioannou, A., Boyer, M. A., Hudson, N., Niv-Solomon, A., Maneggia, D., & Janik, L. (2008). Increasing interest in social studies: Social perspective taking and self-efficacy in stimulating simulations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(4), 894–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldsworthy, R., Schwartz, N., Barab, S., & Landa, A. (2007). Evaluation of a collaborative multimedia conflict resolution curriculum. Educational Technology Research & Development, 55(6), 597–625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-9006-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, T. B., & Whitlock, M. A. (2013). Leveraging web-based environments for mass atrocity prevention. Simulation & Gaming, 44(1), 94–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ioannou A., & Antoniou C. (2016). Tabletops for Peace: Technology Enhanced Peacemaking in School Contexts. Educational Technology & Society, 19(2), 164–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ioannou A., & Antoniou C. (2017). Peacemaking Affordances of Shareable Interfaces: A Provocative Essay on Using Technology for Social Change. Proceedings of HCII 2017 (pp. 12–21).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ioannou, A. & Constantinou, V. (2018). Embracing collaboration and social perspective taking using interactive tabletops. Techtrends (Springer): https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0271-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ioannou, A., Zaphiris, P., Loizides, F., & Vasiliou, C. (2013). Let’s talk about Technology for Peace: A systematic assessment of problem-based group collaboration around an interactive tabletop. Interacting with Computers.https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwt061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ioannou, A., Zeniou, M., & Stylianou-Georgiou, A. (2014). Dialogue, Knowledge Work and Tabletops:Lessons from Preservice Teacher Education. Proceedings of HCII 2014 (pp. 410–418).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, G. P., Hondrou, C., Vasalou, A., Joinson, A., Campos, J., & Martinho, C. (2012). Applying evolutionary psychology to a serious game about children's interpersonal conflict. Evolutionary Psychology, 10(5), doi: 147470491201000510.

  • Jabali, E. H. (2015). The effects of perspective-taking on perceptual learning. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences (ILSHS), 7, 123–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kling, R. (2000). Learning about information technologies and social change: The contribution of social informatics. The Information Society, 16(3), 217–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozma, R. B. (1994). Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, D. A. (2006). Technology mediated dispute resolution (TMDR): A new paradigm for ADR. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 21(3), 629–686.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. J. (2013). Game mechanics to promote new understandings of identity and ethnic minority stereotypes. Digital Culture & Education, 5.

  • Lee, J. J., & Hoadley, C. M. (2006). Ugly in a world where you can choose to be beautiful: Teaching and learning about diversity via virtual worlds. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on learning sciences (pp. 383–389).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. J., & Hoadley, C. M. (2007). Leveraging identity to make learning fun: Possible selves and experiential learning in massively multiplayer online games (MMOGs). Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 3(6), 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, P., Hornecker, E., Morris, R., Dalton, N. S., & Rogers, Y. (2008). When the fingers do the talking: A study of group participation with varying constraints to a tabletop interface. Horizontal Interactive Human Computer Systems, 2008. TABLETOP 2008. 3rd IEEE International Workshop on, 33–40.

  • Memarzia, M., & Star, K. (2011). Choices and Voices–A serious game for preventing violent extremism. Intelligence management (pp. 133–142) Springer.

  • Morris, M. R., Huang, A., Paepcke, A., & Winograd, T. (2006). Cooperative gestures: Multi-user gestural interactions for co-located groupware. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1201–1210.

  • Mutekwe, E. (2012). The impact of technology on social change: A sociological perspective. Journal of Research in Peace, Gender. Development, 2(11), 226–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3(3), 398–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rector-Aranda, A., & Raider-Roth, M. (2015). "I finally felt like I had power": Student agency and voice in an online and classroom-based role-play simulation. Research in Learning Technology, 23.

  • Rick, J., Marshall, P., & Yuill, N. (2011). Beyond one-size-fits-all: How interactive tabletops support collaborative learning. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on interaction design and children (pp. 109–117).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Y., & Lindley, S. (2004). Collaborating around vertical and horizontal large interactive displays: Which way is best? Interacting with Computers, 16(6), 1133–1152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlosser, R. W., Wendt, O., Bhavnani, S., & Nail-Chiwetalu, B. (2006). Use of information-seeking strategies for developing systematic reviews and engaging in evidence-based practice: The application of traditional and comprehensive pearl growing. A review. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 41(5), 567–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A., & Majumdar, S. (2015). Technology and innovation for creating social change: Concepts and theories. In Technology and Innovation for Social Change (pp. 109–123). Springer, New Delhi. Stock, O., Zancanaro, M., Rocchi, C., Tomasini, D., Koren, C., Eisikovits, Z., … Weiss, P. (2009). The design of a collaborative interface for narration to support reconciliation in a conflict. AI & Society, 24(1), 51–59. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-009-0197-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M., Kruger, A. C., & Ratner, H. H. (1993). Cultural learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16(03), 495–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veletsianos, G., & Eliadou, A. (2009). Conceptualizing the use of technology to foster peace via adventure learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 12, 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.06.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yablon, Y. B. (2007). Feeling close from a distance: Peace encounters via internet technology. New Directions for Youth Development, 2007(116), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zancanaro, M., Stock, O., Eisikovits, Z., Koren, C., & Weiss, P. L. (2012). Co-narrating a conflict: An interactive tabletop to facilitate attitudinal shifts. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 19(3), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/2362364.2362372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was not funded by any grant. None of the authors has received funding from any research grants for conducting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cyprus University of Technology, 30 Archbishop Kyprianou Str, 3036, Lemesos, Cyprus

    Chrystalla G. Antoniou & Andri Ioannou

Authors
  1. Chrystalla G. Antoniou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andri Ioannou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andri Ioannou.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Antoniou, C.G., Ioannou, A. Technology for Social Change in school contexts: A new landscape for K-12 educational technology research. Educ Inf Technol 23, 2363–2378 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9721-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9721-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation