Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of Geogebra supported micro teaching applications and technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) game practices on the TPACK levels of prospective teachers

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of GeoGebra Supported Micro Teaching Applications and TPACK Game Practices on the TPACK efficacy and self-efficacy perception levels of the prospective math teachers on polygons. The study was carried out using 2 × 2 factorial design. The study group comprised 88 prospective math teachers. The prospective teachers were separated into 4 groups (G1, G2, G3, G4) randomly. Prospective teachers in G1 were participated in Micro Teaching Applications and Game- Based TPACK Activities, G2 participated in GeoGebra Supported Micro Teaching Applications, G3 group participated in Micro Teaching Applications and finally G4 group was participated in GeoGebra Supported Micro Teaching Applications and Game-Based TPACK Activities. The prospective teachers’ efficacy levels were determined by using lesson plan and participant form; TPACK self-efficacy perception levels were determined by using TPACK Scale for Geometry. It was determined all application processes increased prospective teachers’ TPACK efficacy and self-efficacy scores. The result of study showed that in terms of group variable there is a statistically significant difference between prospective teachers’ TCK and TPACK efficacy levels. The results for self-efficacy scores rejected the statiscally significant difference for post-test scores in terms of group variable for CK, PCK, TCK and TPACK.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbitt, J. T. (2011). Measuring technological pedagogical content knowledge in preservice teacher education: A review of current methods and instruments. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(4), 281–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abdi, H. (2010). Holm’s sequential Bonferroni procedure. In N. Salkind (Ed.), Encyclopedia of research design (pp. 1–8). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abdulwahed, S., & Ismail, A. (2011). Student teachers’ microteaching experiences in a preservice English teacher education program. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(5), 1043–1051. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.2.5.1043-1051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agyei, D. D., & Keengwe, J. (2014). Using technological pedagogical content knowledge development to enhance learning outcomes. Education and Information Technologies, 19, 155–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-012-9204-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agyei, D., & Voogt, J. (2012). Developing technological pedagogical content knowledge in pre-service mathematics teachers, through collaborative design teams. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(4), 547–564. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akyüz, D. (2016). TPACK analysis of preservice teachers under different instruction methods and class levels. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 7(1), 89–111.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Albion, P. (1999). Self-efficacy beliefs as an indicator of teachers’ preparedness for teaching with technology. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference of the society for information technology & teacher education (SITE 1999) (pp. 1602–1608). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

  • Albion, P. R. (2000). Interactive multimedia problem-based learning for enhancing preservice teachers’ self efficacy beliefs about teaching with computers: Design, development and evaluation. Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba.

  • Balgalmış, E. (2013). An investigation of pre-service elementary mathematics teachers’ techno- pedagogical content knowledge within the context of their teaching practices. Doctoral dissertation, Middle East Technical University, Ankara.

  • Balgalmış, E., Shafer, K. G., & Çakıroğlu, E. (2013). Reactions of pre-service elementary teachers’ to implementing technology based mathematics lessons. In Proceedings of the eighth congress of the European society of research in mathematics education (pp. 2534–2543).

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Exercise of personal and collective efficacy in changing societies. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 1–45). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baran, E., & Canbazoğlu-Bilici, S. (2015). A review of the research on technological pedagogical content knowledge: The case of Turkey. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 30(1), 15–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baran, E., & Uygun, E. (2016). Putting technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK) in action: An integrated TPACK-design-based learning (DBL) approach. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32(2), 47–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, N. (2007). Microteaching: What is it that is going on here? Linguistics and Education, 18(1), 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2007.04.002.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Benton-Kupper, J. (2001). The microteaching experience: Student perspectives. Education, 121(4), 830–835.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatta, B. (2013). Teacher development through repair: A conversation analytic study of microteaching. http://www.ffl.kanagawa-u.ac.jp/graduate/ronsyu/img/vol_20/vol20_04.pdf. Accessed 12 Sept 2018.

  • Bozkurt, A., Bindak, R., & Demir, S. (2011). Mathematics teacher’s views about use of computer in lessons and suitability of their workplace. E-Journal of New World Sciences Academy, 6(2), 1747–1758.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulut, A. (2012). Investigating perceptions of preservice mathematics teachers on their technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) regarding geometry. Master thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara.

  • Canady III, L. D. (2013). A case study of principal-led professional development using micro teaching and inquiry-oriented formative feedback. Doctoral dissertation, North Carolina at Greensboro University, Greensboro.

  • Canbazoğlu-Bilici, S., Guzey, S., & Yamak, H. (2016). Assessing pre-service science teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) through observations and lesson plans. Research in Science & Technological Education, 34(2), 237–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2016.1144050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavin, R. M. (2007). Developing technological pedagogical content knowledge in preservice teachers through microteaching lesson study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Florida State University.

  • Çetin, İ. (2017). The investigation of changes in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) proficiencies and levels of mathematics teacher candidates in secondary education. Doctoral dissertation, The University of Necmettin Erbakan, Turkey.

  • Clara, I. P., Cox, B. J., & Enns, M. W. (2001). Confirmatory factor analysis of the depression anxiety-stress scales in depressed and anxious patients. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 23, 61–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, P. J. (2009). A Caribbean pre-service mathematics teacher’s impetus to integrate computer technology in his practice. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 16(4), 145–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coolican, H. (1996). Research methods and statistics in psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Hodder & Stoughton Educational.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couto, A., & Vale, I. (2014). Pre-service teachers’ knowledge on elementary geometry concepts. Journal of the European Teacher Education Network, 9, 57–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, S. M. (2008). A conceptual analysis of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Doctoral dissertation, Brigham Young University, United States.

  • Delice, A., & Karaaslan, G. (2015). The reflection of the activities prepared on the polygons and dynamic geometry softwares to the perceptions of the teachers and the students’ performances. Karaelmas Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(2), 133–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doğan, M. (2012). Prospective Turkish primary teachers’ views about the use of computers in mathematics education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 15(4), 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-012-9214-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdemir, N., Bakırcı, H., & Eyduran, E. (2009). Determining of student teachers’ self confidence using technology in instruction. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 6(3), 99–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdoğan, A. (2014). Pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge development in a computer-assisted mathematics instruction course. Master thesis, Boğaziçi University, İstanbul.

  • Erdoğan, A., & Şahin, I. (2010). Relationship between math teacher candidates’ technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) and achievement levels. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2707–2711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erez, M. M., & Yerushalmy, M. (2006). “If you can turn a rectangle into a square, you can turn a square into a rectangle ...” young students experience the dragging tool. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 11(3), 271–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erfjord, I. (2011). Teachers’ initial orchestration of students’ dynamic geometry software use: Consequences for students’ opportunities to learn mathematics. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 16(1), 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-011-9176-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, M. L. (2005). Learning through microteaching lesson study in teacher preparation. Action in Teacher Education, 26(4), 37–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, A. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fraenkel, J., Wallen, N., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). Boston: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita, T., & Jones, K. (2006). Primary trainee teachers’ knowledge of parallelograms. Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 26(2), 25–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldthwaite, D. T. (1968). A study of micro-teaching in the preservice education of science teachers. Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University, Michigan.

  • Graham, C. R., Burgoyne, N., Cantrell, P., Smith, L., St. Clair, L., & Harris, R. (2009). TPACK development in science teaching: Measuring the TPACK confidence of inservice science teachers. TechTrends, Special Issue on TPACK, 53(5), 70–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gueudet, G., & Trouche, L. (2011). Mathematics teacher education advanced methods: An example in dynamic geometry. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 43(3), 399–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-011-0313-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habre, S., & Grundmeier, T. A. (2007). Prospective mathematics teachers’ views on the role of technology in mathematics education. The Journal, 3, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacıömeroğlu, E. S., Bu, L., Schoen, R. C., & Hohenwarter, M. (2009). Learning to develop mathematics lessons with GeoGebra. MSOR Connections, 9(2), 24–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacıömeroğlu, E. S., Bu, L., Schoen, R. C., & Hohenwarter, M. (2011). Prospective teachers’ experiences in developing lessons with dynamic mathematics software. The International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 18(2), 72–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, M. D. (2010). Facilitating growth in preservice mathematics teachers’ TPCK. National Teacher Education Journal, 3(2), 121–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J., Grandgenett, N., & Hofer, M. (2010). Testing a TPACK-based technology integration assessment rubric. In C. Crawford, D. A. Willis, R. Carlsen, I. Gibson, K. McFerrin, J. Price, & R. Weber (Eds.), Proceedings of the society for information technology and teacher education international conference 2010 (pp. 3833–3840). Chesapeake: AACE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinkle, D. E., Wiersma, W., & Jurs, S. G. (2003). Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences (5th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, M. (2015). Practicing technology integration decisions via the TPACK game. http://www.luminaris.link/blog/practicing-technology-integration-decisions-via-the tpack-game. Accessed 01 Feb 2018.

  • Hohenwarter, M. (2002). GeoGebra-ein Software system für dynamische Geometrie und Algebra der Ebene. Master’s thesis, Universität Salzburg, Austria.

  • Hohenwarter, M., & Lavicza, Z. (2007). Mathematics teacher development with ICT: Towards an International GeoGebra Institute. Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 27(3), 49–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, K. (2009). Planning to teach with digital tools: Introducing the IWB to pre-service secondary mathematics teachers. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(3), 351–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivy, J. T. (2011). Secondary mathematics teachers’ perceptions of their integration of instructional technologies. Doctoral dissertation, The University of Mississippi, United States.

  • Jones, K. (2001). Learning geometrical concepts using dynamic geometry software. In K. Irwin (Ed.), Mathematics education research: A catalyst for change (pp. 50–58). Auckland: University of Auckland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kafyulilo, A. C. (2010). TPACK for pre-service science and mathematics teachers. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531601.pdf. Accessed 05 May 2018.

  • Kafyulilo, A., Fisser, P., Pieters, J., & Voogt, J. (2015). ICT use in science and mathematics teacher education in Tanzania: Developing technological pedagogical content knowledge. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(4), 381–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research., 32(2), 131–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kordaki, M., & Balomenou, A. (2006). Challenging students to view the concept of area in triangles in a broader context: Exploiting the tools of Cabri II. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 11(1), 99–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koştur, M. (2018). Promoting and investigating pre-service middle school mathematics teachers’ TPACK practical development in the context of an undergraduate course. Doctoral dissertation, Middle East Technical Unıversity, Ankara.

  • Kpanja, E. (2001). A study of the effects of video tape recording in microteaching training. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(4), 483–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurbanoğlu, S. S. (2004). Self-efficacy belief and its importance for information professionals. Information World, 5(2), 137–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurt, G. (2016). Technologıcal Pedagogıcal content knowledge (TPACK) development of preservice middle school mathematics teachers in statistics teaching: A microteaching lesson study. Doctoral dissertation, Middle East Technical Unıversity, Ankara.

  • Kutluca, T., & Baki, A. (2013). Developing computer assisted worksheets with electronic spreadsheets and computer algebra system. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 9(4), 511–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutluca, T., & Birgin, O. (2007). Evaluation of prospective mathematics teachers’ views about computer assisted teaching material developed in the linear equation topic. Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty, 27(2), 81–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laborde, C. (2001). The use of new technologies as a vehicle for restructuring teachers’ mathematics. In T. Conney & F. L. Lin (Eds.), Making sense of mathematics teacher education (pp. 87–109). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodico, M. G., Spaulding, D. T., & Voegtle, K. H. (2006). Methods in educational research: From theory to practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBroom, E. S. (2012). Teaching with dynamic geometry software: A multiple case study of teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge. Doctoral dissertation, Texas State University-San Marcos.

  • Meagher, M., Özgün-Koca, S. A., & Edwards, M. T. (2011). Preservice teachers’ experiences with advanced digital technologies: The interplay between technology in a preservice classroom and in field placements. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 11(3), 243–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meng, C. C., Sam, L. C., Yew, W. T., & Lian, L. H. (2014). Effect of lesson study on pre-service secondary teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge. Sains Humanika, 2(4), 55–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of National Education (MoNE). (2013). Ortaokul matematik dersi (5–8. Sınıflar) öğretim programı [Middle grade mathematics curriculum (Grades 5–8)] Ankara.

  • Mishra, P. (2010). TPACK game, the Math Koehler version. http://www.punyamishra.com/2010/08/13/tpack-game-the-matt-koehler-version/. Accessed 31 Jan 2017.

  • Mishra, P. (2013). TPACK game on (or precocious us). http://www.punyamishra.com/2013/08/25/tpack-game-on-or-precocious-us/. Accessed 31 Jan 2017.

  • Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for integrating technology in teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudzimiri, R. (2012). A study of the development of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in pre-service secondary mathematics teachers. Doctoral dissertation, Montana State University, Montana.

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. http://www.nctm.org/standards.htm. Accessed 10 May 2011.

  • Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 509–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.03.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niess, M. L., Ronau, R. N., Shafer, K. G., Driskell, S. O., Harper, S. R., Johnston, C., Browning, C., Özgün Koca, S. A., & Kersaint, G. (2009). Mathematics teacher TPACK standards and development model. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 4–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Özgün-Koca, S. A., Meagher, M., & Edwards, M. T. (2010). Preservice teachers’ emerging TPACK in a technology-rich methods class. The Mathematics Educator, 19(2), 10–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallant, J. (2011). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for windows (4th ed.). McGraw Hill: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickreign, J. (2007). Rectangles and rhombi: How well do preservice teachers know them? The Journal, 1, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ping, W. (2013). Micro-teaching: A powerful tool to embedding the English teacher certification testing in the development of English teaching methodologies. International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 2(3), 163–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polly, D. (2014). Deepening pre-service teachers’ knowledge of technology, pedagogy, and content (TPACK) in an elementary school mathematics methods course. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 33(2), 233–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pringle, R. M., Dawson, K., & Ritzhaupt, A. D. (2015). Integrating science and technology: Using technological pedagogical content knowledge as a framework to study the practices of science teachers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(5), 648–662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9553-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, K. W. (2010). TPACK: Game on. Learning and Leading with Technology, 37(8), 34–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, R., Tondeur, J., Siddiq, F., & Baran, E. (2018). The importance of attitudes toward technology for pre-service teachers’ technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge: Comparing structural equation modeling approaches. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shevlin, M., & Miles, J. (1998). Effects of sample size, model specification and factor loadings on the GFI in confirmatory factor analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 85–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stols, G., & Kriek, J. (2011). Why don’t all maths teachers use dynamic geometry software in their classrooms? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(1), 137–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suharwoto, G. (2006). Secondary mathematics preservice teachers’ development of technology pedagogical content knowledge in subject-specific, technology integrated teacher preparation program. Doctoral dissertation, Oregon State University, Oregon.

  • Tabach, M. (2011). A mathematics teacher’s practice in a technological environment: A case study analysis using two complementary theories. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 16(3), 247–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-011-9186-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban-Woldron, H. (2013). Integration of digital tools into the mathematics classroom: A challenge for preparing and supporting the teacher. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 20(3), 115–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uygun, E. (2013). Learning by design: An integrated approach for technological pedagogical content knowledge development. Master thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara.

  • Van Der Valk, T. A., & Broekman, H. (1999). The lesson preparation method: A way of investigating pre-service teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. European Journal of Teacher Education, 22(1), 11–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., & Van Braak, J. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge–a review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(2), 109–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yiğit, M. (2014). A review of the literature: How pre-service mathematics teachers develop their technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 2(1), 26–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yurdakul Kabakçı, I., Odabasi, H. F., Kilicer, K., Coklar, A. N., Birinci, G., & Kurt, A. A. (2012). The development, validity and reliability of TPACK-deep: A technological pedagogical content knowledge scale. Computers and Education, 58(3), 964–977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zambak, V. S. (2014). Pre-service mathematics teachers’ knowledge development and belief change within a technology-enhanced mathematics course. Doctoral dissertation, Clemson University, United States.

  • Zengin, Y., Kağızmanlı, T. B., Tatar, E., & İşleyen, T. (2013). The use of dynamic mathematics software in computer assisted mathematics instruction course. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 10(23), 167–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, T., & Wang, L. (2016). Pre-service mathematics teachers’ technology pedagogical content knowledge: An investigation in China. Journal of Mathematics Education, 9(1), 126–135.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mathematics Education, Inonu University, 44800, Malatya, Turkey

    Kübra Açıkgül & Recep Aslaner

Authors
  1. Kübra Açıkgül
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Recep Aslaner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kübra Açıkgül.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This study includes a part of PhD Thesis by Kübra AÇIKGÜL

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Açıkgül, K., Aslaner, R. Effects of Geogebra supported micro teaching applications and technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) game practices on the TPACK levels of prospective teachers. Educ Inf Technol 25, 2023–2047 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10044-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10044-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation