Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Integrated learning pathways in higher education: A framework enhanced with machine learning and semantics

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present research work proposes the development of an integrated framework for the personalization and parameterization of learning pathways, aiming at optimizing the quality of the offered services by the Higher Educational Institutions (HEI). In order to achieve this goal, in addition to the educational part, the EDUC8 framework encloses the set of parameters that cover both the technical and the financial dimensions of a learning pathway, thus providing a complete tool for the optimization and calculation of the offered services by the HEIs in combination with the minimization of respective costs. Moreover, the proposed framework incorporates simulation modeling along with machine learning for the purpose of designing learning pathways and evaluating quality assurance indicators and the return on investment of implementation. The study presents a case study in relation to tertiary education in Greece, with a particular focus on Computer Science programs. Data clustering is specifically applied to learn potential insights pertaining to student characteristics, education factors and outcomes. Generally, the framework is conceived to provide a systematic approach for developing tertiary policies that help optimize the quality and cost of education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bailey, T., Jaggars, S. S., & Jenkins, D. (2015). What We Know About Guided Pathways, (March). Retrieved from http://academiccommons.columbia.edu/catalog/ac:185800

  • Booch, G. (1999). The unified modeling language user guide by object technology Series. Addison-Wesley.

  • Buizza, C., Ghilardi, A., Olivetti, E., Costa, A., Buizza, C., Ghilardi, A., … Costa, A. (2019). Drop out from a university counselling service : A quantitative and qualitative study. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 0(0), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2019.1566513.

  • Casalone, G., & Orientale, P. (2011). Does time-to-degree matter ? The effect of delayed graduation on employment: AlmaLaurea Inter-University Consortium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernando, D., Cabral, R. B., Souza, C. P., & Gam, C. (2010). Maturity model for process of academic management. In 2010 International Conference on Information Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiasi, S., Srivastava, A., Yang, X., & Sarrafzadeh, M. (2002). Optimal energy aware clustering in sensor networks. Sensors, 2(7), 258–269. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20700258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grunschel, C., Patrzek, J., & Fries, S. (2013). Exploring reasons and consequences of academic procrastination: an interview study. In Exploring reasons and consequences of academic procrastination : An interview study, 841–861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-012-0143-4.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments. Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • HQA (2017). Έκθεση ποιότητας της ανώτατης εκπαίδευσης 2017. HQA (Vol. 1).

  • Iatrellis, O., Kameas, A., & Fitsilis, P. (2019a). A novel integrated approach to the execution of personalized and self-evolving learning pathways. Educ Inf Technol (2019) 24:781-803, 24(ISSN 1360-2357). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9802-7.

  • Iatrellis, O., Kameas, A., & Fitsilis, P. (2019b). EDUC8 ontology: Semantic modeling of multi-facet learning pathways. Education and Information Technologies, 2019, 2371–2390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09877-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, J., Berlanga, A. J., & Koper, R. (2011). Evaluation of the learning path specification. Educational Technology & Society, 14, 218–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, D., & Cho, S.-W. (2013). Get with the program ... and finish it: Building guided pathways to accelerate student completion. New Directions for Community Colleges, 2013(164), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/cc.20078.

  • Kappe, R., & Van Der Flier, H. (2012). Predicting academic success in higher education: What’s more important than being smart? European Journal of Psychology of Education, 27(4), 605–619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-011-0099-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kučak, D., Juričić, V., & Đambić, G. (2018). Machine learning in education - a survey of current research trends. Annals of DAAAM and Proceedings of the International DAAAM Symposium, 29(1), 0406–0410. https://doi.org/10.2507/29th.daaam.proceedings.059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, P. M. S. (2016). Student performance and learning outcomes in higher education, I(i), 674–684.

  • MacQueen, J. and others. (1967). Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, 1(14), 281–297. Retrieved from http://books.google.de/books?hl=de&lr=&id=IC4Ku_7dBFUC&oi=fnd&pg=PA281&dq=MacQueen+some+methods+for+classification&ots=nNTcK1IdoQ&sig=fHzdVcbvmYJ-lTNHu1HncmOFOkM#v=onepage&q=MacQueen some methods for classification&f=false.

  • McCarthy, W. (1982). The REA accounting model: A generalized framework for accounting systems in a shared data environment. Accounting Review, 554–578.

  • McKenzie, K., & Schweitzer, R. (2001). Who succeeds at university? Factors predicting academic performance in first year Australian university students. Higher Education Research and Development, 20(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/07924360120043621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, T. P., White, I. R., & Crowther, M. J. (2019). Using simulation studies to evaluate statistical methods. Statistics in Medicine, 38(11), 2074–2102. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.8086.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, M. N. (2016). How DOES the ASAP model align with guided pathways implementation in community COLLEGES?, 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlenko, V., Prokhorov, A., Kuzminska, O., & Mazorchuk, M. (2017). Competence approach to modeling and control of students’ learning pathways in the cloud service. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 1844, 257–264.

  • Pearson, K. (1901). On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 2(11), 559–572. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786440109462720.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Prebble, T., Hargraves, H., Leach, L., Naidoo, K., Suddaby, G., & Zepke, N. (2004). Impact of student support services and academic development Programmes on student outcomes in undergraduate tertiary study : A synthesis of the research. Wellington: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, A., Lemay, G., Larsen, P., & Johnson, D. M. (2009). Service quality in higher education. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 20(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783360802622805.

  • Schouwenburg, H., Lay, C., Pychyl, T., & Ferrari, J. (2006). Counseling the procrastinator in academic settings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott-Clayton, J. (2011). The shapeless river: Does a lack of structure inhibit students’ Progress at community Colleges? A working paper in thE CCRC assessment of evidence series, (January).

  • Song, J., Li, F., Takemoto, K., Haffari, G., Akutsu, T., Chou, K. C., & Webb, G. I. (2018). PREvaIL, an integrative approach for inferring catalytic residues using sequence, structural, and network features in a machine-learning framework. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 443, 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2018.01.023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The EFQM Excellence Model. (1988). Retrieved January 30, 2017, from http://www.efqm.org/the-efqm-excellence-model

    Google Scholar 

  • U-Multirank | Universities compared. Your way. (2011). Retrieved August 14, 2018, from http://www.umultirank.org

  • Wong, L. H., & Looi, C. K. (2009). Adaptable learning pathway generation with ant Colony optimization. Educational Technology and Society, 12(3), 309–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, B. H. (2011). Let’s enforce a simple visualization rule in software architecture. In 2011 international conference on information science and technology, ICIST 2011 (pp. 427–433). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIST.2011.5765283.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Omiros Iatrellis.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Iatrellis, O., Savvas, I.K., Kameas, A. et al. Integrated learning pathways in higher education: A framework enhanced with machine learning and semantics. Educ Inf Technol 25, 3109–3129 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10105-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10105-7

Keywords

Navigation