Abstract
Massive open online courses MOOCs) are a mode of online learning available to students at any place in the world to improve their skills. Their acceptance for academic purposes remains low, and it is desirable to promote their usage among students. The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) was enhanced by the inclusion of attitude and computer self-efficacy, factors verified in the literature. The objective of this study was to use a UTAUT model to identify the major factors determining learners’ acceptance of MOOCs in higher education in Saudi Arabia. An online survey was administered to 169 students of Taif University in Saudi Arabia and structural equation modeling was used to analyze the data. The results show that the proposed model can explain 63.3% of behavioral intention and 66.1% of user behavior of MOOC. The study unexpectedly found that behavioral intention was affected only by attitude. The actual use was affected by behavioral intention, attitude, and facilitating conditions. Attitude was affected by performance expectancy, social influence, and computer self-efficacy. In addition, computer self-efficacy as an external factor has an important effect on performance expectancy, effort expectancy, and attitude. The main finding is that although most studies of technology acceptance exclude attitude, this study found it to have a critical role in verifying the UTAUT model. This study highlights the main factors that affect MOOC intention and its usage for students in higher education.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.
Al-Shehri, M. (2017). The effectiveness of D2L system: An evaluation of teaching-learning process in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2017.080156
Althunibat, A. (2015). Determining the factors influencing students’ intention to use m-learning in Jordan higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 65–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.046.
Botero, G. G., Questier, F., Cincinnato, S., He, T., & Zhu, C. (2018). Acceptance and usage of mobile assisted language learning by higher education students. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(3), 426–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9177-1.
Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216.
Chang, C. T., Hajiyev, J., & Su, C. R. (2017). Examining the students’ behavioral intention to use e-learning in Azerbaijan: The general extended technology acceptance model for e-learning approach. Computers & Education, 111, 128–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.04.010.
Chatterjee, S., & Bhattacharjee, K. K. (2020). Adoption of artificial intelligence in higher education: A quantitative analysis using structural equation modelling. Education Information Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10159-7.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.
Conole, G. (2016). MOOCs as disruptive technologies: Strategies for enhancing the learner experience and quality of MOOCs. RED: Revista de Educacion a Distancia, 50, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.6018/red/50/2.
Curley, N. (2013). Saudi Arabia’s Rwaq builds an online courseware platform for the Middle East. Wamda Blog. Retrieved from http://www.wamda.com/2013/12/saudi-arabia-rwaq-online-courseware-mooc-middle-east.
Davis, F. D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results. Massachusetts: Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008.
Davis, F. D., Bogozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35, 982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982.
Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., Janssen, M., Lal, B., Williams, M. D., & Clemente, M. (2017). An empirical validation of a unified model of electronic government adoption (UMEGA). Government Information Quarterly, 34(2), 211–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.03.001.
Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., Jeyaraj, A., Clement, M., & Williams, M. D. (2019). Re-examining the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): Towards a revised theoretical model. Information Systems Frontiers, 21(3), 719–734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-017-9774-y.
Fianu, E., Blewett, C., Ampong, G., & Ofori, K. (2018). Factors affecting MOOC usage by students in selected Ghanaian universities. Education Sciences, 8(2), 70. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8020070.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 13, 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104.
Gao, S., & Yang, Y. (2015). Exploring users’ adoption of MOOCs from the perspective of the institutional theory. WHICEB 2015 Proceedings, 282–290. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijnvo.2016.10002515.
Gunasinghe, A., Abd Hamid, J., Khatibi, A., & Azam, S. F. (2019). Academicians' acceptance of online learning environments: A review of information system theories and models. Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 39, 31–39. https://doi.org/10.34257/GJCSTHVOL19IS1PG31.
Hair Jr., J., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Hamdan, F., Nordin, N., Khalid, F., Muslimin, M. S., & Norman, H. (2018). Technology acceptance of online managerial finance training via massive open online courses for life long learning. Advanced Science Letters, 24(4), 2365–2369. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2018.10955.
Hoi, V. N. (2020). Understanding higher education learners' acceptance and use of mobile devices for language learning: A Rasch-based path modeling approach. Computers & Education, 146, 103761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103761.
Hsu, C.-L., & Lu, H.-P. (2004). Why do people play online games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience. Information and Management, 41, 853–868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.08.014.
Kim, T. G., Lee, J. H., & Law, R. (2008). An empirical examination of the acceptance behavior of hotel front office systems: An extended technology acceptance model. Tourism Management, 29(3), 500–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2007.05.016.
Kim, T., Suh, Y. K., Lee, G., & Choi, B. G. (2010). Modelling roles of task-technology fit and self-efficacy in hotel employees’ usage behaviors of hotel information systems. International Journal of Tourism Research, 12(6), 709e725–709e725. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.787.
King Khalid University. (2012). KKU MOOC. eLD news. Abha: KSA Retrieved from http://oldelc.kku.edu.sa/en/node/3/2060.
Lwoga, E. T., & Komba, M. (2015). Antecedents of continued usage intentions of web-based learning management system in Tanzania. Education+Training, 57(7), 738–756. https://doi.org/10.1108/et-02-2014-0014.
Ma, L., & Lee, C. S. (2020). Drivers and barriers to MOOC adoption: Perspectives from adopters and non-adopters. Online Information Review, 44(3), 671–684. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-06-2019-0203.
Malek, A., & Karim, A. (2010). An empirical investigation into the role of enjoyment, computer anxiety, computer self-efficacy and internet experience in influencing the students’ intention to use e-learning: A case study. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9, 22–34.
Mikalef, P., Pappas, I. O., & Giannakos, M. (2016). An integrative adoption model of video-based learning. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 33(4), 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijilt-01-2016-0007.
Mulik, S., Srivastava, M., & Yajnik, N. (2018). Extending the UTAUT model to examine MOOC adoption. NMIMS Management Review, 36(2), 26–44.
Nunnally, J. C., Bernstein, I. H., & Berge, J. M. T. (1967). Psychometric theory (Vol. 226). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Pellas, N. (2014). The influence of computer self-efficacy, meta cognitive self-regulation and self-esteem on student engagement in online learning programs: Evidence from the virtual world of second life. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.048.
Pituch, K. A., & Lee, Y. K. (2006). The influence of system characteristics on e-learning use. Computers & Education, 47(2), 222–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.10.007.
Ruipérez-Valiente, J. A., Halawa, S., Slama, R., & Reich, J. (2019). Using multi-platform learning analytics to compare regional and global MOOC learning in the Arab world. Computers & Education, 146, 103776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103776.
Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., Thiele, K. O., & Gudergan, S. P. (2016). Estimation issues with PLS and CBSEM: Where the bias lies!. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4010–3998.
Sattari, A., Abdekhoda, M., & Gavgani, V. Z. (2017). Determinant factors affecting the web based training acceptance by health students, applying the UTAUT model. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 12(10), 112–126. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v12i10.7258.
Straub, D. W. (1989). Validating instruments in MIS research. MIS Quarterly, 13(2), 146–169. https://doi.org/10.2307/248922.
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144–176. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.6.2.144.
Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39, 273–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, F. D., & Davis, G. B. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27, 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540.
Wu, B., & Chen, X. (2017). Continuance intention to use MOOCs: Integrating the technology acceptance model (TAM) and task technology fit (TTF) model. Computers in Human Behavior, 67, 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.028.
Zhao, Y., Wang, A., & Sun, Y. (2020). Technological environment, virtual experience, and MOOC continuance: A stimulus–organism–response perspective. Computers & Education, 144, 103721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103721.
Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank all associated personnel who contributed toward this research work. This study was financially supported via a funding grant by Deanship of Scientific Research, Taif University, Taif, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (Grant Number:1-439-6121). Further, there are no conflicts of interest to declare
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Altalhi, M. Toward a model for acceptance of MOOCs in higher education: the modified UTAUT model for Saudi Arabia. Educ Inf Technol 26, 1589–1605 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10317-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10317-x