Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A novel integrated approach to the execution of personalized and self-evolving learning pathways

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the main challenges to be confronted by Higher Educational Institutions (HEI), so as to increase quality, is the provision of personalized education services in a wide range of educational settings, often beyond the course sequences historically offered to students. However, this personalization requires the continuous reconfiguration and adaptation of the selected academic plans, since each student is a unique case and both the educational options and current circumstances inside an educational institution change rapidly. In this paper, we present an innovative software environment offered to the academic staff and personnel that provides an integrated information technology solution concerning the dynamic and personalized composition of students’ learning pathways during execution phase. The software environment comprises a process execution engine based on a semantic infrastructure (ontology) for configuring the learning pathways. During the execution of learning pathways, the system reasons over the rules and dynamically recommends the next steps of the learning. The implemented graphical user interface and the respective business logic for the recommendation and execution of the learning pathway processes is presented, alongside with a graphical rule generator interface for the definition of the rule-set for the learning pathways in a user-friendly way.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ACM. (2001). ACM curriculum guidelines for Computer Science. The Joint Task Force on Computing Curricula Society, IEEE Computer Machinery, Association for Computing, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.1145/384274.384275.

  • ACM CSS. (2012). Retrieved from https://www.acm.org/publications/class-2012

  • Bandara, W., Chand, D. R., Chircu, A. M., Hintringer, S., Karagiannis, D., Recker, J. C., et al. (2010). Business process management education in academia: Status, challenges, and recommendations. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 27, 743–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BBC - Ontologies - Curriculum Ontology. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.bbc.co.uk/ontologies/curriculum

  • Cerverón-lleó, V., Cabotà-soro, J., Grimaldo-moreno, F., & Ferrís-castell, R. (2014). Bpm for quality assurance systems in higher education. Journal of Teaching and Education, 03(02), 175–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Souza, J. M., Bomfim, E., & Oliveira, J. (2007). Using a CBR approach based on ontologies for recommendation and reuse of educational processes. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 3(2), 170–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geerts, G. L., & McCarthy, W. E. (2003). An ontological analysis of the economc primitives of the extended-Rea enterprise information architecture. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 3(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1467-0895(01)00021-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HEI-UP Business Process Management in Higher Education Institutions. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.bpm-hei.eu/

  • Iatrellis, O., Kameas, A., & Fitsilis, P. (2017). Academic advising systems: A systematic literature review of empirical evidence. Education Sciences, 7(4), 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci7040090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jami, S. I., & Shaikh, Z. A. (2007). A workflow based academic management system using multi agent approach. Proceeding of the 11th Wseas International Conference on Computers: Computer Science and Technology, Vol 4, 201–206.

  • Janssen, J., Hermans, H., Berlanga, A., & Koper, R. (2010). Learning path information model - version 1.3. Retrieved November, (march), 1–23.

  • K.V.Zhukova and A.Yu.Pleshkova. (2016). Business process modeling: Case of undergraduate program. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Communication, Management and Information Technology (Iccmit 2016) (pp. 179–186).

  • Kakasevski, G., Mihajlov, M., Arsenovski, S., & Chungurski, S. (2008). Sealms: Semantically Enhanced Adaptive Learning Management System, 4(5), 613–618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurilovas, E., Kubilinskiene, S., & Dagiene, V. (2014). Web 3.0 - based personalisation of learning objects in virtual learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 654–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machinery, A. for C., & IEEE Computer Society. (2016). Computer Engineering Curricula 2016 CE2016 Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Computer Engineering. Retrieved from https://www.acm.org/binaries/content/assets/education/ce2016-final-report.pdf

  • Nauta, M. M. (2010). The development, evolution, and status of Holland’s theory of vocational personalities: Reflections and future directions for counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018213.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Noy, N. F., & Mcguinness, D. L. (2000). Ontology development 101 : A guide to creating your first ontology, 1–25.

  • OKI. (2004). Open Service Interface Definitions. Retrieved from http://heanet.dl.sourceforge.net/ project/okiproject/Doc %28previous OSID versions%29/ Full Documentation Set/OSID_Documentation_rc6.1.pdf.

  • Ouf, S., Abd Ellatif, M., Salama, S. E., & Helmy, Y. (2016). A proposed paradigm for smart learning environment based on semantic web. Computers in Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.030.

  • Panagiotopoulos, I., Kalou, A., Pierrakeas, C., & Kameas, A. (2012). An ontology-based model for student representation in intelligent tutoring systems for distance learning. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 381(AICT(PART 1)), 296–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33409-2_31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlenko, V., Prokhorov, A., Kuzminska, O., & Mazorchuk, M. (2017). Competence approach to modeling and control of students’ learning pathways in the cloud service. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 1844, 257–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., & Chatterjee, S. (2007). A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(3), 45–77. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: FreePress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rius, A., & Conesa, J. (2013). Specifying patterns of educational settings by means of ontologies. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 19(3), 353–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rius, À., Conesa, J., García-barriocanal, E., & Sicilia, M. (2014). Computer Standards & Interfaces Automating educational processes implementation by means of an ontological framework. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 36(2), 335–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2013.08.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rius, À., Conesa, J., García-Barriocanal, E., & Sicilia, M. Á. (2017). An ontology-driven framework for specifying, adapting and implementing educational settings. Applied Ontology, 12(1), 33–58. https://doi.org/10.3233/AO-170176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seng, D., & Churilov, L. (2003). Business process-oriented information support for a higher education Enterprise. 7th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, (July), 1055–1074. Retrieved from http://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:309426

  • The EFQM Excellence Model. (2013). Retrieved January 30, 2017, from http://www.efqm.org/the-efqm-excellence-model

  • Tsinidou, M., Gerogiannis, V., & Fitsilis, P. (2010). Evaluation of the factors that determine quality in higher education: An empirical study. Quality Assurance in Education, 18(3), 227–244. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684881011058669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U-Multirank | Universities compared. Your way. (2011). Retrieved from http://www.umultirank.org

  • Wen, F., & McGreal, F. (2007). E-advisor: A multi-agent system for academic advising. Workshop on Agent-Based Systems for Human and Entertainment (ABSHLE) at AAMAS, 2007(1988), 34–37 Retrieved from http://io.acad.athabascau.ca/~oscarl/pub/ABSHL2007.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarandi, M., Tawil, A.-R., & Jahankhani, H. (2011). Adaptive E-learning system using ontology. 2011 22nd International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications, (c), 511–516. https://doi.org/10.1109/DEXA.2011.9

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Applied Sciences of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece

    Omiros Iatrellis & Panos Fitsilis

  2. Hellenic Open University Patras, Patras, Greece

    Omiros Iatrellis & Achilles Kameas

Authors
  1. Omiros Iatrellis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Achilles Kameas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Panos Fitsilis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Omiros Iatrellis.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Iatrellis, O., Kameas, A. & Fitsilis, P. A novel integrated approach to the execution of personalized and self-evolving learning pathways. Educ Inf Technol 24, 781–803 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9802-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9802-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation