Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The peer interaction process on Facebook: a social network analysis of learners’ online conversations

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the increasing prominence of computer-mediated communication (CMC) in higher education, the number of programmes and studies integrating online peer interaction opportunities on social media, likewise, has surged. Nevertheless, little quantitative research has been performed on the ways in which learners interact with one another via these platforms for academic purposes. As a result, little is known about how learners develop a network of peers and how they interact with this peer group through social media tools. This paper analyses the peer interaction process in a Facebook environment, integrated into the foreign language curriculum at university level. In two consecutive years, two groups of Belgian first-year foreign language learners of English (N = 119, N = 112) were invited to consult with a community of learners about their learning trajectory via the platform. Through social network analysis, it is determined which topics, challenges and personal experiences students discuss on Facebook and how these are embedded in the peer interaction process overall. While the two learner groups have different approaches to addressing learning challenges and needs, certain topics and activities consistently co-occur in interaction sequences, exemplifying how learners tend to provide scaffolded support and co-construct knowledge online. This study shows how learners can develop both their learning and language ability as a scaffolded, dialogic process within an online social networking environment when having access to a combination of information and learning resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. for an overview of the literature on the subject, see Sato and Ballinger (2016).

  2. For a complete account of the coding process and the resulting taxonomy, please see Peeters (2018).

References

  • Balaman, U., & Sert, O. (2017). Development of L2 interactional resources for online collaborative task accomplishment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(7), 601–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baralt, M., Gurzynski-Weiss, L., & Kim, Y. (2016). The effects of task complexity and classroom environment on learners’ engagement with the language. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 209–240). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Blattner, G., & Fiori, M. (2009). Facebook in the language classroom: Promises and possibilities. Instructional Technology and Distance Learning (ITDL), 6(1), 17–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blin, F., & Appel, C. (2011). Computer supported collaborative writing in practice: An activity theoretical study. CALICO Journal, 28(2), 473–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cappellini, M., Lewis, T., & Rivens Mompean, A. (2017). Learner autonomy and web 2.0. Sheffield: Equinox.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doleck, T., & Lajoie, S. (2018). Social networking and academic performance: A review. Education and Information Technologies, 23(1), 435–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farina, M. (2018). Facebook and conversation analysis. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández Dobao, A. (2016). Peer interaction and learning: A focus on the silent learner. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical implications and research agenda (pp. 33–61). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hanneman, R. A., & Riddle, M. (2005). Introduction to social network methods. Riverside: UC Riverside.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosinski, M., Matz, S. C., Gosling, S. D., Popov, V., & Stillwell, D. (2015). Facebook as a research tool for the social sciences: Opportunities, challenges, ethical considerations, and practical guidelines. American Psychologist, 70(6), 543–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumpulainen, K., & Rajala, A. (2016). Negotiating time-space contexts in students’ technology-mediated interaction during a collaborative learning activity. International Journal of Educational Research, 84, 90–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamy, M. N., & Zourou, K. (2013). Social networking for language education. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lantolf, J., & Thorne, S. L. (2007). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. In B. van Patten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 201–224). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lantz-Andersson, A. (2017). Language play in a second language: Social media as contexts for emerging sociopragmatic competence. Education and Information Technologies, 23(2), 705–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, L. (2016). Autonomous learning through task-based instruction in fully online language courses. Language Learning & Technology, 20(2), 81–97.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., & Bonk, C. J. (2016). Social network analysis of peer relationships and online interactions in a blended class using blogs. Internet and Higher Education, 28, 35–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M., & McLoughlin, C. (2010). Web 2.0-based learning: Applying social informatics for tertiary teaching. Hershey: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C.-H., Warschauer, M., & Blake, R. (2016). Language learning through social networks: Perceptions and reality. Language Learning & Technology, 20(1), 124–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, D. (1991). Learner autonomy 1: Definitions, issues, problems. Dublin: Authentik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manca, S., & Ranieri, M. (2016). Is Facebook still a suitable technology enhanced learning environment? An update critical review of the literature from 2012 to 2015. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32, 503–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin-Beltrán, M., Chen, P. J., Guzman, N., & Merrills, K. (2016). How adolescents use social discourse to open space for language learning during peer interactions. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 319–348). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, G. (2014). Social dimensions of autonomy in language learning. London: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Niu, L. (2017). Using Facebook for academic purposes: Current literature and directions for future research. Journal for Educational Computing Research., 56, 1384–1406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117745161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunan, D. (1997). Designing and adapting materials to encourage learner autonomy. In P. Benson & P. Voller (Eds.), Autonomy and independence in language learning (pp. 192–203). London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peeters, W. (2018). Applying the networking power of Web 2.0 to the foreign language classroom: A taxonomy of the online peer interaction process. Computer Assisted Language Learning 31(8), 905–931.

  • Peeters, W., & Fourie, C. (2016). Academic acculturation in language learning through Facebook: Passing the turning points. English Text Construction, 9(2), 292–316.

  • Peeters, W., & Ludwig, C. (2017). ‘Old concepts in new spaces’? – A model for developing learner autonomy in social networking spaces. In T. Lewis, A. Rivens Mompean & M. Cappellini (Eds.), Learner autonomy and Web 2.0 (pp. 117–142). Sheffield: Equinox.

  • Philp, J. J. (2016). Epilogue: New pathways in researching interaction. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 377–396). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Philp, J. J., Adams, R., & Iwashita, N. (2014). Peer interaction and second language learning. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 459–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roushad, A., & Storch, N. (2016). A focus on mode: Patterns of interaction in face-to-face and computer mediated contexts. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 267–290). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sato, M., & Ballinger, S. (2016). Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scholand, A. J., Tausczik, Y. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). Social language network analysis. In CSCW 2010 (pp. 23–26), February 6–10, 2010, Savannah, GA.

  • Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. (2017). Social network analysis. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, M. P., & Liu, M. (2010). Learning a language with web 2.0: Exploring the use of social networking features of foreign language learning websites. CALICO Journal, 27(2), 233–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storch, N. (2013). Collaborative writing in L2 classrooms. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Strobl, C. (2014). Affordances of web 2.0 technologies for collaborative advanced writing in a foreign language. CALICO Journal, 31(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 320–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swain, M., Brooks, L., & Tocalli-Beller, A. (2002). Peer-peer dialogue as a means of second language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 171–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, J., Oskoz, A., & Thorne, S. (2008). Web 2.0, synthetic immersive environments, and mobile resources for language education. CALICO Journal, 25(3), 528–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, S. L., & Lantolf, J. P. (2006). A linguistics of communicative activity. In S. Makoni & A. Pennycook (Eds.), Disinventing and reconstituting languages. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, R., Scown, P., Urquhart, C., & Hardman, J. (2014). Tapping the educational potential of Facebook: Guidelines for use in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 19(1), 21–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wills, G. (2009, September 5). Play politics. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/2009/09/06/opinion/06wills.html.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Kanda University of International Studies, Wakaba 1-4-1, Mihama-ku, Chiba-shi, 261-0014, Japan

    Ward Peeters

  2. University of Antwerp, Prinsstraat 13, 2000, Antwerpen, Belgium

    Ward Peeters

Authors
  1. Ward Peeters
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ward Peeters.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

International Research Fellow of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Peeters, W. The peer interaction process on Facebook: a social network analysis of learners’ online conversations. Educ Inf Technol 24, 3177–3204 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09914-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09914-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation