Abstract
As digital multimedia devices increasingly pervade people’s lives, including the lives of older adults, the need to provide relevant training for these age groups grows. Older adults, not due to their frailty or age, often find it difficult to use digital devices like smartphones, and they often lack the basic digital literacy required to use multimedia interactive devices with touchscreen technology. This is the major reason why they are experiencing the sharp digital divide in the twenty-first century. In this study, older adults from four European countries participated in a two-phase process: playing interactive games on a large touchscreen tablet and learning how to use a smartphone to access digital services. The attitudes and the difficulties associated with adopting the skills to operate the device and use the digital services were observed and discussed. The findings and recommendations for an effective approach to this problem are discussed at the end of the paper.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Al Mahmud, A., Mubin, O., Shahid, S., & Martens, J. (2008). Designing and evaluating the tabletop game experience for senior citizens. In Proceedings of the 5th Nordic conference on human-computer interaction building bridges - NordiCHI '08 (pp. 215–222) https://pure.uvt.nl/ws/files/1049756/p403-al_mahmud2.pdf, accessed, February 5th, 2019.
Allan, G. (2003). A critique of using grounded theory as a research method. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 2(1), 1–10 http://www.ejbrm.com/vol2/v2-i1/issue1-art1-allan.pdf, accessed, May 11th, 2019.
Baldaro, B., Tozzi, G., Codispoti, M., Montebarrocci, O., Barbagli, F., & Trobini, E. (2004). Aggressive and non violent videogames:Short-term psychological and cardiovascular effects on habitual players. Stress and Health, 20(4), 203–208. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.1015 Accessed March 10th, 2019.
Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2009). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1301 Accessed February 5th, 2019.
Barab, S., Thomas, M., Dodge, T., & Tuzun, H. (2005). Making learning fun: Quest Atlantis, a game without guns. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(1), 86–107.
Biagi, F., & Loi, M. (2013). Measuring ICT use and learning outcomes: Evidence from recent econometric studies. European Journal of Education, 48(1), 28–42 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/ejed.12016, Accessed February 2019.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Journal of Qualitative Research in Psychology, (2), 77–101 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235356393_Using_Thematic_Analysis_in_Psychology, Accessed February 12th, 2019.
Bryant, A., & Chamaz, K. (2008). The sage handbook of grounded theory and coding. Sage P.C.
BTOP, National Telecommunications and Information Administration, File 2013, https://www.ntia.doc.gov/files/ntia/publications/asr_final_report.pdf by C Sterba, accessed 8.8.2018.
Connolly, T. M., Boyle, E. A., MacArthur, E., Hainey, T., & Boyle, J. M. (2012). A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Computers & Education, 59, 661–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.004.
Crooks, L. D. (2001). The importance of symbolic interaction grounded theory research on woman health. Journal Health Care for Women International, 22(1–2), 11–27 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/073993301300003054, Accessed February 5th, 2019.
Czaja, S. J., & Sharit, J. (2012). Designing training and instructional programs for older adults. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press https://www.crcpress.com/Designing-Training-and-Instructional-Programs-for-Older-Adults/Czaja-Sharit/p/book/9781439847879, Accessed September 9th, 2018.
Damodaran, L., & Sandhu, J. (2016). The role of a social context for ICT learning and support in reducing digital inequalities for older ICT users. International Journal of Learning Technology, [online] 11(2), 156–175. http://irep.ntu.ac.uk/27281/1/4898_Sandhu.pdf. Accessed February 12th, 2019.
Delello, J. A., & McWhorter, M. (2015). Reducing the digital divide, connecting older adults to iPAD technology. Journal of Applied Gerontology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464815589985 Accessed February 2019.
Digital Summit, 2017, https://www.eu2017.ee/political-meetings/tallinn-digital-summit
EACEA –ERASMUS , https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/erasmus-plus/actions/key-action-2-cooperation-for-innovation-and-exchange-good-practices_en, accessed 20.12.2018.
EuDiPro, 2017 https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Population_and_social_conditions, Accessed November 11th, 2018.
Easterday, W. M., Rees, L. D. G., & Gerber, E. M. (2018). The logic of design research. Learning: Research and Practice, 4(2), 131–160.
Eurostat 2016a, Digital economy and society statistics - households and individuals. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Digital_economy_and_society_statistics_-_households_and_individuals , Accessed May 8th 2018.
Eurostat 2016b, A look at the life of the elderly in the EU today, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cache/infographs/elderly/index.htm, 2016, accessed 5.8.2018.
Eurostat 2016c, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Eurostat_regional_yearbook, Accessed October 28th, 2018.
Ferrari, A. (2012) Digital competence in practice: An analysis of frameworks, Seville, Joint Research Center, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, jiscdesignstudio.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/.../FinalCSReport_PDFPARAWEB.pdf, Accessed, June 2nd 2019.
Garris, R., Ahlers, R., & Driskell, J. E. (2002). Games, motivation, and learning: A research and practice model. Simulation & Gaming, 33(4), 441. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878102238607.
Gerling, K., Schulte, F., & Masuch, M. (2011). Designing and evaluating digital games for frail elderly persons. In ACM conference proceeding ACE (pp. 119–127). Lisbon: ACM Conference proceeding ACE http://hci.usask.ca/uploads/235-a62-gerling.pdf, Accessed October 28th 2018.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory (p. 215). Chicago, USA: Aldine Publishing.
Hafeez, K., Foroudi, P., Nguyen, B., Gupta, S., & Alghatas, F. (2018). How do entrepreneurs learn and engage in an online community-of-practice? A case study approach. Behaviour & Information Technology, 37(7), 714–735.
Häikiö, J., Wallin, A., Isomursu, M., Ailisto, H., Matinmikko, T., & Huomo, T. (2007). Touch-based user interface for elderly users. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on human computer interaction with mobile devices and services - MobileHCI '07 (pp. 289–296) https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1378021, Accessed September 2nd, 2018.
Hill, R., Betts, R. L., & Gardner, E. S. (2015). Older adult’s experience s and perceptions of digital technology: (dis)empowerement, wellbeing and inclusion. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 415–423.
Loos, E. (2017). Exergamming: Meaningful play for older adults? Silver gaming:Seniors fun for seniors? In J. Zhou & G. Salvendy (Eds.), Human aspects of IT for the aged population, applications, services and context (pp. 254–265). Springer P.C.
IJsselsteijn, W., Nap, H. H., & de Korte, Y. (2009). Senior gamers: Preferences, motivations and needs. Human-Technology Interaction, 8(4), 247–262 https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Yvonne_De_Kort2/publication/211726554_Senior_gamers_Preferences_motivations_needs/links/08fd63d3d562e70cabf7be6a/Senior-gamers-Preferences-motivations-needs.pdf, Accessed, August 8th 2018.
Jahn, G., & Krems, J. F. (2013). Skill acquisition with text-entry interfaces:Particularly older adult users benefits from minimized information processing demands. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 32, 605–626. 101177/0733464811433485.
Jerman-Blažič, A., & Jerman-Blažič, B. (2015). Exploring and upgrading the educational business-game taxonomy. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 52(3), 303–340 http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0735633115572959, accessed 4.11.2016.
Kaufman1, K., Sauvé, L., Renaud, L., Sixsmith K., Mortenson, B., (2016), Older adults’ digital gameplay: Patterns, benefits, and challenges, Simulation & Gaming, 1–25 DOI: 10.1177/.
Khosravi, P., Rezvani, A., & Wiewiora, A. (2016). The impact of technology in older adults’ social isolation. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 594–603.
Knowles, H. G. W. (2011). A history of his thought. Education in a competitive and globalizing world. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
Martin, A. (2008). Digital literacy and the society. In C. Lanksear & M. Knobel (Eds.), Digital literacies: Concept, policies and practices (Vol. 156, p. 151). New York: Peter Lang.
Martin, P., & Turner, B. (1986). Grounded theory and organizational research. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 22(2), 141–152.
McDougall J., Readman, M, Wilkinson, P. (2018), The uses of digital literacy, Learning, Media and Technology 43 (3), 263–279, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17439884.2018.1462206
Moghaddam, A. (2006). Coding issues in grounded theory issues. Educational Research, ERIC, 16(1), 52–66.
Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy ? Computers & Education, 59(3), 163–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016.
Niehaves, B., & Plattfaut, R. (2013). Internet adoption by elderly: Employing IS technology acceptance theories for understanding the age-related digital divide. European Journal of Information Systems, 23(6), 708–726. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2013.19.
Piantanida, M., Tananis, C., & Crubs, R. (2002). Claiming grounded theory for practice-based dissertation research: A think piece. In Paper presented at the conference on interdisciplinary qualitative studies, roundtable discussion. Athens, Georgia: http://www.coe.uga.edu/quig/pdf/claim.pdf, Accessed February 8th, 2019.
Simbioza, G. (2018). http://www.simbioza.eu/sl/2017/predstavitev, Accessed, May 7th, 2018.
Schreiber, R. S. (2001). Using grounded theory in nursing. PN Stern.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage P.C.
Toril, P., Reales, M. J., & Ballesteros. (2014). Video game training enhances cognition of older adults: A meta-analytical study. Psychology and Aging, 20(3), 706–716.
Tsai, H. S., Schillar, R., & Cotton, R. S. (2017). Social support and playing around : An examination of how older adults acquire digital literacy with tablet computers. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 36(1), 20–55.
Van Hees, M. (1994). Oud geleerd, oud gedaan, optimalisering van handleidingen voor ouderen. Graduation thesis. Utrecht University.
Van Staalduinen, J., & De Freitas, S. (2011). A game-based learning framework: Linking game design and learning outcomes. In M. Khyne (Ed.), Learning to play: Exploring the future of education with video games (pp. 29–45). New York, USA: Peter Lang.
Van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2017). The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills (p. 72). Computers in Human Behavior: A systematic literature review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.010.
Wang, F., Lockee, B. B., & Burton, J. K. (2011). Computer game-based learning: Perceptions and experiences of senior Chinese adults. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 40, 45–58. https://doi.org/10.2190/ET.40.
Wilson, K., Bedwell, W., Lazzara, E., Salas, E., Burke, C., Estock, J., Orvis, K., & Conkey, C. (2008). Relationships between game attributes and learning outcomes. Simulation & Gaming, 40(2), 229–243 https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1517828, accessed 18.10.2018.
Wortley, D., An, J. Y., & Heshmati, A. (2017). Tackling the challenge of the aging society: Detecting and preventing cognitive and physical decline through games and consumer technologies. Healthcare Informatics, 23(2), 87–93.
Zelinski, E. M., & Reyes, R. (2009). Cognitive benefits of computer games for older adults. Geronthechnology, 8(4), 220–235.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix 1
Data from the post-experiment questionnaire
Austria data (the first two tables are from S. Oppl and C. Stary paper in Universal Access in the Information Society https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-018-0638-0v).
United Kingdom Data (the data a from the questionnaires answers in the project GIRDA Freedcam portal).
Macedonia data (the data from the questionnaires answers in the project GIRDA Freedcam portal).
Slovenia data (the data from the questionnaires answers in the project GIRDA Freedcam portal).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Blažič, B.J., Blažič, A.J. Overcoming the digital divide with a modern approach to learning digital skills for the elderly adults. Educ Inf Technol 25, 259–279 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09961-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09961-9